Israeli war deaths go largely unnoticed

binauralsoundsbinauralsounds Posts: 1,357
edited August 2006 in A Moving Train
Israeli war deaths go largely unnoticed

Hours after mother and two daughters are killed in Hizbullah rocket attack, media outlets around world fail to report deaths; meanwhile, British press continues anti-Israel tirade
Yaakov Lappin

Media bias? Hours after 60-year-old Fadia Jumaa and her two daughters, Samira, 31, and Sultana, 33, were killed by a Hizbullah rocket attack on their home in the Israeli-Bedouin village of Arab al-Aramshe, the international media has so far largely ignored their deaths.

Reuters was alone among non-Israeli media outlets to report the deaths, according to a Google news search, a number of hours after the first reports of the attack surfaced.

The lack of coverage of the Israeli civilian war casualties stands in marked contrast to the swift response by many sections of the international media to reported Lebanese casualties.

Meanwhile, the British press, which has produced some of the most venomous anti-Israel coverage during the war, has continued its tirade against Israel.

Inaccuracies



An article in the London-based Guardian, entitled "Militants merge with mainstream ," argues that Hizbullah has gained widespread, cross-religious support in the Arab world, and uses terms such as "the Qana massacre" to explain the apparent newfound unity.



The article argues that Sunnis and Shiites have come together in their backing of Hizbullah: "Whatever qualms Arabs once had about Hizbullah


they have since been dissipated by Israel's attacks, the hundreds of deaths, the sight of up to a quarter of the Lebanese population fleeing their homes, and especially the bombing of UN observers and the massacre at Qana. The Shiite organisation and its leader, Hassan Nasrallah, have become symbols of resistance even in such unlikely places as the Gulf countries where Sunnis and Shiites have been spotted waving the yellow-and-green flag."



The article was co-written by Issandr el-Amrani, a freelance journalist in Egypt who referred to Hizbullah as " Lebanese resistance fighters " on his personal blog and who describes reports of Hizbullah members operating out of civilian areas as "Israeli lies."



The article's authors failed, however, to note that an influential Saudi Sunni cleric, Sheikh Safar al-Hawali, has issued an anti-Hizbullah fatwa declaring that "Hizbullah is not the 'Party of God' but the 'Party of Satan.'"



An Associated Press report, which undermines the Guardian's claims, says that "Al-Hawali's words are an addition to a previous fatwa issued two weeks ago in Saudi Arabia by the leader of the Wahhabi movement, Sheikh Abdullah bin Jabrin, which declared that it is illegal to support, join, or even pray for Hizbullah."



BBC correspondent reports his own views



Meanwhile, an article has appeared on the BBC website in which a reporter for the British broadcaster, Hugh Sykes, relays a conversation he has with Lebanese residents.



The article is remarkable as it contains the views of a BBC journalist being given to Lebanese locals, rather than the other way around.



In the piece, written in first person narrative, Sykes tells people in Lebanon that there would be "no point" for Israel to strike Hizbullah targets in Lebanon: "'People keep asking me… ' Beirut - will they bomb Beirut again?' 'What would be the point?" I reply.'"



The BBC journalist also attempts to second guess where Israeli strikes hit.



"Four massive thumps one night, and six the next, as Israeli bombs or shells slammed into the ground a few kilometres away. Or into the children's homes," Sykes wrote.
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • Since 2000 how many Israeli deaths have been caused by Hezbollah?
  • B/c I am wondering?
  • shirazshiraz Posts: 528
    Stop With These Death Comparisons, It Is Pointless & Sick!!!
  • enharmonicenharmonic Posts: 1,917
    The Pro-Iraeli slant here in the USA is sickening as well. The other day I was at a restaurant where they had the news on. They were covering the situation in Lebanon, and stated that 40 Lebanese were killed in an Israely military operation, while two Israeli's were killed in the latest barrage *this was Thursday) of rocken attacks.

    What you saw on the screen was a different story. From across the room, all you could see were plumes of smoke and the caption "Deadly rocket attacks from Hezbollah"

    How that makes any sense with regard to truth in reporting is beyond me. I'm not comparing, but where's the "deadly Israeli attack" caption showing 10 times the number of dead Lebanese civilians?

