Here is my view for night 2. Not sure why they can not take the net down but hoping it just blends in and we do not notice it. Also it looks like to me that a lot of the seats that dropped on the verified fan that were limited view due to the angle are better seats then some of the 10 club sections in the stands imo.
Looking for 2-4 Ticketbastard seats together if possible for fenway night 1 for some friends
anywhere in the Park
thanks
The whole world will be different soon... - EV
RED ROCKS 6-19-95
AUGUSTA 9-26-96
MANSFIELD 9-15-98
BOSTON 9-29-04
BOSTON 5-25-06
MANSFIELD 6-30-08
EV SOLO BOSTON 8-01-08
BOSTON 5-17-10
EV SOLO BOSTON 6-16-11
PJ20 9-3-11
PJ20 9-4-11
WRIGLEY 7-19-13
WORCESTER 10-15-13
WORCESTER 10-16-13
HARTFORD 10-25-13
I compiled all of the seat data from this thread. This is how it breaks down based on the self-reported information: Rows 1 and 2 - Lottery winners Ten Club numbers 1XXX to around 50XXX = A5 Row 3 Ten Club numbers 51XXX to around 100XXX = Rows 4 - 8 of A3/A4/A5 Rows 9 and 10 - Lottery winners Ten Club numbers 101XXX to around 135XXX = remainder of seats in the A sections Ten Club numbers 136XXX to around 265XXX = B section field seats
Lowest number: 1XXX Highest number: 680XXX
125 reporting numbers, 34 not reporting numbers
13 lottery winners Only 1 confirmed lottery winner between 1XXX and 400XXX (1.4%) 3 lottery winners from 400XXX thru 500XXX (12%) 2 lottery winners from 500XXX thru 600XXX (12.5%) 3 lottery winners from 600XXX thru 700XXX (27%)
This data seems to suggest that the lottery is weighed in favor of the higher numbers.
Boston (4/10/94), Hartford (10/2/96), Barre (8/22/98), Hartford (9/13/98), Mansfield (9/15/98 + 9/16/98), Mansfield (8/29/00 + 8/30/00), Mansfield (7/2/03 + 7/11/03), Boston (9/28/04), Hartford (5/13/06), Boston (5/24/06 + 5/25/06), Hartford (6/27/08), Mansfield (6/28/08 + 6/30/08), Philadelphia (10/31/09), Hartford (5/15/10), Worcester (10/15/13 + 10/16/13), Hartford (10/25/13), New York (5/1/16), Boston (8/5/16 + 8/7/16), Boston (9/2/18 + 9/4/18)
I compiled all of the seat data from this thread. This is how it breaks down based on the self-reported information: Rows 1 and 2 - Lottery winners Ten Club numbers 1XXX to around 50XXX = A5 Row 3 Ten Club numbers 51XXX to around 100XXX = Rows 4 - 8 of A3/A4/A5 Rows 9 and 10 - Lottery winners Ten Club numbers 101XXX to around 135XXX = remainder of seats in the A sections Ten Club numbers 136XXX to around 265XXX = B section field seats
Lowest number: 1XXX Highest number: 680XXX
125 reporting numbers, 34 not reporting numbers
13 lottery winners Only 1 confirmed lottery winner between 1XXX and 400XXX (1.4%) 3 lottery winners from 400XXX thru 500XXX (12%) 2 lottery winners from 500XXX thru 600XXX (12.5%) 3 lottery winners from 600XXX thru 700XXX (27%)
This data seems to suggest that the lottery is weighed in favor of the higher numbers.
Thanks for assembling this. I never thought I had a chance to win the lottery with a TenClub number under 100k.
I believe it is heavily weighted in favor of high numbers.
