Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Shouldn't there be calls for him to drop out after this nonsensical response? Isn't that how this works?
I would be interested to hear from our maga friends about what they thing about his answer....not what you think about the subject, but with how Trump answered. The cognitive decline is real and it is sad.
Shouldn't there be calls for him to drop out after this nonsensical response? Isn't that how this works?
I would be interested to hear from our maga friends about what they thing about his answer....not what you think about the subject, but with how Trump answered. The cognitive decline is real and it is sad.
So we have this nonsense statement from Trump, and then JD tells people that grandma and grandpa need to help out a little more. Nice plan, douchebags. I'd rather you had no platform than this garbage.
So we have this nonsense statement from Trump, and then JD tells people that grandma and grandpa need to help out a little more. Nice plan, douchebags. I'd rather you had no platform than this garbage.
Juggs said it best, “this is not a serious party, candidates or campaign.” Maybe not just like that but they did use the word “serious.”
“I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about, because child care is child care, you have to have it in this country. You have to have it,” Trump said. “But when you talk about those numbers compared to the type of numbers I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to, but they’ll get used to it very quickly.”
“I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about, because child care is child care, you have to have it in this country. You have to have it,” Trump said. “But when you talk about those numbers compared to the type of numbers I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to, but they’ll get used to it very quickly.”
Would be front page headlines if Biden muttered this nonsense.
To Trump's credit--he is going to a lot of events and taking questions....but the answers always look like this rambling incoherent nonsense. The man cannot be president again.
Shouldn't there be calls for him to drop out after this nonsensical response? Isn't that how this works?
I would be interested to hear from our maga friends about what they thing about his answer....not what you think about the subject, but with how Trump answered. The cognitive decline is real and it is sad.
Shouldn't there be calls for him to drop out after this nonsensical response? Isn't that how this works?
I would be interested to hear from our maga friends about what they thing about his answer....not what you think about the subject, but with how Trump answered. The cognitive decline is real and it is sad.
I'm loath to defend Trump, but I don't think this answer is nonsensical, exactly. It's digressive, it's unspecific, and it fundamentally misunderstands economics, but there is a logic to it. He is saying that his tariffs (what he calls "taxes on foreign nations") will generate so much money that we'll be able to spend it on new programs, including expanded access to child care. There are problems with this answer, including that this is not how tariffs work-- they are paid by U.S. consumers, not foreign nations-- and the answer completely dodges the part of the question asking what specific things Trump would support.
Now, with respect to the frequent times when Trump really does utter word salads that don't track, as someone said, "good luck with that" getting people to focus on it. Trump "not making sense" is the norm, and thus the bar is lowered. When Biden struggled at the debate, it stood out because Biden generally makes sense. He's not the smoothest public speaker and never has been, and he may mix up a name or word at times, but he doesn't usually say things like "we finally beat Medicare" after losing his train of thought in the middle of a rambling answer. It alarmed people because it deviated so much from the norm. Trump is out there every day rambling like a mental patient, so people are inured to it when he goes off on a tangent about sharks or Hannibal Lecter or ancient aliens or whatever.
Shouldn't there be calls for him to drop out after this nonsensical response? Isn't that how this works?
I would be interested to hear from our maga friends about what they thing about his answer....not what you think about the subject, but with how Trump answered. The cognitive decline is real and it is sad.
I'm loath to defend Trump, but I don't think this answer is nonsensical, exactly. It's digressive, it's unspecific, and it fundamentally misunderstands economics, but there is a logic to it. He is saying that his tariffs (what he calls "taxes on foreign nations") will generate so much money that we'll be able to spend it on new programs, including expanded access to child care. There are problems with this answer, including that this is not how tariffs work-- they are paid by U.S. consumers, not foreign nations-- and the answer completely dodges the part of the question asking what specific things Trump would support.
Now, with respect to the frequent times when Trump really does utter word salads that don't track, as someone said, "good luck with that" getting people to focus on it. Trump "not making sense" is the norm, and thus the bar is lowered. When Biden struggled at the debate, it stood out because Biden generally makes sense. He's not the smoothest public speaker and never has been, and he may mix up a name or word at times, but he doesn't usually say things like "we finally beat Medicare" after losing his train of thought in the middle of a rambling answer. It alarmed people because it deviated so much from the norm. Trump is out there every day rambling like a mental patient, so people are inured to it when he goes off on a tangent about sharks or Hannibal Lecter or ancient aliens or whatever.
You're being extraordinarily generous. It makes even less sense than when he was asked how he would balance the budget and he said we would drill for more oil. That's colossally stupid, yet borderline genius compared to this.
