Hey how about those 2 missing Ten Club singles!

1…7071737576…103

Comments

  • on2legs
    on2legs Posts: 16,015
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    cincybearcat said:
    You know they coulda sent us the single from the album...instead of making people buy it while still waiting.  Seems like a missed opportunity. 
    The only reason they made that one-sided single was a cynical way to make a "bundle" to create a "want" and extra cash in on fans. 

    That single is green disease. Nothing else. No other reason for it existing. 

    And they would lose the FOMO-cashing in if they "gave it" away.
    Well... not everyone works for free like you do. 
    1996: Randall's Island 2  1998: East Rutherford | MSG 1 & 2  2000: Cincinnati | Columbus | Jones Beach 1, 2, & 3 | Boston 1 | Camden 1 & 2 2003: Philadelphia | Uniondale | MSG 1 & 2 | Holmdel  2005: Atlantic City 1  2006: Camden 1 | East Rutherford 1 & 2 2008: Camden 1 & 2 | MSG 1 & 2 (#25) | Newark (EV)  2009: Philadelphia 1, 2 & 4  2010: Newark | MSG 1 & 2  2011: Toronto 1  2013: Wrigley Field | Brooklyn 2 | Philadelphia 1 & 2 | Baltimore  2015: Central Park  2016: Philadelphia 1 & 2 | MSG 1 & 2 | Fenway Park 2 | MSG (TOTD)  2017: Brooklyn (RnR HOF)  2020: MSG | Asbury Park  2021: Asbury Park  2022: MSG | Camden | Nashville  2024: MSG 1 & 2 (#50) | Philadelphia 1 & 2 | Baltimore  2025: Raleigh


  • pjl44
    pjl44 Posts: 10,576
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    cincybearcat said:
    You know they coulda sent us the single from the album...instead of making people buy it while still waiting.  Seems like a missed opportunity. 
    The only reason they made that one-sided single was a cynical way to make a "bundle" to create a "want" and extra cash in on fans. 

    That single is green disease. Nothing else. No other reason for it existing. 

    And they would lose the FOMO-cashing in if they "gave it" away.
    At least it's black tho
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,527
    on2legs said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    cincybearcat said:
    You know they coulda sent us the single from the album...instead of making people buy it while still waiting.  Seems like a missed opportunity. 
    The only reason they made that one-sided single was a cynical way to make a "bundle" to create a "want" and extra cash in on fans. 

    That single is green disease. Nothing else. No other reason for it existing. 

    And they would lose the FOMO-cashing in if they "gave it" away.
    Well... not everyone works for free like you do. 
    pjl44 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    cincybearcat said:
    You know they coulda sent us the single from the album...instead of making people buy it while still waiting.  Seems like a missed opportunity. 
    The only reason they made that one-sided single was a cynical way to make a "bundle" to create a "want" and extra cash in on fans. 

    That single is green disease. Nothing else. No other reason for it existing. 

    And they would lose the FOMO-cashing in if they "gave it" away.
    At least it's black tho

    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"

    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • pjl44
    pjl44 Posts: 10,576
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    on2legs said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    cincybearcat said:
    You know they coulda sent us the single from the album...instead of making people buy it while still waiting.  Seems like a missed opportunity. 
    The only reason they made that one-sided single was a cynical way to make a "bundle" to create a "want" and extra cash in on fans. 

    That single is green disease. Nothing else. No other reason for it existing. 

    And they would lose the FOMO-cashing in if they "gave it" away.
    Well... not everyone works for free like you do. 
    pjl44 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    cincybearcat said:
    You know they coulda sent us the single from the album...instead of making people buy it while still waiting.  Seems like a missed opportunity. 
    The only reason they made that one-sided single was a cynical way to make a "bundle" to create a "want" and extra cash in on fans. 

    That single is green disease. Nothing else. No other reason for it existing. 

