I hope it's set 6,000 years ago and involves dinosaurs.
i'd like to see the spin on how it fits with her hard-core family values.
well, as long as she's doing her husband, i don't think there's anything in the bible against exhibitionism.
oh and yeaaaaa....she is hardly the hottest, most desirable woman over 40. not even close. she's 'political hot'...not real world hot.
my sister is the same age as palin, and she's waaayyyy hotter....and she's just your 'average woman' not a celebrity, actress, model, etc.
this attitude... calling a human being that you don't even know "a nasty piece of discarded plastic" once again shows your true colors.
wow.
you pro-life, right-wing christians really do have kind souls...
OR NOT!
:eek:
Hatred toward women? What are you talking about? How do you aggregate a personal opinion on one person to an entire sex? Come on.... that's just wrong.
I think Pam Anderson is a nasty piece of discarded plastic. That's my opinion on HER.
And how does being pro-life and voicing it on a message board show any disdain towards womens rights? I'm very very pro-womens rights... including women who have not been born yet.
If you disagree about the abortion issue, fine... but, don't label someone a woman hater because they disagree with you on that issue and because they think Pam Anderson, a former porn star and major representative of awful plastic surgery, is a nasty peice of discarded plastic. Cuz... she is.
Hatred toward women? What are you talking about? How do you aggregate a personal opinion on one person to an entire sex? Come on.... that's just wrong.
I think Pam Anderson is a nasty piece of discarded plastic. That's my opinion on HER.
And how does being pro-life and voicing it on a message board show any disdain towards womens rights? I'm very very pro-womens rights... including women who have not been born yet.
If you disagree about the abortion issue, fine... but, don't label someone a woman hater because they disagree with you on that issue and because they think Pam Anderson, a former porn star and major representative of awful plastic surgery, is a nasty peice of discarded plastic. Cuz... she is.
I could be wrong, but I have a feeling Anna is basing her comments on more than just this thread.
My question is: How can anyone fault Pam Anderson for being a former porn star as an argument for why they'd rather see Sarah Palin in a porno?
I could be wrong, but I have a feeling Anna is basing her comments on more than just this thread.
Please present me with one quote where I put women down at all... ever. I would never do that. The poster simply disagrees with me on the abortion issue and therefore, thinks I am against women's rights.... which is fanatical and just plain retarded. We disagree on abortion.... that's all.
My question is: How can anyone fault Pam Anderson for being a former porn star as an argument for why they'd rather see Sarah Palin in a porno?
I'm faulting Pam Anderson for her looks. Just like the person who I originally replied to was faulting Sarah Palin for hers. This thread is a thread about a topic which will never occur. If in some magical bizzaro world, there was a slight chance that I could see either Pam Anderson (who I regard as a very plastic and unattractive woman) or Sarah Palin (who I regard as a very attactive mom) in a porn... I'd prefer to see Sarah Palin. That's my take and my preference... please continue to tell me who I should think is more attractive though.
The biggest irony is.... read the thread... I'm not alone in my opinion. You just picked me out because you want to argue.
Please present me with one quote where I put women down at all... ever. I would never do that. The poster simply disagrees with me on the abortion issue and therefore, thinks I am against women's rights.... which is fanatical and just plain retarded. We disagree on abortion.... that's all.
I'm faulting Pam Anderson for her looks. Just like the person who I originally replied to was faulting Sarah Palin for hers. This thread is a thread about a topic which will never occur. If in some magical bizzaro world, there was a slight chance that I could see either Pam Anderson (who I regard as a very plastic and unattractive woman) or Sarah Palin (who I regard as a very attactive mom) in a porn... I'd prefer to see Sarah Palin. That's my take and my preference... please continue to tell me who I should think is more attractive though.
The biggest irony is.... read the thread... I'm not alone in my opinion. You just picked me out because you want to argue.
I didn't "pick you out" because I want to argue, and I'm certainly not telling you who you should find more attractive. I don't don't care who you would rather see in a porn flick (although I personally find your desire to see either of them in porn to be disrespectful to women).
But you seemed to be saying you would rather see Palin in porn because Anderson is a "nasty piece of discarded plastic" and that Anderson is a "nasty piece of discarded plastic" not only because she has had plastic surgery but also because she is a former porn star. I was just observing that this seems illogical.
(I might also argue that it is degrading to women to want them to fullfil your sexual desires and then think less of them for doing so... but that would be a topic for another thread.)
Here's something I'm curious about: Why did you refer to Anderson as an "unattractive woman" and Palin as an "attractive mom" when they're both moms?
Sarah Palin is one of the least attractive women I've ever looked at. I'd rather watch an episode of Bang Bus starring Rosanne Barr than to see that evil scank Palin do anything. Knowing that racist exists makes the world less of a place.
I didn't "pick you out" because I want to argue, and I'm certainly not telling you who you should find more attractive. I don't don't care who you would rather see in a porn flick (although I personally find your desire to see either of them in porn to be disrespectful to women).
