he impact of Clinton's Impeachment on Hilliary's Bid for President
puremagic
Posts: 1,907
TITLE should be, The impact of Clinton's Impeachment on Hilliary's Bid for President
This came up over lunch today.
Does Clinton's impeachment exclude him from holding any type of official posting in the White House even as a good will ambassador? Hillary has stated that she plans on using his expertise in some capacity, maybe as an ambassador and would seek his opinions.
If this is the case, could Clinton's advise been seen as illegal unless given in one-on-one dinner conversation or in the bedroom or other "personal" private moments? Wouldn't a "hold that thought moment while I ask Bill" be an illegal act?
I find it a little confusing because I remember seeing G.W. solicit the aid of his father and Clinton for Katrina ambassadors to oversee the foreign contributions to help New Orleans.
Yet, it kind of bothers me, that if Clinton is legally allowed to provide her with his expertise on what could be seen as a consultant basis, it that raises the question of who would be in charge at the White House? Honestly, both scenarios raise that question and I can see Hillary letting Bill taking the phone at 3 a.m. More importantly, I can see a White House staff not knowing who to give the phone to.
This came up over lunch today.
Does Clinton's impeachment exclude him from holding any type of official posting in the White House even as a good will ambassador? Hillary has stated that she plans on using his expertise in some capacity, maybe as an ambassador and would seek his opinions.
If this is the case, could Clinton's advise been seen as illegal unless given in one-on-one dinner conversation or in the bedroom or other "personal" private moments? Wouldn't a "hold that thought moment while I ask Bill" be an illegal act?
I find it a little confusing because I remember seeing G.W. solicit the aid of his father and Clinton for Katrina ambassadors to oversee the foreign contributions to help New Orleans.
Yet, it kind of bothers me, that if Clinton is legally allowed to provide her with his expertise on what could be seen as a consultant basis, it that raises the question of who would be in charge at the White House? Honestly, both scenarios raise that question and I can see Hillary letting Bill taking the phone at 3 a.m. More importantly, I can see a White House staff not knowing who to give the phone to.
SIN EATERS--We take the moral excrement we find in this equation and we bury it down deep inside of us so that the rest of our case can stay pure. That is the job. We are morally indefensible and absolutely necessary.
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
come on, I think you know the answer to that question.
and though he was impeached, he was not removed from office, so there of course would be no reason why he couldn't be a consultant, ambassador, or anything else. and I think he was a much better president than what she would be, so I don't even care if he's running the show instead of her.
I don't think it has any bearing really. I'd imagine that she would ask him his opinion on non top secret matters as any normal couple would especially given his previous experience.
The people voting for her I believe consider Bill's Impeachment a vast right wing conspiracy and he wasn't removed from office so I don't think people that would vote for her have a problem with it whatsoever and since he retained office and remains popular I don't see it as a political problem for him to be an embassador at home or abroad. It certainly has an effect on some of the swing vote, but that was gone for her long before he was impeached much more so from the whitewater deal and other legal impropriaties with her law firm she didn't own up to. If anything I think it's her own transgressions that are going to effect her electablility much more so than anything Bill has done. but that's just my take.
I think he'd have to be impeached, removed from office and convicted of a felony or something to be barred from public office of some sort. I'm sure it depends on who you asked as to what people think, and I'm no lawyer, but I don't think legally there is an issue with him being the first man.
it really doesn't because I don't see any possible way that she's going to get the nomination anyway.