Internet sales tax, yea or nay?

13»

Comments

  • F Me In The BrainF Me In The Brain this knows everybody from other commets Posts: 31,384
    I think this had to be done.  As Brian correctly states, this is a boom for Brick-and-Mortar retailers and a bust for E-tailers.
    However.....hidden in this is the fact that Amazon already collects a tax in every state that has one. 
    So....this really is a crushing blow to those trying to compete with Amazon's price as they now lost the 5-9% advantage they carried h2h in not collecting a tax.

    Interesting.  I think it is just.
    The love he receives is the love that is saved
  • Jason PJason P Posts: 19,147
    Fuck sales tax and fuck the king.  IMHO =)
    Be Excellent To Each Other
    Party On, Dudes!
  • unsungunsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    tbergs said:
    Supreme Court rules states can force online retailers to collect sales tax

    And the government takes more $....prices up for everyone!!!

    In reality this makes sense in a changing online economy. 
    Same thing about that whole $15/hr wage for low/no skilled fast food workers, govt is all for it because govt gets a larger cut.
  • jeffbrjeffbr Seattle Posts: 7,177
    Trump called this decision a "great victory for consumers and retailers." How is it great for consumers? I'm sure it needed to be done, but having the cost of purchases increase can rarely be considered a victory for the consumer. Much like Trump's trade war, this will result in additional money out of the consumer's pocket. Some victory. BTW, trumpstore.com only collects sales tax in 4 states currently, so when Trump excoriated Amazon over this issue he was being incredibly hypocritical. Surprised?
    "I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
  • brianluxbrianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,309
    jeffbr said:
    Trump called this decision a "great victory for consumers and retailers." How is it great for consumers? I'm sure it needed to be done, but having the cost of purchases increase can rarely be considered a victory for the consumer. Much like Trump's trade war, this will result in additional money out of the consumer's pocket. Some victory. BTW, trumpstore.com only collects sales tax in 4 states currently, so when Trump excoriated Amazon over this issue he was being incredibly hypocritical. Surprised?
    D.T. is such an idiot.  I think he just makes up shit as the day goes along.
    "Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!"
    -Eddie Vedder, "Smile"

    "Try to not spook the horse."
    -Neil Young













  • brianluxbrianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,309
    Oklahoma and Pennsylvania just added on-line sales tax.  Looks like, for now at least, this is going state-by-state.  And also, Australia added something called "Goods and Services" tax for anything under $1,000... as if it already wasn't a shit load of money to mail stuff to Australia. 
    "Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!"
    -Eddie Vedder, "Smile"

    "Try to not spook the horse."
    -Neil Young













  • LongestRoadLongestRoad Posts: 477
    yea
  • brianluxbrianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,309
    yea
    Care to expand on why "yea"?
    "Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!"
    -Eddie Vedder, "Smile"

    "Try to not spook the horse."
    -Neil Young













  • vaggar99vaggar99 San Diego USA Posts: 3,427
    jeffbr said:
    Trump called this decision a "great victory for consumers and retailers." How is it great for consumers? I'm sure it needed to be done, but having the cost of purchases increase can rarely be considered a victory for the consumer. Much like Trump's trade war, this will result in additional money out of the consumer's pocket. Some victory. BTW, trumpstore.com only collects sales tax in 4 states currently, so when Trump excoriated Amazon over this issue he was being incredibly hypocritical. Surprised?
    whenever competition is made more fair, the consumer should win.  there was a time when we went to a local store for almost all of our shopping needs.  Brick and mortar did a great job of brining deals to your local neighborhood store.  not so much anymore.  foot traffic is way down, so the focus has turned to selling higher dollar/higher margin items to make up for the traffic loss.  bottom line: if you want something now, you're gonna have less choice and pay more for it.  

    hopefully, things start moving back to the glory days of the mid 90's!!! 


