***Spring 2020 Lottery Results***

given2fly23

[Woops, sorry, lets keep the song titles in the correct thread.]

djbrothers

Never Destination just came in my email.

RedMosquitoSmile28

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

RedMosquitoSmile28 said:

Saltzy23 said:

RedMosquitoSmile28 said:

Saltzy23 said:

OceansJenny said:

Sprunkn7 said:

OceansJenny said:

Perhaps 10c should have used the messaging verified fan did.

We expect the demand for tickets to see Pearl Jam to be overwhelming.

Yea, so basically my Wed night email will read Due to overwhelming ticket demand you have been denied Verifiied Presale. I already know it's coming.

Yeah, I threw in for VF for Billy Joel once and didn’t get a code. This is going to be worse.

I dunno.  This Verified thing was only open for a few days before they closed it.

I think there is still a solid shot to get tickets if you win a code.

Depends on the show, but it will be a cluster. Just because the window was short doesn't mean there won't be a gazillion people trying to get tickets. And the limit is higher than 10c too. New York and Baltimore will be almost impossible. Nashville, St. Louis and Denver won't be gimmees. 

But it will be better than nothing at all.

Without knowing how many 10C seats were allocated its impossible to tell, but every time I have won a Verified fan code in the past I have got tickets.

Figure that like 95% of whatever is left for these shows will go via these sales.

We should all find out if we got a code sometime later today based on the email confirmation.

Good to know. That should give people some confidence. I haven't bought through verified fan myself so I honestly didn't know (sorry for throwing out assumptions!). My wife got some for Taylor Swift for a kid, but it was a stadium show so there was a lot to choose from. I was just thinking with the smaller venues and demand it would be a cluster like other presales. That said, if they limit codes and what not, yeah, it could be a decent experience. 

Personally I haven’t had any luck in verified fan, so I wouldn’t get your hopes up. It’s luck of the draw, though, so some get lucky.

Well, there's another perspective. Luckily I don't need it. I've gotten three of my four so far and I'm good if I don't get the other. But I know a lot of people really want New York and Baltimore especially and are anxious.

MH56465

Saltzy23

RedMosquitoSmile28 said:

Saltzy23 said:

RedMosquitoSmile28 said:

Saltzy23 said:

OceansJenny said:

Sprunkn7 said:

OceansJenny said:

Perhaps 10c should have used the messaging verified fan did.

We expect the demand for tickets to see Pearl Jam to be overwhelming.

Yea, so basically my Wed night email will read Due to overwhelming ticket demand you have been denied Verifiied Presale. I already know it's coming.

Yeah, I threw in for VF for Billy Joel once and didn’t get a code. This is going to be worse.

I dunno.  This Verified thing was only open for a few days before they closed it.

I think there is still a solid shot to get tickets if you win a code.

Depends on the show, but it will be a cluster. Just because the window was short doesn't mean there won't be a gazillion people trying to get tickets. And the limit is higher than 10c too. New York and Baltimore will be almost impossible. Nashville, St. Louis and Denver won't be gimmees. 

But it will be better than nothing at all.

Without knowing how many 10C seats were allocated its impossible to tell, but every time I have won a Verified fan code in the past I have got tickets.

Figure that like 95% of whatever is left for these shows will go via these sales.

We should all find out if we got a code sometime later today based on the email confirmation.

Good to know. That should give people some confidence. I haven't bought through verified fan myself so I honestly didn't know (sorry for throwing out assumptions!). My wife got some for Taylor Swift for a kid, but it was a stadium show so there was a lot to choose from. I was just thinking with the smaller venues and demand it would be a cluster like other presales. That said, if they limit codes and what not, yeah, it could be a decent experience. 

Posted this a few times, but I was able to get 4 tickets to Hamilton for a Saturday night show a few years ago when they were raging hot and 2 singles for the 1st run of the Bruce Springsteen on Broadway show before he announced it was being extended, which was basically the toughest ticket ever via the Verified fan thing.

Winning a code is probably the hard part for the NYC/Baltimore shows.  I'll bet that most that do and are in front of their computers at exactly 10AM will at least be able to grab a single.  Could be wrong, but don't think I am.

PJlive

given2fly23 said:

Hopefully this creates one place for results & excitement. Would be helpful if people sharing results could post:

(1) Show 
(2) GA, Reserved or Best selected
(3) Result
(4) 10C number if Reserved.

for each show in the order you ranked them. 

Good luck everyone!

Well I am xx,xxx and got shut out for MSG. Oh well.

chukdotcom

OceansJenny said:

Perhaps 10c should have used the messaging verified fan did.

