Steven Tyler is amazing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24200/24200c03ca557f54cef9fa63e77fd8be722f4c0c" alt="melodyman22"
Steven Tyler, is for sure one of the best vocalists ever. I mean even to this day he sounds great. Better then Plant does now. The range he has, is just amazing. I know many on here wont agree, but I feel Aerosmith is better then the mighty Led Zeppelin. Dont get me wrong Led kicks ass.
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
Otherwise, no. Horrible singer.
plant > tyler .. now and always
zeppelin > aerosmith .. of course
ev > any singer
pj > any band
... hehehe
2008: MSG 1, Hartford, Mansfield 2, Ed Solo NYC 1
2009: London (O2), Philly 1, 2, 3, & 4
2010: Hartford, Boston, MSG 1 & 2
2011: Ed Solo Hartford
2012: Philly (MIA Fest)
2013: Worcester 2, Brooklyn 1 & 2, Hartford
Last Child was the first song I ever heard by Aerosmith when I was a little kid, and damn they rocked that song live.
Top five best unplugs ever
ooooh tough one, never compared the two.
gets to me every time
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Sz_t7xjvI7o
I saw them once and thought it sucked. It wasnt that bad but they did 90 minutes did exactly the same show im sure they did in every other city on the tour and that was it. Not a bad show but it was just a straight show, no heart!
I like Aerosmith. I've seen them a few times live and I enjoyed it. Not as good as a Pearl Jam show, but what is? I actually like most of Aerosmith's albums 1970's-2000's. There were a few I didn't like here or there (ie Rock and a Hard Place) but overall they are consistent.
we sit around and wonder exactly why our marriage should feel threatened by gay marriage
Really? None of their albums sound the same, at least not to me. Maybe I just can't conceive that the band the pretty much created the template for hard rock could be considered boring. Oh well, to each their own...
Andromeda
Blue Cheer
The Firebirds
High Tide
Jeff Beck
MC5
Sainte Anthony's Fyre
The Stooges
Vanilla Fudge
Yesterday's Children
And since Zeppelin plagiarised most of their tunes and lyrics on their first two albums, they were neither original nor particularly groundbreaking. There's nothing wrong with liking them of course, that's your choice but they certainly didn't lay the template for hard rock. They might have consolidated it, yes.
You obviously never saw LZ. There truly is no band that rocks harder than Zep did from '69-'73. NO BAND.
Aerosmith are Zeppelin imitators to the max.
-Reagan
To be honest, none of the elite guitar gods (Hendrix, Page, Clapton) really appeal to me. I know how great they are/were, but their actual music does nothing for me.
we sit around and wonder exactly why our marriage should feel threatened by gay marriage
I feel the same way EXCEPT for Page. Have you ever listened to any the official live Zep stuff? If not check out HTWWW (How The West Was Won). It will splatter your brain onto the wall.
-Reagan
Dude I could care less about how popular they are or how they're rated by guitar aficionados. In my opinion Page is on of the the greatest guitarists ever. Great riff writer, great shredder at times, but also very soulful. Great musician. (Well he WAS... These days, idk...)
All I'm doing is making a recommendation. What are you doing speaking for him anyway? You guys on some kind of overreaction crusade or something?
-Reagan
But I was still very impressed at the Aerosmith show. I think LZ is the BETTER band, but I PREFER Aerosmith if that makes sense.
Chris Cornell
http://www.myspace.com/mrwalkerb