  • Meltdown99Meltdown99 None Of Your Business... Posts: 10,739
    vaggar99 said:
    jeffbr said:
    Trump called this decision a "great victory for consumers and retailers." How is it great for consumers? I'm sure it needed to be done, but having the cost of purchases increase can rarely be considered a victory for the consumer. Much like Trump's trade war, this will result in additional money out of the consumer's pocket. Some victory. BTW, trumpstore.com only collects sales tax in 4 states currently, so when Trump excoriated Amazon over this issue he was being incredibly hypocritical. Surprised?
    whenever competition is made more fair, the consumer should win.  there was a time when we went to a local store for almost all of our shopping needs.  Brick and mortar did a great job of brining deals to your local neighborhood store.  not so much anymore.  foot traffic is way down, so the focus has turned to selling higher dollar/higher margin items to make up for the traffic loss.  bottom line: if you want something now, you're gonna have less choice and pay more for it.  

    hopefully, things start moving back to the glory days of the mid 90's!!! 


    America stores with less choice?  That made me laugh.  
    Give Peas A Chance…
  • brianluxbrianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,309
    vaggar99 said:
    jeffbr said:
    Trump called this decision a "great victory for consumers and retailers." How is it great for consumers? I'm sure it needed to be done, but having the cost of purchases increase can rarely be considered a victory for the consumer. Much like Trump's trade war, this will result in additional money out of the consumer's pocket. Some victory. BTW, trumpstore.com only collects sales tax in 4 states currently, so when Trump excoriated Amazon over this issue he was being incredibly hypocritical. Surprised?
    whenever competition is made more fair, the consumer should win.  there was a time when we went to a local store for almost all of our shopping needs.  Brick and mortar did a great job of brining deals to your local neighborhood store.  not so much anymore.  foot traffic is way down, so the focus has turned to selling higher dollar/higher margin items to make up for the traffic loss.  bottom line: if you want something now, you're gonna have less choice and pay more for it.  

    hopefully, things start moving back to the glory days of the mid 90's!!! 


    America stores with less choice?  That made me laugh.  
    It is true that many stores in America have an almost obscene number of choice for the same common products where are almost all the same.  On the other hand, more and more I am finding there are high quality products that I used to get that I cannot find in any brick and mortar store in our area.  That include the  Newman's own kibble for my cat that I now have to buy on-line.  It includes some hardware items that, if I want quality, I have to go on line for.  And it definitely includes 99.99% of the records I would like to buy (preferable used in good condition).

    Three things have killed local downtown brick and mortar stores:
    1.Walmart (more crap per square foot than any store in the world).
    2.On-line sales.
    3.Suburbia, shopping malls and the death of community focused city central almost everywhere.

    "Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!"
    -Eddie Vedder, "Smile"

    "Try to not spook the horse."
    -Neil Young













  • Meltdown99Meltdown99 None Of Your Business... Posts: 10,739
    brianlux said:
    vaggar99 said:
    jeffbr said:
    Trump called this decision a "great victory for consumers and retailers." How is it great for consumers? I'm sure it needed to be done, but having the cost of purchases increase can rarely be considered a victory for the consumer. Much like Trump's trade war, this will result in additional money out of the consumer's pocket. Some victory. BTW, trumpstore.com only collects sales tax in 4 states currently, so when Trump excoriated Amazon over this issue he was being incredibly hypocritical. Surprised?
    whenever competition is made more fair, the consumer should win.  there was a time when we went to a local store for almost all of our shopping needs.  Brick and mortar did a great job of brining deals to your local neighborhood store.  not so much anymore.  foot traffic is way down, so the focus has turned to selling higher dollar/higher margin items to make up for the traffic loss.  bottom line: if you want something now, you're gonna have less choice and pay more for it.  

    hopefully, things start moving back to the glory days of the mid 90's!!! 


    America stores with less choice?  That made me laugh.  
    It is true that many stores in America have an almost obscene number of choice for the same common products where are almost all the same.  On the other hand, more and more I am finding there are high quality products that I used to get that I cannot find in any brick and mortar store in our area.  That include the  Newman's own kibble for my cat that I now have to buy on-line.  It includes some hardware items that, if I want quality, I have to go on line for.  And it definitely includes 99.99% of the records I would like to buy (preferable used in good condition).

    Three things have killed local downtown brick and mortar stores:
    1.Walmart (more crap per square foot than any store in the world).
    2.On-line sales.
    3.Suburbia, shopping malls and the death of community focused city central almost everywhere.