We expect the demand for tickets to see Pearl Jam to be overwhelming.

Instead of this messaging:

“Although we feel confident we’ll be able to meet the demand of most, if not all Ten Club ticket requests, we recommend that members also register for the Ticketmaster Verified Fan®“

I’m guessing they were a tad optimistic.

Seems to me like MOST people did get tickets.  There is a fairly vocal minority that did not.  I would say that overall 80%+ of people got their #1 pick.  Now, if your #1 pick was MSG GA only, you likely did not get tickets.  Most of the complaints are coming out of MSG and BAL.  That doesn't represent the entire tour.

MAMIAST

Baltimore & St. Louis 
Ticketmaster pages have
 charity & platinum 
tickets  being available 1-31 

Gludfssr

YAKIMATSU said:

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

ecdanc said:

Luckytwn1 said:

mace1229 said:

I think the odds tool worked. If anything it might have only shown round 1 odds and not overall odds, which would be a change. But given that for most shows except Bal and MSG rounds 3 and 4 were winners it probably was correct.
I know anyone who didn’t get tickets doesn’t want to hear this, but the most likely reason is user error. I say this based on the amounts of comments you can read about people not knowing they had to prioritize at the end and not as they go, and especially the fact that all new entries deletes all previous ones, that has been a big one. 

It sucks and I feel bad for anyone who missed out, but just reading comments that seems like the simplest explanation.

The odds tool certainly did not work. Any basic understanding of math shows that. It either needs to be junked or refined for future sales. And if it was reflective of first choice only odds then you don’t think it needed to say that? Especially in light of the language in the email that most, if not all, orders would be filled. 

I'm still a touch skeptical of this claim. There could be other issues than the odds at play. In other words, do we have any instance in which we *know* that a person was denied only because they ran out of tickets (for a show that was listed at 99%)? Honestly, I'm not even sure it's possible to have that information (at this point or, probably, ever). 

Someone this morning posted they got LA1 or 2 with their 5th pick.  I think a lot of people are claiming that EVERYONE who didn’t get one of those shows in their first few picks had user error.  That just can’t be correct

Everyone? I've only heard/seen one. Yes LA 1 priority 4 and LA 2 priority 5.

I Had LA1 & LA2 both BA and only got 1 of them. 

So how did people get these same shows with a priority of 3 or higher. This needs to be explained. 

So stop the crap about user error, There was no user error at least on my part.  

OceansJenny

chukdotcom said:

OceansJenny said:

Perhaps 10c should have used the messaging verified fan did.

We expect the demand for tickets to see Pearl Jam to be overwhelming.

Instead of this messaging:

“Although we feel confident we’ll be able to meet the demand of most, if not all Ten Club ticket requests, we recommend that members also register for the Ticketmaster Verified Fan®“

I’m guessing they were a tad optimistic.

Seems to me like MOST people did get tickets.  There is a fairly vocal minority that did not.  I would say that overall 80%+ of people got their #1 pick.  Now, if your #1 pick was MSG GA only, you likely did not get tickets.  Most of the complaints are coming out of MSG and BAL.  That doesn't represent the entire tour.

“All 10c ticket requests” to me means priority 2, 3, etc as well as priority 1.

The messaging, to me, felt similar to last year’s Home and Away shows, where the majority (if not all) requests WERE fulfilled. But ballparks are larger, so I suppose that’s just logic.

YAKIMATSU

Gludfssr said:

YAKIMATSU said:

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

ecdanc said:

Luckytwn1 said:

mace1229 said:

I think the odds tool worked. If anything it might have only shown round 1 odds and not overall odds, which would be a change. But given that for most shows except Bal and MSG rounds 3 and 4 were winners it probably was correct.
I know anyone who didn’t get tickets doesn’t want to hear this, but the most likely reason is user error. I say this based on the amounts of comments you can read about people not knowing they had to prioritize at the end and not as they go, and especially the fact that all new entries deletes all previous ones, that has been a big one. 

It sucks and I feel bad for anyone who missed out, but just reading comments that seems like the simplest explanation.

The odds tool certainly did not work. Any basic understanding of math shows that. It either needs to be junked or refined for future sales. And if it was reflective of first choice only odds then you don’t think it needed to say that? Especially in light of the language in the email that most, if not all, orders would be filled. 

I'm still a touch skeptical of this claim. There could be other issues than the odds at play. In other words, do we have any instance in which we *know* that a person was denied only because they ran out of tickets (for a show that was listed at 99%)? Honestly, I'm not even sure it's possible to have that information (at this point or, probably, ever). 

