So how did this all work?
So did 99% chance mean 99% for all priorities for that seat level/pick?
if GA 37% and Res 99% did that mean GA only was 37% and Best Available (BA) was 99% in with a 37% chance of getting GA?
Now wouldn’t that 99% be affected by people selecting BA and not getting GA so in effect RES is not really 99%?
Now wouldn’t that 99% be affected by people selecting BA and not getting GA so in effect RES is not really 99%?
Did BA default to GA for stats and Res only counted for the 99% chance?
if people posting are to be believed, some lower priority shows selected at the 99% were won while others lost same shows at higher priorities, is this a case of the 1%?
is this NBA style lottery where priority 1 gets more chances but a priority 2 can still sneak in?
thoughts?
if people posting are to be believed, some lower priority shows selected at the 99% were won while others lost same shows at higher priorities, is this a case of the 1%?
is this NBA style lottery where priority 1 gets more chances but a priority 2 can still sneak in?
thoughts?
0
Comments
2003: St. Paul
2005: Thunder Bay
2008: West Palm Beach, Tampa
2009: Chicago I, Chicago II
2010: Boston
2011: Toronto I, Toronto II, Winnipeg
2012: Missoula
2013: London, Pittsburgh, Buffalo
2014: St. Paul, Milwaukee
2016: Quebec City, Ottawa, Toronto I, Toronto II
2022: Hamilton, Toronto
2023: St. Paul I, St. Paul II
2024: Vancouver I, Vancouver II
its also possible that BA this time exhausted GA quicker than last time as I think people wanting to play it safe last time put in for Res