2000- Atlanta, GA: New Orleans, LA: Memphis, TN: Nashville, TN
2003- Raleigh, NC: Charlotte, NC: Atlanta, GA
2004- Asheville, NC (hometown show)
2006- Cincinnati, OH
2008- Columbia, SC
2009- Chicago, IL x 2 / Ed Vedder- Atlanta, GA x 2
2010- Bristow, VA
2011- Alpine Valley, WI (PJ20) x 2 / Ed Vedder- Chicago, IL
2012- Atlanta, GA
2013- Charlotte, NC
2014- Cincinnati, OH
2015- New York, NY
2016- Greenville, SC: Hampton, VA:: Columbia, SC: Raleigh, NC : Lexington, KY: Philly, PA 2: (Wrigley) Chicago, IL x 2 (holy shit): Temple of the Dog- Philly, PA
I compiled all of the seat data from this thread. This is how it breaks down based on the self-reported information: Rows 1 and 2 - Lottery winners Ten Club numbers 1XXX to around 50XXX = A5 Row 3 Ten Club numbers 51XXX to around 100XXX = Rows 4 - 8 of A3/A4/A5 Rows 9 and 10 - Lottery winners Ten Club numbers 101XXX to around 135XXX = remainder of seats in the A sections Ten Club numbers 136XXX to around 265XXX = B section field seats
Lowest number: 1XXX Highest number: 680XXX
125 reporting numbers, 34 not reporting numbers
13 lottery winners Only 1 confirmed lottery winner between 1XXX and 400XXX (1.4%) 3 lottery winners from 400XXX thru 500XXX (12%) 2 lottery winners from 500XXX thru 600XXX (12.5%) 3 lottery winners from 600XXX thru 700XXX (27%)
This data seems to suggest that the lottery is weighed in favor of the higher numbers.
No it just means there are more higher numbers than lower numbers.
I compiled all of the seat data from this thread. This is how it breaks down based on the self-reported information: Rows 1 and 2 - Lottery winners Ten Club numbers 1XXX to around 50XXX = A5 Row 3 Ten Club numbers 51XXX to around 100XXX = Rows 4 - 8 of A3/A4/A5 Rows 9 and 10 - Lottery winners Ten Club numbers 101XXX to around 135XXX = remainder of seats in the A sections Ten Club numbers 136XXX to around 265XXX = B section field seats
Lowest number: 1XXX Highest number: 680XXX
125 reporting numbers, 34 not reporting numbers
13 lottery winners Only 1 confirmed lottery winner between 1XXX and 400XXX (1.4%) 3 lottery winners from 400XXX thru 500XXX (12%) 2 lottery winners from 500XXX thru 600XXX (12.5%) 3 lottery winners from 600XXX thru 700XXX (27%)
This data seems to suggest that the lottery is weighed in favor of the higher numbers.
No it just means there are more higher numbers than lower numbers.
Not accurate based on the self-reported data. There are 72 members who reported their number as between 1XXX and 400XXX. Only one of these members won the lottery. Conversely there were 52 who reported numbers from 400XXX through 700XXX and there were 8 lottery winners in this range. So, there were more attendees in the under 400XXX range but 8 of the 9 winners came from the over 400XXX range.
If you are under 400XXX you had a 1.4% chance, above 400XXX you had a 10X greater chance (15%).
Now this analysis is based on self-reporting so there is a chance that the data is skewed. But it looks valid to me.
Boston (4/10/94), Hartford (10/2/96), Barre (8/22/98), Hartford (9/13/98), Mansfield (9/15/98 + 9/16/98), Mansfield (8/29/00 + 8/30/00), Mansfield (7/2/03 + 7/11/03), Boston (9/28/04), Hartford (5/13/06), Boston (5/24/06 + 5/25/06), Hartford (6/27/08), Mansfield (6/28/08 + 6/30/08), Philadelphia (10/31/09), Hartford (5/15/10), Worcester (10/15/13 + 10/16/13), Hartford (10/25/13), New York (5/1/16), Boston (8/5/16 + 8/7/16), Boston (9/2/18 + 9/4/18)
I compiled all of the seat data from this thread. This is how it breaks down based on the self-reported information: Rows 1 and 2 - Lottery winners Ten Club numbers 1XXX to around 50XXX = A5 Row 3 Ten Club numbers 51XXX to around 100XXX = Rows 4 - 8 of A3/A4/A5 Rows 9 and 10 - Lottery winners Ten Club numbers 101XXX to around 135XXX = remainder of seats in the A sections Ten Club numbers 136XXX to around 265XXX = B section field seats
Lowest number: 1XXX Highest number: 680XXX
125 reporting numbers, 34 not reporting numbers
13 lottery winners Only 1 confirmed lottery winner between 1XXX and 400XXX (1.4%) 3 lottery winners from 400XXX thru 500XXX (12%) 2 lottery winners from 500XXX thru 600XXX (12.5%) 3 lottery winners from 600XXX thru 700XXX (27%)
This data seems to suggest that the lottery is weighed in favor of the higher numbers.
No it just means there are more higher numbers than lower numbers.
