Steven Tyler is amazing.

melodyman22
Posts: 326
Steven Tyler, is for sure one of the best vocalists ever. I mean even to this day he sounds great. Better then Plant does now. The range he has, is just amazing. I know many on here wont agree, but I feel Aerosmith is better then the mighty Led Zeppelin. Dont get me wrong Led kicks ass.
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
-
I've only heard one vocal performance from Steve Tyler ever that didn't make me think of an ordinary singer belting out Zeppelin songs while a gestapo officer holds his testicles in a vice. That song was Dream On.
Otherwise, no. Horrible singer."I remember one night at Muzdalifa with nothing but the sky overhead, I lay awake amid sleeping Muslim brothers and I learned that pilgrims from every land — every colour, and class, and rank; high officials and the beggar alike — all snored in the same language"0 -
i don't want to insult your opinion, but i completely disagree with everything there. i do not think steven tyler is a very good singer at all. also, led zeppelin is MILES better then aerosmith. aerosmith is overrated as it is.
plant > tyler .. now and always
zeppelin > aerosmith .. of course
ev > any singer
pj > any band
... hehehe2006: Hartford
2008: MSG 1, Hartford, Mansfield 2, Ed Solo NYC 1
2009: London (O2), Philly 1, 2, 3, & 4
2010: Hartford, Boston, MSG 1 & 2
2011: Ed Solo Hartford
2012: Philly (MIA Fest)
2013: Worcester 2, Brooklyn 1 & 2, Hartford0 -
They put on a HELL of a live show. I've never seen a band rock so hard.Believe me, when I was growin up, I thought the worst thing you could turn out to be was normal, So I say freaks in the most complementary way. Here's a song by a fellow freak - E.V0
-
maybe 30 years ago.0
-
I saw them live around 6 or 7 years ago. It was one of my favorite concerts. Aerosmith is a great classic rock band. However, I wouldn't go so far to say that Steven Tyler is the best singer out there. He's got a good voice but he's far from the best. He is a great front man though.
Last Child was the first song I ever heard by Aerosmith when I was a little kid, and damn they rocked that song live.Pitt 98, Pitt 00, Cleveland 03, Pitt 03, State College 03, Toledo 04, Toronto 05, Pitt 05, Cleveland 06, Pitt 06 & Chicago 07, Chicago 1&2 09, Philly 2,3,4 09, Cleveland 10, Columbus 10, Alpine Valley 1& 2 110 -
He has crazy range... and i haven't heard him recently but i still bet he has it..
Top five best unplugs ever0 -
LeatherMandi wrote:He has crazy range... and i haven't heard him recently but i still bet he has it..
Top five best unplugs ever0 -
I'm a huge fan of 70's Aerosmith and I wouldn't say that Tyler is amazing by any stretch of the imagination. But he is better than Axl Rose. I'll give him that!0
-
Absolutely fantastic when I saw them at Hyde Park Calling last year. Tyler's voice has not aged one bit.0
-
Hebejebe wrote:Yeah he's certainly looked after his voice. It's a pity that Ed hasn't. Ed has improved as a singer but he has let his voice go a bit, dude needs to stop smoking.deep, deep blue of the morning
gets to me every time0 -
Axl was a way better vocalist than Steven Tyler or Robert Plant. At the top of all their games Axl is the best.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Sz_t7xjvI7o0 -
keeponrockin wrote:They put on a HELL of a live show. I've never seen a band rock so hard.
I saw them once and thought it sucked. It wasnt that bad but they did 90 minutes did exactly the same show im sure they did in every other city on the tour and that was it. Not a bad show but it was just a straight show, no heart!Be excellent to each other0 -
Im not saying he's the best singer ever. Im saying he has an amazing voice. For those who think he's horrible. Go listen to your Arcade fire cd.0
-
melodyman22 wrote:Im not saying he's the best singer ever. Im saying he has an amazing voice. For those who think he's horrible. Go listen to your Arcade fire cd."I remember one night at Muzdalifa with nothing but the sky overhead, I lay awake amid sleeping Muslim brothers and I learned that pilgrims from every land — every colour, and class, and rank; high officials and the beggar alike — all snored in the same language"0
-
I actually have never cared for Led Zeppelin. Sure they're talented. But I find them extremely boring.
I like Aerosmith. I've seen them a few times live and I enjoyed it. Not as good as a Pearl Jam show, but what is? I actually like most of Aerosmith's albums 1970's-2000's. There were a few I didn't like here or there (ie Rock and a Hard Place) but overall they are consistent.I love my female wife...
we sit around and wonder exactly why our marriage should feel threatened by gay marriage0 -
Pearls&Stones wrote:I actually have never cared for Led Zeppelin. Sure they're talented. But I find them extremely boring.
Really? None of their albums sound the same, at least not to me. Maybe I just can't conceive that the band the pretty much created the template for hard rock could be considered boring. Oh well, to each their own..."I'll ride the wave where it takes me"0 -
wcsmith wrote:Really? None of their albums sound the same, at least not to me. Maybe I just can't conceive that the band the pretty much created the template for hard rock could be considered boring. Oh well, to each their own...
Andromeda
Blue Cheer
The Firebirds
High Tide
Jeff Beck
MC5
Sainte Anthony's Fyre
The Stooges
Vanilla Fudge
Yesterday's Children
And since Zeppelin plagiarised most of their tunes and lyrics on their first two albums, they were neither original nor particularly groundbreaking. There's nothing wrong with liking them of course, that's your choice but they certainly didn't lay the template for hard rock. They might have consolidated it, yes."I remember one night at Muzdalifa with nothing but the sky overhead, I lay awake amid sleeping Muslim brothers and I learned that pilgrims from every land — every colour, and class, and rank; high officials and the beggar alike — all snored in the same language"0 -
keeponrockin wrote:They put on a HELL of a live show. I've never seen a band rock so hard.
You obviously never saw LZ. There truly is no band that rocks harder than Zep did from '69-'73. NO BAND.
Aerosmith are Zeppelin imitators to the max.I pledge to you a government that will not only work well, but wisely, its ability to act tempered by prudence, and its willingness to do good, balanced by the knowledge that government is never more dangerous than when our desire to have it help us blinds us to its great power to harm us.
-Reagan0 -
wcsmith wrote:Really? None of their albums sound the same, at least not to me. Maybe I just can't conceive that the band the pretty much created the template for hard rock could be considered boring. Oh well, to each their own...
To be honest, none of the elite guitar gods (Hendrix, Page, Clapton) really appeal to me. I know how great they are/were, but their actual music does nothing for me.I love my female wife...
we sit around and wonder exactly why our marriage should feel threatened by gay marriage0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 275 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help