And you thought pollution was so horrible!

binauralsounds
binauralsounds Posts: 1,357
edited November 2006 in A Moving Train
LMAO!!! Just when the fear mongers think they have it right, it just keeps coming back..

Scientists: Pollution could combat global warming

http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/11/16/smog.warming.ap/index.html
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • ThumbingMyWay32
    ThumbingMyWay32 Posts: 1,224
    binauralsounds wrote:
    LMAO!!! Just when the fear mongers think they have it right, it just keeps coming back..

    Scientists: Pollution could combat global warming

    http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/11/16/smog.warming.ap/index.html


    Don't try and prove a liberal wrong. You can't.

    The fact that some scientists know what the temperature was on this day 4.7 million years ago is just plain fact. Deal with it.
    "Sarcasm: intellect on the offensive"

    "What I lack in decorum, I make up for with an absence of tact."

    Camden 5-28-06
    Washington, D.C. 6-22-08
  • binauralsounds
    binauralsounds Posts: 1,357
    ThumbingMyWay32 wrote:
    Don't try and prove a liberal wrong. You can't.

    The fact that some scientists know what the temperature was on this day 4.7 million years ago is just plain fact. Deal with it.

    HAHAHAH :D
  • bmwweirdoguy
    bmwweirdoguy Right of Seattle Posts: 228
    Cool, instead of being flooded out by melting ice caps, we all will develop lung cancer...I love it...two wrongs DO NOT make a right...
    "Trial and error isn't a bad way to learn how to build an aircraft, but it can be a disastrous way to learn how to build a civilization..."
  • ThumbingMyWay32
    ThumbingMyWay32 Posts: 1,224
    bmwweirdoguy wrote:
    Cool, instead of being flooded out by melting ice caps, we all will develop lung cancer...I love it...two wrongs DO NOT make a right...


    I just hope we save those poor polar bears. You're just as responsible as I!
    "Sarcasm: intellect on the offensive"

    "What I lack in decorum, I make up for with an absence of tact."

    Camden 5-28-06
    Washington, D.C. 6-22-08
  • Kann
    Kann Posts: 1,146
    I really don't get why some people bitch as much on global warming.
    Terror is a threat to occidental populations :
    billions are spent, 2 (I'd even say three) wars are started, thousands have died, populations have fled etc.
    Global warming is a threat to humankind, and people just go :
    "well, there's no proof it really exists".
    Ok, I'll give you that, maybe global warming is a lot of noise for nothing much. But what if it isn't? What if it's all the shit that "liberal" scientists predicts? There will be nevermetyet consequences.
    In the name of pre-emptive actions wich most of occidentals seem to find ok, why do you keep bitching?
  • inmytree
    inmytree Posts: 4,741
    hooray for pollution...woooo hooo...!!!

    I was planning on changing the oil in my Van this weekend, now I can just go throw the old oil in the lake...

    man, life is good....
  • Uncle Leo
    Uncle Leo Posts: 1,059
    Kann wrote:
    I really don't get why some people bitch as much on global warming.
    Terror is a threat to occidental populations :
    billions are spent, 2 (I'd even say three) wars are started, thousands have died, populations have fled etc.
    Global warming is a threat to humankind, and people just go :
    "well, there's no proof it really exists".
    Ok, I'll give you that, maybe global warming is a lot of noise for nothing much. But what if it isn't? What if it's all the shit that "liberal" scientists predicts? There will be nevermetyet consequences.
    In the name of pre-emptive actions wich most of occidentals seem to find ok, why do you keep bitching?

    Because if global warming exists, behaivor has to change.
    I cannot come up with a new sig till I get this egg off my face.
  • RockinInCanada
    RockinInCanada Posts: 2,016
    Watched a program the other day about the main man doing seminars about why global warming is false....funny as he is the same man that did the same thing saying tobacco products did not cause cancer...too funny (plus he still believes they dont but anyway...and yes he has been shown multiple times speaking for the White House)....plus he had the lamest arguement ever..."you know a thousand years ago the Vikings settled in Greenland, in Greenland, try doing that now a days"....speaking how it was indeed warmer 1000 years ago than today and he was using this as is "back-breaker" arguement...funny thing is scientists do not deny that claim, the main thing is that we are CONTRIBUTING to natural warming...BIG fucking difference than CAUSING....and I believe most nay-sayers have a difficult time differentiating between the two.....

    I gotta ask where do you really believe all the emissions go?
  • Jammin909
    Jammin909 Posts: 888
    binauralsounds wrote:
    LMAO!!! Just when the fear mongers think they have it right, it just keeps coming back..

