Home› A Moving Train

Mitt Romney...Careless Whisper???

ledveddermanledvedderman Posts: 7,761
edited January 2008 in A Moving Train
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/MSNBC_blames_Romney_whisper_on_microphone_0125.html
E8toX.gif

http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • DPrival78DPrival78 CT Posts: 2,263
    i heard that last night and immediately thought that someone was coaching romney. microphone malfunction.. right. but who's microphone?

    it seems like the debate last night was fixed to make mitt look like the winner. he had the most time to speak, as well a little help coming from an unknown source.

    this whole election thing is rigged, i tells ya.
    i'm more a fan of popular bands.. like the bee-gees, pearl jam
  • comfortably numbcomfortably numb Posts: 188
    the man's going to be our next president. get used to him
    saw things so much clearer
  • ledveddermanledvedderman Posts: 7,761
    comfortably numb wrote:
    the man's going to be our next president. get used to him

    I hate to say it, but I think the Clintons are going to take it. Makes me want to puke.
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • otis mcflusterotis mcfluster Posts: 536
    Here's the video: http://youtube.com/watch?v=HcmFvg24XK4
  • gabersgabers Posts: 2,787
    Can someone give me a reasonable explanation why these candidates are wearing earpieces to begin with? It seems to just invite cheating. Ask Bushy. This reminds of the dumb asses in high school that would cheat on every exam because they were too lazy and stupid to take the test on their own.
  • anothercloneanotherclone Posts: 1,688
    as the article says, I'm calling shenanigans.
  • comfortably numbcomfortably numb Posts: 188
    hmm.. whatever you think about the guy, you have to give him more credit than that. obviously romney knew what the moderator was talking about. even if you dont like him, you're blowing things way out of proportion to suggest that there would even be a possibitly that he wouldnt know what reagan did in 1983. you could babble on about how evil or incompetent he is if you must, but he's not stupid.

    use your brains people.. dont base your opinions on ridiculously biased articles. that's just pathetic.

    it's quite clear that the mysterious voice was for the moderator, to specify things for at least the audience. most people, especially people who werent alive or old enough in 1983, arent going to have any idea what the question was about, making it a pretty ridiculous question if it hadnt been elaborated. that's why the moderator elaborates right after romney says he wont raise taxes...

    you guys and your conspiracy theories.
    saw things so much clearer
  • ledveddermanledvedderman Posts: 7,761
    What conspiracy theories?
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • RolandTD20KdrummerRolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    Oh man it's all staged

    These freaks don't know a damn thing...

    ahhhh run away...

    get out while you still can!

    hehe

    seriously though that's screwed up...

    Mittwitt....
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • comfortably numbcomfortably numb Posts: 188
    it's incredibly obvious nobody was feeding that line to him. i dont know.. maybe the candidates are coached.. whatever.. but that wasnt it. some people just need to think every now and then. just think about it. read what i posted. it's straight of out the textbook for common sense 101. it's the first chapter.
    saw things so much clearer
  • anothercloneanotherclone Posts: 1,688
    comfortably numb wrote:
    it's quite clear that the mysterious voice was for the moderator, to specify things for at least the audience.

    it is?

    Hey, I don't care one way or another, but if it were as you say, wouldn't Tim Russert (the moderator) be piping up now to clarify?
  • comfortably numbcomfortably numb Posts: 188
    according to that BS article, MSNBC already said something.

    besides, what is there to clarify? first if all it's very clear to begin with. second of all, why should russert personally "pipe up" to put a few people on the internets' minds at ease? they probably like thinking romney was getting notes anyway. it would make him look bad.
    saw things so much clearer
  • anothercloneanotherclone Posts: 1,688
    I meant that Russert could say "I was the voice that said 'he raised taxes' " because that has not been clarified. NBC has said there was a problem with his mic.

    Seriously, I couldn't care less about this, I'm just thinking out loud.

    Shenanigans, I tell ya. :p
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    i would never vote for a man that wore that tacky ass pimp style shiny metallic blue suit that he wore last night

    this man oozes "i am an asshole" from every pore in his skin... am i wrong?
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    my2hands wrote:
    i would never vote for a man that wore that tacky ass pimp style shiny metallic blue suit that he wore last night

    this man oozes "i am an asshole" from every pore in his skin... am i wrong?

    is that what you base your voting on? how about his policies?
  • comfortably numbcomfortably numb Posts: 188
    jlew24asu wrote:
    is that what you base your voting on? how about his policies?

    rofl, ditto.

    his god damn suit? oh i get it.. i guess he's rich? and an enemy of the working class? something like that? *yawn*
    saw things so much clearer
  • RolandTD20KdrummerRolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    my2hands wrote:
    i would never vote for a man that wore that tacky ass pimp style shiny metallic blue suit that he wore last night

    this man oozes "i am an asshole" from every pore in his skin... am i wrong?