Not accurate based on the self-reported data. There are 72 members who reported their number as between 1XXX and 400XXX. Only one of these members won the lottery. Conversely there were 52 who reported numbers from 400XXX through 700XXX and there were 8 lottery winners in this range. So, there were more attendees in the under 400XXX range but 8 of the 9 winners came from the over 400XXX range.
If you are under 400XXX you had a 1.4% chance, above 400XXX you had a 10X greater chance (15%).
Now this analysis is based on self-reporting so there is a chance that the data is skewed. But it looks valid to me.
I'm a lottery winner at 341xxx. Being that we're getting all mathematical now!
I compiled all of the seat data from this thread. This is how it breaks down based on the self-reported information: Rows 1 and 2 - Lottery winners Ten Club numbers 1XXX to around 50XXX = A5 Row 3 Ten Club numbers 51XXX to around 100XXX = Rows 4 - 8 of A3/A4/A5 Rows 9 and 10 - Lottery winners Ten Club numbers 101XXX to around 135XXX = remainder of seats in the A sections Ten Club numbers 136XXX to around 265XXX = B section field seats
Lowest number: 1XXX Highest number: 680XXX
125 reporting numbers, 34 not reporting numbers
13 lottery winners Only 1 confirmed lottery winner between 1XXX and 400XXX (1.4%) 3 lottery winners from 400XXX thru 500XXX (12%) 2 lottery winners from 500XXX thru 600XXX (12.5%) 3 lottery winners from 600XXX thru 700XXX (27%)
This data seems to suggest that the lottery is weighed in favor of the higher numbers.
No it just means there are more higher numbers than lower numbers.
Not accurate based on the self-reported data. There are 72 members who reported their number as between 1XXX and 400XXX. Only one of these members won the lottery. Conversely there were 52 who reported numbers from 400XXX through 700XXX and there were 8 lottery winners in this range. So, there were more attendees in the under 400XXX range but 8 of the 9 winners came from the over 400XXX range.
If you are under 400XXX you had a 1.4% chance, above 400XXX you had a 10X greater chance (15%).
Now this analysis is based on self-reporting so there is a chance that the data is skewed. But it looks valid to me.
I'm a lottery winner at 341xxx. Being that we're getting all mathematical now!
2000- Atlanta, GA: New Orleans, LA: Memphis, TN: Nashville, TN
2003- Raleigh, NC: Charlotte, NC: Atlanta, GA
2004- Asheville, NC (hometown show)
2006- Cincinnati, OH
2008- Columbia, SC
2009- Chicago, IL x 2 / Ed Vedder- Atlanta, GA x 2
2010- Bristow, VA
2011- Alpine Valley, WI (PJ20) x 2 / Ed Vedder- Chicago, IL
2012- Atlanta, GA
2013- Charlotte, NC
2014- Cincinnati, OH
2015- New York, NY
2016- Greenville, SC: Hampton, VA:: Columbia, SC: Raleigh, NC : Lexington, KY: Philly, PA 2: (Wrigley) Chicago, IL x 2 (holy shit): Temple of the Dog- Philly, PA
I compiled all of the seat data from this thread. This is how it breaks down based on the self-reported information: Rows 1 and 2 - Lottery winners Ten Club numbers 1XXX to around 50XXX = A5 Row 3 Ten Club numbers 51XXX to around 100XXX = Rows 4 - 8 of A3/A4/A5 Rows 9 and 10 - Lottery winners Ten Club numbers 101XXX to around 135XXX = remainder of seats in the A sections Ten Club numbers 136XXX to around 265XXX = B section field seats
Lowest number: 1XXX Highest number: 680XXX
125 reporting numbers, 34 not reporting numbers
13 lottery winners Only 1 confirmed lottery winner between 1XXX and 400XXX (1.4%) 3 lottery winners from 400XXX thru 500XXX (12%) 2 lottery winners from 500XXX thru 600XXX (12.5%) 3 lottery winners from 600XXX thru 700XXX (27%)
This data seems to suggest that the lottery is weighed in favor of the higher numbers.
No it just means there are more higher numbers than lower numbers.
Not accurate based on the self-reported data. There are 72 members who reported their number as between 1XXX and 400XXX. Only one of these members won the lottery. Conversely there were 52 who reported numbers from 400XXX through 700XXX and there were 8 lottery winners in this range. So, there were more attendees in the under 400XXX range but 8 of the 9 winners came from the over 400XXX range.
