Russia May Send Nukes To Cuba

puremagicpuremagic Posts: 1,907
edited July 2008 in A Moving Train
Russia May Send Nukes To Cuba

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/07/24/world/main4288940.shtml
Castro Commends New Leader's Silence On Report, Says Cuba Owes Washington No Explanations

HAVANA, July 23, 2008

Ailing Fidel Castro said Wednesday that Cuba's president was right to adopt a "dignified silence" over a Moscow newspaper report that Russia may send nuclear bombers to the island, and said Cuba doesn't owe any explanation to Washington about the story.

In a brief, cryptic essay posted on a government Web site Wednesday night, the 81-year-old former president neither confirmed nor denied the Monday report in Izvestia newspaper.

Moscow is angry about U.S. plans for missile-defense sites in eastern Europe and Izvestia cited a "highly placed" military aviation source as saying, "While they are deploying the anti-missile systems in Poland and the Czech Republic, our long-range strategic aircraft already will be landing in Cuba." Izvestia said this apparently refers to long-range nuclear-capable bombers.

Izvestia points out that there would have to be a political decision on landing bombers in Cuba, and quoted the unnamed source as saying there have been such discussions.

Former Russian Air Force Commander-in-Chief Anatoly Kornukov told Russia's Interfax news agency Thursday that the country's "strategic bombers are entitled to use airfields in any country, including Cuba, as long as its leaders do not object."

A well informed military-diplomatic official in Moscow told CBS News Thursday that Russian strategic bombers "could use an airfield in Cuba for refueling during flights for air patrol over the Atlantic." The source spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the topic.

Kornukov's statement was made in response to remarks earlier in the week by the nominee for U.S. Air Force chief of staff, Gen. Norton Schwartz, who said a move by Moscow to position nuclear weapons on the Caribbean Island would cross "a red line for the United States of America".

The London-based AFX news wire quoted Schwartz as saying: "If they did I think we should stand strong and indicate that is something that crosses a threshold, crosses a red line for the United States."

"The statement by Gen. Schwartz cannot be called other than inadequate and childish," Kornukov said, according to Interfax, which, like all Russian media, is closely monitored by the Kremlin. "Gen. Schwartz, being a professional, must know that missile carriers have the right to fly over neutral waters in any part of the world, which, by the way, is what U.S. bombers are doing as well."
SIN EATERS--We take the moral excrement we find in this equation and we bury it down deep inside of us so that the rest of our case can stay pure. That is the job. We are morally indefensible and absolutely necessary.
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • LikeAnOceanLikeAnOcean Posts: 7,718
    Will the world ever grow the fuck up?

    It's like little kids fighting in a sandbox, only deadlier.

    The U.S. should set an example and destroy all of its nuclear weapons and Russia should follow.. all it takes is for one to go off and everyone is fucked. It's a loose loose situation. It takes anyone over the age of 12 to figure that out.

    Isn't there enough nukes in the world to destroy it 10x over?.. Human's may be the dumbest species in the universe.
  • NMyTreeNMyTree Posts: 2,374
    And unfortunately, our government is the biggest brat in the sandbox.

    We certainly have company in the brat department, but no one challenges the biggest brat in the area of petulance, impudence and insolence.
  • rocketmanrocketman Posts: 68
    puremagic wrote:
    Russia May Send Nukes To Cuba

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/07/24/world/main4288940.shtml
    Castro Commends New Leader's Silence On Report, Says Cuba Owes Washington No Explanations

    HAVANA, July 23, 2008

    Ailing Fidel Castro said Wednesday that Cuba's president was right to adopt a "dignified silence" over a Moscow newspaper report that Russia may send nuclear bombers to the island, and said Cuba doesn't owe any explanation to Washington about the story.

    In a brief, cryptic essay posted on a government Web site Wednesday night, the 81-year-old former president neither confirmed nor denied the Monday report in Izvestia newspaper.

    Moscow is angry about U.S. plans for missile-defense sites in eastern Europe and Izvestia cited a "highly placed" military aviation source as saying, "While they are deploying the anti-missile systems in Poland and the Czech Republic, our long-range strategic aircraft already will be landing in Cuba." Izvestia said this apparently refers to long-range nuclear-capable bombers.

    Izvestia points out that there would have to be a political decision on landing bombers in Cuba, and quoted the unnamed source as saying there have been such discussions.

    Former Russian Air Force Commander-in-Chief Anatoly Kornukov told Russia's Interfax news agency Thursday that the country's "strategic bombers are entitled to use airfields in any country, including Cuba, as long as its leaders do not object."

    A well informed military-diplomatic official in Moscow told CBS News Thursday that Russian strategic bombers "could use an airfield in Cuba for refueling during flights for air patrol over the Atlantic." The source spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the topic.

    Kornukov's statement was made in response to remarks earlier in the week by the nominee for U.S. Air Force chief of staff, Gen. Norton Schwartz, who said a move by Moscow to position nuclear weapons on the Caribbean Island would cross "a red line for the United States of America".

    The London-based AFX news wire quoted Schwartz as saying: "If they did I think we should stand strong and indicate that is something that crosses a threshold, crosses a red line for the United States."

    "The statement by Gen. Schwartz cannot be called other than inadequate and childish," Kornukov said, according to Interfax, which, like all Russian media, is closely monitored by the Kremlin. "Gen. Schwartz, being a professional, must know that missile carriers have the right to fly over neutral waters in any part of the world, which, by the way, is what U.S. bombers are doing as well."
    This is utter rubbish.
  • 69charger69charger Posts: 1,045
    Isn't there enough nukes in the world to destroy it 10x over?

    No. Not even close.

    Make life for humans almost impossible? Yes.

    Destroy the Earth? No.

    The Chicxulub impact, that is commonly blamed for the extinction of the dinosaurs, released energy equivalent to 100 teratons of TNT. By contrast, the most powerful man-made explosive device ever detonated, the Tsar Bomba or Emperor Bomb, had a yield of only 50 megatons, making the Chicxulub impact 2 million times more powerful.

    All this and Chicxulub is not even the largest recorded impact structure. The largest is over 2 times bigger!

    ...and you thought you were having a bad day! ;)
Sign In or Register to comment.