What 1996 boots are soundboard?

Spiritual_Chaos

tbergs said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Wait... there has been two 98 shows as vaults? I must have both on vinyl then... but did any of them come with a MP3 copy of the concert?

No. You have to buy those separately. 

Thanks!

PB11041

FYI, someone sent me this link on another board.  Carl S's site is still active under a newer domain, it is rich and plentiful with data.  I used to rely on his site in the late 90s and early aughts before the advent of Torrents, when we used to trade shows the old fashioned way, USPS

https://hardtoimagine.org/

NewJPage

tbergs said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Wait... there has been two 98 shows as vaults? I must have both on vinyl then... but did any of them come with a MP3 copy of the concert?

No. You have to buy those separately. 

Vault 3 came w download 

Spiritual_Chaos

NewJPage said:

tbergs said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Wait... there has been two 98 shows as vaults? I must have both on vinyl then... but did any of them come with a MP3 copy of the concert?

No. You have to buy those separately. 

Vault 3 came w download 

Yes, that is why I have that one as mp3 then. I think.

tbergs

NewJPage said:

tbergs said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Spiritual_Chaos said:

Wait... there has been two 98 shows as vaults? I must have both on vinyl then... but did any of them come with a MP3 copy of the concert?

No. You have to buy those separately. 

Vault 3 came w download 

Too bad they didn't keep that trend going. Forgot they did that.

demetrios

PB11041 said:

CopperTom said:

PB11041 said:

CopperTom said:

And Portland

Theres an ALD source of Portland 1998?

source: [Nak700 > DTR80P] + [SBD (mono) > ALD > DAT] => CDR, lineage: CDR > CDR > .flac, transfer: EAC > FLAC frontend > .flac

I've had a NAK 2 source mix for a long while, but definitely not with and ALD line.  Do you have to have this flac?  I would love to compare it to what I have.  

And then to the larger world reading if you are reading, does anyone have the ALD source alone?

I got these 3 sources ..

1.) [Nak700 > DTR80P] + [SBD (mono) > ALD > DAT] => CDR

2.) Source: Nakamichi 700 > Denon DTR-80p > DAT > CDR > dEdit > dEQ > SHN

3.) Nakamichi CM700 -> Denon DTR-80p (11th row) / Generation: DAT(M) -> DAT(2) 44.1khz -> FLAC / Transfer: DA-20 -> Monster coax -> DiO 2496 -> Soundforge 6.0 -> (resample to 44.1) -> CDWave -> FLAC [619mb]

PB11041

demetrios said:

PB11041 said:

CopperTom said:

PB11041 said:

CopperTom said:

And Portland

Theres an ALD source of Portland 1998?

source: [Nak700 > DTR80P] + [SBD (mono) > ALD > DAT] => CDR, lineage: CDR > CDR > .flac, transfer: EAC > FLAC frontend > .flac

I've had a NAK 2 source mix for a long while, but definitely not with and ALD line.  Do you have to have this flac?  I would love to compare it to what I have.  

And then to the larger world reading if you are reading, does anyone have the ALD source alone?

I got these 3 sources ..

1.) [Nak700 > DTR80P] + [SBD (mono) > ALD > DAT] => CDR

2.) Source: Nakamichi 700 > Denon DTR-80p > DAT > CDR > dEdit > dEQ > SHN

3.) Nakamichi CM700 -> Denon DTR-80p (11th row) / Generation: DAT(M) -> DAT(2) 44.1khz -> FLAC / Transfer: DA-20 -> Monster coax -> DiO 2496 -> Soundforge 6.0 -> (resample to 44.1) -> CDWave -> FLAC [619mb]

Can a beggar be a chooser?  I am interested in checking out the ALD lineage.

Spiritual_Chaos

What is ALD? audiofeed for the hearing impaired?

jeffbr

Spiritual_Chaos said:

What is ALD? audiofeed for the hearing impaired?

Yes. It is a mono feed from the soundboard.

CopperTom

PB11041 said:

demetrios said:

PB11041 said:

CopperTom said:

PB11041 said:

CopperTom said:

And Portland

Theres an ALD source of Portland 1998?

source: [Nak700 > DTR80P] + [SBD (mono) > ALD > DAT] => CDR, lineage: CDR > CDR > .flac, transfer: EAC > FLAC frontend > .flac

I've had a NAK 2 source mix for a long while, but definitely not with and ALD line.  Do you have to have this flac?  I would love to compare it to what I have.  

And then to the larger world reading if you are reading, does anyone have the ALD source alone?

I got these 3 sources ..

1.) [Nak700 > DTR80P] + [SBD (mono) > ALD > DAT] => CDR

2.) Source: Nakamichi 700 > Denon DTR-80p > DAT > CDR > dEdit > dEQ > SHN

3.) Nakamichi CM700 -> Denon DTR-80p (11th row) / Generation: DAT(M) -> DAT(2) 44.1khz -> FLAC / Transfer: DA-20 -> Monster coax -> DiO 2496 -> Soundforge 6.0 -> (resample to 44.1) -> CDWave -> FLAC [619mb]

Can a beggar be a chooser?  I am interested in checking out the ALD lineage.

IIRC, The mix doesn't sound much better than #3.  I think that's one of ALD sources that is impossible to find by itself.

given2fly23

Slipped my mind.  I do have the 2-source mixes for STL and PDX 98. 