If you are under 400XXX you had a 1.4% chance, above 400XXX you had a 10X greater chance (15%).
Now this analysis is based on self-reporting so there is a chance that the data is skewed. But it looks valid to me.
I'm a lottery winner at 341xxx. Being that we're getting all mathematical now!
It would be interesting to know how many low to mid numbers are not current accounts. Would be cool is they could re-calculate and assign everyone new numbers, removing the inactive accounts
It would be interesting to know how many low to mid numbers are not current accounts. Would be cool is they could re-calculate and assign everyone new numbers, removing the inactive accounts
100% agree. The numbers go up to 680,000. But how many are active? It seems there's some secrecy around but I don't see why.
I compiled all of the seat data from this thread. This is how it breaks down based on the self-reported information: Rows 1 and 2 - Lottery winners Ten Club numbers 1XXX to around 50XXX = A5 Row 3 Ten Club numbers 51XXX to around 100XXX = Rows 4 - 8 of A3/A4/A5 Rows 9 and 10 - Lottery winners Ten Club numbers 101XXX to around 135XXX = remainder of seats in the A sections Ten Club numbers 136XXX to around 265XXX = B section field seats
Lowest number: 1XXX Highest number: 680XXX
125 reporting numbers, 34 not reporting numbers
13 lottery winners Only 1 confirmed lottery winner between 1XXX and 400XXX (1.4%) 3 lottery winners from 400XXX thru 500XXX (12%) 2 lottery winners from 500XXX thru 600XXX (12.5%) 3 lottery winners from 600XXX thru 700XXX (27%)
This data seems to suggest that the lottery is weighed in favor of the higher numbers.
No it just means there are more higher numbers than lower numbers.
Not accurate based on the self-reported data. There are 72 members who reported their number as between 1XXX and 400XXX. Only one of these members won the lottery. Conversely there were 52 who reported numbers from 400XXX through 700XXX and there were 8 lottery winners in this range. So, there were more attendees in the under 400XXX range but 8 of the 9 winners came from the over 400XXX range.
If you are under 400XXX you had a 1.4% chance, above 400XXX you had a 10X greater chance (15%).
Now this analysis is based on self-reporting so there is a chance that the data is skewed. But it looks valid to me.
Of course I’m 400xxx almost down to the exact 400k number lol. I guess I should’ve waited another year or two to join
Thanks for assembling this. I never thought I had a chance to win the lottery with a TenClub number under 100k.
My # is 74,xxx and I won the lottery once.
Have to say I felt a bit guilty about it, but my guest ticket went to someone who'd traveled from South America to Canada for the show, so it was all good!
Thanks for assembling this. I never thought I had a chance to win the lottery with a TenClub number under 100k.
My # is 74,xxx and I won the lottery once.
Have to say I felt a bit guilty about it, but my guest ticket went to someone who'd traveled from South America to Canada for the show, so it was all good!
One valid reason that those with really low numbers are less likely to win the lottery is that a move to rows 9 and 10 would be a downgrade. I'm assuming that lottery wins that would move you back are ignored. Also assuming that the number of tickets in rows 9 and 10 are equal to those in rows 1 and 2, then low Ten Club numbers would only have half the chance of others to win the lottery.
When you look at the numbers you see that 5 of the reported lottery winners are between Ten Club number 540XXX and 680XXX. And that's with only 14 members posting their seat locations. That's a really high percentage of wins (35%). Now some of this may be due to self-reporting. Its possible newer members would be less likely to know of or use the forum. But the data seems to show that the very high numbers are given a better chance to win.
