The Economist endores Obama

IndifferenceIndifference Posts: 2,742
edited October 2008 in A Moving Train
http://www.economist.com/world/unitedstates/displayStory.cfm?story_id=12516666&source=features_box_main

Good part:
There is no getting around the fact that Mr Obama’s résumé is thin for the world’s biggest job. But the exceptionally assured way in which he has run his campaign is a considerable comfort. It is not just that he has more than held his own against Mr McCain in the debates. A man who started with no money and few supporters has out-thought, out-organised and outfought the two mightiest machines in American politics—the Clintons and the conservative right.

SHOW COUNT: (164) 1990's=3, 2000's=53, 2010/20's=108, US=118, CAN=15, Europe=20 ,New Zealand=4, Australia=5
Mexico=1, Colombia=1 



Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • sweetpotatosweetpotato Posts: 1,278
    http://www.economist.com/world/unitedstates/displayStory.cfm?story_id=12516666&source=features_box_main

    Good part:
    There is no getting around the fact that Mr Obama’s résumé is thin for the world’s biggest job. But the exceptionally assured way in which he has run his campaign is a considerable comfort. It is not just that he has more than held his own against Mr McCain in the debates. A man who started with no money and few supporters has out-thought, out-organised and outfought the two mightiest machines in American politics—the Clintons and the conservative right.

    wow. nice endorsement, left-handed though it may be. i'll take it! :)
    "Ladies and gentlemen, the President of the United States, Barack Obama."

    "Obama's main opponent in this election on November 4th (was) not John McCain, it (was) ignorance."~Michael Moore

    "i'm feeling kinda righteous right now. with my badass motherfuckin' ukulele!"
    ~ed, 8/7
  • sweetpotatosweetpotato Posts: 1,278
    But then again, what do the people at The Economist know about money, right? :D Bunch of smarty-pants elitists. ;)
    "Ladies and gentlemen, the President of the United States, Barack Obama."

    "Obama's main opponent in this election on November 4th (was) not John McCain, it (was) ignorance."~Michael Moore

    "i'm feeling kinda righteous right now. with my badass motherfuckin' ukulele!"
    ~ed, 8/7
  • jimed14jimed14 Posts: 9,488
    But then again, what do the people at The Economist know about money, right? :D Bunch of smarty-pants elitists. ;)

    a bunch of loony Brits to boot! :D
    "You're one of the few Red Sox fans I don't mind." - Newch91

    "I don't believe in damn curses. Wake up the damn Bambino and have me face him. Maybe I'll drill him in the ass." --- Pedro Martinez
  • PJ_SalukiPJ_Saluki Posts: 1,006
    jimed14 wrote:
    a bunch of loony Brits to boot! :D

    Brits=Socialists ;)
    "Almost all those politicians took money from Enron, and there they are holding hearings. That's like O.J. Simpson getting in the Rae Carruth jury pool." -- Charles Barkley
  • The Economist is a ROTHSCHILD magazine.

    Big fucking deal.

    So the richest people in the world support Obama?

    CHANGE I CAN BELIEVE IN!
    :rolleyes:
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • jimed14jimed14 Posts: 9,488
    The Economist is a ROTHSCHILD magazine.

    Big fucking deal.

    So the richest people in the world support Obama?

    CHANGE I CAN BELIEVE IN!
    :rolleyes:

    wait, I thought Obama was only supported by poor people ... you mean rich people like him too? People who would get their taxes increased are ok with him? oh my.
    "You're one of the few Red Sox fans I don't mind." - Newch91

    "I don't believe in damn curses. Wake up the damn Bambino and have me face him. Maybe I'll drill him in the ass." --- Pedro Martinez
  • The Economist is a ROTHSCHILD magazine.

    Big fucking deal.

    So the richest people in the world support Obama?

    CHANGE I CAN BELIEVE IN!
    :rolleyes:

    Wait... Listening to the right, I thought that only poor welfare people were supporting Obama? Now I'm confused...
    My whole life
    was like a picture
    of a sunny day
    “We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
    ― Abraham Lincoln
  • CollinCollin Posts: 4,931
    The Economist is a ROTHSCHILD magazine.

    Big fucking deal.

    So the richest people in the world own Obama?

    CHANGE I CAN BELIEVE IN!
    :rolleyes:

    Fixed! :D
    THANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!


    naděje umírá poslední
  • DOSWDOSW Posts: 2,014
    A man who started with no money and few supporters has out-thought, out-organised and outfought the two mightiest machines in American politics—the Clintons and the conservative right.

    I actually haven't thought about it that way before. A guy who had absolutely no reputation (save for the 2004 keynote speech, which was all his effort) somehow managed to beat out the Clintons and one of the most well-known Republican senators who happens to be an honorable war hero.

    Hm. Interesting. :)
    It's a town full of losers and I'm pulling out of here to win
  • jimed14 wrote:
    wait, I thought Obama was only supported by poor people ... you mean rich people like him too? People who would get their taxes increased are ok with him? oh my.

    You guys are on crack.

    The Rothschilds essentially own this planet.
    And they have held fundraisers for John McCain as well.

    Its not a question of whether rich OR poor or rich AND poor people support Obama.

    You yahoos are running around saying, "lookie, this magazine endorses Obama", like it is some great glowing praise, because the magazine is called "The Economist".

    Well that magazine is often used as a propagandist mouthpiece for the interests that control both sides of the American political system, and run most of the worlds affairs.

    So i don't take an "endorsement" from The Economist to mean shit, except to say, "Yep, the establishment approves of the candidate they already approved of."

    Why do you people insist on being evasive around the very issue that is central to Obama's campaign? CHANGE.

    Namely, he doesn't represent shit for it.
    The criminals that run this world own both candidates.
    Its time to stop telling yourself lies about all this fantasy "change" that the man on "the left" represents.
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • jimed14jimed14 Posts: 9,488
    You guys are on crack.

    The Rothschilds essentially own this planet.
    And they have held fundraisers for John McCain as well.

    Its not a question of whether rich OR poor or rich AND poor people support Obama.

    You yahoos are running around saying, "lookie, this magazine endorses Obama", like it is some great glowing praise, because the magazine is called "The Economist".

    Well that magazine is often used as a propagandist mouthpiece for the interests that control both sides of the American political system, and run most of the worlds affairs.

    So i don't take an "endorsement" from The Economist to mean shit, except to say, "Yep, the establishment approves of the candidate they already approved of."

    Why do you people insist on being evasive around the very issue that is central to Obama's campaign? CHANGE.

    Namely, he doesn't represent shit for it.
    The criminals that run this world own both candidates.
    Its time to stop telling yourself lies about all this fantasy "change" that the man on "the left" represents.


    I personally could not care less what magazine is supporting which ever candidate. If you didn't see the sarcasm in my post ... forgive me.
    "You're one of the few Red Sox fans I don't mind." - Newch91

    "I don't believe in damn curses. Wake up the damn Bambino and have me face him. Maybe I'll drill him in the ass." --- Pedro Martinez
Sign In or Register to comment.