Neil Young vs Eddie Van Halen
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0bfb/f0bfb6fc82a04881fde9c56e1822217414bc5a6b" alt="StuffnJunk"
Who do you prefer and why?
Who is "better"?
I think your answer says a lot about you as a person.
Who is "better"?
I think your answer says a lot about you as a person.
"I'll tell you what: If all I had was Pearl Jam, and I didn't have another band in the world, I would not be worried. Because in there is the essence of making great music. You don't have to use it all at once, but it's there." - Neil Young
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
8/25/92, 10/4/96, 10/5/96, 9/1/98, 9/4/98, 8/4/00, 8/6/00, 4/15/03, 4/16/03, 10/6/04, 6/16/08
Neil Young - icon
Enough said.
...Neil Young.
end thread.
Sha la la la i'm in love with a jersey girl
I love you forever and forever
Adel 03 Melb 1 03 LA 2 06 Santa Barbara 06 Gorge 1 06 Gorge 2 06 Adel 1 06 Adel 2 06 Camden 1 08 Camden 2 08 Washington DC 08 Hartford 08
Van Halen is obviously the better guitar player, but if I had to choose one of theirs music to take with me on a desert island , it'd easily be Neil Young's
Untill their will grows tired
--Jack Lengyel
yeah, Neil Young - better music by far. I can see how it speaks volumes about the person. I laugh at the idea of prefering Van Halen, a mouth-breathing, balding-mullet cheeseball comes to mind. I do like VH, but its not even close to NY's music.
Yes, Eddie Van Halen is a great player, but I too would rather listen to Neil's playing. Every note bleeds emotion - exactly right.
No, this is not the case at all. Technicial proficiency is not all that is required to play the guitar; if so, Steve Vai or someone of his ilk would be the greatest guitar player in music history. But that's not all that is required, particularly in rock and roll. This type of music, and this instrument requires that you speak and scream through your instrument, that you make the song even greater than it is and compliment your solo so that it is complimented by the song. This is the largest cliche in the world, but it's true; it's not how many notes you play, but the notes you DO play, and the notes you do not. Eddie Van Halen does quick, lightning-fast runs. Good for him. Neil Young, on the other hand;
1. Has strayed away from a typical rock and roll lead guitarist sound.
2. Has established a signature sound, so when you hear a Neil Young solo, you know who it's coming from.
3. Has developed his talents so the solos heighten the emotions of his incredible songs, never overwhelming them but making them even stronger.
Go ahead and take Eddie Van Halen; you can have him. And yes, I would feel this way about Neil Young's guitar playing abilities even if I had never heard about Eddie Vedder, considering I've felt this strongly about Neil since before I've been a fan of Pearl Jam. So that point of your argument is moot.
Carry on...
Edit: Ooops. This WAS in the musicians forum but it's now been moved to the other music forum. Uhm.....
ok
Wrong! The question was "who is better?". Neil's songwriting skills are far superior than Van Halen's. I'll go even further and say thet Van Halen is the most overrated band in the history of Rock and Roll. Guitarists like Van Halen that are technically great doesn't mean they are great songwriters. I have this argument all the time in regards to Neil Peart. Everyone says he's the best ever. I totally disagree. He's a great technical drummer, but there are many more drummers out there that are technically sound...BUT ADD FEEL! Same goes with EV Halen.
Huh?
It's like saying what's better...origami or kung fu ? the most pointless question I ever saw. lol
Although Diamond Dave era Van Halen is a guilty pleasure of mine, Neil has to win this one by a loooooong shot.