Boston (4/10/94), Hartford (10/2/96), Barre (8/22/98), Hartford (9/13/98), Mansfield (9/15/98 + 9/16/98), Mansfield (8/29/00 + 8/30/00), Mansfield (7/2/03 + 7/11/03), Boston (9/28/04), Hartford (5/13/06), Boston (5/24/06 + 5/25/06), Hartford (6/27/08), Mansfield (6/28/08 + 6/30/08), Philadelphia (10/31/09), Hartford (5/15/10), Worcester (10/15/13 + 10/16/13), Hartford (10/25/13), New York (5/1/16), Boston (8/5/16 + 8/7/16), Boston (9/2/18 + 9/4/18)
I compiled all of the seat data from this thread. This is how it breaks down based on the self-reported information: Rows 1 and 2 - Lottery winners Ten Club numbers 1XXX to around 50XXX = A5 Row 3 Ten Club numbers 51XXX to around 100XXX = Rows 4 - 8 of A3/A4/A5 Rows 9 and 10 - Lottery winners Ten Club numbers 101XXX to around 135XXX = remainder of seats in the A sections Ten Club numbers 136XXX to around 265XXX = B section field seats
Lowest number: 1XXX Highest number: 680XXX
125 reporting numbers, 34 not reporting numbers
13 lottery winners Only 1 confirmed lottery winner between 1XXX and 400XXX (1.4%) 3 lottery winners from 400XXX thru 500XXX (12%) 2 lottery winners from 500XXX thru 600XXX (12.5%) 3 lottery winners from 600XXX thru 700XXX (27%)
This data seems to suggest that the lottery is weighed in favor of the higher numbers.
No it just means there are more higher numbers than lower numbers.
Not accurate based on the self-reported data. There are 72 members who reported their number as between 1XXX and 400XXX. Only one of these members won the lottery. Conversely there were 52 who reported numbers from 400XXX through 700XXX and there were 8 lottery winners in this range. So, there were more attendees in the under 400XXX range but 8 of the 9 winners came from the over 400XXX range.
If you are under 400XXX you had a 1.4% chance, above 400XXX you had a 10X greater chance (15%).
Now this analysis is based on self-reporting so there is a chance that the data is skewed. But it looks valid to me.
Or, more likely true is the fans with higher numbers are beleaguered like me and don't want to bother posting their obstructed view blind purchase seats and those that won are thrilled to share the news.
I highly doubt a band with such an unrelentingly biased ticket policy would bother to weigh the lottery in any direction without notice. Although they did sell obstructed view without notice at time of purchase
I've been a fan since day one but always disliked fan clubs and blind purchasing of concert Tix. This experience reminds me why I avoided joining for so long. But I'm in the door and trying to be positive
Based on the original ticket notice from the band, I was expecting upper level first few rows but got grandstand with a nice pole obstruction according to Fenway precise seating...and possibly a balcony obstruction as well, since precise seating assumes we will be sitting not standing
G16 r14...665xxx
Let's drive down the % to a more realistic representation
I know some are disappointed with their seats but let’s remember that
10c got a hold of a lot more seats than normal for these shows, the percentages
hardly moved from 99%. Not every seat is going to be great with an awesome
view. My night 1 seats aren't great but I'm thrilled to be in the building and
didn't have to deal with the public sale like some of my friends did. They were
on well before the start time and got nothing and are still trying to find
reasonably priced tickets for the show.
RE: obstructed view tix... that sucks. Does your ticket actually say "Obstructed" on it? Or are you basing it on some seating chart or online seating views? I know that Fenway is really good about noting obstructed view for baseball games, but seems to be hit or miss on this when it comes to concerts, based on som eother online complaints I have seen. Also, their definition of an obstruction may be more liberal than yours (like if a pole is in your line of sight but does not block the view of the stage, just one of the screens, Fenway may not label that as obstructed, even though it probably is). Pearl Jam/10 Club relies on the stadium to tell them what is obstructed and what is not... there's no way they would be able to check all the seats. BUT, if it says "obstructed view" right on the tickets, then that doesn't seem right.
1998 Mansfield 09/15 | 2000 Mansfield 08/30 | 2003 Mansfield 07/02, 07/03, 07/11 | 2004 Boston 09/28 | 2006 Boston 05/24, 05/25 | 2008 Mansfield 06/28, 06/30 | 2009 Philadelphia 10/27, 10/28, 10/31 | 2010 Boston 05/17 | 2013 Worcester 10/15, 10/16 - Hartford 10/25 | 2016 Boston 08/05, 08/07 - Chicago 08/20, 08/22 | 2018 Seattle 08/08, 08/10 - Boston 09/02, 09/04 | 2022 Denver, 09/22
Thanks for assembling this. I never thought I had a chance to win the lottery with a TenClub number under 100k.
My # is 74,xxx and I won the lottery once.
Have to say I felt a bit guilty about it, but my guest ticket went to someone who'd traveled from South America to Canada for the show, so it was all good!
thanks for letting me know. I have always wondered if they even put us in the draw.
