Pearl Jam 2020 postponed posters

1…104105107109110…155

Comments

  • drfox
    drfox Posts: 1,481
    I wonder whether the Mumford, Munk One and Byous are now really close to selling out. Placed an order last Monday and again today and there’s around 1,100 difference in order numbers. Can’t imagine people are buying that many of the other posters. It must be getting really close
  • Vitalogensia
    Vitalogensia Posts: 2,197
    demetrios said:
    Baltimore poster from 10club shipped! 
    Me too, rather stoked to see this in person!
  • on2legs
    on2legs Posts: 15,956
    MickeyMouse said:
    shecky said:
    When the "Ultra Limited" GIDs start to arrive it'll be interesting to hear from the buyers if these posters are numbered. If it truly is an edition of 10 then they should be numbered out of 10. If they are not numbered, that greatly effects the integrity - and value - of the edition. If there are an additional 10, 20, 30 or more GIDs that were printed, they can just be leaked out over time and who would know? And that would not necessarily be dishonest or unethical on Ames' part. I mean, what is the legal definition of "Ultra Limited" anyway?
    Wouldn't be the first or last time Ames has done this. Nothing really dishonest about it, though. They said "ultra limited" and never specified a number. So if the prints are not numbered, they aren't going back on anything they said. Also lol to asking for legal definitions. Only people who are saying there are 10 are those who heard from someone who heard from someone. 
    Why not just be transparent and number them?  Then no one says you’re being shady.  
    1996: Randall's Island 2  1998: East Rutherford | MSG 1 & 2  2000: Cincinnati | Columbus | Jones Beach 1, 2, & 3 | Boston 1 | Camden 1 & 2 2003: Philadelphia | Uniondale | MSG 1 & 2 | Holmdel  2005: Atlantic City 1  2006: Camden 1 | East Rutherford 1 & 2 2008: Camden 1 & 2 | MSG 1 & 2 (#25) | Newark (EV)  2009: Philadelphia 1, 2 & 4  2010: Newark | MSG 1 & 2  2011: Toronto 1  2013: Wrigley Field | Brooklyn 2 | Philadelphia 1 & 2 | Baltimore  2015: Central Park  2016: Philadelphia 1 & 2 | MSG 1 & 2 | Fenway Park 2 | MSG (TOTD)  2017: Brooklyn (RnR HOF)  2020: MSG | Asbury Park  2021: Asbury Park  2022: MSG | Camden | Nashville  2024: MSG 1 & 2 (#50) | Philadelphia 1 & 2 | Baltimore  2025: Raleigh


