Home› Other Music

Ok, what's up with this I hear Jimmy Page dated a 14 year old girl!?

nepalnepal Posts: 143
edited September 2008 in Other Music
http://www.stryder.de/rest/Groupie_Central_Lori_%20Maddox.html

Jimmy was 28 at the time, that's just wrong!
...the dreams ain't broken down here now,
they're walking with a limp
Post edited by Unknown User on
«13

Comments

  • MonsterOfTheMidwayMonsterOfTheMidway Posts: 416
    nepal wrote:
    http://www.stryder.de/rest/Groupie_Central_Lori_%20Maddox.html

    Jimmy was 28 at the time, that's just wrong!



    If by wrong you mean awesome, then yes, it's very, very wrong.
    16

    Lil Wayne is better than Pearl Jam.

    Bitches ain't nothin' but hoes 'n tricks
  • geniegenie Posts: 2,222
    nepal wrote:
    http://www.stryder.de/rest/Groupie_Central_Lori_%20Maddox.html

    Jimmy was 28 at the time, that's just wrong!

    :eek: tut tut.

    what i want to know is how it feels like to be known as a groupie and have a page on internet that discusses the age she lost her virginity and to whom, ew is all i can say.....
  • geniegenie Posts: 2,222
    MonsterOfTheMidway wrote:
    If by wrong you mean awesome, then yes, it's very, very wrong.

    try saying the same sentence in a prison........... ;)
  • Jeremy1012Jeremy1012 Posts: 7,170
    MonsterOfTheMidway wrote:
    If by wrong you mean awesome, then yes, it's very, very wrong.
    ugh
    "I remember one night at Muzdalifa with nothing but the sky overhead, I lay awake amid sleeping Muslim brothers and I learned that pilgrims from every land — every colour, and class, and rank; high officials and the beggar alike — all snored in the same language"
  • ajedigeckoajedigecko \m/deplorable af \m/ Posts: 2,431
    MonsterOfTheMidway wrote:
    If by wrong you mean awesome, then yes, it's very, very wrong.
    O
    O

    BLAST........BLAST

    disgusting bastard.
    live and let live...unless it violates the pearligious doctrine.
  • even flow?even flow? Posts: 8,066
    Must have got some inside info from Killer. ;)
    You've changed your place in this world!
  • geniegenie Posts: 2,222
    Jeremy1012 wrote:
    ugh

    that was my initial reaction too
  • Jeremy1012Jeremy1012 Posts: 7,170
    genie wrote:
    that was my initial reaction too
    But hey, who are we to tell rock stars what to do? Normal laws and social conventions shouldn't apply :rolleyes:
    "I remember one night at Muzdalifa with nothing but the sky overhead, I lay awake amid sleeping Muslim brothers and I learned that pilgrims from every land — every colour, and class, and rank; high officials and the beggar alike — all snored in the same language"
  • LizardLizard So Cal Posts: 12,091
    This is all kinds of wrong and no way to make it right!
    So I'll just lie down and wait for the dream
    Where I'm not ugly and you're lookin' at me
  • pjoasisrulepjoasisrule Posts: 3,412
    Get them while they are ripe. Jerry Lee Lewis married his young cousin I think.
    Alpine Valley 2000
    Summerfest 2006

    "Why would they come to our concert just to boo us?" -Lisa Simpson
  • xSmackSoundxxSmackSoundx Posts: 479
    MonsterOfTheMidway wrote:
    If by wrong you mean awesome, then yes, it's very, very wrong.

    that was MY initial reaction

    haha
  • ajedigeckoajedigecko \m/deplorable af \m/ Posts: 2,431
    pjoasisrule wrote:
    Get them while they are ripe. Jerry Lee Lewis married his young cousin I think.
    O
    O

    BLAST.....BLAST.


    disgusting bastard.
    live and let live...unless it violates the pearligious doctrine.
  • Jeremy1012Jeremy1012 Posts: 7,170
    pjoasisrule wrote:
    Get them while they are ripe. Jerry Lee Lewis married his young cousin I think.
    To be fair, Jerry Lee Lewis married his cousin in the 50s, and in the south. And it was STILL a scandal.

    Page is British and it was the 70s. That shit doesn't fly over here :D
    "I remember one night at Muzdalifa with nothing but the sky overhead, I lay awake amid sleeping Muslim brothers and I learned that pilgrims from every land — every colour, and class, and rank; high officials and the beggar alike — all snored in the same language"
  • stu geestu gee Posts: 1,174
    MonsterOfTheMidway wrote:
    If by wrong you mean awesome, then yes, it's very, very wrong.

    Strange person.

