Canada to ban incandescent light bulbs

2»

Comments

  • sourdoughsourdough Posts: 579
    I'm not applauding the Cons by any means (they're distortion of Kyoto in their latest release was mind boggling) but I do think this is a good idea even if it is a token propaganda measure.

    Incandescent bulbs are inefficient and they should be eliminated. I don't give the cons much praise for their environmental outlook but this is a good step. They miss the big picture, but they have done some good small things to continue their facade.
  • rebornFixerrebornFixer Posts: 4,901
    sourdough wrote:
    I'm not applauding the Cons by any means (they're distortion of Kyoto in their latest release was mind boggling) but I do think this is a good idea even if it is a token propaganda measure.

    Incandescent bulbs are inefficient and they should be eliminated. I don't give the cons much praise for their environmental outlook but this is a good step. They miss the big picture, but they have done some good small things to continue their facade.

    And if one does buy what Gore says, a bunch of small steps added together will wind up making a difference.

    Just for the record, I agree that this is an appeasement move. I don't think Harper poops green or anything. It just happens to be a move that won't hurt, and might help, at least a little.
  • rebornFixerrebornFixer Posts: 4,901
    polaris wrote:
    you can buy into the PR campaign and the talking points the cons have ... the reality paints a different picture ... again - the liberals were far from perfect ... but this gov't is inept at best ...

    this is a gov't that wanted to set reduction targets for 2050!?? ... they insulted every canadian out there with that joke of an act ... but hey - as long as we keep harping on the libs - we don't actually have to hold these guys accountable ...

    Harping on the libs (by me) only happens when I see a distortion of the facts that needs to be addressed. I have no real beef with people slamming Harper ... In fact, not only is slamming the government a Canadian tradition, its a healthy democratic process. Like I said, its hard to watch and not comment when people's comments miss half the boat.
  • sourdoughsourdough Posts: 579
    And if one does buy what Gore says, a bunch of small steps added together will wind up making a difference.

    Just for the record, I agree that this is an appeasement move. I don't think Harper poops green or anything. It just happens to be a move that won't hurt, and might help, at least a little.

    I agree and I think the government DOES need to do all of the small things which cumulatively make a difference, however that does not absolve the government from doing their part in taking a more pro-active big picture approach to the problem. I really don't beleive individuals and grass roots movements are enough to solve the problem.

    Tax incentives and and credits for transit users and hybrid car owners were also good moves. I would also like to see more "sticks" to motivate people to change their behaviour.
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    the most appropriate line ... *wrong side of the science and the wrong side of history* ... the probation period is over - we need real leadership ...

    http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2007/04/26/emission-reac.html
Sign In or Register to comment.