    And they would lose the FOMO-cashing in if they "gave it" away.
    At least it's black tho

    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"

    You do have a point at the root, in that $10 for a one-sided single is pretty wild. Where we split is I can't imagine caring whether they sell it or if people buy it.
  • on2legs
    on2legs Posts: 16,015
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    on2legs said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    cincybearcat said:
    You know they coulda sent us the single from the album...instead of making people buy it while still waiting.  Seems like a missed opportunity. 
    The only reason they made that one-sided single was a cynical way to make a "bundle" to create a "want" and extra cash in on fans. 

    That single is green disease. Nothing else. No other reason for it existing. 

    And they would lose the FOMO-cashing in if they "gave it" away.
    Well... not everyone works for free like you do. 
    pjl44 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    cincybearcat said:
    You know they coulda sent us the single from the album...instead of making people buy it while still waiting.  Seems like a missed opportunity. 
    The only reason they made that one-sided single was a cynical way to make a "bundle" to create a "want" and extra cash in on fans. 

    That single is green disease. Nothing else. No other reason for it existing. 

    And they would lose the FOMO-cashing in if they "gave it" away.
    At least it's black tho

    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"

    Nah... I just don’t begrudge the band for offering it for sale. People like vinyl and they made it available. No one is forcing anyone to buy it.  Not everything is a giant conspiracy. 


    1996: Randall's Island 2  1998: East Rutherford | MSG 1 & 2  2000: Cincinnati | Columbus | Jones Beach 1, 2, & 3 | Boston 1 | Camden 1 & 2 2003: Philadelphia | Uniondale | MSG 1 & 2 | Holmdel  2005: Atlantic City 1  2006: Camden 1 | East Rutherford 1 & 2 2008: Camden 1 & 2 | MSG 1 & 2 (#25) | Newark (EV)  2009: Philadelphia 1, 2 & 4  2010: Newark | MSG 1 & 2  2011: Toronto 1  2013: Wrigley Field | Brooklyn 2 | Philadelphia 1 & 2 | Baltimore  2015: Central Park  2016: Philadelphia 1 & 2 | MSG 1 & 2 | Fenway Park 2 | MSG (TOTD)  2017: Brooklyn (RnR HOF)  2020: MSG | Asbury Park  2021: Asbury Park  2022: MSG | Camden | Nashville  2024: MSG 1 & 2 (#50) | Philadelphia 1 & 2 | Baltimore  2025: Raleigh


  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,527
    on2legs said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    on2legs said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    cincybearcat said:
    You know they coulda sent us the single from the album...instead of making people buy it while still waiting.  Seems like a missed opportunity. 
    The only reason they made that one-sided single was a cynical way to make a "bundle" to create a "want" and extra cash in on fans. 

    That single is green disease. Nothing else. No other reason for it existing. 

    And they would lose the FOMO-cashing in if they "gave it" away.
    Well... not everyone works for free like you do. 
    pjl44 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    cincybearcat said:
    You know they coulda sent us the single from the album...instead of making people buy it while still waiting.  Seems like a missed opportunity. 
    The only reason they made that one-sided single was a cynical way to make a "bundle" to create a "want" and extra cash in on fans. 

    That single is green disease. Nothing else. No other reason for it existing. 

    And they would lose the FOMO-cashing in if they "gave it" away.
    At least it's black tho

    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"

    Nah... I just don’t begrudge the band for offering it for sale. People like vinyl and they made it available. No one is forcing anyone to buy it.  Not everything is a giant conspiracy. 


    Not saying it is a "conspiracy" - I'm just saying how it is.
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,527
    pjl44 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    on2legs said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    cincybearcat said:
    You know they coulda sent us the single from the album...instead of making people buy it while still waiting.  Seems like a missed opportunity. 
    The only reason they made that one-sided single was a cynical way to make a "bundle" to create a "want" and extra cash in on fans. 

    That single is green disease. Nothing else. No other reason for it existing. 

    And they would lose the FOMO-cashing in if they "gave it" away.
    Well... not everyone works for free like you do. 
    pjl44 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    cincybearcat said:
    You know they coulda sent us the single from the album...instead of making people buy it while still waiting.  Seems like a missed opportunity. 
    The only reason they made that one-sided single was a cynical way to make a "bundle" to create a "want" and extra cash in on fans. 

    That single is green disease. Nothing else. No other reason for it existing. 