    All good points.  I also think if items are selling well in store, then they'd stock it.  Another point you brought up is so much choice  among common products, that chews up shelf space.  30 years ago I worked at a K Mart ... theft was a huge problem,  online sales eliminates customer theft...so I'm sure that is driving companies to push online sales.  That's a huge cost savings for a company like Amazon?
    Give Peas A Chance…
  • Meltdown99Meltdown99 None Of Your Business... Posts: 10,739
    I hate suburbia ... 
    Give Peas A Chance…
  • vaggar99vaggar99 San Diego USA Posts: 3,427
    vaggar99 said:
    jeffbr said:
    Trump called this decision a "great victory for consumers and retailers." How is it great for consumers? I'm sure it needed to be done, but having the cost of purchases increase can rarely be considered a victory for the consumer. Much like Trump's trade war, this will result in additional money out of the consumer's pocket. Some victory. BTW, trumpstore.com only collects sales tax in 4 states currently, so when Trump excoriated Amazon over this issue he was being incredibly hypocritical. Surprised?
    whenever competition is made more fair, the consumer should win.  there was a time when we went to a local store for almost all of our shopping needs.  Brick and mortar did a great job of brining deals to your local neighborhood store.  not so much anymore.  foot traffic is way down, so the focus has turned to selling higher dollar/higher margin items to make up for the traffic loss.  bottom line: if you want something now, you're gonna have less choice and pay more for it.  

    hopefully, things start moving back to the glory days of the mid 90's!!! 


    America stores with less choice?  That made me laugh.  
    well, i happen to help run a small retail chain and that's not only what I see but help execute everyday.   the change is subtle, but it's there.
  • Meltdown99Meltdown99 None Of Your Business... Posts: 10,739
    vaggar99 said:
    vaggar99 said:
    jeffbr said:
    Trump called this decision a "great victory for consumers and retailers." How is it great for consumers? I'm sure it needed to be done, but having the cost of purchases increase can rarely be considered a victory for the consumer. Much like Trump's trade war, this will result in additional money out of the consumer's pocket. Some victory. BTW, trumpstore.com only collects sales tax in 4 states currently, so when Trump excoriated Amazon over this issue he was being incredibly hypocritical. Surprised?
    whenever competition is made more fair, the consumer should win.  there was a time when we went to a local store for almost all of our shopping needs.  Brick and mortar did a great job of brining deals to your local neighborhood store.  not so much anymore.  foot traffic is way down, so the focus has turned to selling higher dollar/higher margin items to make up for the traffic loss.  bottom line: if you want something now, you're gonna have less choice and pay more for it.  

    hopefully, things start moving back to the glory days of the mid 90's!!! 


    America stores with less choice?  That made me laugh.  
    well, i happen to help run a small retail chain and that's not only what I see but help execute everyday.   the change is subtle, but it's there.
    So is theft a big problem in your chain?  Somehow I think retailers like the cost savings from online sales (no theft).  When I worked at K Mart they tried to keep theft at 3% or less ... I will be honest I was young and they never explained 3% or less.  I was assuming 3% of store sales, these issues were discussed at monthly staff meetings ... one year theft was over 5%, and the manager was "pissed".
    Give Peas A Chance…
  • Meltdown99Meltdown99 None Of Your Business... Posts: 10,739
    Another issue that might lead to less choice is companies buying shelf space ... the big companies through marketing and buying shelf space dictate our choices.  
    Give Peas A Chance…
  • Meltdown99Meltdown99 None Of Your Business... Posts: 10,739
    Also, as a 53 year old male who hates shopping, congestion and not a big fan people I prefer the faceless, nameless world of online shopping.  Sorry Brian.  My favourite online retailers Amazon, Eddie Bauer (retail stores as well, just not where I am located), Duluth Trading, Apple, Mountain Warehouse (retail store opening in a local mall tomorrow).
    Give Peas A Chance…
  • vaggar99vaggar99 San Diego USA Posts: 3,427
    edited June 2018
    vaggar99 said:
    vaggar99 said:
    jeffbr said:
    Trump called this decision a "great victory for consumers and retailers." How is it great for consumers? I'm sure it needed to be done, but having the cost of purchases increase can rarely be considered a victory for the consumer. Much like Trump's trade war, this will result in additional money out of the consumer's pocket. Some victory. BTW, trumpstore.com only collects sales tax in 4 states currently, so when Trump excoriated Amazon over this issue he was being incredibly hypocritical. Surprised?
    whenever competition is made more fair, the consumer should win.  there was a time when we went to a local store for almost all of our shopping needs.  Brick and mortar did a great job of brining deals to your local neighborhood store.  not so much anymore.  foot traffic is way down, so the focus has turned to selling higher dollar/higher margin items to make up for the traffic loss.  bottom line: if you want something now, you're gonna have less choice and pay more for it.  