2000- Atlanta, GA: New Orleans, LA: Memphis, TN: Nashville, TN
2003- Raleigh, NC: Charlotte, NC: Atlanta, GA
2004- Asheville, NC (hometown show)
2006- Cincinnati, OH
2008- Columbia, SC
2009- Chicago, IL x 2 / Ed Vedder- Atlanta, GA x 2
2010- Bristow, VA
2011- Alpine Valley, WI (PJ20) x 2 / Ed Vedder- Chicago, IL
2012- Atlanta, GA
2013- Charlotte, NC
2014- Cincinnati, OH
2015- New York, NY
2016- Greenville, SC: Hampton, VA:: Columbia, SC: Raleigh, NC : Lexington, KY: Philly, PA 2: (Wrigley) Chicago, IL x 2 (holy shit): Temple of the Dog- Philly, PA
Or, more likely true is the fans with higher numbers are beleaguered like me and don't want to bother posting their obstructed view blind purchase seats and those that won are thrilled to share the news.
I highly doubt a band with such an unrelentingly biased ticket policy would bother to weigh the lottery in any direction without notice. Although they did sell obstructed view without notice at time of purchase
I've been a fan since day one but always disliked fan clubs and blind purchasing of concert Tix. This experience reminds me why I avoided joining for so long. But I'm in the door and trying to be positive
Based on the original ticket notice from the band, I was expecting upper level first few rows but got grandstand with a nice pole obstruction according to Fenway precise seating...and possibly a balcony obstruction as well, since precise seating assumes we will be sitting not standing
G16 r14...665xxx
Let's drive down the % to a more realistic representation
My advice is to get to Fenway early on the day of show. If your seat is obstructed, as you expect it to be, take some photos. There should be a Ten Club ticket table in the venue. It was under the right field bleachers by the Red Sox store when they played here in 2016. I had a similar issue with my tickets to the 2nd show. We were in the section near Pesky's pole and it obstructed the stage perfectly from our seats and we could only see the screens. I went and spoke to the TC rep and they said they relied on Fenway to provide info about seats being obstructed. We were given seats on the turf in one of the B sections in the middle.
2000: Pittsburgh
2008: Mansfield II
2010: Hartford, Boston
2013: Chicago, Worcester I, Hartford 2016: Boston I, Boston II 2018: Boston I, Boston II
I compiled all of the seat data from this thread. This is how it breaks down based on the self-reported information: Rows 1 and 2 - Lottery winners Ten Club numbers 1XXX to around 50XXX = A5 Row 3 Ten Club numbers 51XXX to around 100XXX = Rows 4 - 8 of A3/A4/A5 Rows 9 and 10 - Lottery winners Ten Club numbers 101XXX to around 135XXX = remainder of seats in the A sections Ten Club numbers 136XXX to around 265XXX = B section field seats
Lowest number: 1XXX Highest number: 680XXX
125 reporting numbers, 34 not reporting numbers
13 lottery winners Only 1 confirmed lottery winner between 1XXX and 400XXX (1.4%) 3 lottery winners from 400XXX thru 500XXX (12%) 2 lottery winners from 500XXX thru 600XXX (12.5%) 3 lottery winners from 600XXX thru 700XXX (27%)
This data seems to suggest that the lottery is weighed in favor of the higher numbers.
No it just means there are more higher numbers than lower numbers.
Not accurate based on the self-reported data. There are 72 members who reported their number as between 1XXX and 400XXX. Only one of these members won the lottery. Conversely there were 52 who reported numbers from 400XXX through 700XXX and there were 8 lottery winners in this range. So, there were more attendees in the under 400XXX range but 8 of the 9 winners came from the over 400XXX range.
If you are under 400XXX you had a 1.4% chance, above 400XXX you had a 10X greater chance (15%).
Now this analysis is based on self-reporting so there is a chance that the data is skewed. But it looks valid to me.
Or, more likely true is the fans with higher numbers are beleaguered like me and don't want to bother posting their obstructed view blind purchase seats and those that won are thrilled to share the news.
