Home› A Moving Train

Is Bush Committing an Act of Treason with this Iraqi Agreement?

puremagicpuremagic Posts: 1,907
edited November 2008 in A Moving Train
Bush's action's in time of military engagement seems to conflict with military laws, by placing U.S. troops under the displinary laws of the government of Iraq while we are still officially engaged in military actions within that country?

By allowing contract troops, Blackwater to also be held legally bound by Iraq laws even though we have been told their function is to protect the U.S. embassy, which would be considered U.S. soil.
SIN EATERS--We take the moral excrement we find in this equation and we bury it down deep inside of us so that the rest of our case can stay pure. That is the job. We are morally indefensible and absolutely necessary.
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • jbalicki10jbalicki10 Posts: 517
    puremagic wrote:
    Bush's action's in time of military engagement seems to conflict with military laws, by placing U.S. troops under the displinary laws of the government of Iraq while we are still officially engaged in military actions within that country?

    By allowing contract troops, Blackwater to also be held legally bound by Iraq laws even though we have been told their function is to protect the U.S. embassy, which would be considered U.S. soil.

    I don't think its treason, but I don't agree with it...
Sign In or Register to comment.