Breaking News

1356

Comments

  • dankind
    dankind Posts: 20,841
    mickeyrat said:
    PJPOWER said:
    mickeyrat said:
    Kat said:8
    Expect this to get zero coverage.  They’ll be talking about skateboarding dogs again by tomorrow. Doesn’t fit the narrative of white dudes with guns, so let’s just move on.

    https://apnews.com/article/car-rams-capitol-barricade-add0fea76244f1755344aa856ee64ecd

    One officer dead after car rams Capitol barricade; suspect fatally shot by police, officials say
    By Peter Hermann, Aaron C. Davis, Matt Zapotosky and Jessica Contrera

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/capitol-lockdown-police-officers-injured-barricade-rammed/2021/04/02/1e1820aa-93d8-11eb-a74e-1f4cf89fd948_story.html

    https://reut.rs/39CXASC

    Attack at Capitol Kills One Officer and Injures Another; Suspect Is Dead https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/04/02/us/us-capitol-police-attack


    all top headline. havent gone through yahoo news aggregator yet.....


    Whoosh, that went over your head.  Of course they’ll write on it, but no white guy = no narrative.   No marches, no looting, no fires.  Same violence, same death, same mourning families though.  Burger King and CVS are safe for another night.  Wonder if they surround the hill with barbed wire fences when a follower of the Nation of Islam is at fault.  Serious question.
    Ill take a chance and guess this guy wasn't  looking to overturn the election.
    Like the mostly white, male QtRUmplicans who thought it was okay to have an insurrection based on a LIE
    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/04/02/noah-green-went-from-football-player-posting-extremist-groups/7068100002/

    WASHINGTON — The man who police say rammed his car into a security barrier at the U.S. Capitol on Friday and was fatally shot by police after emerging from the vehicle with a knife was a lifelong athlete who in recent months had shown growing support on social media for Louis Farrakhan and the extremist Nation of Islam group. 

    find it odd that in the several articles I read on this , not one listed his race. we are to infer he is black( I assume) given the reported support or infatuation with farrakhan
    The first and only article I read showed a picture of him. 
    Picture sure but, no mention of his skin color.

    The news will do this often.  You can see where they want the story to go with how they describe certain things.
    mickeyrat said:
    PJPOWER said:
    mickeyrat said:
    Kat said:8
    Expect this to get zero coverage.  They’ll be talking about skateboarding dogs again by tomorrow. Doesn’t fit the narrative of white dudes with guns, so let’s just move on.

    https://apnews.com/article/car-rams-capitol-barricade-add0fea76244f1755344aa856ee64ecd

    One officer dead after car rams Capitol barricade; suspect fatally shot by police, officials say
    By Peter Hermann, Aaron C. Davis, Matt Zapotosky and Jessica Contrera

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/capitol-lockdown-police-officers-injured-barricade-rammed/2021/04/02/1e1820aa-93d8-11eb-a74e-1f4cf89fd948_story.html

    https://reut.rs/39CXASC

    Attack at Capitol Kills One Officer and Injures Another; Suspect Is Dead https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/04/02/us/us-capitol-police-attack


    all top headline. havent gone through yahoo news aggregator yet.....


    Whoosh, that went over your head.  Of course they’ll write on it, but no white guy = no narrative.   No marches, no looting, no fires.  Same violence, same death, same mourning families though.  Burger King and CVS are safe for another night.  Wonder if they surround the hill with barbed wire fences when a follower of the Nation of Islam is at fault.  Serious question.
    Ill take a chance and guess this guy wasn't  looking to overturn the election.
    Like the mostly white, male QtRUmplicans who thought it was okay to have an insurrection based on a LIE
    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/04/02/noah-green-went-from-football-player-posting-extremist-groups/7068100002/

    WASHINGTON — The man who police say rammed his car into a security barrier at the U.S. Capitol on Friday and was fatally shot by police after emerging from the vehicle with a knife was a lifelong athlete who in recent months had shown growing support on social media for Louis Farrakhan and the extremist Nation of Islam group. 

    find it odd that in the several articles I read on this , not one listed his race. we are to infer he is black( I assume) given the reported support or infatuation with farrakhan
    The first and only article I read showed a picture of him. 
    Picture sure but, no mention of his skin color.