I highly doubt a band with such an unrelentingly biased ticket policy would bother to weigh the lottery in any direction without notice. Although they did sell obstructed view without notice at time of purchase
I've been a fan since day one but always disliked fan clubs and blind purchasing of concert Tix. This experience reminds me why I avoided joining for so long. But I'm in the door and trying to be positive
Based on the original ticket notice from the band, I was expecting upper level first few rows but got grandstand with a nice pole obstruction according to Fenway precise seating...and possibly a balcony obstruction as well, since precise seating assumes we will be sitting not standing
G16 r14...665xxx
Let's drive down the % to a more realistic representation
Comments
member 188###
anywhere in the Park
thanks
RED ROCKS 6-19-95
AUGUSTA 9-26-96
MANSFIELD 9-15-98
BOSTON 9-29-04
BOSTON 5-25-06
MANSFIELD 6-30-08
EV SOLO BOSTON 8-01-08
BOSTON 5-17-10
EV SOLO BOSTON 6-16-11
PJ20 9-3-11
PJ20 9-4-11
WRIGLEY 7-19-13
WORCESTER 10-15-13
WORCESTER 10-16-13
HARTFORD 10-25-13
D'oh!
1 - Loge Box 127 row 4 - lower grandstand behind home plate, would be great seats for the Sox!
2 - F76 row 2
Rows 1 and 2 - Lottery winners
Ten Club numbers 1XXX to around 50XXX = A5 Row 3
Ten Club numbers 51XXX to around 100XXX = Rows 4 - 8 of A3/A4/A5
Rows 9 and 10 - Lottery winners
Ten Club numbers 101XXX to around 135XXX = remainder of seats in the A sections
Ten Club numbers 136XXX to around 265XXX = B section field seats
Lowest number: 1XXX
Highest number: 680XXX
125 reporting numbers, 34 not reporting numbers
13 lottery winners
Only 1 confirmed lottery winner between 1XXX and 400XXX (1.4%)
3 lottery winners from 400XXX thru 500XXX (12%)
2 lottery winners from 500XXX thru 600XXX (12.5%)
3 lottery winners from 600XXX thru 700XXX (27%)
This data seems to suggest that the lottery is weighed in favor of the higher numbers.
Thanks for assembling this. I never thought I had a chance to win the lottery with a TenClub number under 100k.
I believe it is heavily weighted in favor of high numbers.
livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=446
1995- New Orleans, LA : New Orleans, LA
1996- Charleston, SC
1998- Atlanta, GA: Birmingham, AL: Greenville, SC: Knoxville, TN
2000- Atlanta, GA: New Orleans, LA: Memphis, TN: Nashville, TN
2003- Raleigh, NC: Charlotte, NC: Atlanta, GA
2004- Asheville, NC (hometown show)
2006- Cincinnati, OH
2008- Columbia, SC
2009- Chicago, IL x 2 / Ed Vedder- Atlanta, GA x 2
2010- Bristow, VA
2011- Alpine Valley, WI (PJ20) x 2 / Ed Vedder- Chicago, IL
2012- Atlanta, GA
2013- Charlotte, NC
2014- Cincinnati, OH
2015- New York, NY
2016- Greenville, SC: Hampton, VA:: Columbia, SC: Raleigh, NC : Lexington, KY: Philly, PA 2: (Wrigley) Chicago, IL x 2 (holy shit): Temple of the Dog- Philly, PA
2017- ED VED- Louisville, KY
2018- Chicago, IL x2, Boston, MA x2
2020- Nashville, TN
2022- Smashville
2023- Austin, TX x2
2024- Baltimore
If you are under 400XXX you had a 1.4% chance, above 400XXX you had a 10X greater chance (15%).
Now this analysis is based on self-reporting so there is a chance that the data is skewed. But it looks valid to me.
congrats. good to see a great fan win!!!
livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=446
1995- New Orleans, LA : New Orleans, LA
1996- Charleston, SC
1998- Atlanta, GA: Birmingham, AL: Greenville, SC: Knoxville, TN
2000- Atlanta, GA: New Orleans, LA: Memphis, TN: Nashville, TN
2003- Raleigh, NC: Charlotte, NC: Atlanta, GA
2004- Asheville, NC (hometown show)
2006- Cincinnati, OH
2008- Columbia, SC
2009- Chicago, IL x 2 / Ed Vedder- Atlanta, GA x 2
2010- Bristow, VA
2011- Alpine Valley, WI (PJ20) x 2 / Ed Vedder- Chicago, IL
2012- Atlanta, GA
2013- Charlotte, NC
2014- Cincinnati, OH
2015- New York, NY
2016- Greenville, SC: Hampton, VA:: Columbia, SC: Raleigh, NC : Lexington, KY: Philly, PA 2: (Wrigley) Chicago, IL x 2 (holy shit): Temple of the Dog- Philly, PA
2017- ED VED- Louisville, KY
2018- Chicago, IL x2, Boston, MA x2
2020- Nashville, TN
2022- Smashville
2023- Austin, TX x2
2024- Baltimore
Updated numbers
1XXX thru 400XXX - 3 lottery winners
400XXX thru 700XXX - 8 lottery winners
I see three more lottery winners (arlandocruz, tombrady12, and cdann0220) who didn't indicate their numbers.