    Scientists: Pollution could combat global warming

    http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/11/16/smog.warming.ap/index.html

    OK do us all a favor and go suck on your exhaust pipe.
    The less you know, the more you believe.
  • Collin
    Collin Posts: 4,931
    "could"
    THANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!


    naděje umírá poslední
  • inmytree
    inmytree Posts: 4,741
    chiefojibwa wrote:
    nah, just throw it down binauralsounds' well. i'm sure he won't mind.

    good thinking...:)
  • gabers
    gabers Posts: 2,787
    This isn't groundbreaking news here folks. Scientists, and anyone who has done any real studying of global warming, have said for years that the increase in particulate pollution would most likely reduce the amount of sun's rays that reach the earth. It's not too difficult to imagine. All you naysayers just keep in mind though, that this is a complex issue. There are many factors that contribute to global warming just like there are many factors that can limit it's impact. If all the world's volcanoes erupted it would block most of the sun's rays, but would that help us???
  • thankyougrandma
    thankyougrandma Posts: 1,182
    what's great about pollution? It IS horrible...
    "L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
    -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
  • binauralsounds
    binauralsounds Posts: 1,357
    chiefojibwa wrote:
    nah, just throw it down binauralsounds' well. i'm sure he won't mind.

    bla hahahahahahahahahah

    :D:D
  • Deacon_Blues
    Deacon_Blues Posts: 2
    If you find that interesting, read Michael Crichton's State Of Fear. Amazing stuff. Global Warming is only a theory, theres no reason to believe it's fact.
  • Scratchin a Letter
    Scratchin a Letter Posts: 2,303
    Deacon_Blues wrote:
    If you find that interesting, read Michael Crichton's State Of Fear. Amazing stuff. Global Warming is only a theory, theres no reason to believe it's fact.
    Yeer! You know, I actually think it's getting colder! Who cares if it doesn't rain in Middle Africa anymore?! And who gives a fuck about pollution anyway?! I mean, it's only a few grey clouds aint it? Nothing to worry about.

    Jus' keep drivin' the ole hummer and it'll be soon be forgotten! Yee-haw!
  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    ThumbingMyWay32 wrote:
    Don't try and prove a liberal wrong. You can't.

    The fact that some scientists know what the temperature was on this day 4.7 million years ago is just plain fact. Deal with it.

    Yeah, coz if you don't agree with something then it must have been produced by a 'liberal', right?
  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    Kann wrote:
    I really don't get why some people bitch as much on global warming.
    Terror is a threat to occidental populations :
    billions are spent, 2 (I'd even say three) wars are started, thousands have died, populations have fled etc.
    Global warming is a threat to humankind, and people just go :
    "well, there's no proof it really exists".
    Ok, I'll give you that, maybe global warming is a lot of noise for nothing much. But what if it isn't? What if it's all the shit that "liberal" scientists predicts? There will be nevermetyet consequences.
    In the name of pre-emptive actions wich most of occidentals seem to find ok, why do you keep bitching?

    'liberal scientists'? Please explain what you mean by this statement. By 'liberal scientist', do you mean those scientists who are not in the pay of big business? Please clear this up for me as I'm confused. Thanks.
  • Jeanwah
    Jeanwah Posts: 6,363
    Byrnzie wrote:
    'liberal scientists'? Please explain what you mean by this statement. By 'liberal scientist', do you mean those scientists who are not in the pay of big business? Please clear this up for me as I'm confused. Thanks.
    "Liberal" scientists must be the scientists that are:

    1. not hired by corporations, and
    2. threatened by the Bush administration that they would have them fired by their employer if they released their legitamate findings that climate change, global warming, and melting glaciers are in fact, true. And this has happened, just in the past year.

    Aside from the scientists, how would one assuming it's all a hoax, explain this?
    http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/08/politics/08climate.html?ex=1275883200&en=22149dd80c073dd8&ei=5089
    Bush Aide Softened Greenhouse Gas Links to Global Warming
    ...In handwritten notes on drafts of several reports issued in 2002 and 2003, the official, Philip A. Cooney, removed or adjusted descriptions of climate research that government scientists and their supervisors, including some senior Bush administration officials, had already approved. In many cases, the changes appeared in the final reports...
  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    Jeanwah wrote:
    "Liberal" scientists must be the scientists that are:

    1. not hired by corporations, and
    2. threatened by the Bush administration that they would have them fired by their employer if they released their legitamate findings that climate change, global warming, and melting glaciers are in fact, true. And this has happened, just in the past year.

    Aside from the scientists, how would one assuming it's all a hoax, explain this?
    http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/08/politics/08climate.html?ex=1275883200&en=22149dd80c073dd8&ei=5089
    Bush Aide Softened Greenhouse Gas Links to Global Warming

    My point exactly.

Categories