Fender Twin, Vox AC30CC or Fender 57 Twin Amp reissue?
moejiles
Posts: 70
Money aside, which one would you guys get for a standard les paul and standard strat to play blues/rock/Pearl Jam/Tragically hip?
Moe
Moe
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
Bottom line is, just try out all 3 and go with what you think sounds best.
Good luck!
https://www.facebook.com/aghostwritersapology/
My favorite of that group is by far the 57 Twin.
Imitating great musical styles has a lot of precedent. Mozart played Pearl Jam style is not traditional, interesting; but not traditional. Pearl Jam with full strings and cello may be interesting but is not accurate. The closer we hold the accurate the more realistic the traditional, in the far future, may be.
*** Covered Immortality, Not For You and others with our Lead playing a friendly '75 Stat on a Fender Twin. It was quite successful but maybe not actually accurate.
1 <> 2 <> 3 4 <> 5 <> 6 <> 7 8
Okay that went over my head. All I'm saying is, just go play all three and go with the one that fits you best. That's all. I'm not trying to step on any toes, or slam anyone.
https://www.facebook.com/aghostwritersapology/
Thanks for the replies
Moe
but if your gonna spend the money , take a look at Dr. Z !!!!
http://www.drzamps.com/index.html
Then again, I think anyone would be able to get the tones you seek from a Fender Hot Rod Deluxe/DeVille. Upgrade to a Celestion V30 in the speaker department, and you're golden.
with a bluesbreaker sitting beside it.
If you arn't looking to buy the more expensive Blue speaker version and dont want to replace the speakers yourself i wouldnt go for the AC30 CC
The '65 RI is great on it's own for clean stuff and light OD. They never seem to handle a great amount of overdrive before they get very boomy. Also, the '65 RI is 85 watts and you are going to make your ears bleed before you get it to break up naturally.
The Vox amp has some decent cleans and a good amount of natural overdrive but, not for Pearl Jam.
The '57 Twin has become very popular in the last few years. Clapton and David Gilmour record and play live with them. Obviously Eddie Vedder plays them now so, its great for PJ. It can naturally distort and takes pedals well. At 45 watts you can play large and small clubs and not kill everyone's hearing in the process.
There have been several here that have recommended the new '57 Deluxe. You probably know that Neil Young plays one of the non-reissue '57 but, he almost has to use a 4x12 cab with it to get heard as it's only 15-18 watts.
Well, out of the 3 amps, the Fender '65 Twin Reverb has the best clean tone (that is if you're looking
to get your crunch and lead tone with a few pedals - but be prepared for a really loud amp 85-watts).
However, if you're looking for a really versatile amp with very nice cleans, but good crunch and lead
tones (and you're willing to spend the $2399 on that '57 twin), take a look at the Marshall JVM410C.
It's a great sounding/versatile amp that does it all: clean/crunch/lead (with 4 channels), so you really
won't need much pedal-wise (maybe a wah, modulation, and some delay effects, but that's about it).
Cheers . . .
- Ian
<b><font color="red">CONTACT ME HERE</font>: www.myspace.com/ianvomsaal</b>
♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫
I'll give that Marshall a go too - thanks for all the advice guys.
Moe
I'd go for a Marshall more. The Fenders will need peadls. The Vox is cool, and not over-priced, but beware, those suckers are HEAVY !! I checked one out today, they are pretty cheap even here in OZ, and have a great pedigree.
The best thing for me was to try dozens of amps before landing on this one.
Cheers
Joe
glad you like the 57. tweeds are great.
Last time I saw the Hip in Atlanta one guy had a mesa on stage. They ran the whole rig through a Digidesign Live recording rig. They sounded excellent.
and you will as well.
I think Ted Weber designed those speakers for Fender spefically for the 57 Twin.
i wonder why they did that instead of just tossing jensen alnicos into it.
not really sure honestly but I think they got it right. Perhaps street cred. Perhaps testers just thought they sounded best and to fill the order Eminence was used because Webers shop is still small. I know that particular amp is particularly special to some of thier endorsers and clientele due to it's history so that might have had something to do with it. Chances are it's got some special specs that the Jensens didn't quite match or they aged the cones a bit like they do with the pre rola stuff to take out the brightness (Scumback etc)
He has expanded and started some kind of partnership with Fender now.
His shop has kind of exploded the last few years.