100% agree. The numbers go up to 680,000. But how many are active? It seems there's some secrecy around but I don't see why.
2010: Newark 5/18 MSG 5/20-21 2011: PJ20 9/3-4 2012: Made In America 9/2
2013: Brooklyn 10/18-19 Philly 10/21-22 Hartford 10/25 2014: ACL10/12
2015: NYC 9/23 2016: Tampa 4/11 Philly 4/28-29 MSG 5/1-2 Fenway 8/5+8/7
2017: RRHoF 4/7 2018: Fenway 9/2+9/4 2021: Sea Hear Now 9/18
2022: MSG 9/11 2024: MSG 9/3-4 Philly 9/7+9/9 Fenway 9/15+9/17
LOOKING FOR A SINGLE TICKET TO MSG NIGHT 2
Have to say I felt a bit guilty about it, but my guest ticket went to someone who'd traveled from South America to Canada for the show, so it was all good!
Or, more likely true is the fans with higher numbers are beleaguered like me and don't want to bother posting their obstructed view blind purchase seats and those that won are thrilled to share the news.
I highly doubt a band with such an unrelentingly biased ticket policy would bother to weigh the lottery in any direction without notice. Although they did sell obstructed view without notice at time of purchase
I've been a fan since day one but always disliked fan clubs and blind purchasing of concert Tix. This experience reminds me why I avoided joining for so long. But I'm in the door and trying to be positive
Based on the original ticket notice from the band, I was expecting upper level first few rows but got grandstand with a nice pole obstruction according to Fenway precise seating...and possibly a balcony obstruction as well, since precise seating assumes we will be sitting not standing
G16 r14...665xxx
Let's drive down the % to a more realistic representation
I know some are disappointed with their seats but let’s remember that 10c got a hold of a lot more seats than normal for these shows, the percentages hardly moved from 99%. Not every seat is going to be great with an awesome view. My night 1 seats aren't great but I'm thrilled to be in the building and didn't have to deal with the public sale like some of my friends did. They were on well before the start time and got nothing and are still trying to find reasonably priced tickets for the show.
2008 Mansfield 06/28, 06/30 | 2009 Philadelphia 10/27, 10/28, 10/31 | 2010 Boston 05/17 | 2013 Worcester 10/15, 10/16 - Hartford 10/25 |
2016 Boston 08/05, 08/07 - Chicago 08/20, 08/22 | 2018 Seattle 08/08, 08/10 - Boston 09/02, 09/04 | 2022 Denver, 09/22
thanks for letting me know. I have always wondered if they even put us in the draw.
livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=446
1995- New Orleans, LA : New Orleans, LA
1996- Charleston, SC
1998- Atlanta, GA: Birmingham, AL: Greenville, SC: Knoxville, TN
2000- Atlanta, GA: New Orleans, LA: Memphis, TN: Nashville, TN
2003- Raleigh, NC: Charlotte, NC: Atlanta, GA
2004- Asheville, NC (hometown show)
2006- Cincinnati, OH
2008- Columbia, SC
2009- Chicago, IL x 2 / Ed Vedder- Atlanta, GA x 2
2010- Bristow, VA
2011- Alpine Valley, WI (PJ20) x 2 / Ed Vedder- Chicago, IL
2012- Atlanta, GA
2013- Charlotte, NC
2014- Cincinnati, OH
2015- New York, NY
2016- Greenville, SC: Hampton, VA:: Columbia, SC: Raleigh, NC : Lexington, KY: Philly, PA 2: (Wrigley) Chicago, IL x 2 (holy shit): Temple of the Dog- Philly, PA
2017- ED VED- Louisville, KY
2018- Chicago, IL x2, Boston, MA x2
2020- Nashville, TN
2022- Smashville
2023- Austin, TX x2
2024- Baltimore
2008: Mansfield II
2010: Hartford, Boston
2013: Chicago, Worcester I, Hartford
2016: Boston I, Boston II
2018: Boston I, Boston II