Someone this morning posted they got LA1 or 2 with their 5th pick.  I think a lot of people are claiming that EVERYONE who didn’t get one of those shows in their first few picks had user error.  That just can’t be correct

Everyone? I've only heard/seen one. Yes LA 1 priority 4 and LA 2 priority 5.

I Had LA1 & LA2 both BA and only got 1 of them. 

So how did people get these same shows with a priority of 3 or higher. This needs to be explained. 

So stop the crap about user error, There was no user error at least on my part.  

Only thing I can think of is I only asked for 1 ticket to each of those shows.

RedMosquitoSmile28

chukdotcom said:

OceansJenny said:

Perhaps 10c should have used the messaging verified fan did.

We expect the demand for tickets to see Pearl Jam to be overwhelming.

Instead of this messaging:

“Although we feel confident we’ll be able to meet the demand of most, if not all Ten Club ticket requests, we recommend that members also register for the Ticketmaster Verified Fan®“

I’m guessing they were a tad optimistic.

Seems to me like MOST people did get tickets.  There is a fairly vocal minority that did not.  I would say that overall 80%+ of people got their #1 pick.  Now, if your #1 pick was MSG GA only, you likely did not get tickets.  Most of the complaints are coming out of MSG and BAL.  That doesn't represent the entire tour.

Yes, most of those were NYC and Baltimore, which are not surprising, with a sprinkling of rejections in the other cities. And those seem to be GAs and lower priorities. 

chukdotcom

Gludfssr said:

YAKIMATSU said:

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

ecdanc said:

Luckytwn1 said:

mace1229 said:

I think the odds tool worked. If anything it might have only shown round 1 odds and not overall odds, which would be a change. But given that for most shows except Bal and MSG rounds 3 and 4 were winners it probably was correct.
I know anyone who didn’t get tickets doesn’t want to hear this, but the most likely reason is user error. I say this based on the amounts of comments you can read about people not knowing they had to prioritize at the end and not as they go, and especially the fact that all new entries deletes all previous ones, that has been a big one. 

It sucks and I feel bad for anyone who missed out, but just reading comments that seems like the simplest explanation.

The odds tool certainly did not work. Any basic understanding of math shows that. It either needs to be junked or refined for future sales. And if it was reflective of first choice only odds then you don’t think it needed to say that? Especially in light of the language in the email that most, if not all, orders would be filled. 

I'm still a touch skeptical of this claim. There could be other issues than the odds at play. In other words, do we have any instance in which we *know* that a person was denied only because they ran out of tickets (for a show that was listed at 99%)? Honestly, I'm not even sure it's possible to have that information (at this point or, probably, ever). 

Someone this morning posted they got LA1 or 2 with their 5th pick.  I think a lot of people are claiming that EVERYONE who didn’t get one of those shows in their first few picks had user error.  That just can’t be correct

Everyone? I've only heard/seen one. Yes LA 1 priority 4 and LA 2 priority 5.

I Had LA1 & LA2 both BA and only got 1 of them. 

So how did people get these same shows with a priority of 3 or higher. This needs to be explained. 

So stop the crap about user error, There was no user error at least on my part.  

In your example, the user error could very well be on the person who claimed they got tickets at priority #5 (when they didn't explicitly rank priorities).  So, still user error, just not yours...

I don't believe anyone that claims to have been filled at 4+ has provided proof of their priority.

Gludfssr

YAKIMATSU said:

Gludfssr said:

YAKIMATSU said:

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

ecdanc said:

Luckytwn1 said:

mace1229 said:

I think the odds tool worked. If anything it might have only shown round 1 odds and not overall odds, which would be a change. But given that for most shows except Bal and MSG rounds 3 and 4 were winners it probably was correct.
I know anyone who didn’t get tickets doesn’t want to hear this, but the most likely reason is user error. I say this based on the amounts of comments you can read about people not knowing they had to prioritize at the end and not as they go, and especially the fact that all new entries deletes all previous ones, that has been a big one. 

It sucks and I feel bad for anyone who missed out, but just reading comments that seems like the simplest explanation.

The odds tool certainly did not work. Any basic understanding of math shows that. It either needs to be junked or refined for future sales. And if it was reflective of first choice only odds then you don’t think it needed to say that? Especially in light of the language in the email that most, if not all, orders would be filled. 