    hopefully, things start moving back to the glory days of the mid 90's!!! 


    America stores with less choice?  That made me laugh.  
    well, i happen to help run a small retail chain and that's not only what I see but help execute everyday.   the change is subtle, but it's there.
    So is theft a big problem in your chain?  Somehow I think retailers like the cost savings from online sales (no theft).  When I worked at K Mart they tried to keep theft at 3% or less ... I will be honest I was young and they never explained 3% or less.  I was assuming 3% of store sales, these issues were discussed at monthly staff meetings ... one year theft was over 5%, and the manager was "pissed".
    yes, theft is a big problem.  we probably sit around 3% loss from theft.  it might be true that there is less theft in online sales, but you still have employee theft to deal with.  Online stores have additional cost of shipping and labor associated with picking product that the consumer would have normally done.  The long standing sales tax holiday was sort of a way to help online stores offset some of these costs.  
  • brianluxbrianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,309
    Also, as a 53 year old male who hates shopping, congestion and not a big fan people I prefer the faceless, nameless world of online shopping.  Sorry Brian.  My favourite online retailers Amazon, Eddie Bauer (retail stores as well, just not where I am located), Duluth Trading, Apple, Mountain Warehouse (retail store opening in a local mall tomorrow).
    I'm actually in favor of both.  In my perfect, idealistic world, anything that can be produced locally or reused/re-purposed would be sold in shops in walkable downtown areas of towns and cities.  Things that are not produced locally would be purchased on line to consolidate transporting them.  Both would help reduce ecological footprint (I don't care for those trendy terms but I don't know how else to word it). Doing things this way would reduce loss of land to shopping malls and parking lots, save energy, reduce pollution and increase a sense of community.  Have our cake and eat it too!
    "Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!"
    -Eddie Vedder, "Smile"

    "Try to not spook the horse."
    -Neil Young













  • PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 49,989
    brianlux said:
    vaggar99 said:
    jeffbr said:
    Trump called this decision a "great victory for consumers and retailers." How is it great for consumers? I'm sure it needed to be done, but having the cost of purchases increase can rarely be considered a victory for the consumer. Much like Trump's trade war, this will result in additional money out of the consumer's pocket. Some victory. BTW, trumpstore.com only collects sales tax in 4 states currently, so when Trump excoriated Amazon over this issue he was being incredibly hypocritical. Surprised?
    whenever competition is made more fair, the consumer should win.  there was a time when we went to a local store for almost all of our shopping needs.  Brick and mortar did a great job of brining deals to your local neighborhood store.  not so much anymore.  foot traffic is way down, so the focus has turned to selling higher dollar/higher margin items to make up for the traffic loss.  bottom line: if you want something now, you're gonna have less choice and pay more for it.  

    hopefully, things start moving back to the glory days of the mid 90's!!! 


    America stores with less choice?  That made me laugh.  
    It is true that many stores in America have an almost obscene number of choice for the same common products where are almost all the same.  On the other hand, more and more I am finding there are high quality products that I used to get that I cannot find in any brick and mortar store in our area.  That include the  Newman's own kibble for my cat that I now have to buy on-line.  It includes some hardware items that, if I want quality, I have to go on line for.  And it definitely includes 99.99% of the records I would like to buy (preferable used in good condition).

    Three things have killed local downtown brick and mortar stores:
    1.Walmart (more crap per square foot than any store in the world).
    2.On-line sales.
    3.Suburbia, shopping malls and the death of community focused city central almost everywhere.