    Dont let the Led Zep fans see that you are accusing him of being a paedo by the way, i remember a thread on here about Pete Townsend and some The Who fans getting very annoyed about people talking ill of him.
    People say im paranoid. Well, they dont say it, but i know that's what they are thinking.
  • Joe2TheRevengeJoe2TheRevenge Posts: 904
    He plays guitar really well, so of course he must be a perfect human being who makes perfect choices all the time. right? right.

    Rockstars are always the most normal and moral of people to look up to.
    You can't spell "dumb" without DMB
  • eyedclaareyedclaar Posts: 6,980
    Back when Jimmy Page was dating this 14 year old, the average human life was only 33 years, so it wasn't quite as shocking compared to today's standard. Also, she was a chinese gymnast and after the IOC looked into it she turned out to be at least 16.
    Idaho's Premier Outdoor Writer

    Please Support My Writing Habit By Purchasing A Book:

    https://www.createspace.com/3437020

    http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000663025696

    http://earthtremors.blogspot.com/
  • Evacuation RulesEvacuation Rules Posts: 2,162
    stu gee wrote:
    Strange person.

    Dont let the Led Zep fans see that you are accusing him of being a paedo by the way, i remember a thread on here about Pete Townsend and some The Who fans getting very annoyed about people talking ill of him.

    That's because the accusations against Pete were false.
  • FinsburyParkCarrotsFinsburyParkCarrots Seattle, WA Posts: 12,223
    She was practically an old hag by Bill Wyman's standards.
  • stu geestu gee Posts: 1,174
    JWBusher wrote:
    That's because the accusations against Pete were false.

    I think i posted something about him being wrong for looking at child pornography, which it was, whatever excuse it was he gave for doing so, and was met with heated responses from fans who obviously wouldnt hear a bad word against him which i found quite amusing.
    People say im paranoid. Well, they dont say it, but i know that's what they are thinking.
  • Evacuation RulesEvacuation Rules Posts: 2,162
    stu gee wrote:
    I think i posted something about him being wrong for looking at child pornography.

    Don't be an idiot. He found a kiddie porn website in his research and reported it to the proper authorities. Then the British press railroaded him and made it look like he was looking at kiddie porn, which he wasn't. So get a clue.
  • stu geestu gee Posts: 1,174
    JWBusher wrote:
    Don't be an idiot. He found a kiddie porn website in his research and reported it to the proper authorities. Then the British press railroaded him and made it look like he was looking at kiddie porn, which he wasn't. So get a clue.

    Lol, you sound like one of ones who got so upset. "Research". Ok Pete!! Since when was it your job to research and report child pornography? He also said he was looking at it to find out if he had been abused as a child which is an odd way of going about it to say the least.

    Im not going to post anymore about it because this isnt what the thread is about but in my opinion, anyone who looks up child porn is in the wrong, fact. Argue with that if you want.
    People say im paranoid. Well, they dont say it, but i know that's what they are thinking.
  • Jeremy1012Jeremy1012 Posts: 7,170
    stu gee wrote:
    Lol, you sound like one of ones who got so upset. "Research". Ok Pete!! Since when was it your job to research and report child pornography?

    Im not going to post anymore about it because this isnt what the thread is about but in my opinion, anyone who looks up child porn is in the wrong, fact. Argue with that if you want.
    Agreed. The only people that have any business accessing those sites are the police and social services.

    Whether or not Pete had good intentions, and I think he probably did, he was woefully naive.
    "I remember one night at Muzdalifa with nothing but the sky overhead, I lay awake amid sleeping Muslim brothers and I learned that pilgrims from every land — every colour, and class, and rank; high officials and the beggar alike — all snored in the same language"
  • Evacuation RulesEvacuation Rules Posts: 2,162
    stu gee wrote:
    He also said he was looking at it to find out if he had been abused as a child which is an odd way of going about it to say the least.

    Huh? He never admitted to looking at kiddie porn. He said that he found a kiddie porn website disguised as something else, and he reported it to social services. That's it. So anybody who stumbles upon a kiddie porn site is committing a crime? Get real. He didn't hide the fact that he found it. He reported it to the authorities. Doesn't sound like a crime to me, unless, of course, you don't like Pete or you're a British tabloid journalist.

    Besides, if Eddie Vedder did it, you'd be falling over yourself to explain it away.
  • facepollutionfacepollution Posts: 6,834
    JWBusher wrote:
    Huh? He never admitted to looking at kiddie porn. He said that he found a kiddie porn website disguised as something else, and he reported it to social services. That's it. So anybody who stumbles upon a kiddie porn site is committing a crime? Get real. He didn't hide the fact that he found it. He reported it to the authorities. Doesn't sound like a crime to me, unless, of course, you don't like Pete or you're a British tabloid journalist.

    Besides, if Eddie Vedder did it, you'd be falling over yourself to explain it away.

