Dave Navarro

verb_to_trustverb_to_trust Posts: 178
edited February 2006 in Other Music
Does anybody know the actual reasons he left the Chili Peppers?
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • I think it was a conflict of styles...I seem to remember that from Behind the Music.

    PBM
    "We paced ourselves and we didn't rush through it and we tried to be as creative as our collective minds would let us be over some course of time instead of just trying to rush through a record"

    Wishlist Foundation: http://wishlistfoundation.org
  • brain of cbrain of c Posts: 5,213
    they never really clicked.
  • SteveoSteveo Posts: 352
    nothing matters when your bangin carmen electra
    Life has nothing to do with killing time.
    So why be satisfied?
  • reeferchiefreeferchief Posts: 3,569
    Dave's a good guitarist i've always loved OHM, and i'm just getting in to the beauty that is Janes Addiction, i think another Chilis album with Dave on guitar would have been intresting to hear, but i guess we never will.
    Can not be arsed with life no more.
  • JennytreeJennytree Posts: 5,340
    Because he's not as hip to the groove as John Frusciante! And its the best move the Chili's made IMO.
    This is me:
    http://www.facebook.com/jennytree

    SMELL YER MA!
  • Jennytree wrote:
    Because he's not as hip to the groove as John Frusciante! And its the best move the Chili's made IMO.

    Amen. And i LOVE Dave for his work with Jane's ... but there is only one guitarist for the Peppers, and that is John ... he just rocks the funk groove like no other with them. A shame his vices took him away from the band in the first place, but I guess interesting to see OHM because of it.
    Dave's a good guitarist i've always loved OHM, and i'm just getting in to the beauty that is Janes Addiction, i think another Chilis album with Dave on guitar would have been intresting to hear, but i guess we never will.

    I hope you're tackling Jane's from the early days up, and not from Strays or Kettle Whistle backwards ... XXX (Jane's self titled\no title on XXX records) really is the place to start, IMHO!

    Strays would be a good place to end up ... if you even want to get there ... i prefer to ignore that album, though my friend is somehow convinced it is their best work by far. !?! ... he has a soft spot for production value though.
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • reeferchiefreeferchief Posts: 3,569



    I hope you're tackling Jane's from the early days up, and not from Strays or Kettle Whistle backwards ... XXX (Jane's self titled\no title on XXX records) really is the place to start, IMHO!

    Strays would be a good place to end up ... if you even want to get there ... i prefer to ignore that album, though my friend is somehow convinced it is their best work by far. !?! ... he has a soft spot for production value though.
    Started with Ritual De Lo Habitual, i'm looking to get the S/T next, then Nothings Shocking, all though there is a copy of Kettle for £1.19 on amazon at the moment
    Can not be arsed with life no more.
  • Started with Ritual De Lo Habitual, i'm looking to get the S/T next, then Nothings Shocking, all though there is a copy of Kettle for £1.19 on amazon at the moment

    If KW is that cheap, i would pick it up.

    It IS a great disc, but it's just hard for an old fan to think of it much as an actual JA "album" ... almost everything on there (excepting So What! & My Cat's Name Is Maceo) is OLD material ... most of it having been officialy released before as bsides or on that silly Live & Rare disc ... yeah Slow Divers and Kettle Whistle were re-recorded, but that is about it ... I was dissapointed when i picked it up, only because i had like 90% of that stuff on other JA releases ... :(

    but if you're a new fan, it's probably worth it ... fuck it's worth it for Slow Divers, IMHO ... lol.
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • MCGMCG Posts: 780
    I liked what Dave brought to the Chili Peppers, they really went in an interesting direction with One Hot Minute. But if he had stuck around we never would have got Californication, perhaps the singles were a bit overplayed but it was a great record.
    Which came first,
    the bad idea or me befallen by it?
  • reeferchiefreeferchief Posts: 3,569

    but if you're a new fan, it's probably worth it ... fuck it's worth it for Slow Divers, IMHO ... lol.

    kind of always liked what i'd heard by them, i just never got round to buying anything, till recently i found an mp3 of them covering Sympathy for the Devil which blew me away, not long after bought Ritual, and i aint been able to stop listening, Three Days is fucking amazing cant believe i've been missing out on such brilliant music for so long:)
    Can not be arsed with life no more.
  • Dave Navarro is a TOOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    ††P®Gô'§ Ðøp€†† ¤¥Speaking As A Child Of The Nineties¤¥™
  • Artistic differences
    A restaurant with a smoking section is like a swimming pool with a pissing section
  • kind of always liked what i'd heard by them, i just never got round to buying anything, till recently i found an mp3 of them covering Sympathy for the Devil which blew me away, not long after bought Ritual, and i aint been able to stop listening, Three Days is fucking amazing cant believe i've been missing out on such brilliant music for so long:)


    check out their cover of The Dead's "Ripple" ... talk about a good cover.

    :D
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • Wasn't sure where to post this. There is a documentary about Dave Navarro called 'Mourning Son' that has just been released. Here's the trailer:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1E6nnGZau5U
Sign In or Register to comment.