But you seemed to be saying you would rather see Palin in porn because Anderson is a "nasty piece of discarded plastic" and that Anderson is a "nasty piece of discarded plastic" not only because she has had plastic surgery but also because she is a former porn star. I was just observing that this seems illogical.
(I might also argue that it is degrading to women to want them to fullfil your sexual desires and then think less of them for doing so... but that would be a topic for another thread.)
Here's something I'm curious about: Why did you refer to Anderson as an "unattractive woman" and Palin as an "attractive mom" when they're both moms?
You just want to argue.... with ME. Re-read the thread. People are talking about beastiality in here for Christs sake. It's a joke thread, man. Get a grip.
And Pam Anderson is a nasty piece of discarded plastic. I'm not degrading women by saying that... I'm degrading her. In fact, the reason I dislike her so much is because she's a poster child for plastic augmentation.... living up to the barbie doll syndrome. Her life choices are what's degrading to women. Women can be beautiful without needing to get sixteen billion plastic surgeries. Sarah Palin is evidence of that. I called Sarah Palin a mom because I didn't know Pam Anderson was a mom too. I don't know her life story like you do and I don't care to.
Once again, you picked me out simply to argue. If you were really concerned about this thread being degrading to women, you would be addressing the OP and the rest of the people who responded with opinions on the subject of this thread which was a joke to begin with. God, I can't even give a response in a funny thread anymore, just because I have a minority political viewpoint. It's ridiculous.
I will say one thing. I've heard Pam Anderson and Sarah Palin speak several times and I have a pretty good feel for what they both stand for. There is no doubt in my mind who has more beauty where it actually counts -- compassion for animals, fellow human beings, etc.
Pam Anderson by a mile.
San Diego 10/25/00, Mountain View 6/1/03, Santa Barbara 10/28/03, Northwest School 3/18/05, San Diego 7/7/06, Los Angeles 7/9/06, 7/10/06, Honolulu (U2) 12/9/06, Santa Barbara (EV) 4/10/08, Los Angeles (EV) 4/12/08, Hartford 6/27/08, Mansfield 6/28/08, VH1 Rock Honors The Who 7/12/08, Seattle 9/21/09, Universal City 9/30/09, 10/1/09, 10/6/09, 10/7/09, San Diego 10/9/09, Los Angeles (EV) 7/8/11, Santa Barbara (EV) 7/9/11, Chicago 7/19/13, San Diego 11/21/13, Los Angeles 11/23/13, 11/24/13, Oakland 11/26/13, Chicago 8/22/16, Missoula 8/13/18, Boston 9/2/18, Los Angeles 2/25/22 (EV), San Diego 5/3/22, Los Angeles 5/6/22, 5/7/22, Imola 6/25/22, Los Angeles 5/21/24, [London 6/29/24], [Boston 9/15/24]
You just want to argue.... with ME. Re-read the thread. People are talking about beastiality in here for Christs sake. It's a joke thread, man. Get a grip.
And Pam Anderson is a nasty piece of discarded plastic. I'm not degrading women by saying that... I'm degrading her. In fact, the reason I dislike her so much is because she's a poster child for plastic augmentation.... living up to the barbie doll syndrome. Her life choices are what's degrading to women. Women can be beautiful without needing to get sixteen billion plastic surgeries. Sarah Palin is evidence of that. I called Sarah Palin a mom because I didn't know Pam Anderson was a mom too. I don't know her life story like you do and I don't care to.
Once again, you picked me out simply to argue. If you were really concerned about this thread being degrading to women, you would be addressing the OP and the rest of the people who responded with opinions on the subject of this thread which was a joke to begin with. God, I can't even give a response in a funny thread anymore, just because I have a minority political viewpoint. It's ridiculous.
Eh, get over it. I don't care about you or this thread. You made a particular comment that caught my eye and I just made an observation about it. You're not being victimized. :rolleyes:
I will say one thing. I've heard Pam Anderson and Sarah Palin speak several times and I have a pretty good feel for what they both stand for. There is no doubt in my mind who has more beauty where it actually counts -- compassion for animals, fellow human beings, etc.
Pam Anderson by a mile.
i agree 100%
he he... btw... someone gave me the pam and tommy sex tape yesterday (i've NEVER seen it)
I'm looking forward to learning about his LARGE (com)passionate assets as well.
Sarah Palin is one of the least attractive women I've ever looked at. I'd rather watch an episode of Bang Bus starring Rosanne Barr than to see that evil scank Palin do anything. Knowing that racist exists makes the world less of a place.
LOL...:p
All the world will be your enemy, Prince with a thousand enemies, and whenever they catch you, they will kill you. But first they must catch you, digger, listener, runner, prince with the swift warning. Be cunning and full of tricks and your people shall never be destroyed.
Sarah Palin is one of the least attractive women I've ever looked at. I'd rather watch an episode of Bang Bus starring Rosanne Barr than to see that evil scank Palin do anything. Knowing that racist exists makes the world less of a place.
she wouldn't share the stage with 2 fellow republicans in NH b/c they dared to be pro-choice.....such intolerance is VERY unsexy. obviously, she'd be a complete missionary type of woman. booorrrriiiing.