    How can you "stumble" upon a site like that? I've been using the internet for the best part of a decade and never "stumbled" upon anything like that - thankfully.

    I'm not saying he's guilty or anything, but it does seem like an odd excuse or reason.
  • stu geestu gee Posts: 1,174
    JWBusher wrote:
    Huh? He never admitted to looking at kiddie porn. He said that he found a kiddie porn website disguised as something else, and he reported it to social services. That's it. So anybody who stumbles upon a kiddie porn site is committing a crime? Get real. He didn't hide the fact that he found it. He reported it to the authorities. Doesn't sound like a crime to me, unless, of course, you don't like Pete or you're a British tabloid journalist.

    Besides, if Eddie Vedder did it, you'd be falling over yourself to explain it away.

    I said i wouldnt post but its fairly quiet so...

    I dont like or dislike him, i dont know him, and im not a journalist, yet. All im saying is he was wrong to look at it, for whatever reason he gave. He used a credit card to access a site that had child porn on it. Doing so was ILLEGAL, and im saying he was in the wrong. As i said, argue with THAT if you please.

    And if Eddie Vedder was caught looking at child pornography i would criticise him the same, believe me. It is a disgusting subject and people who pay money towards it are contributing to creating a market for it and should be punished.
    People say im paranoid. Well, they dont say it, but i know that's what they are thinking.
  • SoonForgotten2SoonForgotten2 Posts: 2,245
    nepal wrote:
    http://www.stryder.de/rest/Groupie_Central_Lori_%20Maddox.html

    Jimmy was 28 at the time, that's just wrong!

    Damn, that is wrong. Why go for someone so young when you could arguably have anyone else you wanted? Sick.
    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jmgphotos/sets/72157600802942672/">My Pearl Jam Photos</a>

    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jmgphotos/4731512142/&quot; title="PJ Banner2 by Mister J Photography, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1135/4731512142_258f2d6ab4_b.jpg&quot; width="630" height="112" alt="PJ Banner2" /></a>
  • JaneNYJaneNY Posts: 4,438
    SoonForgotten2 wrote:
    Damn, that is wrong. Why go for someone so young when you could arguably have anyone else you wanted? Sick.

    Yes it was wrong. But they were hardcore partiers and really, quintessential rockstars of a pretty much past era, where they could and did get away with just about anything.
    R.i.p. Rigoberto Alpizar.
    R.i.p. My Dad - May 28, 2007
    R.i.p. Black Tail (cat) - Sept. 20, 2008
  • ajedigeckoajedigecko \m/deplorable af \m/ Posts: 2,431
    facepollution wrote:
    How can you "stumble" upon a site like that? I've been using the internet for the best part of a decade and never "stumbled" upon anything like that - thankfully.

    I'm not saying he's guilty or anything, but it does seem like an odd excuse or reason.
    well said.....i do not even get adult sites popping up on my computer.

    "stumble".....sure.
    live and let live...unless it violates the pearligious doctrine.
  • catch22catch22 Posts: 1,081
    JWBusher wrote:
    Huh? He never admitted to looking at kiddie porn. He said that he found a kiddie porn website disguised as something else, and he reported it to social services. That's it. So anybody who stumbles upon a kiddie porn site is committing a crime? Get real. He didn't hide the fact that he found it. He reported it to the authorities. Doesn't sound like a crime to me, unless, of course, you don't like Pete or you're a British tabloid journalist.

    Besides, if Eddie Vedder did it, you'd be falling over yourself to explain it away.

    you're right. OJ didn't do it either.

    amazing what a good lawyer can do for a wealthy client.

    in any case, i made a joke about pete and who fans were like pit bulls all over me.

    if ed was busted for kiddie porn, he'd get the same treatment from me.

    as to jimmy page, i'm not in the least surprised. though i wonder what he knew. i've got to say, the way girls look anymore, if i was in a touring band doing the kind of drugs they did, im not sure how my awareness and judgment would be in that situation.
    and like that... he's gone.
  • Strangest TribeStrangest Tribe Posts: 2,502
    facepollution wrote:
    How can you "stumble" upon a site like that? I've been using the internet for the best part of a decade and never "stumbled" upon anything like that - thankfully.

    I'm not saying he's guilty or anything, but it does seem like an odd excuse or reason.

    I have.

    sometimes weird shit "pops" up when you do searches especially from European websites.
    This was more the case 10 years ago before popup blockers and good security. I can totally relate...before I switched to a Mac...my PC got infected with some kind of European Porno bug that I couldn't get rid of. Pictures of naked Russian girls kept popping up, wanting to get married and come to America. Some of them couldn't have been more than 14.

    ...just sayin
    the Minions
Sign In or Register to comment.