    The news will do this often.  You can see where they want the story to go with how they describe certain things.
    The picture didn’t really leave much doubt about the issue. 
    You mean, the media outlets didn't whitewash it? :whistle:
    I SAW PEARL JAM
  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 41,385
    dankind said:
    mickeyrat said:
    PJPOWER said:
    mickeyrat said:
    Kat said:8
    Expect this to get zero coverage.  They’ll be talking about skateboarding dogs again by tomorrow. Doesn’t fit the narrative of white dudes with guns, so let’s just move on.

    https://apnews.com/article/car-rams-capitol-barricade-add0fea76244f1755344aa856ee64ecd

    One officer dead after car rams Capitol barricade; suspect fatally shot by police, officials say
    By Peter Hermann, Aaron C. Davis, Matt Zapotosky and Jessica Contrera

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/capitol-lockdown-police-officers-injured-barricade-rammed/2021/04/02/1e1820aa-93d8-11eb-a74e-1f4cf89fd948_story.html

    https://reut.rs/39CXASC

    Attack at Capitol Kills One Officer and Injures Another; Suspect Is Dead https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/04/02/us/us-capitol-police-attack


    all top headline. havent gone through yahoo news aggregator yet.....


    Whoosh, that went over your head.  Of course they’ll write on it, but no white guy = no narrative.   No marches, no looting, no fires.  Same violence, same death, same mourning families though.  Burger King and CVS are safe for another night.  Wonder if they surround the hill with barbed wire fences when a follower of the Nation of Islam is at fault.  Serious question.
    Ill take a chance and guess this guy wasn't  looking to overturn the election.
    Like the mostly white, male QtRUmplicans who thought it was okay to have an insurrection based on a LIE
    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/04/02/noah-green-went-from-football-player-posting-extremist-groups/7068100002/

    WASHINGTON — The man who police say rammed his car into a security barrier at the U.S. Capitol on Friday and was fatally shot by police after emerging from the vehicle with a knife was a lifelong athlete who in recent months had shown growing support on social media for Louis Farrakhan and the extremist Nation of Islam group. 

    find it odd that in the several articles I read on this , not one listed his race. we are to infer he is black( I assume) given the reported support or infatuation with farrakhan
    The first and only article I read showed a picture of him. 
    Picture sure but, no mention of his skin color.

    The news will do this often.  You can see where they want the story to go with how they describe certain things.
    mickeyrat said:
    PJPOWER said:
    mickeyrat said:
    Kat said:8
    Expect this to get zero coverage.  They’ll be talking about skateboarding dogs again by tomorrow. Doesn’t fit the narrative of white dudes with guns, so let’s just move on.

    https://apnews.com/article/car-rams-capitol-barricade-add0fea76244f1755344aa856ee64ecd

    One officer dead after car rams Capitol barricade; suspect fatally shot by police, officials say
    By Peter Hermann, Aaron C. Davis, Matt Zapotosky and Jessica Contrera

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/capitol-lockdown-police-officers-injured-barricade-rammed/2021/04/02/1e1820aa-93d8-11eb-a74e-1f4cf89fd948_story.html

    https://reut.rs/39CXASC

    Attack at Capitol Kills One Officer and Injures Another; Suspect Is Dead https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/04/02/us/us-capitol-police-attack


    all top headline. havent gone through yahoo news aggregator yet.....


