most ethical and conscious band?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94905/94905fbd92610c75c073ce3a23d98f71e56439e1" alt="musicismylife78"
I think the obvious choice, and only choice for number one is fugazi. When you have a lead singer who runs one of the most important indie labels in the world, and he refuses to even take a salary from his work there, you have the makings of a selfless and unique individual.
but my pick for number two would be radiohead. Seems like they seriously considered never touring again because of the impact on the environment, and I know many bands have taped performances for talk shows, but never heard of a band taping a performance for a talk show because they didnt want to negatively impact the environment. Hell even their live show lights are environmentally conscious.
but my pick for number two would be radiohead. Seems like they seriously considered never touring again because of the impact on the environment, and I know many bands have taped performances for talk shows, but never heard of a band taping a performance for a talk show because they didnt want to negatively impact the environment. Hell even their live show lights are environmentally conscious.
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
FUCK BONO.
Ahhhhhhh, i feel better now.
"Call me Ishmael. Some years ago- never mind how long precisely- having little or no money in my purse, and nothing particular to interest me on shore, I thought I would sail about a little and see the watery part of the world." Herman Melville : Moby Dick
gets to me every time
piss you off because they don't tour enough? haha, I know what you're saying... they were like everywhere you looked on the internet for a long while there.
I also think that Bad Religion should be up for consideration, too.
Pearl Jam anyone?
Can someone go a bit deeper into this? Does the band support certain causes or anything? Or is it strictly an anti-corporate punk thing? Do they do charitable shows?
I'm asking because I don't know. If they do, then that is pretty great. But in my opinion, if it is just an anti-corporate punk attitude thing, that seems pretty useless in terms of bringing about positive change to the world.
People call Bono all sorts of things, but the guy is doing a lot of good with his celebrity. Really, being "punk" means absolutely nothing to people in Africa or elsewhere dying of starvation.
They also played benefits and free shows and the like. Regardless of that though, the reason I think it is great is that they have always been about music for the people rather than being anti-corporate for the sake of it. Back as far as 1981 with Minor Threat, they would only play all-age venues because they remembered how much it sucked when they were kids being turned away from Ramones and Clash shows because they were under 21. They put $10 prices on the artwork for all Dischord Records releases so that stores can't change the price. They never charged more than $5 for a show if they could help it and often played for free and did benefits. They wouldn't do interviews for magazines that had alcohol and tobacco adverts because they felt that using their music to be complicit in corrupting young people was wrong. MacKaye still runs Dischord Records, which he started with Minor Threat's drummer Jeff Nelson and is involved in the day to day business because he wants to keep it DIY.
Basically Fugazi (and all of his bands) operate in a way that means that it is ALL about the music. No bullshit. They aren't trying to change the world like Bono, they don't pretend to be. The ethic seems to be that if they can change the life of a couple of teenagers with nowhere to go because they can't get into rock clubs and play gigs to them to stop them from boredom and wasting their lives, it'll all be worth it.
Plus, the music fucking ROCKS