    And they would lose the FOMO-cashing in if they "gave it" away.
    At least it's black tho

    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"

    You do have a point at the root, in that $10 for a one-sided single is pretty wild. Where we split is I can't imagine caring whether they sell it or if people buy it.
    You do have a point at the root, in that $500 for a front row seat is pretty wild. Where we split is I can't imagine caring whether they sell it or if people buy it.
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,726
    I really don't get the point in selling the single on vinyl if it's coming at the same time as the full record, and with no extra non-album track. I could see it if it had been sold prior to, like the singles of old were (cd and cassette and vinyl). I guess it's really nothing more than a collectible. I can't see why anyone would spin this when they have the full record at their disposal. 
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,527
    edited January 2020
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    I really don't get the point in selling the single on vinyl if it's coming at the same time as the full record, and with no extra non-album track. I could see it if it had been sold prior to, like the singles of old were (cd and cassette and vinyl). I guess it's really nothing more than a collectible. I can't see why anyone would spin this when they have the full record at their disposal. 
    IT IS A SINGLE EDIT THOUGH!

    IT 

    IS

    SHORTER
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • pjl44
    pjl44 Posts: 10,576
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    pjl44 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    on2legs said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    cincybearcat said:
    You know they coulda sent us the single from the album...instead of making people buy it while still waiting.  Seems like a missed opportunity. 
    The only reason they made that one-sided single was a cynical way to make a "bundle" to create a "want" and extra cash in on fans. 

    That single is green disease. Nothing else. No other reason for it existing. 

    And they would lose the FOMO-cashing in if they "gave it" away.
    Well... not everyone works for free like you do. 
    pjl44 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    cincybearcat said:
    You know they coulda sent us the single from the album...instead of making people buy it while still waiting.  Seems like a missed opportunity. 
    The only reason they made that one-sided single was a cynical way to make a "bundle" to create a "want" and extra cash in on fans. 

    That single is green disease. Nothing else. No other reason for it existing. 

    And they would lose the FOMO-cashing in if they "gave it" away.
    At least it's black tho

    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"

    You do have a point at the root, in that $10 for a one-sided single is pretty wild. Where we split is I can't imagine caring whether they sell it or if people buy it.
    You do have a point at the root, in that $500 for a front row seat is pretty wild. Where we split is I can't imagine caring whether they sell it or if people buy it.
    If they chose to do that, they'd certainly be within their rights
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,527
    pjl44 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    pjl44 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    on2legs said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    cincybearcat said:
    You know they coulda sent us the single from the album...instead of making people buy it while still waiting.  Seems like a missed opportunity. 
    The only reason they made that one-sided single was a cynical way to make a "bundle" to create a "want" and extra cash in on fans. 

    That single is green disease. Nothing else. No other reason for it existing. 

    And they would lose the FOMO-cashing in if they "gave it" away.
    Well... not everyone works for free like you do. 
    pjl44 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    cincybearcat said:
    You know they coulda sent us the single from the album...instead of making people buy it while still waiting.  Seems like a missed opportunity. 
    The only reason they made that one-sided single was a cynical way to make a "bundle" to create a "want" and extra cash in on fans. 

    That single is green disease. Nothing else. No other reason for it existing. 

    And they would lose the FOMO-cashing in if they "gave it" away.
    At least it's black tho

    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"

    You do have a point at the root, in that $10 for a one-sided single is pretty wild. Where we split is I can't imagine caring whether they sell it or if people buy it.
    You do have a point at the root, in that $500 for a front row seat is pretty wild. Where we split is I can't imagine caring whether they sell it or if people buy it.
    If they chose to do that, they'd certainly be within their rights
    ...Ok...
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • pulling69
    pulling69 KBTL Posts: 1,006
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    on2legs said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    on2legs said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    cincybearcat said:
    You know they coulda sent us the single from the album...instead of making people buy it while still waiting.  Seems like a missed opportunity. 
    The only reason they made that one-sided single was a cynical way to make a "bundle" to create a "want" and extra cash in on fans. 

    That single is green disease. Nothing else. No other reason for it existing. 