I'm still a touch skeptical of this claim. There could be other issues than the odds at play. In other words, do we have any instance in which we *know* that a person was denied only because they ran out of tickets (for a show that was listed at 99%)? Honestly, I'm not even sure it's possible to have that information (at this point or, probably, ever). 

Someone this morning posted they got LA1 or 2 with their 5th pick.  I think a lot of people are claiming that EVERYONE who didn’t get one of those shows in their first few picks had user error.  That just can’t be correct

Everyone? I've only heard/seen one. Yes LA 1 priority 4 and LA 2 priority 5.

I Had LA1 & LA2 both BA and only got 1 of them. 

So how did people get these same shows with a priority of 3 or higher. This needs to be explained. 

So stop the crap about user error, There was no user error at least on my part.  

Only thing I can think of is I only asked for 1 ticket to each of those shows.

Actually so did I, so explain that. 

Saltzy23

MAMIAST said:

Baltimore & St. Louis 
Ticketmaster pages have
 charity & platinum 
tickets  being available 1-31 

What is this Platinum of which you speak?

I only see a Vitality Foundation Charity auction that basically ends at show time that is gonna wind up with outwardly laughable prices.

chukdotcom

YAKIMATSU said:

Gludfssr said:

YAKIMATSU said:

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

ecdanc said:

Luckytwn1 said:

mace1229 said:

I think the odds tool worked. If anything it might have only shown round 1 odds and not overall odds, which would be a change. But given that for most shows except Bal and MSG rounds 3 and 4 were winners it probably was correct.
I know anyone who didn’t get tickets doesn’t want to hear this, but the most likely reason is user error. I say this based on the amounts of comments you can read about people not knowing they had to prioritize at the end and not as they go, and especially the fact that all new entries deletes all previous ones, that has been a big one. 

It sucks and I feel bad for anyone who missed out, but just reading comments that seems like the simplest explanation.

The odds tool certainly did not work. Any basic understanding of math shows that. It either needs to be junked or refined for future sales. And if it was reflective of first choice only odds then you don’t think it needed to say that? Especially in light of the language in the email that most, if not all, orders would be filled. 

I'm still a touch skeptical of this claim. There could be other issues than the odds at play. In other words, do we have any instance in which we *know* that a person was denied only because they ran out of tickets (for a show that was listed at 99%)? Honestly, I'm not even sure it's possible to have that information (at this point or, probably, ever). 

Someone this morning posted they got LA1 or 2 with their 5th pick.  I think a lot of people are claiming that EVERYONE who didn’t get one of those shows in their first few picks had user error.  That just can’t be correct

Everyone? I've only heard/seen one. Yes LA 1 priority 4 and LA 2 priority 5.

I Had LA1 & LA2 both BA and only got 1 of them. 

So how did people get these same shows with a priority of 3 or higher. This needs to be explained. 

So stop the crap about user error, There was no user error at least on my part.  

Only thing I can think of is I only asked for 1 ticket to each of those shows.

That is likely a very key detail.

TA243471

A hell of a lot of people did get tickets for this portion of the tour, but i've been keeping up on this thread, and it is a whole lot more than just MSG and BAL that got rejections.  Not nearly as many, and not nearly as vocal, but WAAAAAYYY more than should be possible, even at something like 80%.  Unless everyone that still has tickets outstanding and hasnt gotten the denial email ends up getting tickets, then that will change things a lot.

Saltzy23

chukdotcom said:

YAKIMATSU said:

Gludfssr said:

YAKIMATSU said:

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

ecdanc said:

Luckytwn1 said:

mace1229 said:

I think the odds tool worked. If anything it might have only shown round 1 odds and not overall odds, which would be a change. But given that for most shows except Bal and MSG rounds 3 and 4 were winners it probably was correct.
I know anyone who didn’t get tickets doesn’t want to hear this, but the most likely reason is user error. I say this based on the amounts of comments you can read about people not knowing they had to prioritize at the end and not as they go, and especially the fact that all new entries deletes all previous ones, that has been a big one. 

It sucks and I feel bad for anyone who missed out, but just reading comments that seems like the simplest explanation.

The odds tool certainly did not work. Any basic understanding of math shows that. It either needs to be junked or refined for future sales. And if it was reflective of first choice only odds then you don’t think it needed to say that? Especially in light of the language in the email that most, if not all, orders would be filled. 

I'm still a touch skeptical of this claim. There could be other issues than the odds at play. In other words, do we have any instance in which we *know* that a person was denied only because they ran out of tickets (for a show that was listed at 99%)? Honestly, I'm not even sure it's possible to have that information (at this point or, probably, ever). 