    My 72 year old mother is constantly complaining about the obscene amount of choice we have in stores. She thinks it's completely outrageous and really annoying. I personally like it, just because there aren't that many choices when it comes to GOOD products, but the wider the selection, the more likely it is that there will be at least one really good choice to make. But ideally, the market just wouldn't be flooded with all those crappy options. It's always amazed me how companies are able to find such huge markets for inferior products, while there is a far superior product everyone could be using. Sometimes there isn't even a price difference. And sometimes this is so much the case, that the far superior product goes off the market. Is it because people simply aren't very discerning or what??
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • Meltdown99Meltdown99 None Of Your Business... Posts: 10,739
    brianlux said:
    Also, as a 53 year old male who hates shopping, congestion and not a big fan people I prefer the faceless, nameless world of online shopping.  Sorry Brian.  My favourite online retailers Amazon, Eddie Bauer (retail stores as well, just not where I am located), Duluth Trading, Apple, Mountain Warehouse (retail store opening in a local mall tomorrow).
    I'm actually in favor of both.  In my perfect, idealistic world, anything that can be produced locally or reused/re-purposed would be sold in shops in walkable downtown areas of towns and cities.  Things that are not produced locally would be purchased on line to consolidate transporting them.  Both would help reduce ecological footprint (I don't care for those trendy terms but I don't know how else to word it). Doing things this way would reduce loss of land to shopping malls and parking lots, save energy, reduce pollution and increase a sense of community.  Have our cake and eat it too!
    I do have to visit the grocery store ... as of yet I don't buy groceries on-line ... so yes I use both, but why do these stores need to be so frickin big.  I just want my groceries, not a 20 mile hike to get them...one of my favourite stores to visit is Giant Tiger ... because is just the right size.
    Give Peas A Chance…
  • brianluxbrianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,309
    brianlux said:
    Also, as a 53 year old male who hates shopping, congestion and not a big fan people I prefer the faceless, nameless world of online shopping.  Sorry Brian.  My favourite online retailers Amazon, Eddie Bauer (retail stores as well, just not where I am located), Duluth Trading, Apple, Mountain Warehouse (retail store opening in a local mall tomorrow).
    I'm actually in favor of both.  In my perfect, idealistic world, anything that can be produced locally or reused/re-purposed would be sold in shops in walkable downtown areas of towns and cities.  Things that are not produced locally would be purchased on line to consolidate transporting them.  Both would help reduce ecological footprint (I don't care for those trendy terms but I don't know how else to word it). Doing things this way would reduce loss of land to shopping malls and parking lots, save energy, reduce pollution and increase a sense of community.  Have our cake and eat it too!
    I do have to visit the grocery store ... as of yet I don't buy groceries on-line ... so yes I use both, but why do these stores need to be so frickin big.  I just want my groceries, not a 20 mile hike to get them...one of my favourite stores to visit is Giant Tiger ... because is just the right size.
    Yeah, some of these stores are monstrous.   Take water, compass, extra sock for that long trek, lol.

    PJ_Soul said:
    brianlux said:
    vaggar99 said:
    jeffbr said:
    Trump called this decision a "great victory for consumers and retailers." How is it great for consumers? I'm sure it needed to be done, but having the cost of purchases increase can rarely be considered a victory for the consumer. Much like Trump's trade war, this will result in additional money out of the consumer's pocket. Some victory. BTW, trumpstore.com only collects sales tax in 4 states currently, so when Trump excoriated Amazon over this issue he was being incredibly hypocritical. Surprised?
    whenever competition is made more fair, the consumer should win.  there was a time when we went to a local store for almost all of our shopping needs.  Brick and mortar did a great job of brining deals to your local neighborhood store.  not so much anymore.  foot traffic is way down, so the focus has turned to selling higher dollar/higher margin items to make up for the traffic loss.  bottom line: if you want something now, you're gonna have less choice and pay more for it.  

    hopefully, things start moving back to the glory days of the mid 90's!!! 


    America stores with less choice?  That made me laugh.  
    It is true that many stores in America have an almost obscene number of choice for the same common products where are almost all the same.  On the other hand, more and more I am finding there are high quality products that I used to get that I cannot find in any brick and mortar store in our area.  That include the  Newman's own kibble for my cat that I now have to buy on-line.  It includes some hardware items that, if I want quality, I have to go on line for.  And it definitely includes 99.99% of the records I would like to buy (preferable used in good condition).