    And they would lose the FOMO-cashing in if they "gave it" away.
    Well... not everyone works for free like you do. 
    pjl44 said:
    Spiritual_Chaos said:
    cincybearcat said:
    You know they coulda sent us the single from the album...instead of making people buy it while still waiting.  Seems like a missed opportunity. 
    The only reason they made that one-sided single was a cynical way to make a "bundle" to create a "want" and extra cash in on fans. 

    That single is green disease. Nothing else. No other reason for it existing. 

    And they would lose the FOMO-cashing in if they "gave it" away.
    At least it's black tho

    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"

    Nah... I just don’t begrudge the band for offering it for sale. People like vinyl and they made it available. No one is forcing anyone to buy it.  Not everything is a giant conspiracy. 


    Not saying it is a "conspiracy" - I'm just saying how it is.


    "Populated with every reject and cutthroat from Bombay to Calcutta. It's worse than Detroit."
  • FR181798
    FR181798 Posts: 2,166
    edited January 2020
    Of course Ive bought the DotC single but it is a bit pointless, merely a collectable and Ive gone this far with the collection so I may as well add another record.
    Post edited by FR181798 on
  • TM307021
    TM307021 Raleigh, NC Posts: 42
    Why can't 10C just print a ton of Dance Clairvoyants 7" and then take that and their assortment of 7" past singles and call it a day for the 2 that are overdue?  Mystery box style..

    Raleigh - 2003

    MSG NYC 1&2 - 2016

    Fenway 2 - 2016

    Seattle 2 - 2018

    Missoula - 2018

  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,726
    TM307021 said:
    Why can't 10C just print a ton of Dance Clairvoyants 7" and then take that and their assortment of 7" past singles and call it a day for the 2 that are overdue?  Mystery box style..
    that would kinda suck. as much as the xmas singles haven't been the best assortment of original material, I still would like to have an actual complete set of actual fan club singles, not just "here's what's left in the warehouse" to close this out. 

    unless they have a bunch of Eddie Vedder No More 7" records. then I'll take that. LOL
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,726
    although, might have been kinda cool to just repress the first two and send those out. 
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • TM307021
    TM307021 Raleigh, NC Posts: 42
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    TM307021 said:
    Why can't 10C just print a ton of Dance Clairvoyants 7" and then take that and their assortment of 7" past singles and call it a day for the 2 that are overdue?  Mystery box style..
    that would kinda suck. as much as the xmas singles haven't been the best assortment of original material, I still would like to have an actual complete set of actual fan club singles, not just "here's what's left in the warehouse" to close this out. 

    unless they have a bunch of Eddie Vedder No More 7" records. then I'll take that. LOL
    yeah but what if they were throwing in a bunch of signed vinyls, maybe some 12"s to folks, a couple of Lost Dogs?

    Raleigh - 2003

    MSG NYC 1&2 - 2016

    Fenway 2 - 2016

    Seattle 2 - 2018

    Missoula - 2018

  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,726
    TM307021 said:
    HughFreakingDillon said:
    TM307021 said:
    Why can't 10C just print a ton of Dance Clairvoyants 7" and then take that and their assortment of 7" past singles and call it a day for the 2 that are overdue?  Mystery box style..
    that would kinda suck. as much as the xmas singles haven't been the best assortment of original material, I still would like to have an actual complete set of actual fan club singles, not just "here's what's left in the warehouse" to close this out. 

    unless they have a bunch of Eddie Vedder No More 7" records. then I'll take that. LOL
    yeah but what if they were throwing in a bunch of signed vinyls, maybe some 12"s to folks, a couple of Lost Dogs?
    I honestly just want the xmas singles and for it to be done with. 
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • FR181798
    FR181798 Posts: 2,166
    This discussion must go on. I feel its part of my life now, like brushing my teeth. I must check this thread at least twice a day.
  • Enzed
    Enzed NZ Posts: 563
    One day this thread may be redundant.

    That day isn't today.
    Auckland 1 1995
    Auckland 1998
    EV (Neil Finn and Friends, April 2, 2001)
    Auckland 2009
    Auckland 2014
    Auckland 1 2024
    Auckland 2 2024
This discussion has been closed.

Categories