An excellent analysis and interpretation of POOTWH’s colon blow of word salad.
Following Trump’s train of thought as it derails on a child care question
Trump sought out an applause line as if it were the sole exit in a flame-filled room.
There are a few things that are particularly useful to remember about former president Donald Trump.
One is that he operates under the assumption that he can simply talk his way out of any situation. It’s likely that this stems from his career as a salesperson: that he learned to say whatever he needed to close a deal — and then to say whatever he needed to clean up the mess from the promises he made at the outset.
Another is that he internalizes sales pitches that work. Like many salespeople, he develops a patter, a series of phrases and pitches. Those lines come out spontaneously and effortlessly, to the point that he has often winnowed them down to just their most basic elements. Instead of saying that President Joe Biden’s administration was unsuccessful for various reasons, he just says things like, “America is a failing country.”
A third thing to remember about Trump is that the sell he’s working on now isn’t focused on votes. That’s ancillary, the way that securing agreements to use the name “Trump” for marketing was ancillary. What he’s aiming for instead is applause and approval. During his speeches, that’s what he’s trying to achieve. That’s what his riffs are aimed at. He’s building a voter base the way he built a market, by getting people to approve of him. This is why he tracks crowd size so closely.
On Thursday, his push to be elected for a second term as president brought him to the Economic Club of New York. The organization prides itself on its sober, informed assessments of the economic and political worlds, meaning that Trump was already somewhat disadvantaged. His politics are not predicated on his grasp of policy but on appeals to the politically disaffected. His descriptions of how things are working are much more effective with people who don’t know how things work.
But the question that tripped him up, the one that launched a thousand criticisms and not a few memes, was one focused on something that he should theoretically have had a grasp on: child care.
If you win in November,” a panelist asked, “can you commit to prioritizing legislation to make child care affordable and if so, what specific piece of legislation will you advance?”
Here is Trump's entire answer, verbatim.
“Well, I would do that, and we’re sitting down — you know, I was, uh, somebody, we had Sen. Marco Rubio [(R-Fla.)] and my daughter, Ivanka, was so, uh, impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue.”
“But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about, that — because child care is child care. It’s, couldn’t — you know, it’s something, you have to have it. In this country, you have to have it.”
“But when you talk about those numbers compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to but they’ll get used to it very quickly. And it’s not going to stop them from doing business with us, but they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country.”
“Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s gonna take care. We’re gonna have — I, I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time. Coupled with, uh, the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country — because I have to say with child care, I want to stay with childcare, but those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth.”
“But growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just, uh, that I just told you about. We’re gonna be taking in trillions of dollars, and as much as childcare is talked about as being expensive, it’s, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers we’ll be taking in.”
“We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people and then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people. But we’re gonna take care of our country first. This is about America first. It’s about: Make America great again. We have to do it, because right now we’re a failing nation. So we’ll take care of it. Thank you. Very good question.”
Particularly when removed from the context of the rest of his comments, the response reads like gibberish. A few days after his running mate mocked Vice President Kamala Harris by comparing her to the fumbling, desperate answer of a pageant contestant back in 2007, Trump offered a much more convincing re-creation.
The media does admittedly often polish Trump’s claims in a way that obscures the circuity of the route he took to get there. In this case, though, it’s useful to establish at the outset what he was trying to say, in part because it helps explain how he ended up taking this particular path and in part because it doesn’t serve as much more of an endorsement.
This was the last question Trump answered at the event, one in which he was focused centrally on making the case for his economic policies. Those policies were delineated during his prepared remarks and focused heavily on the use of tariffs. So what he ended up saying, in essence, was that he was going to generate so much money from policies like tariffs — price increases that disproportionately came out of Americans' pockets — that paying for child care would be easy.
But, at the outset, he clearly didn’t know what he was going to say. He had suddenly been thrust into a dark, smoke-filled room and had to find the exit.
He started a few times.
“Well, I would do that, and we're sitting down,” he began, likely preparing to claim (as he so often does) that a specific policy was being prepared and would be produced within a few weeks (as he so rarely does).
But then he appears to have remembered that this was something he had actually talked about with people (or seen people talking about it on TV). Like his daughter and, perhaps, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who introduced legislation on child care earlier this year.
“You know,” he transitioned, “I was, uh, somebody, we had Senator Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka was so, uh, impactful on that issue.”
It wasn't going well. And when Trump is scrambling for an exit, his instinct is to find one from which he can hear the muffled sounds of applause emanating.
“It's a very important issue,” he told the questioner. He was starting over, looking to build a rapport. He continued down that path, fumbling through the dark.