    Whoosh, that went over your head.  Of course they’ll write on it, but no white guy = no narrative.   No marches, no looting, no fires.  Same violence, same death, same mourning families though.  Burger King and CVS are safe for another night.  Wonder if they surround the hill with barbed wire fences when a follower of the Nation of Islam is at fault.  Serious question.
    Ill take a chance and guess this guy wasn't  looking to overturn the election.
    Like the mostly white, male QtRUmplicans who thought it was okay to have an insurrection based on a LIE
    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/04/02/noah-green-went-from-football-player-posting-extremist-groups/7068100002/

    WASHINGTON — The man who police say rammed his car into a security barrier at the U.S. Capitol on Friday and was fatally shot by police after emerging from the vehicle with a knife was a lifelong athlete who in recent months had shown growing support on social media for Louis Farrakhan and the extremist Nation of Islam group. 

    find it odd that in the several articles I read on this , not one listed his race. we are to infer he is black( I assume) given the reported support or infatuation with farrakhan
    The first and only article I read showed a picture of him. 
    Picture sure but, no mention of his skin color.

    The news will do this often.  You can see where they want the story to go with how they describe certain things.
    The picture didn’t really leave much doubt about the issue. 
    You mean, the media outlets didn't whitewash it? :whistle:
    That too!
  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    Not sure if this fits into the “Breaking News” category, but maybe;
    New Zealand considers banning smoking for anyone born after 2004:
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/16/new-zealand-aims-to-create-smoke-free-generation-cigarettes

    Just curious about what everyone thinks about this.  Justified or overstepping?  I think it is idiotic to smoke cigarettes, and have seen many people I’m close to suffer from the choice to do so, but evidently some people still like doing it for some reason.  Any smokers around here have comments on New Zealand’s approach to this?
  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 41,385
    PJPOWER said:
    Not sure if this fits into the “Breaking News” category, but maybe;
    New Zealand considers banning smoking for anyone born after 2004:
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/16/new-zealand-aims-to-create-smoke-free-generation-cigarettes

    Just curious about what everyone thinks about this.  Justified or overstepping?  I think it is idiotic to smoke cigarettes, and have seen many people I’m close to suffer from the choice to do so, but evidently some people still like doing it for some reason.  Any smokers around here have comments on New Zealand’s approach to this?
    That country willfully gave up their guns so why not smoking?  I'm sure other things are on the docket too.

    Anything else that causes problems?  A book or certain music perhaps?

    Not a fan of this...
  • Hobbes
    Hobbes Pacific Northwest Posts: 6,438
    edited April 2021
    PJPOWER said:
    Not sure if this fits into the “Breaking News” category, but maybe;
    New Zealand considers banning smoking for anyone born after 2004:
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/16/new-zealand-aims-to-create-smoke-free-generation-cigarettes

    Just curious about what everyone thinks about this.  Justified or overstepping?  I think it is idiotic to smoke cigarettes, and have seen many people I’m close to suffer from the choice to do so, but evidently some people still like doing it for some reason.  Any smokers around here have comments on New Zealand’s approach to this?
    That country willfully gave up their guns so why not smoking?  I'm sure other things are on the docket too.

    Anything else that causes problems?  A book or certain music perhaps?

    Not a fan of this...
    Name a book or piece of music that is cause of death. 
    Post edited by Hobbes on
  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    edited April 2021
    PJPOWER said:
    Not sure if this fits into the “Breaking News” category, but maybe;
    New Zealand considers banning smoking for anyone born after 2004:
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/16/new-zealand-aims-to-create-smoke-free-generation-cigarettes

    Just curious about what everyone thinks about this.  Justified or overstepping?  I think it is idiotic to smoke cigarettes, and have seen many people I’m close to suffer from the choice to do so, but evidently some people still like doing it for some reason.  Any smokers around here have comments on New Zealand’s approach to this?
    That country willfully gave up their guns so why not smoking?  I'm sure other things are on the docket too.

    Anything else that causes problems?  A book or certain music perhaps?

    Not a fan of this...
    It is definitely an interesting approach.  It will be illegal for some adults and legal for others.  I think it will get weird when you have a 31 year old that can smoke legally and a 30 year old that cannot. Again, I hate cigarettes, but I’m not sure this will have the intended results down the road.  What motivates people to smoke in the first place?  Unless the motivation is gone, people will continue to do it unless they flat out eradicate it, which they could probably actually do on the little island.
    Liberty is not without its caveats, but how much removal of liberty is acceptable by a society before they are considered oppressed?  I feel like there is a fragile balance between the two.