    It's totally fucked up.
  • rebornFixerrebornFixer Posts: 4,901
    Israeli war deaths go largely unnoticed

    Hours after mother and two daughters are killed in Hizbullah rocket attack, media outlets around world fail to report deaths; meanwhile, British press continues anti-Israel tirade
    Yaakov Lappin

    Media bias? Hours after 60-year-old Fadia Jumaa and her two daughters, Samira, 31, and Sultana, 33, were killed by a Hizbullah rocket attack on their home in the Israeli-Bedouin village of Arab al-Aramshe, the international media has so far largely ignored their deaths.

    Reuters was alone among non-Israeli media outlets to report the deaths, according to a Google news search, a number of hours after the first reports of the attack surfaced.

    The lack of coverage of the Israeli civilian war casualties stands in marked contrast to the swift response by many sections of the international media to reported Lebanese casualties.

    Meanwhile, the British press, which has produced some of the most venomous anti-Israel coverage during the war, has continued its tirade against Israel.

    Inaccuracies



    An article in the London-based Guardian, entitled "Militants merge with mainstream ," argues that Hizbullah has gained widespread, cross-religious support in the Arab world, and uses terms such as "the Qana massacre" to explain the apparent newfound unity.



    The article argues that Sunnis and Shiites have come together in their backing of Hizbullah: "Whatever qualms Arabs once had about Hizbullah


    they have since been dissipated by Israel's attacks, the hundreds of deaths, the sight of up to a quarter of the Lebanese population fleeing their homes, and especially the bombing of UN observers and the massacre at Qana. The Shiite organisation and its leader, Hassan Nasrallah, have become symbols of resistance even in such unlikely places as the Gulf countries where Sunnis and Shiites have been spotted waving the yellow-and-green flag."



    The article was co-written by Issandr el-Amrani, a freelance journalist in Egypt who referred to Hizbullah as " Lebanese resistance fighters " on his personal blog and who describes reports of Hizbullah members operating out of civilian areas as "Israeli lies."



    The article's authors failed, however, to note that an influential Saudi Sunni cleric, Sheikh Safar al-Hawali, has issued an anti-Hizbullah fatwa declaring that "Hizbullah is not the 'Party of God' but the 'Party of Satan.'"



    An Associated Press report, which undermines the Guardian's claims, says that "Al-Hawali's words are an addition to a previous fatwa issued two weeks ago in Saudi Arabia by the leader of the Wahhabi movement, Sheikh Abdullah bin Jabrin, which declared that it is illegal to support, join, or even pray for Hizbullah."



    BBC correspondent reports his own views



    Meanwhile, an article has appeared on the BBC website in which a reporter for the British broadcaster, Hugh Sykes, relays a conversation he has with Lebanese residents.



    The article is remarkable as it contains the views of a BBC journalist being given to Lebanese locals, rather than the other way around.



    In the piece, written in first person narrative, Sykes tells people in Lebanon that there would be "no point" for Israel to strike Hizbullah targets in Lebanon: "'People keep asking me… ' Beirut - will they bomb Beirut again?' 'What would be the point?" I reply.'"



    The BBC journalist also attempts to second guess where Israeli strikes hit.



    "Four massive thumps one night, and six the next, as Israeli bombs or shells slammed into the ground a few kilometres away. Or into the children's homes," Sykes wrote.

    I read the Guardian's stuff, but usually only so that I can get a glimpse of the highly biased European media machine. Its pretty sad. Some people on this continent rag on Fox, and perhaps justifiably so. But some of these European sources are just as slanted.
  • RushlimboRushlimbo Posts: 832
    Nothing on all of the news channels right now except for the Israeli deaths in Haifa from the lastest rocket attacks. There goes this theory.
    War is Peace
    Freedom is Slavery
    Ignorance is Strength
  • OpenOpen Posts: 792
    Rushlimbo wrote:
    Nothing on all of the news channels right now except for the Israeli deaths in Haifa from the lastest rocket attacks. There goes this theory.

    Exactly, that's all that's CNN right now.
  • Ian MIan M Posts: 123
    The lack of coverage of the Israeli civilian war casualties stands in marked contrast to the swift response by many sections of the international media to reported Lebanese casualties.

    Meanwhile, the British press, which has produced some of the most venomous anti-Israel coverage during the war, has continued its tirade against Israel.

    Here's a pretty extensive Medialens 'alert' on why this is a near exact reversal of the truth (part two is most relevant):

    http://www.medialens.org/alerts/index.php
  • shiraz wrote:
    Stop With These Death Comparisons, It Is Pointless & Sick!!!

    What I am not allowed to ask questions now...is that it? I dont know and I want to....dammit....not that hard to compherend....
Sign In or Register to comment.