“But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I'm talking about, that — because child care is child care,” he said. 'It's, couldn't — you know, it's something, you have to have it. In this country, you have to have it.”
You can see him figuring out what he's going to say even as he is patting the questioner on the head.
“But when you talk about those numbers compared to the kind of numbers that I'm talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they're not used to but they'll get used to it very quickly,” he continued. “And it's not going to stop them from doing business with us, but they'll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country.”
This is the patter kicking in. He's going to tax the foreign manufacturers at levels they've never seen before! He's going to fix our problems with One Simple Trick.
But then, it seems, he realized that he was drifting away from the actual question, which asked for a specific policy. So he wound back to that.
“Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s gonna take care. We’re gonna have — I, I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time,” he said. “Coupled with, uh, the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country—”
This is a reference to his earlier promise to put Elon Musk in chargeof a commission that would find the places where the government was wasting at least a third of the money it spent. This is … an overestimate of how much spending is wasted. But Trump was looping back to more comfortable, better-worn terrain closer to the overall thrust of his speech.
“Because I have to say with child care, I want to stay with child care,” he continued, “but those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth.” He riffed on this a little more.
That was the answer, though: that this unrealistic promise of eliminating the deficit by increasing tariffs (and, by extension, costs for Americans) and uprooting trillions of dollars in wasteful or fraudulent spending would leave the country’s coffers so flush that he would pay for child care. Which is certainly what his party would want to prioritize over tax cuts, right?
Anyway, Trump finally found the door, closing out his answer the way he likes to conclude his rallies.
“We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people, and then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people. But we’re gonna take care of our country first,” he said. “This is about America first. It’s about: Make America great again.”
The audience applauded.
“We have to do it, because right now we’re a failing nation,” Trump concluded, with almost palpable relief. “So we’ll take care of it. Thank you. Very good question.”
And that was that. Sale made — if only in the room and only for a moment.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
An excellent analysis and interpretation of POOTWH’s colon blow of word salad.
Following Trump’s train of thought as it derails on a child care question
Trump sought out an applause line as if it were the sole exit in a flame-filled room.
There are a few things that are particularly useful to remember about former president Donald Trump.
One is that he operates under the assumption that he can simply talk his way out of any situation. It’s likely that this stems from his career as a salesperson: that he learned to say whatever he needed to close a deal — and then to say whatever he needed to clean up the mess from the promises he made at the outset.
Another is that he internalizes sales pitches that work. Like many salespeople, he develops a patter, a series of phrases and pitches. Those lines come out spontaneously and effortlessly, to the point that he has often winnowed them down to just their most basic elements. Instead of saying that President Joe Biden’s administration was unsuccessful for various reasons, he just says things like, “America is a failing country.”
A third thing to remember about Trump is that the sell he’s working on now isn’t focused on votes. That’s ancillary, the way that securing agreements to use the name “Trump” for marketing was ancillary. What he’s aiming for instead is applause and approval. During his speeches, that’s what he’s trying to achieve. That’s what his riffs are aimed at. He’s building a voter base the way he built a market, by getting people to approve of him. This is why he tracks crowd size so closely.
On Thursday, his push to be elected for a second term as president brought him to the Economic Club of New York. The organization prides itself on its sober, informed assessments of the economic and political worlds, meaning that Trump was already somewhat disadvantaged. His politics are not predicated on his grasp of policy but on appeals to the politically disaffected. His descriptions of how things are working are much more effective with people who don’t know how things work.
But the question that tripped him up, the one that launched a thousand criticisms and not a few memes, was one focused on something that he should theoretically have had a grasp on: child care.
If you win in November,” a panelist asked, “can you commit to prioritizing legislation to make child care affordable and if so, what specific piece of legislation will you advance?”
Here is Trump's entire answer, verbatim.
“Well, I would do that, and we’re sitting down — you know, I was, uh, somebody, we had Sen. Marco Rubio [(R-Fla.)] and my daughter, Ivanka, was so, uh, impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue.”
“But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about, that — because child care is child care. It’s, couldn’t — you know, it’s something, you have to have it. In this country, you have to have it.”
“But when you talk about those numbers compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to but they’ll get used to it very quickly. And it’s not going to stop them from doing business with us, but they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country.”
“Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s gonna take care. We’re gonna have — I, I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time. Coupled with, uh, the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country — because I have to say with child care, I want to stay with childcare, but those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth.”
“But growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just, uh, that I just told you about. We’re gonna be taking in trillions of dollars, and as much as childcare is talked about as being expensive, it’s, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers we’ll be taking in.”