    Post edited by PJPOWER on
  • mickeyrat
    mickeyrat Posts: 44,426
    edited April 2021
    Hobbes said:
    PJPOWER said:
    Not sure if this fits into the “Breaking News” category, but maybe;
    New Zealand considers banning smoking for anyone born after 2004:
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/16/new-zealand-aims-to-create-smoke-free-generation-cigarettes

    Just curious about what everyone thinks about this.  Justified or overstepping?  I think it is idiotic to smoke cigarettes, and have seen many people I’m close to suffer from the choice to do so, but evidently some people still like doing it for some reason.  Any smokers around here have comments on New Zealand’s approach to this?
    That country willfully gave up their guns so why not smoking?  I'm sure other things are on the docket too.

    Anything else that causes problems?  A book or certain music perhaps?

    Not a fan of this...
    Name a book or piece of music that is cause of death. 

    turner diaries

    hitlers trash
    _____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________

    Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
    you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
    memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
    another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
  • mace1229
    mace1229 Posts: 9,829
    PJPOWER said:
    Not sure if this fits into the “Breaking News” category, but maybe;
    New Zealand considers banning smoking for anyone born after 2004:
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/16/new-zealand-aims-to-create-smoke-free-generation-cigarettes

    Just curious about what everyone thinks about this.  Justified or overstepping?  I think it is idiotic to smoke cigarettes, and have seen many people I’m close to suffer from the choice to do so, but evidently some people still like doing it for some reason.  Any smokers around here have comments on New Zealand’s approach to this?
    That country willfully gave up their guns so why not smoking?  I'm sure other things are on the docket too.

    Anything else that causes problems?  A book or certain music perhaps?

    Not a fan of this...
    I wouldn't think it leaps to books or music, but I had a similar thought. Why not alcohol, or fast food? Heart disease is the biggest killer and bad diet/fast food is a big contributor. 
    Think of all the lives we'd save here if we banned fast food and sugar drinks.
  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 41,385
    Hobbes said:
    PJPOWER said:
    Not sure if this fits into the “Breaking News” category, but maybe;
    New Zealand considers banning smoking for anyone born after 2004:
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/16/new-zealand-aims-to-create-smoke-free-generation-cigarettes

    Just curious about what everyone thinks about this.  Justified or overstepping?  I think it is idiotic to smoke cigarettes, and have seen many people I’m close to suffer from the choice to do so, but evidently some people still like doing it for some reason.  Any smokers around here have comments on New Zealand’s approach to this?
    That country willfully gave up their guns so why not smoking?  I'm sure other things are on the docket too.

    Anything else that causes problems?  A book or certain music perhaps?

    Not a fan of this...
    Name a book or piece of music that is cause of death. 
    Catcher in the Rye?
  • Hobbes
    Hobbes Pacific Northwest Posts: 6,438
    mickeyrat said:
    Hobbes said:
    PJPOWER said:
    Not sure if this fits into the “Breaking News” category, but maybe;
    New Zealand considers banning smoking for anyone born after 2004:
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/16/new-zealand-aims-to-create-smoke-free-generation-cigarettes

    Just curious about what everyone thinks about this.  Justified or overstepping?  I think it is idiotic to smoke cigarettes, and have seen many people I’m close to suffer from the choice to do so, but evidently some people still like doing it for some reason.  Any smokers around here have comments on New Zealand’s approach to this?
    That country willfully gave up their guns so why not smoking?  I'm sure other things are on the docket too.

    Anything else that causes problems?  A book or certain music perhaps?