Someone this morning posted they got LA1 or 2 with their 5th pick.  I think a lot of people are claiming that EVERYONE who didn’t get one of those shows in their first few picks had user error.  That just can’t be correct

Everyone? I've only heard/seen one. Yes LA 1 priority 4 and LA 2 priority 5.

I Had LA1 & LA2 both BA and only got 1 of them. 

So how did people get these same shows with a priority of 3 or higher. This needs to be explained. 

So stop the crap about user error, There was no user error at least on my part.  

Only thing I can think of is I only asked for 1 ticket to each of those shows.

That is likely a very key detail.

I specifically remember somewhere in the verbiage it said that the number of tickets requested would not effect your odds of winning.

Edit, yup.

TEN CLUB TICKET OPTIONS

Single Tickets:
Ten Club members are no longer required to purchase tickets in pairs for this tour. You may now request a single ticket to the show(s) you want to attend. Requesting a single ticket does NOT change your odds of being confirmed.

YAKIMATSU

	Apr 11 Sat • 7:30pm Glendale, AZ Gila River Arena
	2 x Multiple Price Levels Requested GA Pit • Standing • $103.00 ea Plus $20.00 service fee per ticket 99% Reserved • Seating • $103.00 ea Plus $20.00 service fee per ticket 99% Total: $246.00

2
	Apr 18 Sat • 7:30pm Oakland, CA Oakland Arena
	2 x Reserved • Seating • $103.00 ea 99% Total: $246.30

3
	Apr 19 Sun • 7:30pm Oakland, CA Oakland Arena
	2 x Reserved • Seating • $103.00 ea 99% Total: $246.30

4
	Apr 15 Wed • 8:00pm Los Angeles, CA The Forum
	1 x Reserved • Seating • $103.00 ea 99% Total: $126.70

5
	Apr 16 Thu • 8:00pm Los Angeles, CA The Forum
	1 x Reserved • Seating • $103.00 ea 99% Total: $126.70

6
	Apr 13 Mon • 7:30pm San Diego, CA Viejas Arena at Aztec Bowl
	1 x Multiple Price Levels Requested GA Pit • Standing • $107.00 ea Plus $15.00 service fee per ticket 98% Reserved • Seating • $107.00 ea Plus $15.00 service fee per ticket 99% Total: $122.00

Tickets

$931.00

Order Details

Apr 16 Thu • 8:00PM

Pearl Jam The Forum

Tickets	$103.00
Service Fees	$23.70
Delivery	Free
Total Charge:	$126.70

I have 3 other confirmed emails for LA1, Oak1, Oak2

Sheets Of Clay

chukdotcom said:

YAKIMATSU said:

Gludfssr said:

YAKIMATSU said:

RoleModelsinBlood31 said:

ecdanc said:

Luckytwn1 said:

mace1229 said:

I think the odds tool worked. If anything it might have only shown round 1 odds and not overall odds, which would be a change. But given that for most shows except Bal and MSG rounds 3 and 4 were winners it probably was correct.
I know anyone who didn’t get tickets doesn’t want to hear this, but the most likely reason is user error. I say this based on the amounts of comments you can read about people not knowing they had to prioritize at the end and not as they go, and especially the fact that all new entries deletes all previous ones, that has been a big one. 

It sucks and I feel bad for anyone who missed out, but just reading comments that seems like the simplest explanation.

The odds tool certainly did not work. Any basic understanding of math shows that. It either needs to be junked or refined for future sales. And if it was reflective of first choice only odds then you don’t think it needed to say that? Especially in light of the language in the email that most, if not all, orders would be filled. 

I'm still a touch skeptical of this claim. There could be other issues than the odds at play. In other words, do we have any instance in which we *know* that a person was denied only because they ran out of tickets (for a show that was listed at 99%)? Honestly, I'm not even sure it's possible to have that information (at this point or, probably, ever). 

Someone this morning posted they got LA1 or 2 with their 5th pick.  I think a lot of people are claiming that EVERYONE who didn’t get one of those shows in their first few picks had user error.  That just can’t be correct

Everyone? I've only heard/seen one. Yes LA 1 priority 4 and LA 2 priority 5.

I Had LA1 & LA2 both BA and only got 1 of them. 

So how did people get these same shows with a priority of 3 or higher. This needs to be explained. 

So stop the crap about user error, There was no user error at least on my part.  

Only thing I can think of is I only asked for 1 ticket to each of those shows.

That is likely a very key detail.

I got a pair of LA2 reserved as my 6th pick.