“We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people and then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people. But we’re gonna take care of our country first. This is about America first. It’s about: Make America great again. We have to do it, because right now we’re a failing nation. So we’ll take care of it. Thank you. Very good question.”
Particularly when removed from the context of the rest of his comments, the response reads like gibberish. A few days after his running mate mocked Vice President Kamala Harris by comparing her to the fumbling, desperate answer of a pageant contestant back in 2007, Trump offered a much more convincing re-creation.
The media does admittedly often polish Trump’s claims in a way that obscures the circuity of the route he took to get there. In this case, though, it’s useful to establish at the outset what he was trying to say, in part because it helps explain how he ended up taking this particular path and in part because it doesn’t serve as much more of an endorsement.
This was the last question Trump answered at the event, one in which he was focused centrally on making the case for his economic policies. Those policies were delineated during his prepared remarks and focused heavily on the use of tariffs. So what he ended up saying, in essence, was that he was going to generate so much money from policies like tariffs — price increases that disproportionately came out of Americans' pockets — that paying for child care would be easy.
But, at the outset, he clearly didn’t know what he was going to say. He had suddenly been thrust into a dark, smoke-filled room and had to find the exit.
He started a few times.
“Well, I would do that, and we're sitting down,” he began, likely preparing to claim (as he so often does) that a specific policy was being prepared and would be produced within a few weeks (as he so rarely does).
But then he appears to have remembered that this was something he had actually talked about with people (or seen people talking about it on TV). Like his daughter and, perhaps, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who introduced legislation on child care earlier this year.
“You know,” he transitioned, “I was, uh, somebody, we had Senator Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka was so, uh, impactful on that issue.”
It wasn't going well. And when Trump is scrambling for an exit, his instinct is to find one from which he can hear the muffled sounds of applause emanating.
“It's a very important issue,” he told the questioner. He was starting over, looking to build a rapport. He continued down that path, fumbling through the dark.
“But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I'm talking about, that — because child care is child care,” he said. 'It's, couldn't — you know, it's something, you have to have it. In this country, you have to have it.”
You can see him figuring out what he's going to say even as he is patting the questioner on the head.
“But when you talk about those numbers compared to the kind of numbers that I'm talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they're not used to but they'll get used to it very quickly,” he continued. “And it's not going to stop them from doing business with us, but they'll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country.”
This is the patter kicking in. He's going to tax the foreign manufacturers at levels they've never seen before! He's going to fix our problems with One Simple Trick.
But then, it seems, he realized that he was drifting away from the actual question, which asked for a specific policy. So he wound back to that.
“Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s gonna take care. We’re gonna have — I, I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time,” he said. “Coupled with, uh, the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country—”
This is a reference to his earlier promise to put Elon Musk in chargeof a commission that would find the places where the government was wasting at least a third of the money it spent. This is … an overestimate of how much spending is wasted. But Trump was looping back to more comfortable, better-worn terrain closer to the overall thrust of his speech.
“Because I have to say with child care, I want to stay with child care,” he continued, “but those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth.” He riffed on this a little more.
That was the answer, though: that this unrealistic promise of eliminating the deficit by increasing tariffs (and, by extension, costs for Americans) and uprooting trillions of dollars in wasteful or fraudulent spending would leave the country’s coffers so flush that he would pay for child care. Which is certainly what his party would want to prioritize over tax cuts, right?
Anyway, Trump finally found the door, closing out his answer the way he likes to conclude his rallies.
“We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people, and then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people. But we’re gonna take care of our country first,” he said. “This is about America first. It’s about: Make America great again.”
The audience applauded.
“We have to do it, because right now we’re a failing nation,” Trump concluded, with almost palpable relief. “So we’ll take care of it. Thank you. Very good question.”
And that was that. Sale made — if only in the room and only for a moment.
Shouldn't there be calls for him to drop out after this nonsensical response? Isn't that how this works?
I would be interested to hear from our maga friends about what they thing about his answer....not what you think about the subject, but with how Trump answered. The cognitive decline is real and it is sad.
good god. I mean, it seems like he's trying to give a typical politician non-answer by spinning it into something he thinks he knows what he's talking about, but he's so fucking bad at it. reminds me of that miss america pageant answer that went viral a decade ago. "in the iraq".
"Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk" -EV 8/14/93
An excellent analysis and interpretation of POOTWH’s colon blow of word salad.
Following Trump’s train of thought as it derails on a child care question
Trump sought out an applause line as if it were the sole exit in a flame-filled room.
There are a few things that are particularly useful to remember about former president Donald Trump.