    Not a fan of this...
    Name a book or piece of music that is cause of death. 

    turner diaries

    hitlers trash
    The bible?
    "Helter Skelter?"
    "Suicide Solution?"
  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 41,385
    mace1229 said:
    PJPOWER said:
    Not sure if this fits into the “Breaking News” category, but maybe;
    New Zealand considers banning smoking for anyone born after 2004:
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/16/new-zealand-aims-to-create-smoke-free-generation-cigarettes

    Just curious about what everyone thinks about this.  Justified or overstepping?  I think it is idiotic to smoke cigarettes, and have seen many people I’m close to suffer from the choice to do so, but evidently some people still like doing it for some reason.  Any smokers around here have comments on New Zealand’s approach to this?
    That country willfully gave up their guns so why not smoking?  I'm sure other things are on the docket too.

    Anything else that causes problems?  A book or certain music perhaps?

    Not a fan of this...
    I wouldn't think it leaps to books or music, but I had a similar thought. Why not alcohol, or fast food? Heart disease is the biggest killer and bad diet/fast food is a big contributor. 
    Think of all the lives we'd save here if we banned fast food and sugar drinks.
    We tried the whole prohibition thing and that seemed to work out so well that it gave birth to organized crime.

    We did the same thing with drugs/narcotics and that seemed to go swimmingly well also.

    Now mind you these 3 are not the same but would they, the smokers be allowed to do ecigs/vapes?  Can I not puff on a cigar anymore?

    Lots of questions.
  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 41,385
    Bloomberg tried to ban soda in the city.  I understood why but the people went nuts over it so it was aborted rather quickly.
  • Hobbes
    Hobbes Pacific Northwest Posts: 6,438
    mace1229 said:
    PJPOWER said:
    Not sure if this fits into the “Breaking News” category, but maybe;
    New Zealand considers banning smoking for anyone born after 2004:
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/16/new-zealand-aims-to-create-smoke-free-generation-cigarettes

    Just curious about what everyone thinks about this.  Justified or overstepping?  I think it is idiotic to smoke cigarettes, and have seen many people I’m close to suffer from the choice to do so, but evidently some people still like doing it for some reason.  Any smokers around here have comments on New Zealand’s approach to this?
    That country willfully gave up their guns so why not smoking?  I'm sure other things are on the docket too.

    Anything else that causes problems?  A book or certain music perhaps?

    Not a fan of this...
    I wouldn't think it leaps to books or music, but I had a similar thought. Why not alcohol, or fast food? Heart disease is the biggest killer and bad diet/fast food is a big contributor. 
    Think of all the lives we'd save here if we banned fast food and sugar drinks.
    We tried the whole prohibition thing and that seemed to work out so well that it gave birth to organized crime.

    We did the same thing with drugs/narcotics and that seemed to go swimmingly well also.

    Now mind you these 3 are not the same but would they, the smokers be allowed to do ecigs/vapes?  Can I not puff on a cigar anymore?

    Lots of questions.
    Actually, these examples are more related than your guns-cigarettes-books/music scenario.
  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 41,385
    Hobbes said:
    mace1229 said:
    PJPOWER said:
    Not sure if this fits into the “Breaking News” category, but maybe;
    New Zealand considers banning smoking for anyone born after 2004:
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/16/new-zealand-aims-to-create-smoke-free-generation-cigarettes

    Just curious about what everyone thinks about this.  Justified or overstepping?  I think it is idiotic to smoke cigarettes, and have seen many people I’m close to suffer from the choice to do so, but evidently some people still like doing it for some reason.  Any smokers around here have comments on New Zealand’s approach to this?
    That country willfully gave up their guns so why not smoking?  I'm sure other things are on the docket too.

    Anything else that causes problems?  A book or certain music perhaps?

    Not a fan of this...
    I wouldn't think it leaps to books or music, but I had a similar thought. Why not alcohol, or fast food? Heart disease is the biggest killer and bad diet/fast food is a big contributor. 
    Think of all the lives we'd save here if we banned fast food and sugar drinks.
    We tried the whole prohibition thing and that seemed to work out so well that it gave birth to organized crime.

    We did the same thing with drugs/narcotics and that seemed to go swimmingly well also.

    Now mind you these 3 are not the same but would they, the smokers be allowed to do ecigs/vapes?  Can I not puff on a cigar anymore?