PB11041

CopperTom said:

PB11041 said:

demetrios said:

PB11041 said:

CopperTom said:

PB11041 said:

CopperTom said:

And Portland

Theres an ALD source of Portland 1998?

source: [Nak700 > DTR80P] + [SBD (mono) > ALD > DAT] => CDR, lineage: CDR > CDR > .flac, transfer: EAC > FLAC frontend > .flac

I've had a NAK 2 source mix for a long while, but definitely not with and ALD line.  Do you have to have this flac?  I would love to compare it to what I have.  

And then to the larger world reading if you are reading, does anyone have the ALD source alone?

I got these 3 sources ..

1.) [Nak700 > DTR80P] + [SBD (mono) > ALD > DAT] => CDR

2.) Source: Nakamichi 700 > Denon DTR-80p > DAT > CDR > dEdit > dEQ > SHN

3.) Nakamichi CM700 -> Denon DTR-80p (11th row) / Generation: DAT(M) -> DAT(2) 44.1khz -> FLAC / Transfer: DA-20 -> Monster coax -> DiO 2496 -> Soundforge 6.0 -> (resample to 44.1) -> CDWave -> FLAC [619mb]

Can a beggar be a chooser?  I am interested in checking out the ALD lineage.

IIRC, The mix doesn't sound much better than #3.  I think that's one of ALD sources that is impossible to find by itself.

Jammalambo

CopperTom said:

PB11041 said:

demetrios said:

PB11041 said:

CopperTom said:

PB11041 said:

CopperTom said:

And Portland

Theres an ALD source of Portland 1998?

source: [Nak700 > DTR80P] + [SBD (mono) > ALD > DAT] => CDR, lineage: CDR > CDR > .flac, transfer: EAC > FLAC frontend > .flac

I've had a NAK 2 source mix for a long while, but definitely not with and ALD line.  Do you have to have this flac?  I would love to compare it to what I have.  

And then to the larger world reading if you are reading, does anyone have the ALD source alone?

I got these 3 sources ..

1.) [Nak700 > DTR80P] + [SBD (mono) > ALD > DAT] => CDR

2.) Source: Nakamichi 700 > Denon DTR-80p > DAT > CDR > dEdit > dEQ > SHN

3.) Nakamichi CM700 -> Denon DTR-80p (11th row) / Generation: DAT(M) -> DAT(2) 44.1khz -> FLAC / Transfer: DA-20 -> Monster coax -> DiO 2496 -> Soundforge 6.0 -> (resample to 44.1) -> CDWave -> FLAC [619mb]

Can a beggar be a chooser?  I am interested in checking out the ALD lineage.

IIRC, The mix doesn't sound much better than #3.  I think that's one of ALD sources that is impossible to find by itself.

I agree, the AUD + ALD matrix for Portland 98 doesn't sound as good as one would imagine.. Not even close to the excellent sound of other similar matrixes (both LA shows from 1998, Mansfield 1998/09/16, St Louis 1998 with two AUD sources mixed with an ALD, or Hartford 1996). I wonder if an ALD source was truly used, or maybe the mix was not properly done, or the original ALD was simply not that good. Also, contrary to the other ALD sources mentioned, I've never seen the ALD source alone available anywhere for Portland 98.

PB11041

Jammalambo said:

CopperTom said:

PB11041 said:

demetrios said:

PB11041 said:

CopperTom said:

PB11041 said:

CopperTom said:

And Portland

Theres an ALD source of Portland 1998?

source: [Nak700 > DTR80P] + [SBD (mono) > ALD > DAT] => CDR, lineage: CDR > CDR > .flac, transfer: EAC > FLAC frontend > .flac

I've had a NAK 2 source mix for a long while, but definitely not with and ALD line.  Do you have to have this flac?  I would love to compare it to what I have.  

And then to the larger world reading if you are reading, does anyone have the ALD source alone?

I got these 3 sources ..

1.) [Nak700 > DTR80P] + [SBD (mono) > ALD > DAT] => CDR

2.) Source: Nakamichi 700 > Denon DTR-80p > DAT > CDR > dEdit > dEQ > SHN

3.) Nakamichi CM700 -> Denon DTR-80p (11th row) / Generation: DAT(M) -> DAT(2) 44.1khz -> FLAC / Transfer: DA-20 -> Monster coax -> DiO 2496 -> Soundforge 6.0 -> (resample to 44.1) -> CDWave -> FLAC [619mb]

Can a beggar be a chooser?  I am interested in checking out the ALD lineage.

IIRC, The mix doesn't sound much better than #3.  I think that's one of ALD sources that is impossible to find by itself.

I agree, the AUD + ALD matrix for Portland 98 doesn't sound as good as one would imagine.. Not even close to the excellent sound of other similar matrixes (both LA shows from 1998, Mansfield 1998/09/16, St Louis 1998 with two AUD sources mixed with an ALD, or Hartford 1996). I wonder if an ALD source was truly used, or maybe the mix was not properly done, or the original ALD was simply not that good. Also, contrary to the other ALD sources mentioned, I've never seen the ALD source alone available anywhere for Portland 98.

So Carl just reached out to me on reddit.  Super nice of him, he clarified the Portland source does in fact include an ALD.  The ALD for that particular show has some issues in and of itself.   In any event I would based on the information he shared with me trust that his source guides at the link above are quite accurate.  Some of the ALDs are just better than others.

There are actually quite a few more ALD shows in 1998 than I knew of.