    Three things have killed local downtown brick and mortar stores:
    1.Walmart (more crap per square foot than any store in the world).
    2.On-line sales.
    3.Suburbia, shopping malls and the death of community focused city central almost everywhere.

    My 72 year old mother is constantly complaining about the obscene amount of choice we have in stores. She thinks it's completely outrageous and really annoying. I personally like it, just because there aren't that many choices when it comes to GOOD products, but the wider the selection, the more likely it is that there will be at least one really good choice to make. But ideally, the market just wouldn't be flooded with all those crappy options. It's always amazed me how companies are able to find such huge markets for inferior products, while there is a far superior product everyone could be using. Sometimes there isn't even a price difference. And sometimes this is so much the case, that the far superior product goes off the market. Is it because people simply aren't very discerning or what??
    That makes sense but, again, my idealist brain goes to, "Why aren't all products well made?  What pride is there in making a piece of crap?  (Neil Young anyone, LOL).
    "Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!"
    -Eddie Vedder, "Smile"

    "Try to not spook the horse."
    -Neil Young













  • PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 49,989
    brianlux said:
    brianlux said:
    Also, as a 53 year old male who hates shopping, congestion and not a big fan people I prefer the faceless, nameless world of online shopping.  Sorry Brian.  My favourite online retailers Amazon, Eddie Bauer (retail stores as well, just not where I am located), Duluth Trading, Apple, Mountain Warehouse (retail store opening in a local mall tomorrow).
    I'm actually in favor of both.  In my perfect, idealistic world, anything that can be produced locally or reused/re-purposed would be sold in shops in walkable downtown areas of towns and cities.  Things that are not produced locally would be purchased on line to consolidate transporting them.  Both would help reduce ecological footprint (I don't care for those trendy terms but I don't know how else to word it). Doing things this way would reduce loss of land to shopping malls and parking lots, save energy, reduce pollution and increase a sense of community.  Have our cake and eat it too!
    I do have to visit the grocery store ... as of yet I don't buy groceries on-line ... so yes I use both, but why do these stores need to be so frickin big.  I just want my groceries, not a 20 mile hike to get them...one of my favourite stores to visit is Giant Tiger ... because is just the right size.
    Yeah, some of these stores are monstrous.   Take water, compass, extra sock for that long trek, lol.

    PJ_Soul said:
    brianlux said:
    vaggar99 said:
    jeffbr said:
    Trump called this decision a "great victory for consumers and retailers." How is it great for consumers? I'm sure it needed to be done, but having the cost of purchases increase can rarely be considered a victory for the consumer. Much like Trump's trade war, this will result in additional money out of the consumer's pocket. Some victory. BTW, trumpstore.com only collects sales tax in 4 states currently, so when Trump excoriated Amazon over this issue he was being incredibly hypocritical. Surprised?
    whenever competition is made more fair, the consumer should win.  there was a time when we went to a local store for almost all of our shopping needs.  Brick and mortar did a great job of brining deals to your local neighborhood store.  not so much anymore.  foot traffic is way down, so the focus has turned to selling higher dollar/higher margin items to make up for the traffic loss.  bottom line: if you want something now, you're gonna have less choice and pay more for it.  

    hopefully, things start moving back to the glory days of the mid 90's!!! 


    America stores with less choice?  That made me laugh.  
    It is true that many stores in America have an almost obscene number of choice for the same common products where are almost all the same.  On the other hand, more and more I am finding there are high quality products that I used to get that I cannot find in any brick and mortar store in our area.  That include the  Newman's own kibble for my cat that I now have to buy on-line.  It includes some hardware items that, if I want quality, I have to go on line for.  And it definitely includes 99.99% of the records I would like to buy (preferable used in good condition).

    Three things have killed local downtown brick and mortar stores:
    1.Walmart (more crap per square foot than any store in the world).
    2.On-line sales.
    3.Suburbia, shopping malls and the death of community focused city central almost everywhere.

