1996 New York City Ward Sutton Poster

not perfect 
see images 
$600 plus shipping 
no time this time to feign reluctance

Comments


  • no time this time to feign reluctance
  • You'll get a third of that considering condition.
  • Okay , thanks for the input . I’m terrible at pricing . Thanks again 
    no time this time to feign reluctance
  • PB11041PB11041 Posts: 2,805
    I wouldn't sell that for less than $400 unless you are in dire straits.   These are not growing on trees.  That is minimal damage to a 22 year old print.
    His eminence has yet to show. 
    http://www.hi5sports.org/ (Sports Program for Kids with Disabilities)
    http://www.livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=3652

  • Thanks for the encouragement . I’m terrible at pricing 
    no time this time to feign reluctance
  • LoujoeLoujoe Posts: 9,037
    True. Some forget posters are paper. Old posters are not damaged, they have character revealing their authenticity. Lmk if you want to trade. I dont have any cash, was my 2nd PJ show and could care less about merch back then.
  • PB11041 said:
    I wouldn't sell that for less than $400 unless you are in dire straits.   These are not growing on trees.  That is minimal damage to a 22 year old print.
    too bad you missed out on one a few months ago that was in better condition for $400!
  • PB11041PB11041 Posts: 2,805
    PB11041 said:
    I wouldn't sell that for less than $400 unless you are in dire straits.   These are not growing on trees.  That is minimal damage to a 22 year old print.
    too bad you missed out on one a few months ago that was in better condition for $400!
    I have owned one since 1998.
    His eminence has yet to show. 
    http://www.hi5sports.org/ (Sports Program for Kids with Disabilities)
    http://www.livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=3652

  • on2legson2legs Posts: 14,973
    PB11041 said:
    I wouldn't sell that for less than $400 unless you are in dire straits.   These are not growing on trees.  That is minimal damage to a 22 year old print.
    $400 is a reasonable price and I don’t see prices dropping anytime soon. 
    1996: Randall's Island 2  1998: East Rutherford | MSG 1 & 2  2000: Cincinnati | Columbus | Jones Beach 1, 2, & 3 | Boston 1 | Camden 1 & 2 2003: Philadelphia | Uniondale | MSG 1 & 2 | Holmdel  2005: Atlantic City 1  2006: Camden 1 | East Rutherford 1 & 2 2008: Camden 1 & 2 | MSG 1 & 2 | Newark (EV)  2009: Philadelphia 1, 2 & 4  2010: Newark | MSG 1 & 2  2011: Toronto 1  2013: Wrigley Field | Brooklyn 2 | Philadelphia 1 & 2 | Baltimore  2015: Central Park  2016: Philadelphia 1 & 2 | MSG 1 & 2 | Fenway Park 2 | MSG (TOTD)  2017: Brooklyn (RnR HOF)  2020: MSG | Asbury Park  2021: Asbury Park  2022: MSG | Camden | Nashville  2024: MSG 1 & 2 (#50) | Philadelphia 1 & 2 | Baltimore


  • PB11041PB11041 Posts: 2,805
    on2legs said:
    PB11041 said:
    I wouldn't sell that for less than $400 unless you are in dire straits.   These are not growing on trees.  That is minimal damage to a 22 year old print.
    $400 is a reasonable price and I don’t see prices dropping anytime soon. 
    I agree.  
    His eminence has yet to show. 
    http://www.hi5sports.org/ (Sports Program for Kids with Disabilities)
    http://www.livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=3652

  • MattchewMattchew Posts: 1,345
    Loujoe said:
    True. Some forget posters are paper. Old posters are not damaged, they have character revealing their authenticity. Lmk if you want to trade. I dont have any cash, was my 2nd PJ show and could care less about merch back then.
    That may be how some look at posters, but the honest truth is that the majority of people will not pay that much for damaged posters.  They want 96 or 98 posters that are in near mint condition, or they will have to pay hundreds of dollars to get the poster restored, depending on the damage.
  • PB11041PB11041 Posts: 2,805
    Mattchew said:
    Loujoe said:
    True. Some forget posters are paper. Old posters are not damaged, they have character revealing their authenticity. Lmk if you want to trade. I dont have any cash, was my 2nd PJ show and could care less about merch back then.
    That may be how some look at posters, but the honest truth is that the majority of people will not pay that much for damaged posters.  They want 96 or 98 posters that are in near mint condition, or they will have to pay hundreds of dollars to get the poster restored, depending on the damage.
    The majority are already often times paying insane markups on posters that are not even more than a few months to a few years old and variants.  

    The market is super saturated and they will be lucky to get a shade over their initial investment back.  It is like what happened with baseball cards in the 1990s, irrational exuberance about new cards that had been overproduced and overvalued. 
    His eminence has yet to show. 
    http://www.hi5sports.org/ (Sports Program for Kids with Disabilities)
    http://www.livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=3652

  • LoujoeLoujoe Posts: 9,037
    Mattchew said:
    Loujoe said:
    True. Some forget posters are paper. Old posters are not damaged, they have character revealing their authenticity. Lmk if you want to trade. I dont have any cash, was my 2nd PJ show and could care less about merch back then.
    That may be how some look at posters, but the honest truth is that the majority of people will not pay that much for damaged posters.  They want 96 or 98 posters that are in near mint condition, or they will have to pay hundreds of dollars to get the poster restored, depending on the damage.
    True too. Depends on the collectors standards. If something is too minty fresh i'd be skeptical. But I've only traded and never paid above face for anything...yet.
  • No one should pay face . 
    no time this time to feign reluctance
  • No one should pay face . 
    I'm surprised this hasn't sold yet.

    Where are all the poster junkies at?!?
  • LoujoeLoujoe Posts: 9,037
    No one should pay face . 
    Face at shows or from a friend. Wouldnt expect face for aftermarket sale. Unless it's a wolf bear pig...
Sign In or Register to comment.