One is that he operates under the assumption that he can simply talk his way out of any situation. It’s likely that this stems from his career as a salesperson: that he learned to say whatever he needed to close a deal — and then to say whatever he needed to clean up the mess from the promises he made at the outset.
Another is that he internalizes sales pitches that work. Like many salespeople, he develops a patter, a series of phrases and pitches. Those lines come out spontaneously and effortlessly, to the point that he has often winnowed them down to just their most basic elements. Instead of saying that President Joe Biden’s administration was unsuccessful for various reasons, he just says things like, “America is a failing country.”
A third thing to remember about Trump is that the sell he’s working on now isn’t focused on votes. That’s ancillary, the way that securing agreements to use the name “Trump” for marketing was ancillary. What he’s aiming for instead is applause and approval. During his speeches, that’s what he’s trying to achieve. That’s what his riffs are aimed at. He’s building a voter base the way he built a market, by getting people to approve of him. This is why he tracks crowd size so closely.
On Thursday, his push to be elected for a second term as president brought him to the Economic Club of New York. The organization prides itself on its sober, informed assessments of the economic and political worlds, meaning that Trump was already somewhat disadvantaged. His politics are not predicated on his grasp of policy but on appeals to the politically disaffected. His descriptions of how things are working are much more effective with people who don’t know how things work.
But the question that tripped him up, the one that launched a thousand criticisms and not a few memes, was one focused on something that he should theoretically have had a grasp on: child care.
If you win in November,” a panelist asked, “can you commit to prioritizing legislation to make child care affordable and if so, what specific piece of legislation will you advance?”
Here is Trump's entire answer, verbatim.
“Well, I would do that, and we’re sitting down — you know, I was, uh, somebody, we had Sen. Marco Rubio [(R-Fla.)] and my daughter, Ivanka, was so, uh, impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue.”
“But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about, that — because child care is child care. It’s, couldn’t — you know, it’s something, you have to have it. In this country, you have to have it.”
“But when you talk about those numbers compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to but they’ll get used to it very quickly. And it’s not going to stop them from doing business with us, but they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country.”
“Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s gonna take care. We’re gonna have — I, I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time. Coupled with, uh, the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country — because I have to say with child care, I want to stay with childcare, but those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth.”
“But growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just, uh, that I just told you about. We’re gonna be taking in trillions of dollars, and as much as childcare is talked about as being expensive, it’s, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers we’ll be taking in.”
“We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people and then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people. But we’re gonna take care of our country first. This is about America first. It’s about: Make America great again. We have to do it, because right now we’re a failing nation. So we’ll take care of it. Thank you. Very good question.”
Particularly when removed from the context of the rest of his comments, the response reads like gibberish. A few days after his running mate mocked Vice President Kamala Harris by comparing her to the fumbling, desperate answer of a pageant contestant back in 2007, Trump offered a much more convincing re-creation.
The media does admittedly often polish Trump’s claims in a way that obscures the circuity of the route he took to get there. In this case, though, it’s useful to establish at the outset what he was trying to say, in part because it helps explain how he ended up taking this particular path and in part because it doesn’t serve as much more of an endorsement.
This was the last question Trump answered at the event, one in which he was focused centrally on making the case for his economic policies. Those policies were delineated during his prepared remarks and focused heavily on the use of tariffs. So what he ended up saying, in essence, was that he was going to generate so much money from policies like tariffs — price increases that disproportionately came out of Americans' pockets — that paying for child care would be easy.
But, at the outset, he clearly didn’t know what he was going to say. He had suddenly been thrust into a dark, smoke-filled room and had to find the exit.
He started a few times.
“Well, I would do that, and we're sitting down,” he began, likely preparing to claim (as he so often does) that a specific policy was being prepared and would be produced within a few weeks (as he so rarely does).
But then he appears to have remembered that this was something he had actually talked about with people (or seen people talking about it on TV). Like his daughter and, perhaps, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who introduced legislation on child care earlier this year.
“You know,” he transitioned, “I was, uh, somebody, we had Senator Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka was so, uh, impactful on that issue.”
It wasn't going well. And when Trump is scrambling for an exit, his instinct is to find one from which he can hear the muffled sounds of applause emanating.
“It's a very important issue,” he told the questioner. He was starting over, looking to build a rapport. He continued down that path, fumbling through the dark.
“But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I'm talking about, that — because child care is child care,” he said. 'It's, couldn't — you know, it's something, you have to have it. In this country, you have to have it.”
You can see him figuring out what he's going to say even as he is patting the questioner on the head.