    My 72 year old mother is constantly complaining about the obscene amount of choice we have in stores. She thinks it's completely outrageous and really annoying. I personally like it, just because there aren't that many choices when it comes to GOOD products, but the wider the selection, the more likely it is that there will be at least one really good choice to make. But ideally, the market just wouldn't be flooded with all those crappy options. It's always amazed me how companies are able to find such huge markets for inferior products, while there is a far superior product everyone could be using. Sometimes there isn't even a price difference. And sometimes this is so much the case, that the far superior product goes off the market. Is it because people simply aren't very discerning or what??
    That makes sense but, again, my idealist brain goes to, "Why aren't all products well made?  What pride is there in making a piece of crap?  (Neil Young anyone, LOL).
    Well yeah, for sure, it's stupid. But since that isn't reality, I take the next best option. And Why? Because a whole lot of consumers are STUPID. Remember, it's the general population controlling this at the end of the day. If they didn't buy all those inferior products, the producers wouldn't be cranking them out.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • brianluxbrianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,309
    PJ_Soul said:
    brianlux said:
    brianlux said:
    Also, as a 53 year old male who hates shopping, congestion and not a big fan people I prefer the faceless, nameless world of online shopping.  Sorry Brian.  My favourite online retailers Amazon, Eddie Bauer (retail stores as well, just not where I am located), Duluth Trading, Apple, Mountain Warehouse (retail store opening in a local mall tomorrow).
    I'm actually in favor of both.  In my perfect, idealistic world, anything that can be produced locally or reused/re-purposed would be sold in shops in walkable downtown areas of towns and cities.  Things that are not produced locally would be purchased on line to consolidate transporting them.  Both would help reduce ecological footprint (I don't care for those trendy terms but I don't know how else to word it). Doing things this way would reduce loss of land to shopping malls and parking lots, save energy, reduce pollution and increase a sense of community.  Have our cake and eat it too!
    I do have to visit the grocery store ... as of yet I don't buy groceries on-line ... so yes I use both, but why do these stores need to be so frickin big.  I just want my groceries, not a 20 mile hike to get them...one of my favourite stores to visit is Giant Tiger ... because is just the right size.
    Yeah, some of these stores are monstrous.   Take water, compass, extra sock for that long trek, lol.

    PJ_Soul said:
    brianlux said:
    vaggar99 said:
    jeffbr said:
    Trump called this decision a "great victory for consumers and retailers." How is it great for consumers? I'm sure it needed to be done, but having the cost of purchases increase can rarely be considered a victory for the consumer. Much like Trump's trade war, this will result in additional money out of the consumer's pocket. Some victory. BTW, trumpstore.com only collects sales tax in 4 states currently, so when Trump excoriated Amazon over this issue he was being incredibly hypocritical. Surprised?
    whenever competition is made more fair, the consumer should win.  there was a time when we went to a local store for almost all of our shopping needs.  Brick and mortar did a great job of brining deals to your local neighborhood store.  not so much anymore.  foot traffic is way down, so the focus has turned to selling higher dollar/higher margin items to make up for the traffic loss.  bottom line: if you want something now, you're gonna have less choice and pay more for it.  

    hopefully, things start moving back to the glory days of the mid 90's!!! 


    America stores with less choice?  That made me laugh.  
    It is true that many stores in America have an almost obscene number of choice for the same common products where are almost all the same.  On the other hand, more and more I am finding there are high quality products that I used to get that I cannot find in any brick and mortar store in our area.  That include the  Newman's own kibble for my cat that I now have to buy on-line.  It includes some hardware items that, if I want quality, I have to go on line for.  And it definitely includes 99.99% of the records I would like to buy (preferable used in good condition).

    Three things have killed local downtown brick and mortar stores:
    1.Walmart (more crap per square foot than any store in the world).
    2.On-line sales.
    3.Suburbia, shopping malls and the death of community focused city central almost everywhere.