  • shecky
    shecky San Francisco Posts: 2,715
    MickeyMouse said:
    shecky said:
    When the "Ultra Limited" GIDs start to arrive it'll be interesting to hear from the buyers if these posters are numbered. If it truly is an edition of 10 then they should be numbered out of 10. If they are not numbered, that greatly effects the integrity - and value - of the edition. If there are an additional 10, 20, 30 or more GIDs that were printed, they can just be leaked out over time and who would know? And that would not necessarily be dishonest or unethical on Ames' part. I mean, what is the legal definition of "Ultra Limited" anyway?
    Wouldn't be the first or last time Ames has done this. Nothing really dishonest about it, though. They said "ultra limited" and never specified a number. So if the prints are not numbered, they aren't going back on anything they said. Also lol to asking for legal definitions. Only people who are saying there are 10 are those who heard from someone who heard from someone. 
    If you read carefully, I asked "what is the legal definition of "Ultra Limited" anyway?". 
  • SHZA
    SHZA St. Louis, MO USA Posts: 4,314
    edited August 2020
    shecky said:
    When the "Ultra Limited" GIDs start to arrive it'll be interesting to hear from the buyers if these posters are numbered. If it truly is an edition of 10 then they should be numbered out of 10. If they are not numbered, that greatly effects the integrity - and value - of the edition. If there are an additional 10, 20, 30 or more GIDs that were printed, they can just be leaked out over time and who would know? And that would not necessarily be dishonest or unethical on Ames' part. I mean, what is the legal definition of "Ultra Limited" anyway?
    It might "effect" the value positively by adding to the mystique. No one knows just how ultra-limited it is. May only be 4 or 5. 
  • rustneversleeps
    rustneversleeps The Motel of Lost Companions Posts: 2,209
    SHZA said:
    shecky said:
    When the "Ultra Limited" GIDs start to arrive it'll be interesting to hear from the buyers if these posters are numbered. If it truly is an edition of 10 then they should be numbered out of 10. If they are not numbered, that greatly effects the integrity - and value - of the edition. If there are an additional 10, 20, 30 or more GIDs that were printed, they can just be leaked out over time and who would know? And that would not necessarily be dishonest or unethical on Ames' part. I mean, what is the legal definition of "Ultra Limited" anyway?
    It might "effect" the value positively by adding to the mystique. No one knows just how ultra-limited it is. May only be 4 or 5. 
    already 4 sold on ebay.  no way this is 10 print run. 
  • 2-feign-reluctance
    2-feign-reluctance TigerTown, USA Posts: 23,460
    shecky said:
    MickeyMouse said:
    shecky said:
    When the "Ultra Limited" GIDs start to arrive it'll be interesting to hear from the buyers if these posters are numbered. If it truly is an edition of 10 then they should be numbered out of 10. If they are not numbered, that greatly effects the integrity - and value - of the edition. If there are an additional 10, 20, 30 or more GIDs that were printed, they can just be leaked out over time and who would know? And that would not necessarily be dishonest or unethical on Ames' part. I mean, what is the legal definition of "Ultra Limited" anyway?
    Wouldn't be the first or last time Ames has done this. Nothing really dishonest about it, though. They said "ultra limited" and never specified a number. So if the prints are not numbered, they aren't going back on anything they said. Also lol to asking for legal definitions. Only people who are saying there are 10 are those who heard from someone who heard from someone. 
    If you read carefully, I asked "what is the legal definition of "Ultra Limited" anyway?". 
    Better put some NASA approved reflective glass on your GID. Direct/passive sunlight might fade that shit and knock off $1470 off that $1500 'value'.
    www.cluthelee.com
  • shecky
    shecky San Francisco Posts: 2,715
    SHZA said:
    shecky said:
    When the "Ultra Limited" GIDs start to arrive it'll be interesting to hear from the buyers if these posters are numbered. If it truly is an edition of 10 then they should be numbered out of 10. If they are not numbered, that greatly effects the integrity - and value - of the edition. If there are an additional 10, 20, 30 or more GIDs that were printed, they can just be leaked out over time and who would know? And that would not necessarily be dishonest or unethical on Ames' part. I mean, what is the legal definition of "Ultra Limited" anyway?
    It might "effect" the value positively by adding to the mystique. No one knows just how ultra-limited it is. May only be 4 or 5. 
    Ha ha! Are you suggesting I should've used the word "affect" instead of "effect"? You're probably correct! Even when I look them both up in the dictionary I still can't get it right!  ;)
  • MickeyMouse
    MickeyMouse Posts: 1,057
    Ames has released un-numbered variants for years and the world keeps spinning and the prints keep selling. Doubt this will be the one that changes anything, unless some legal eagles take them to court. 
    Uniondale, NY 04/30/03 - Camden, NJ 07/05/03 - MSG 07/08/03 - Reading, PA 10/01/04 - Philly 10/03/05 - Ed Sullivan Theatre 05/04/06 - MSG 06/25/08 - MSG 05/21/10 - NYC (EV solo) 06/21/11 - Montreal 09/07/11 - Brooklyn 10/18/13 - Central Park 09/26/15 - Philly 04/29/16 - MSG 05/01/16 - MSG 05/02/16 - Fenway 08/05/16 - Fenway 09/02/18 - Fenway 09/04/18 
  • on2legs
    on2legs Posts: 15,956
    MickeyMouse said:
    Ames has released un-numbered variants for years and the world keeps spinning and the prints keep selling. Doubt this will be the one that changes anything, unless some legal eagles take them to court. 
    I’m pretty sure the guy who mentioned the legal definition was being sarcastic. 

    I still can’t think of a single reason why Ames doesn’t number these except that it allows for more copies to hit the market down the road.  
    1996: Randall's Island 2  1998: East Rutherford | MSG 1 & 2  2000: Cincinnati | Columbus | Jones Beach 1, 2, & 3 | Boston 1 | Camden 1 & 2 2003: Philadelphia | Uniondale | MSG 1 & 2 | Holmdel  2005: Atlantic City 1  2006: Camden 1 | East Rutherford 1 & 2 2008: Camden 1 & 2 | MSG 1 & 2 (#25) | Newark (EV)  2009: Philadelphia 1, 2 & 4  2010: Newark | MSG 1 & 2  2011: Toronto 1  2013: Wrigley Field | Brooklyn 2 | Philadelphia 1 & 2 | Baltimore  2015: Central Park  2016: Philadelphia 1 & 2 | MSG 1 & 2 | Fenway Park 2 | MSG (TOTD)  2017: Brooklyn (RnR HOF)  2020: MSG | Asbury Park  2021: Asbury Park  2022: MSG | Camden | Nashville  2024: MSG 1 & 2 (#50) | Philadelphia 1 & 2 | Baltimore  2025: Raleigh


  • cddenley
    cddenley NJ Posts: 11
    Just received my Ames regular addition artist print. Upon examining the poster I do not see a signature nor the print number anywhere. Am I missing something? Anyone else have this issue?
    Randall's Island 1996
    MSG & E. Rutherford 1998
    Jones Beach & Camden 2000
    Philly, MSG & Holmdel 2003
    Philly 2005
    E. Rutherford & Camden 2006
    Camden 2008
    Philly 2013
    Philly, MSG & Fenway 2016
    Rock N Roll Hall of Fame 2017
  • Caught-A-Bolt-Of-Lightning
    Caught-A-Bolt-Of-Lightning Posts: 1,336
    @bradklausen

