Legality of Tribute Bands/Covers.
Pacomc79
Posts: 9,404
Ok, so many of us have seen Pearl Jam numerous times and probably get even more excited about which covers they choose than thier originals because we know the originals back and forth....
We've also probably seen a Pearl Jam cover band or 3 and perhaps are in one and perhaps we've played some of thier songs live before and may have been paid for it.
I'm pretty sure the letter of the law says this is illegal "public performance" yet I can't think of anyone that's been forced to stop playing someone elses music live even if they are being paid for it.
A lot of people hire cover bands for events after all and aren't at all hiding themselves.
Has anyone ever run into legal issues with covers or playing in cover bands?
After what happened with Napster, is there reason to be concerned Cover Bands could be next on the hitlist?
We've also probably seen a Pearl Jam cover band or 3 and perhaps are in one and perhaps we've played some of thier songs live before and may have been paid for it.
I'm pretty sure the letter of the law says this is illegal "public performance" yet I can't think of anyone that's been forced to stop playing someone elses music live even if they are being paid for it.
A lot of people hire cover bands for events after all and aren't at all hiding themselves.
Has anyone ever run into legal issues with covers or playing in cover bands?
After what happened with Napster, is there reason to be concerned Cover Bands could be next on the hitlist?
My Girlfriend said to me..."How many guitars do you need?" and I replied...."How many pairs of shoes do you need?" She got really quiet.
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
https://www.facebook.com/aghostwritersapology/
Covers are performed, recorded, then sold.
Wouldnt that be "against the law?"
Toledo, Ohio (September 22, 1996), East Troy, Wisconsin (June 26, 1998), Noblesville, Indiana (August 17, 1998), Noblesville, Indiana (August 18, 2000), Cincinnati, Ohio (August 20, 2000), Columbus, Ohio (August 21, 2000), Nashville, Tennessee (April 18, 2003), Champaign, Illinois (April 23, 2003), Noblesville, Indiana (June 22, 2003), Chicago, Illinois (May 16, 2006), Chicago, Illinois (August 05, 2007), West Palm Beach, Florida (June 11, 2008), Tampa, Florida (June 12, 2008), Columbus, OH (May 06, 2010), Noblesville, Indiana (May 07, 2010), Wrigley Field (July 19, 2013), US Bank Arena (October 01, 2014), Lexington (April 26, 2016), Chicago Night 2 (August 20, 2018), Boston Night 1 (September 02, 2018), Nashville (September 16, 2022), St. Louis (September 18, 2022)
Live music venues buy a license from each of the 3 societies each year. This allows songs to be played live at their clubs. The societies come up with an equation as to how they distribute the license fees they collect to the artists that are members. These societies also collect license fees from radio stations as well.
So, when a PJ cover band plays at a club, PJ gets a bit of dough from either bmi, ascap or Sesac (not sure of which society they are members).
The same goes for when they play songs at a sporting event (when a player walks to the plate, when a player is sent off to the penalty box, etc.), the venue pays....same for when a marching band plays a song at a college football game!
Next time you go to see a band at a club, look for the stickers on the door that serves as proof that the venue is paying their license fees.
Makes sense though. Thanks.
Just like radio stations with spins.
These are perfectly legal, and even the band performing gets paid for these.
The only thing they CANNOT be called is the actual band name.
There's is a tribute for Zeppelin and the band's name is Led Zep.
It sells close to 5,000 copies a week. It is perfectly legal. Both Led Zeppelin and the band "Led Zep" get paid. One for the rights, the other for the performance.
"Led Zep" was apparantly never trademarked by the actual band, so it's legit for this "tribute"
yeah the old way was the venue/station needs a PRS license (perfomance rights society) and all cover songs should be declared on a list and then submitted for a share of the spoils
leeds 26/08/06....electric
paris 11/09/06.....crushed...but estatic
wembley 18/06/07.....oh yes
'listen...you can hear the sustain...you just hold that note and you can go get a bite whilst its still going'
the legend , nigel tufnell
"Why do we need permission to perform music?
Music is like all personal property; when you want to use it, you need permission. That’s why in order to play copyrighted music to the public, you must, by law, obtain permission for each of the thousands and thousands of songs you play each year. Your ASCAP license fully protects you by granting lawful permission to play all ASCAP music. While certain performances are exempt under law – such as performances by teachers or students in the course of face-to-face teaching in a classroom of a nonprofit educational institution – a license is required for most performances.
What happens if I use ASCAP music without permission?
If you choose to use another’s property without permission, a court can assess damages at minimum of $500 for each song “infringed,” and can require you to pay attorney’s fees and court costs. As an ASCAP licensee, you are entitled to use any of the music we represent.
What is ASCAP?
ASCAP is the largest performing rights organization in the world, comprised of songwriters and publishers. We distribute over 80% of your license fee to our members to help them keep the music coming. ASCAP gives you the “license to thrill” with over 4 million musical works from over 200,000 members and many more writers and publishers from all over the world."
Cheers . . .
- Ian
<b><font color="red">CONTACT ME HERE</font>: www.myspace.com/ianvomsaal</b>
♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫
Or is it this simple....Get a license or only post your own songs?
And don't get me started on the tab fiasco... :(
If you share cover tunes publically without obtaining permission, you are, by practical purposes "breaking the law" (nod to Judas Priest).
If you'd like to legally make a small run CD (under 2,500 copies) to give out to friends and family (which contains a few covers) you NEED
to obtain a mechanical license.
The click: Harry Fox Agency can help you out for minimal cost. It's easy - just register, find the songs you want to cover, pay the
amount, and post the license # on the CD. The current statutory mechanical royalty rate is $.091 (9.1 cents) per song per unit for
recordings of compositions up to five (5:00) minutes in length.
For example, if one were to make a recording of a song that is less than five minutes in length (e.g. 4:07) and then manufacture and
distribute 500 units of the recording, the total amount of royalties due would be $45.50. ($0.091 X 500 (units) = $45.50).
For songs over five minutes in length, the rate is based upon $.0175 (1.75 cents) per minute or fraction thereof:
5:01 to 6:00 = $0.105 (6 X $.0175); 6:01 to 7:00 = $0.1225 (7 X $.0175); 7:01 to 8:00 = $0.14 (8 X $.0175). In addition to royalty
fees, there is a modest per-song processing fee of $13 to $15 charged by HFA, depending upon how many songs are licensed at once.
Cheers . . .
- Ian
<b><font color="red">CONTACT ME HERE</font>: www.myspace.com/ianvomsaal</b>
♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫
I've been dealing with this stiff for almost 8-years now (since I signed as a session artist), so it's just my work experience.
I'm happy to answer these types of questions (copyright and legality) since I've had to deal with it a bunch regarding my own tunes and other people's.
Cheers . . .
- Ian
<b><font color="red">CONTACT ME HERE</font>: www.myspace.com/ianvomsaal</b>
♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫ ♫