Obama says he's outraged by former pastor's comments

2

Comments

  • rebornFixer
    rebornFixer Posts: 4,901
    lazymoon13 wrote:
    I'm joking man. apparently all new members around here are this jlew guy. stick around, you'll see.

    Yeah, what's up with that?
    I mean, everyone knows that I am in fact jlew.

    :)
  • lazymoon13
    lazymoon13 Posts: 838
    Nevermind wrote:
    How is he racist?

    because he says racists things like saying the white man gave the black man AIDS, and the KKK of A, and telling blacks they are fighting the wrong enemy in regards to black on black crime. thus making him a racist. I could go on if you don;t get it.
  • GauchoB
    GauchoB Posts: 224
    SilverSeed wrote:
    ok ok I understand this crap is not helping Obama. But can someone spell out for me how Hillary has any chance against him? She can't catch up in votes or delegates. If she were to be nominated, it would be against the will of the party and would certainly cause a huge fracture. Barring any major HUGE gaff by Obama, is there any reason we're still entertaining this 'lady'?
    SUPERDELEGATES
  • Nevermind
    Nevermind Posts: 1,006
    lazymoon13 wrote:
    because he says racists things like saying the white man gave the black man AIDS, and the KKK of A, and telling blacks they are fighting the wrong enemy in regards to black on black crime. thus making him a racist. I could go on if you don;t get it.
    I get it. If you dont support your government you are a terrorist. The KKK was founded by a freemason and they still have a picture of him in the lodge I visit from time to time. Freemasons created America as we know it. Look at the conditions people in Compton and all the other ghettos live in.
  • lazymoon13
    lazymoon13 Posts: 838
    Nevermind wrote:
    I get it. If you dont support your government you are a terrorist. The KKK was founded by a freemason and they still have a picture of him in the lodge I visit from time to time. Freemasons created America as we know it. Look at the conditions people in Compton and all the other ghettos live in.

    at least you agree he is a racist.
  • Nevermind
    Nevermind Posts: 1,006
    lazymoon13 wrote:
    at least you agree he is a racist.
    Good job putting words in my mouth.
  • lazymoon13
    lazymoon13 Posts: 838
    Nevermind wrote:
    Good job putting words in my mouth.
    lazymoon13 wrote:
    because he says racists things like saying the white man gave the black man AIDS, and the KKK of A, and telling blacks they are fighting the wrong enemy in regards to black on black crime. thus making him a racist. I could go on if you don;t get it.

    Nevermind wrote:
    I get it.

    good.
  • Nevermind
    Nevermind Posts: 1,006
    lazymoon13 wrote:
    good.
    sar·casm
    –noun 1. harsh or bitter derision or irony.
    2. a sharply ironical taunt; sneering or cutting remark: a review full of sarcasms.
  • SilverSeed
    SilverSeed Posts: 336
    GauchoB wrote:
    SUPERDELEGATES

    Thanks for grasping the question. Here: How could the superdelegates go against the will of the people that make up the democratic party?
    When Jesus said "Love your enemies" he probably didn't mean kill them...

    "Sometimes I think I'd be better off dead. No, wait, not me, you." -Deep Toughts, Jack Handy
  • GauchoB
    GauchoB Posts: 224
    SilverSeed wrote:
    Thanks for grasping the question. Here: How could the superdelegates go against the will of the people that make up the democratic party?

    I didnt say it wasnt a serious long shot. It is. You need at least Florida if not Michigan in addition to Super Delegates to make it happen. Otherwise the Dems will disenfranchise, primarily, the black community, and lots of really silly college kids. But it is doable. I think no matter what the Dems do at this point the candidate will be tainted. If Obama wins w/o Florida and Michigan there is a taint just as there would be a taint if Clinton wins with them. This is just one more example of the Democrats being the Democrats.
  • GauchoB
    GauchoB Posts: 224
    lazymoon13 wrote:
    I'm joking man. apparently all new members around here are this jlew guy. stick around, you'll see.

    Yesterday I was you!
  • Abookamongstthemany
    Abookamongstthemany Posts: 8,209
    SilverSeed wrote:
    Thanks for grasping the question. Here: How could the superdelegates go against the will of the people that make up the democratic party?


