"our laws need to change"
El_Kabong
Posts: 4,141
ok, i obviously missed something...they showed a clip on faux op/ed of bush saying now terrorists can buy disposable cell phones and use anonymous email accounts, our laws need to change...
so what, exactly, needs to change?
so what, exactly, needs to change?
standin above the crowd
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
LOL!
Just think of your own reasoning on economics and you'll understand.
These men see evil terrorists using cell phones and hotmail accounts, so that must mean it's time to ban or track or limit or restrict those things, right?
You see evil profiteers using money and businesses, so that must mean it's time to ban or track or limit or restrict those things, right?
Goes to prove who is actually "winning" if you can call it that...the inherent goal of a terrorist to induce fear in a populace...to make everyday things that are taken for granted more worrisome....hence cell-phones and computers are now targetted as potential terror devices....from my viewpoint they are winning.....
Fear is winning. I'm just not sure which fear-inducing side, the foreign or the domestic, is ahead.
not really...i don't mind profits as long as it is not gained by exploitation or anything like that...i also don't think there should be such a huge gap, what was the ration? $431:$1?
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
-Jean-Jacques Rousseau
And these guys don't really mind cell phones unless they're in the hands of terrorists. Same logic.
If you don't like the gap, start a company and pay everyone equally. But hey, if Bill O'Reilly can control my cell phone even though he has no right to, why can't you control my pay?
God Bless the New America
not really, how do you figure? i don't even know if this can be comparable as i don't know what the 'our laws need to change' really encompasses...
huh? i don't think the executives should be making multi millions while their labor can't even afford to get by.
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
You both assume that you have the right to control something you didn't create, don't own, didn't pay for, didn't earn and have no influence over short of armed force.
It certainly seems to imply that cell phones, anonymous e-mail and similar tools that can be used by terrorists need to be heavily regulated.
Then hire those laborers. And pay them what you feel they're worth. Conversely, you could pass a bunch of laws and walk into those offices with guns and rob every executive you see and distribute the money as you see fit.
did i say i have the right to control or was i voicing my opinion??
and you know if i said that someone would say i was overreacting and don't know what was meant by it, which i don't...personally i think its more towards justifying their domestic spying on our net activities and our phones
rob every executive?? are they getting this money thru exploitation? isn't exploitation bad? so should we allow sweat shops, too? child labor? forced labor?
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
You were just voicing your opinion. So was the guy on the news.
What do you think is meant by laws to "ban or track or limit or restrict" those things?
Certainly.
Since in your world exploitation is apparently defined by a pay ratio, yes.
When someone is actually being exploited, yes.
Yes.
Yes.
No.
They will be able to enforce the anti-masterbation laws they will be trying to amend into the constitution as a side benifit.
Maybe they should start screening shipping containers and doing something about our open borders first though.
Perhaps they could build walls on the border out of confiscated cell phones.
Keep off MIchael Moore's lap. Wait, he doesn't have one.
George Washington