    Received my Nashville poster today. It is amazing in person!! Thanks for the artwork and for the quick shipping & excellent packaging!
    Raleigh, NC., 8/31/98, Charlotte, NC., 8/4/00, Greensboro, NC., 8/6/00, Mountain View, CA., 10/31/00, Raleigh, NC., 4/15/03, Charlotte, NC., 4/16/03, Mountain View, CA., 10/25/03, Asheville, NC., 10/6/04, Philadelphia, PA., 10/3/05, Washington D.C, 5/30/06, Virginia Beach, VA., 6/17/07, Philadelphia, PA., 10/28/09, Charlottesville, VA., 10/29/13, Charlotte, NC., 10/30/13, Memphis, TN., 10/14/14, Greenville, SC., 4/16/16, Hampton, VA., 4/19/16, Raleigh, NC., 4/20/16, Columbia, SC., 4/21/16, Boston, MA., 8/5/16, Boston 9/2/18 & 9/4/18., Nashville, TN., 4/2/20., Nashville, TN., 9/16/22.

    EV Solo - Washington, D.C., 8/17/08, Atlanta, GA., 6/24/09, Orlando, FL., 11/27/12.
  • parkman2827
    parkman2827 Posts: 4
    Mail day 
  • demetrios
    demetrios Posts: 97,350

  • SHZA
    SHZA St. Louis, MO USA Posts: 4,314
    cddenley said:
    Just received my Ames regular addition artist print. Upon examining the poster I do not see a signature nor the print number anywhere. Am I missing something? Anyone else have this issue?

    Should be signed bottom right, assuming you're talking about the version direct from Ames rather than 10c. (Not my pic). 
  • pearljamsam97
    pearljamsam97 Fargo, North Dakota Posts: 37
    This beauty made it all the way to rural North Dakota today. 

    Looks spectacular in person.
  • shecky
    shecky San Francisco Posts: 2,715
    cddenley said:
    Just received my Ames regular addition artist print. Upon examining the poster I do not see a signature nor the print number anywhere. Am I missing something? Anyone else have this issue?
    If I were you I'd be asking Ames Bros quickly before they run out. No one here can help you.
  • RK50065
    RK50065 St. Louis, MO Posts: 897
    on2legs said:
    MickeyMouse said:
    Ames has released un-numbered variants for years and the world keeps spinning and the prints keep selling. Doubt this will be the one that changes anything, unless some legal eagles take them to court. 
    I’m pretty sure the guy who mentioned the legal definition was being sarcastic. 

    I still can’t think of a single reason why Ames doesn’t number these except that it allows for more copies to hit the market down the road.  
    Unless it is the same dude who got the Singles released?! ;)
  • on2legs
    on2legs Posts: 15,956
    RK50065 said:
    on2legs said:
    MickeyMouse said:
    Ames has released un-numbered variants for years and the world keeps spinning and the prints keep selling. Doubt this will be the one that changes anything, unless some legal eagles take them to court. 
    I’m pretty sure the guy who mentioned the legal definition was being sarcastic. 

    I still can’t think of a single reason why Ames doesn’t number these except that it allows for more copies to hit the market down the road.  
    Unless it is the same dude who got the Singles released?! ;)
    Haha.  Different guy.  Thank goodness.  🤦🏻‍♂️
    1996: Randall's Island 2  1998: East Rutherford | MSG 1 & 2  2000: Cincinnati | Columbus | Jones Beach 1, 2, & 3 | Boston 1 | Camden 1 & 2 2003: Philadelphia | Uniondale | MSG 1 & 2 | Holmdel  2005: Atlantic City 1  2006: Camden 1 | East Rutherford 1 & 2 2008: Camden 1 & 2 | MSG 1 & 2 (#25) | Newark (EV)  2009: Philadelphia 1, 2 & 4  2010: Newark | MSG 1 & 2  2011: Toronto 1  2013: Wrigley Field | Brooklyn 2 | Philadelphia 1 & 2 | Baltimore  2015: Central Park  2016: Philadelphia 1 & 2 | MSG 1 & 2 | Fenway Park 2 | MSG (TOTD)  2017: Brooklyn (RnR HOF)  2020: MSG | Asbury Park  2021: Asbury Park  2022: MSG | Camden | Nashville  2024: MSG 1 & 2 (#50) | Philadelphia 1 & 2 | Baltimore  2025: Raleigh


  • MickeyMouse
    MickeyMouse Posts: 1,057


    Orioles variant is stunning in person. Perfect O's orange. My favorite poster from a concert that never happened. 
    Uniondale, NY 04/30/03 - Camden, NJ 07/05/03 - MSG 07/08/03 - Reading, PA 10/01/04 - Philly 10/03/05 - Ed Sullivan Theatre 05/04/06 - MSG 06/25/08 - MSG 05/21/10 - NYC (EV solo) 06/21/11 - Montreal 09/07/11 - Brooklyn 10/18/13 - Central Park 09/26/15 - Philly 04/29/16 - MSG 05/01/16 - MSG 05/02/16 - Fenway 08/05/16 - Fenway 09/02/18 - Fenway 09/04/18 

Categories