    It's been posed before but what if Hillary got the popular vote? Would you all be so worried about the will of the people then?
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • TDMize15
    TDMize15 Posts: 166
    The superdelegates will decide based on who they see as more electable. In most recent polls, national preferences have shown Hillary Clinton either even with or slightly ahead of Barack in national Democratic preferences since Pennsylvania. Also, in all of the head to head projected matchups with John McCain, Hillary does better than does Obama.

    If the superdelegates were going to decide based on the most delegates, they would say so. They have made it a point NOT to say this. I know everyone on this board wants to say that the Wright thing is ridiculous... ridiculous or not it IS hurting him. There is absolutely no way around that.

    If Hillary has all the momentum going into the convention (or end of primaries), then I don't think the superdelegates will think twice about putting her in. They want to win, and frankly I see their point that she is more electable. Another factor, more Democrats will switch to McCain if Obama is nominated than if Hillary is nominated.

    Yet another factor is Michigan and Florida... of course these delegates cannot be counted, but I do believe that superdelegates will take it into consideration that she won both of these states.
    All the rusted signs, we ignore throughout our lives, choosing the shiny ones instead...

    And he who forgets, will be destined to remember...
  • Abookamongstthemany
    Abookamongstthemany Posts: 8,209
    Don't Know Myself wrote:
    The superdelegates will decide based on who they see as more electable. In most recent polls, national preferences have shown Hillary Clinton either even with or slightly ahead of Barack in national Democratic preferences since Pennsylvania. Also, in all of the head to head projected matchups with John McCain, Hillary does better than does Obama.

    If the superdelegates were going to decide based on the most delegates, they would say so. They have made it a point NOT to say this. I know everyone on this board wants to say that the Wright thing is ridiculous... ridiculous or not it IS hurting him. There is absolutely no way around that.

    If Hillary has all the momentum going into the convention (or end of primaries), then I don't think the superdelegates will think twice about putting her in. They want to win, and frankly I see their point that she is more electable. Another factor, more Democrats will switch to McCain if Obama is nominated than if Hillary is nominated.

    Yet another factor is Michigan and Florida... of course these delegates cannot be counted, but I do believe that superdelegates will take it into consideration that she won both of these states.

    Disclaimer: I don't like Hillary anymore than Obama. I don't have to post about that fact as much because practically no one here likes Hillary, so what's the point, really...

    But I just wanted to say that your post was very objective and fair. Obama supporters will not agree but they can't seem to get past their bias in this matter.
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • lazymoon13
    lazymoon13 Posts: 838
    Abookamongstthemany wrote:
    Disclaimer: I don't like Hillary anymore than Obama. I don't have to post about that fact as much because practically no one here likes Hillary, so what's the point, really...

    But I just wanted to say that your post was very objective and fair. Obama supporters will not agree but they can't seem to get past their bias in this matter.

    there's bais for obama on this board? :confused:


    ;)
  • inmytree
    inmytree Posts: 4,741
    lazymoon13 wrote:
    there's bais for obama on this board? :confused:


    ;)

    I love how people whine about bias...

    funny stuff, indeed...:D
  • lazymoon13
    lazymoon13 Posts: 838
    inmytree wrote:
    I love how people whine about bias...

    funny stuff, indeed...:D

    she has a point. 98.9% of peeps on this board would defend obama if he used the word honky to describe white people.
  • inmytree
    inmytree Posts: 4,741
    lazymoon13 wrote:
    she has a point. 98.9% of peeps on this board would defend obama if he used the word honky to describe white people.


    really...?

    I think you're making things up...

    while some may see the support Obama receives as "bias", I see it as "a majority of people here support Obama"...
  • lazymoon13
    lazymoon13 Posts: 838
    inmytree wrote:
    really...?

    I think you're making things up...

    while some may see the support Obama receives as "bias", I see it as "a majority of people here support Obama"...

    nah. for example, I tried debating with you about wright/hagee. when given solid examples to prove my point your response was bin blah bow or something childish along those lines. in most peoples eyes around here obama can do no wrong.
  • inmytree
    inmytree Posts: 4,741
    lazymoon13 wrote:
    nah. for example, I tried debating with you about wright/hagee. when given solid examples to prove my point your response was bin blah bow or something childish along those lines. in most peoples eyes around here obama can do no wrong.

    did your wittle feeling get hurt...?

    honestly, I don't have the time or resolve to explain to you how they are similar...it's not like you're going to change you mind..cuz in your eye Mc100years can do no wrong...

    anyhoo...give this a read...

    http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/04/24/mccains-televangelist-ally-believes-god-damns-america/

Categories