    Lots of questions.
    Actually, these examples are more related than your guns-cigarettes-books/music scenario.
    In that they both gave way to cartels and organized crime?

    I would agree.
  • hedonist
    hedonist Posts: 24,524
    edited April 2021
    A radical idea, but one that merits further thought.

    MeantimeI’ll decide what kills me, thankyouverymuch!
    Post edited by hedonist on
  • Hobbes
    Hobbes Pacific Northwest Posts: 6,438
    Hobbes said:
    mace1229 said:
    PJPOWER said:
    Not sure if this fits into the “Breaking News” category, but maybe;
    New Zealand considers banning smoking for anyone born after 2004:
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/16/new-zealand-aims-to-create-smoke-free-generation-cigarettes

    Just curious about what everyone thinks about this.  Justified or overstepping?  I think it is idiotic to smoke cigarettes, and have seen many people I’m close to suffer from the choice to do so, but evidently some people still like doing it for some reason.  Any smokers around here have comments on New Zealand’s approach to this?
    That country willfully gave up their guns so why not smoking?  I'm sure other things are on the docket too.

    Anything else that causes problems?  A book or certain music perhaps?

    Not a fan of this...
    I wouldn't think it leaps to books or music, but I had a similar thought. Why not alcohol, or fast food? Heart disease is the biggest killer and bad diet/fast food is a big contributor. 
    Think of all the lives we'd save here if we banned fast food and sugar drinks.
    We tried the whole prohibition thing and that seemed to work out so well that it gave birth to organized crime.

    We did the same thing with drugs/narcotics and that seemed to go swimmingly well also.

    Now mind you these 3 are not the same but would they, the smokers be allowed to do ecigs/vapes?  Can I not puff on a cigar anymore?

    Lots of questions.
    Actually, these examples are more related than your guns-cigarettes-books/music scenario.
    In that they both gave way to cartels and organized crime?

    I would agree.
    Multiple layers, sure. My thinking that each (alcohol, narcotics, tobacco) are substances that have lethal consequences.

    A better argument than banning guns leads to banning tobacco which leads to banning books/music. Slippery slope, much?
  • mace1229
    mace1229 Posts: 9,829
    mace1229 said:
    PJPOWER said:
    Not sure if this fits into the “Breaking News” category, but maybe;
    New Zealand considers banning smoking for anyone born after 2004:
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/16/new-zealand-aims-to-create-smoke-free-generation-cigarettes

    Just curious about what everyone thinks about this.  Justified or overstepping?  I think it is idiotic to smoke cigarettes, and have seen many people I’m close to suffer from the choice to do so, but evidently some people still like doing it for some reason.  Any smokers around here have comments on New Zealand’s approach to this?
    That country willfully gave up their guns so why not smoking?  I'm sure other things are on the docket too.

    Anything else that causes problems?  A book or certain music perhaps?

    Not a fan of this...
    I wouldn't think it leaps to books or music, but I had a similar thought. Why not alcohol, or fast food? Heart disease is the biggest killer and bad diet/fast food is a big contributor. 
    Think of all the lives we'd save here if we banned fast food and sugar drinks.
    We tried the whole prohibition thing and that seemed to work out so well that it gave birth to organized crime.

    We did the same thing with drugs/narcotics and that seemed to go swimmingly well also.

    Now mind you these 3 are not the same but would they, the smokers be allowed to do ecigs/vapes?  Can I not puff on a cigar anymore?

