Liberals Invite American Politician To Speak At Convention
surferdude
Posts: 2,057
I find this quite funny considering the mantra from the Liberals that the Candian Conservatives want to be like the US. Yet it's the Lieberals having an American politician as a guest speaker at their leadership convention. Can you say full of shit hypocrites?
“One good thing about music,
when it hits you, you feel to pain.
So brutalize me with music.”
~ Bob Marley
when it hits you, you feel to pain.
So brutalize me with music.”
~ Bob Marley
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
when it hits you, you feel to pain.
So brutalize me with music.”
~ Bob Marley
is the not retarded one or am I thinking of someone else?
Chris Cornell
http://www.myspace.com/mrwalkerb
YEEEAHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!
Clinton spoke at TCU Place in Saskatoon last winter....ticket sold out in less than 2 minutes...I tried but alas I failed to get tickets...heard it was very good.....Howard Dean is better than last times speaker....Bono....but still think they could have done better....maybe should have got Eddie
That's someone I might pay to see.
By "this" do you mean Howard Dean? He's certainly making himself less relevant in American politics. Perhaps he can find a place in Canadian politics.
He represents the fringe left, and as chairman of the Democrat party his job is to polarize the country. In that capacity he has been successful. But he has shown an inability to unite people, and an inability to run a national campaign, so if the Liberals in Canada are looking for help with those two things, they've chosen the wrong guy. If they are looking for polarization, and dogmatic cheerleading, they've hit the jackpot.
Montreal 2000
Toronto 2003
Montreal 2003
Halifax 2005
Hartford 2006
Dean didn't do much of the uniting. He certainly is the head of the DNC. There were others in charge of election strategy and candidate support. Someone else I despise, but who wins my praises for a job well done this election cycle is Charles Schumer. He put together an amazing strategy to win Senate majority. But if you'd like to credit Dean with November's victory, I'll have to ask for specific contributions of his, because I didn't see them.
The Democrats now hold the majority of State Legislatures and Governorships - even in areas not previously considered competitive.
dean doesn't even come close to being left ... nor do any democrats ... but that's a side topic ...
i would suspect that the awful presidency has more to do with the success of the democrats than any person involved ... you can't help but vote against this sack of fraudsters ...
It will be interesting to see how the 50-state plan plays out. He was certainly vindicated to some extent with the November election results. There were obviously races they weren't going to win in areas in which they spent money which may have been better used elsewhere, but I applaud his effort there. If nothing else, the money should help rebuild local party apparatus in preparation for 2008. But there is still a lot of internal strife between Dean and other DNCers about the plan, and there is still big debate about continuing with the 50-State plan or making a more focused effort to apply resources to areas where gains were made to continue expansion. The 2008 national strategy is going to be the real test. We'll see.
I agree...he does not come close to what I define as "left" in Canadian politics....at the very best he would be a moderate...but that in itself is cutting it close.....
You're talking about Canada, I was referring to the US. Different places, thankfully for both of us, apparently.
No doubt about this. I know that in my congressional district here in Washington State, the incumbant Republican, Dave Reichert, nearly lost to a political newcomer with absolutely no previous experience. This, in a district which hasn't elected a Democrat for Congress. The election was too close to call on election day, and was never supposed to be close. But the race tightend up after Bush came to campaign for Reichert. Even Reichert, without specifically stating it, intimated that Bush's visit did not help him, and in fact hurt him. So Bush did more than Dean to help elect some Democracts this year.
That being said, the Liberals should probably formulate a plan that involves electing Bush as PM for a couple of years, at which point voters will be ready to put Liberals back in charge.
this is what is happening now ... although significantly smarter than GWB - he is equally only concerned with only taking care of his political base ...
Yeah Harper is pretty bright, hate to admit it but he is.....see he has re-opened the gay marriage debate again....man I tell you...the cliche of flogging a dead horse does not even apply to this anymore....give it up Stevo.....
i think he got caught up in own britches tho ... he's riding some imaginary wave of success that makes him think he can do whatever he wants ...
It is all in his head.....what I don't understand, which if I was in his shoes I would be devastated in his current situation...yeah yeah your a PM of a minority government but you failed to compltely destroy a mortally wounded party....that to me makes me wonder where this party is headed and he better keep his social conservatism ideas on his back bench b/c that is what will kill him in the next election.....
yeah ... to poll (whatever they are worth) the same as the liberals who are reeling from integrity and scandal and who also don't have a leader is not very good strategically ... their eagerness to put us in war and the subsequent snub from nato along with their environment plan are major setbacks ... poor strategy in my mind ...
Over-confidence is how I define it......