* oh and my sourse for the reps comment is the most excellent newsweek 7 part series linked in this forum.
Comments
i'd like to see the spin on how it fits with her hard-core family values.
well, as long as she's doing her husband, i don't think there's anything in the bible against exhibitionism.
oh and yeaaaaa....she is hardly the hottest, most desirable woman over 40. not even close. she's 'political hot'...not real world hot.
my sister is the same age as palin, and she's waaayyyy hotter....and she's just your 'average woman' not a celebrity, actress, model, etc.
Let's just breathe...
I am myself like you somehow
Hatred toward women? What are you talking about? How do you aggregate a personal opinion on one person to an entire sex? Come on.... that's just wrong.
I think Pam Anderson is a nasty piece of discarded plastic. That's my opinion on HER.
And how does being pro-life and voicing it on a message board show any disdain towards womens rights? I'm very very pro-womens rights... including women who have not been born yet.
If you disagree about the abortion issue, fine... but, don't label someone a woman hater because they disagree with you on that issue and because they think Pam Anderson, a former porn star and major representative of awful plastic surgery, is a nasty peice of discarded plastic. Cuz... she is.
I could be wrong, but I have a feeling Anna is basing her comments on more than just this thread.
My question is: How can anyone fault Pam Anderson for being a former porn star as an argument for why they'd rather see Sarah Palin in a porno?
and still jonesing for another show....
"the waiting drove me mad..."
Please present me with one quote where I put women down at all... ever. I would never do that. The poster simply disagrees with me on the abortion issue and therefore, thinks I am against women's rights.... which is fanatical and just plain retarded. We disagree on abortion.... that's all.
I'm faulting Pam Anderson for her looks. Just like the person who I originally replied to was faulting Sarah Palin for hers. This thread is a thread about a topic which will never occur. If in some magical bizzaro world, there was a slight chance that I could see either Pam Anderson (who I regard as a very plastic and unattractive woman) or Sarah Palin (who I regard as a very attactive mom) in a porn... I'd prefer to see Sarah Palin. That's my take and my preference... please continue to tell me who I should think is more attractive though.
The biggest irony is.... read the thread... I'm not alone in my opinion. You just picked me out because you want to argue.
I didn't "pick you out" because I want to argue, and I'm certainly not telling you who you should find more attractive. I don't don't care who you would rather see in a porn flick (although I personally find your desire to see either of them in porn to be disrespectful to women).
But you seemed to be saying you would rather see Palin in porn because Anderson is a "nasty piece of discarded plastic" and that Anderson is a "nasty piece of discarded plastic" not only because she has had plastic surgery but also because she is a former porn star. I was just observing that this seems illogical.
(I might also argue that it is degrading to women to want them to fullfil your sexual desires and then think less of them for doing so... but that would be a topic for another thread.)
Here's something I'm curious about: Why did you refer to Anderson as an "unattractive woman" and Palin as an "attractive mom" when they're both moms?
You just want to argue.... with ME. Re-read the thread. People are talking about beastiality in here for Christs sake. It's a joke thread, man. Get a grip.
And Pam Anderson is a nasty piece of discarded plastic. I'm not degrading women by saying that... I'm degrading her. In fact, the reason I dislike her so much is because she's a poster child for plastic augmentation.... living up to the barbie doll syndrome. Her life choices are what's degrading to women. Women can be beautiful without needing to get sixteen billion plastic surgeries. Sarah Palin is evidence of that. I called Sarah Palin a mom because I didn't know Pam Anderson was a mom too. I don't know her life story like you do and I don't care to.
Once again, you picked me out simply to argue. If you were really concerned about this thread being degrading to women, you would be addressing the OP and the rest of the people who responded with opinions on the subject of this thread which was a joke to begin with. God, I can't even give a response in a funny thread anymore, just because I have a minority political viewpoint. It's ridiculous.
Pam Anderson by a mile.
Eh, get over it. I don't care about you or this thread. You made a particular comment that caught my eye and I just made an observation about it. You're not being victimized. :rolleyes:
Philly- 2005, 2013, 2016, 2024
Camden 2000, 2003, 2006, 2008, 2022, 2023
Philly Spectrum 2009 x4 - We closed that MFER Down Proper
Baltimore- 2024
DC- 2006, 2008
New York- 2008, 2010
Boston - Fenway 2016 (night 2) , 2024 (night1)
East Rutherford, New Jersey- 2006
Chicago - Lollapalooza 2007
Seattle- Gorge 2005
EV Solo- DC x2, Baltimore x2 , Newark NJ x2, Tower Theater x2
- Given To Fly
i agree 100%
he he... btw... someone gave me the pam and tommy sex tape yesterday (i've NEVER seen it)
I'm looking forward to learning about his LARGE (com)passionate assets as well.
she wouldn't share the stage with 2 fellow republicans in NH b/c they dared to be pro-choice.....such intolerance is VERY unsexy. obviously, she'd be a complete missionary type of woman.
* oh and my sourse for the reps comment is the most excellent newsweek 7 part series linked in this forum.
Let's just breathe...
I am myself like you somehow
Look it up....
Mitch Hedberg