    When the president looks like a gameshow host in a tacky suit, it's not exactly excellent from a global perspective.

    If only having a chimp was in style, this argument would be moot...
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    When the president looks like a gameshow host in a tacky suit, it's not exactly excellent from a global perspective.

    If only having a chimp was in style, this argument would be moot...


    how about pointing and yelling in a high pitch squeeky voice. borderline hysterically. yea he's are man
  • comfortably numbcomfortably numb Posts: 188
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    When the president looks like a gameshow host in a tacky suit, it's not exactly excellent from a global perspective.

    If only having a chimp was in style, this argument would be moot...

    i doubt that suit is going to change the president's image from a global perspective. this isnt fashion show. it's not like the guy was wearing a nudie suit. this discussion is worthless.
    saw things so much clearer
  • RolandTD20KdrummerRolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    comfortably numb wrote:
    i doubt that suit is going to change the president's image from a global perspective. this isnt fashion show. it's not like the guy was wearing a nudie suit. this discussion is worthless.

    Oh I bet a lot of people vote 95% superficially. In fact I can guarantee they do, if the primaries are any indication thus far.

    edit: those words "humble foreign policy" keep echoing in my ears. ;)
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    edit: those words "humble foreign policy" keep echoing in my ears. ;)


    isnt that a good thing? sounds very ron paul like to me
  • ledveddermanledvedderman Posts: 7,761
    jlew24asu wrote:
    how about pointing and yelling in a high pitch squeeky voice. borderline hysterically. yea he's are man

    Ha! (in a Chris Mattews mannar)

    When I think of Ron Paul speaking all I can think of is Jim Moras postgame rant while he was the head coach of the Colts.

    "Playoffs?!?!?! Playoffs?!?!"

    It seems almost identical.
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    ledvedderman wrote:
    Ha! (in a Chris Mattews mannar)

    When I think of Ron Paul speaking all I can think of is Jim Moras postgame rant while he was the head coach of the Colts.

    "Playoffs?!?!?! Playoffs?!?!"

    It seems almost identical.

    +1 thats gold dude. exact match, no question.
  • ledveddermanledvedderman Posts: 7,761
    jlew24asu wrote:
    +1 thats gold dude. exact match, no question.

    Exhibit A- http://youtube.com/watch?v=jdUr5hF0yGc

    Exhibit B- go to youtube.com, search "Ron Paul", and click on any video
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • NevermindNevermind Posts: 1,006
    Whats so funny about a humble foreign policy? It was the idea George Bush campaigned on in 2000. No nation building.
  • RolandTD20KdrummerRolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    I was just saying... humble foreign suit policy.

    The last thing the US needs is a mellower darker haired version of Rod Roddy from the price is right.

    hehe
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • anothercloneanotherclone Posts: 1,688
    Nevermind wrote:
    Whats so funny about a humble foreign policy? It was the idea George Bush campaigned on in 2000. No nation building.

    does anyone else find this comment funny?
  • RolandTD20KdrummerRolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    anotherclone wrote:
    does anyone else find this comment funny?

    Actually like the brain just fell out of my head funny. Mostly because it's absolutely true.

    That's exactly what he campaigned on....then no more than 28 days later (edit: after getting elected) he made the decision to drop bombs in Iraq....before 9/11.

    It hopelessly boggles the mind, until it is truly understood. Then it all it's just gets really dark and creepy.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • anothercloneanotherclone Posts: 1,688
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    Actually like the brain just fell out of my head funny. Mostly because it's absolutely true.

    That's exactly what he campaigned on....then no more than 28 days later he made the decision to drop bombs in Iraq....before 9/11.

    It hopelessly boggles the mind, until it is truly understood. Then it all it's just gets really dark and creepy.


    ok, thanks for validating my feeling. I thought maybe it was just me. :)
  • cornnifercornnifer Posts: 2,130
    ledvedderman wrote:
    I hate to say it, but I think the Clintons are going to take it. Makes me want to puke.

    No way. No effing way. trust me, friend.
    "When all your friends and sedatives mean well but make it worse... better find yourself a place to level out."
Sign In or Register to comment.