“But when you talk about those numbers compared to the kind of numbers that I'm talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they're not used to but they'll get used to it very quickly,” he continued. “And it's not going to stop them from doing business with us, but they'll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country.”
This is the patter kicking in. He's going to tax the foreign manufacturers at levels they've never seen before! He's going to fix our problems with One Simple Trick.
But then, it seems, he realized that he was drifting away from the actual question, which asked for a specific policy. So he wound back to that.
“Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s gonna take care. We’re gonna have — I, I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time,” he said. “Coupled with, uh, the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country—”
This is a reference to his earlier promise to put Elon Musk in chargeof a commission that would find the places where the government was wasting at least a third of the money it spent. This is … an overestimate of how much spending is wasted. But Trump was looping back to more comfortable, better-worn terrain closer to the overall thrust of his speech.
“Because I have to say with child care, I want to stay with child care,” he continued, “but those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth.” He riffed on this a little more.
That was the answer, though: that this unrealistic promise of eliminating the deficit by increasing tariffs (and, by extension, costs for Americans) and uprooting trillions of dollars in wasteful or fraudulent spending would leave the country’s coffers so flush that he would pay for child care. Which is certainly what his party would want to prioritize over tax cuts, right?
Anyway, Trump finally found the door, closing out his answer the way he likes to conclude his rallies.
“We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people, and then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people. But we’re gonna take care of our country first,” he said. “This is about America first. It’s about: Make America great again.”
The audience applauded.
“We have to do it, because right now we’re a failing nation,” Trump concluded, with almost palpable relief. “So we’ll take care of it. Thank you. Very good question.”
And that was that. Sale made — if only in the room and only for a moment.
@pjl44 - I get that you're undecided, but how could you honestly watch that and believe even in the slightest that this man should be president. Again.
Shouldn't there be calls for him to drop out after this nonsensical response? Isn't that how this works?
I would be interested to hear from our maga friends about what they thing about his answer....not what you think about the subject, but with how Trump answered. The cognitive decline is real and it is sad.
I'm loath to defend Trump, but I don't think this answer is nonsensical, exactly. It's digressive, it's unspecific, and it fundamentally misunderstands economics, but there is a logic to it. He is saying that his tariffs (what he calls "taxes on foreign nations") will generate so much money that we'll be able to spend it on new programs, including expanded access to child care. There are problems with this answer, including that this is not how tariffs work-- they are paid by U.S. consumers, not foreign nations-- and the answer completely dodges the part of the question asking what specific things Trump would support.
Now, with respect to the frequent times when Trump really does utter word salads that don't track, as someone said, "good luck with that" getting people to focus on it. Trump "not making sense" is the norm, and thus the bar is lowered. When Biden struggled at the debate, it stood out because Biden generally makes sense. He's not the smoothest public speaker and never has been, and he may mix up a name or word at times, but he doesn't usually say things like "we finally beat Medicare" after losing his train of thought in the middle of a rambling answer. It alarmed people because it deviated so much from the norm. Trump is out there every day rambling like a mental patient, so people are inured to it when he goes off on a tangent about sharks or Hannibal Lecter or ancient aliens or whatever.
The more likely explanation is he hardly even understood the question so he pivoted to the only thing he really cares about....tariffs.
I would for Kamala to bring up Hannibal Lector of the shark thing, almost in a joking matter, and ask him to explain what the hell he means.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
the problem I have with some of these assholes "coming around" is that do they really give a shit about "democracy" or do they just really, really hate what Trump has done to their party and they want things to go back to "normal"?
"Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk" -EV 8/14/93
the problem I have with some of these assholes "coming around" is that do they really give a shit about "democracy" or do they just really, really hate what Trump has done to their party and they want things to go back to "normal"?
Liz Cheney has been pretty consistent on this since the election. None of this makes either Cheney someone I would vote for, but I can give credit where due. Trump is a disgrace, but I can acknowledge that he did a good job with expediting the vaccine, for example. Or G.W. Bush-- he was a failed president and I'd never vote for him, but I can acknowledge that he did a really good thing with PEPFAR.
The thing I was agreeing with specifically was Dick's comment that Trump shouldn't be allowed anywhere near power.
the problem I have with some of these assholes "coming around" is that do they really give a shit about "democracy" or do they just really, really hate what Trump has done to their party and they want things to go back to "normal"?
Liz Cheney has been pretty consistent on this since the election. None of this makes either Cheney someone I would vote for, but I can give credit where due. Trump is a disgrace, but I can acknowledge that he did a good job with expediting the vaccine, for example. Or G.W. Bush-- he was a failed president and I'd never vote for him, but I can acknowledge that he did a really good thing with PEPFAR.