    Lots of questions.
    I agree. Which is why I see banning cigarettes much like the same. We've tried banning certain things and didnt work. I don't see how this would be any different or better.
  • mace1229
    mace1229 Posts: 9,829
    edited April 2021
    Bloomberg tried to ban soda in the city.  I understood why but the people went nuts over it so it was aborted rather quickly.
    Did he ban soda? I thought it was just the limits on free refills and size? Not much different, but still different. 
  • tempo_n_groove
    tempo_n_groove Posts: 41,385
    Hobbes said:
    Hobbes said:
    mace1229 said:
    PJPOWER said:
    Not sure if this fits into the “Breaking News” category, but maybe;
    New Zealand considers banning smoking for anyone born after 2004:
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/16/new-zealand-aims-to-create-smoke-free-generation-cigarettes

    Just curious about what everyone thinks about this.  Justified or overstepping?  I think it is idiotic to smoke cigarettes, and have seen many people I’m close to suffer from the choice to do so, but evidently some people still like doing it for some reason.  Any smokers around here have comments on New Zealand’s approach to this?
    That country willfully gave up their guns so why not smoking?  I'm sure other things are on the docket too.

    Anything else that causes problems?  A book or certain music perhaps?

    Not a fan of this...
    I wouldn't think it leaps to books or music, but I had a similar thought. Why not alcohol, or fast food? Heart disease is the biggest killer and bad diet/fast food is a big contributor. 
    Think of all the lives we'd save here if we banned fast food and sugar drinks.
    We tried the whole prohibition thing and that seemed to work out so well that it gave birth to organized crime.

    We did the same thing with drugs/narcotics and that seemed to go swimmingly well also.

    Now mind you these 3 are not the same but would they, the smokers be allowed to do ecigs/vapes?  Can I not puff on a cigar anymore?

    Lots of questions.
    Actually, these examples are more related than your guns-cigarettes-books/music scenario.
    In that they both gave way to cartels and organized crime?

    I would agree.
    Multiple layers, sure. My thinking that each (alcohol, narcotics, tobacco) are substances that have lethal consequences.

    A better argument than banning guns leads to banning tobacco which leads to banning books/music. Slippery slope, much?
    I can see the banning guns, sure.  I don't like it though.

    Banning cigarettes?  I get it but I don't like it.

    What else would they take next?  It would be interesting to see what happens.  Alcohol next?  Bungee jumping?
  • Hobbes
    Hobbes Pacific Northwest Posts: 6,438
    Hobbes said:
    Hobbes said:
    mace1229 said:
    PJPOWER said:
    Not sure if this fits into the “Breaking News” category, but maybe;
    New Zealand considers banning smoking for anyone born after 2004:
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/16/new-zealand-aims-to-create-smoke-free-generation-cigarettes

    Just curious about what everyone thinks about this.  Justified or overstepping?  I think it is idiotic to smoke cigarettes, and have seen many people I’m close to suffer from the choice to do so, but evidently some people still like doing it for some reason.  Any smokers around here have comments on New Zealand’s approach to this?
    That country willfully gave up their guns so why not smoking?  I'm sure other things are on the docket too.

    Anything else that causes problems?  A book or certain music perhaps?

    Not a fan of this...
    I wouldn't think it leaps to books or music, but I had a similar thought. Why not alcohol, or fast food? Heart disease is the biggest killer and bad diet/fast food is a big contributor. 
    Think of all the lives we'd save here if we banned fast food and sugar drinks.
    We tried the whole prohibition thing and that seemed to work out so well that it gave birth to organized crime.

    We did the same thing with drugs/narcotics and that seemed to go swimmingly well also.

    Now mind you these 3 are not the same but would they, the smokers be allowed to do ecigs/vapes?  Can I not puff on a cigar anymore?

    Lots of questions.
    Actually, these examples are more related than your guns-cigarettes-books/music scenario.
    In that they both gave way to cartels and organized crime?

    I would agree.
    Multiple layers, sure. My thinking that each (alcohol, narcotics, tobacco) are substances that have lethal consequences.

    A better argument than banning guns leads to banning tobacco which leads to banning books/music. Slippery slope, much?
    I can see the banning guns, sure.  I don't like it though.

    Banning cigarettes?  I get it but I don't like it.

    What else would they take next?  It would be interesting to see what happens.  Alcohol next?  Bungee jumping?
    Take? You stated previously that New Zealanders willingly gave up their guns.

    Alcohol? Bungee jumping? Books? Music? Again, slippery slope fallacy.