The thing I was agreeing with specifically was Dick's comment that Trump shouldn't be allowed anywhere near power.
Fully understood your position. Maybe I should haven't quoted you, more just thinking out loud. I don't know if these people care about their country or just their party.
"Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk" -EV 8/14/93
Shouldn't there be calls for him to drop out after this nonsensical response? Isn't that how this works?
I would be interested to hear from our maga friends about what they thing about his answer....not what you think about the subject, but with how Trump answered. The cognitive decline is real and it is sad.
I'm loath to defend Trump, but I don't think this answer is nonsensical, exactly. It's digressive, it's unspecific, and it fundamentally misunderstands economics, but there is a logic to it. He is saying that his tariffs (what he calls "taxes on foreign nations") will generate so much money that we'll be able to spend it on new programs, including expanded access to child care. There are problems with this answer, including that this is not how tariffs work-- they are paid by U.S. consumers, not foreign nations-- and the answer completely dodges the part of the question asking what specific things Trump would support.
Now, with respect to the frequent times when Trump really does utter word salads that don't track, as someone said, "good luck with that" getting people to focus on it. Trump "not making sense" is the norm, and thus the bar is lowered. When Biden struggled at the debate, it stood out because Biden generally makes sense. He's not the smoothest public speaker and never has been, and he may mix up a name or word at times, but he doesn't usually say things like "we finally beat Medicare" after losing his train of thought in the middle of a rambling answer. It alarmed people because it deviated so much from the norm. Trump is out there every day rambling like a mental patient, so people are inured to it when he goes off on a tangent about sharks or Hannibal Lecter or ancient aliens or whatever.
The more likely explanation is he hardly even understood the question so he pivoted to the only thing he really cares about....tariffs.
I would for Kamala to bring up Hannibal Lector of the shark thing, almost in a joking matter, and ask him to explain what the hell he means.
I hope she asks what his favorite Death Row record is.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Comments
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
https://www.threads.net/@sp00pkittn/post/C_kQbFNxdWr/?xmt=AQGzO6sa3T11Z7jzPBTtWqo8sbUJt8ZoM1QVbWFETrReqA
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
https://www.instagram.com/reel/C-QZss6v2Og/?igsh=MTEyM2xhZjhnenNndg==
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
I would be interested to hear from our maga friends about what they thing about his answer....not what you think about the subject, but with how Trump answered. The cognitive decline is real and it is sad.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
To Trump's credit--he is going to a lot of events and taking questions....but the answers always look like this rambling incoherent nonsense. The man cannot be president again.
Now, with respect to the frequent times when Trump really does utter word salads that don't track, as someone said, "good luck with that" getting people to focus on it. Trump "not making sense" is the norm, and thus the bar is lowered. When Biden struggled at the debate, it stood out because Biden generally makes sense. He's not the smoothest public speaker and never has been, and he may mix up a name or word at times, but he doesn't usually say things like "we finally beat Medicare" after losing his train of thought in the middle of a rambling answer. It alarmed people because it deviated so much from the norm. Trump is out there every day rambling like a mental patient, so people are inured to it when he goes off on a tangent about sharks or Hannibal Lecter or ancient aliens or whatever.
Following Trump’s train of thought as it derails on a child care question
Trump sought out an applause line as if it were the sole exit in a flame-filled room.
There are a few things that are particularly useful to remember about former president Donald Trump.
One is that he operates under the assumption that he can simply talk his way out of any situation. It’s likely that this stems from his career as a salesperson: that he learned to say whatever he needed to close a deal — and then to say whatever he needed to clean up the mess from the promises he made at the outset.
Another is that he internalizes sales pitches that work. Like many salespeople, he develops a patter, a series of phrases and pitches. Those lines come out spontaneously and effortlessly, to the point that he has often winnowed them down to just their most basic elements. Instead of saying that President Joe Biden’s administration was unsuccessful for various reasons, he just says things like, “America is a failing country.”
A third thing to remember about Trump is that the sell he’s working on now isn’t focused on votes. That’s ancillary, the way that securing agreements to use the name “Trump” for marketing was ancillary. What he’s aiming for instead is applause and approval. During his speeches, that’s what he’s trying to achieve. That’s what his riffs are aimed at. He’s building a voter base the way he built a market, by getting people to approve of him. This is why he tracks crowd size so closely.
On Thursday, his push to be elected for a second term as president brought him to the Economic Club of New York. The organization prides itself on its sober, informed assessments of the economic and political worlds, meaning that Trump was already somewhat disadvantaged. His politics are not predicated on his grasp of policy but on appeals to the politically disaffected. His descriptions of how things are working are much more effective with people who don’t know how things work.
But the question that tripped him up, the one that launched a thousand criticisms and not a few memes, was one focused on something that he should theoretically have had a grasp on: child care.
If you win in November,” a panelist asked, “can you commit to prioritizing legislation to make child care affordable and if so, what specific piece of legislation will you advance?”
Here is Trump's entire answer, verbatim.
Particularly when removed from the context of the rest of his comments, the response reads like gibberish. A few days after his running mate mocked Vice President Kamala Harris by comparing her to the fumbling, desperate answer of a pageant contestant back in 2007, Trump offered a much more convincing re-creation.
The media does admittedly often polish Trump’s claims in a way that obscures the circuity of the route he took to get there. In this case, though, it’s useful to establish at the outset what he was trying to say, in part because it helps explain how he ended up taking this particular path and in part because it doesn’t serve as much more of an endorsement.
This was the last question Trump answered at the event, one in which he was focused centrally on making the case for his economic policies. Those policies were delineated during his prepared remarks and focused heavily on the use of tariffs. So what he ended up saying, in essence, was that he was going to generate so much money from policies like tariffs — price increases that disproportionately came out of Americans' pockets — that paying for child care would be easy.
But, at the outset, he clearly didn’t know what he was going to say. He had suddenly been thrust into a dark, smoke-filled room and had to find the exit.
He started a few times.
“Well, I would do that, and we're sitting down,” he began, likely preparing to claim (as he so often does) that a specific policy was being prepared and would be produced within a few weeks (as he so rarely does).
But then he appears to have remembered that this was something he had actually talked about with people (or seen people talking about it on TV). Like his daughter and, perhaps, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who introduced legislation on child care earlier this year.
“You know,” he transitioned, “I was, uh, somebody, we had Senator Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka was so, uh, impactful on that issue.”
It wasn't going well. And when Trump is scrambling for an exit, his instinct is to find one from which he can hear the muffled sounds of applause emanating.
“It's a very important issue,” he told the questioner. He was starting over, looking to build a rapport. He continued down that path, fumbling through the dark.
“But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I'm talking about, that — because child care is child care,” he said. 'It's, couldn't — you know, it's something, you have to have it. In this country, you have to have it.”
You can see him figuring out what he's going to say even as he is patting the questioner on the head.
“But when you talk about those numbers compared to the kind of numbers that I'm talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they're not used to but they'll get used to it very quickly,” he continued. “And it's not going to stop them from doing business with us, but they'll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country.”
This is the patter kicking in. He's going to tax the foreign manufacturers at levels they've never seen before! He's going to fix our problems with One Simple Trick.
But then, it seems, he realized that he was drifting away from the actual question, which asked for a specific policy. So he wound back to that.
“Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s gonna take care. We’re gonna have — I, I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time,” he said. “Coupled with, uh, the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country—”
This is a reference to his earlier promise to put Elon Musk in chargeof a commission that would find the places where the government was wasting at least a third of the money it spent. This is … an overestimate of how much spending is wasted. But Trump was looping back to more comfortable, better-worn terrain closer to the overall thrust of his speech.
“Because I have to say with child care, I want to stay with child care,” he continued, “but those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth.” He riffed on this a little more.
That was the answer, though: that this unrealistic promise of eliminating the deficit by increasing tariffs (and, by extension, costs for Americans) and uprooting trillions of dollars in wasteful or fraudulent spending would leave the country’s coffers so flush that he would pay for child care. Which is certainly what his party would want to prioritize over tax cuts, right?
Anyway, Trump finally found the door, closing out his answer the way he likes to conclude his rallies.
“We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people, and then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people. But we’re gonna take care of our country first,” he said. “This is about America first. It’s about: Make America great again.”
The audience applauded.
“We have to do it, because right now we’re a failing nation,” Trump concluded, with almost palpable relief. “So we’ll take care of it. Thank you. Very good question.”
And that was that. Sale made — if only in the room and only for a moment.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/09/06/following-trumps-train-thought-it-derails-child-care-question/
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
(To be clear, nothing Trump says is "effective" on me.)
-EV 8/14/93
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Madness.
I would for Kamala to bring up Hannibal Lector of the shark thing, almost in a joking matter, and ask him to explain what the hell he means.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/06/politics/dick-cheney-kamala-harris-president/index.html
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
-EV 8/14/93
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
The thing I was agreeing with specifically was Dick's comment that Trump shouldn't be allowed anywhere near power.
-EV 8/14/93
James Murdoch, Mark Cuban and dozens of other business leaders endorse Kamala Harris for president
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14