    My 72 year old mother is constantly complaining about the obscene amount of choice we have in stores. She thinks it's completely outrageous and really annoying. I personally like it, just because there aren't that many choices when it comes to GOOD products, but the wider the selection, the more likely it is that there will be at least one really good choice to make. But ideally, the market just wouldn't be flooded with all those crappy options. It's always amazed me how companies are able to find such huge markets for inferior products, while there is a far superior product everyone could be using. Sometimes there isn't even a price difference. And sometimes this is so much the case, that the far superior product goes off the market. Is it because people simply aren't very discerning or what??
    That makes sense but, again, my idealist brain goes to, "Why aren't all products well made?  What pride is there in making a piece of crap?  (Neil Young anyone, LOL).
    Well yeah, for sure, it's stupid. But since that isn't reality, I take the next best option. And Why? Because a whole lot of consumers are STUPID. Remember, it's the general population controlling this at the end of the day. If they didn't buy all those inferior products, the producers wouldn't be cranking them out.
    You are absolutely correct, Alison.  The thing is, I'm promoting ideas that in the big picture are unlikely to come about.  But if I can convince even just one person of the logic of reduced consumption and consumption of durable goods, that will have made some of my time on this (for now) rotting planet worthwhile.  No thanks needs either, just results!
    "Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!"
    -Eddie Vedder, "Smile"

    "Try to not spook the horse."
    -Neil Young













  • PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 49,989
    brianlux said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    brianlux said:
    brianlux said:
    Also, as a 53 year old male who hates shopping, congestion and not a big fan people I prefer the faceless, nameless world of online shopping.  Sorry Brian.  My favourite online retailers Amazon, Eddie Bauer (retail stores as well, just not where I am located), Duluth Trading, Apple, Mountain Warehouse (retail store opening in a local mall tomorrow).
    I'm actually in favor of both.  In my perfect, idealistic world, anything that can be produced locally or reused/re-purposed would be sold in shops in walkable downtown areas of towns and cities.  Things that are not produced locally would be purchased on line to consolidate transporting them.  Both would help reduce ecological footprint (I don't care for those trendy terms but I don't know how else to word it). Doing things this way would reduce loss of land to shopping malls and parking lots, save energy, reduce pollution and increase a sense of community.  Have our cake and eat it too!
    I do have to visit the grocery store ... as of yet I don't buy groceries on-line ... so yes I use both, but why do these stores need to be so frickin big.  I just want my groceries, not a 20 mile hike to get them...one of my favourite stores to visit is Giant Tiger ... because is just the right size.
    Yeah, some of these stores are monstrous.   Take water, compass, extra sock for that long trek, lol.

    PJ_Soul said:
    brianlux said:
    vaggar99 said:
    jeffbr said:
    Trump called this decision a "great victory for consumers and retailers." How is it great for consumers? I'm sure it needed to be done, but having the cost of purchases increase can rarely be considered a victory for the consumer. Much like Trump's trade war, this will result in additional money out of the consumer's pocket. Some victory. BTW, trumpstore.com only collects sales tax in 4 states currently, so when Trump excoriated Amazon over this issue he was being incredibly hypocritical. Surprised?
    whenever competition is made more fair, the consumer should win.  there was a time when we went to a local store for almost all of our shopping needs.  Brick and mortar did a great job of brining deals to your local neighborhood store.  not so much anymore.  foot traffic is way down, so the focus has turned to selling higher dollar/higher margin items to make up for the traffic loss.  bottom line: if you want something now, you're gonna have less choice and pay more for it.  

    hopefully, things start moving back to the glory days of the mid 90's!!! 


    America stores with less choice?  That made me laugh.  
    It is true that many stores in America have an almost obscene number of choice for the same common products where are almost all the same.  On the other hand, more and more I am finding there are high quality products that I used to get that I cannot find in any brick and mortar store in our area.  That include the  Newman's own kibble for my cat that I now have to buy on-line.  It includes some hardware items that, if I want quality, I have to go on line for.  And it definitely includes 99.99% of the records I would like to buy (preferable used in good condition).

    Three things have killed local downtown brick and mortar stores:
    1.Walmart (more crap per square foot than any store in the world).
    2.On-line sales.
    3.Suburbia, shopping malls and the death of community focused city central almost everywhere.

    My 72 year old mother is constantly complaining about the obscene amount of choice we have in stores. She thinks it's completely outrageous and really annoying. I personally like it, just because there aren't that many choices when it comes to GOOD products, but the wider the selection, the more likely it is that there will be at least one really good choice to make. But ideally, the market just wouldn't be flooded with all those crappy options. It's always amazed me how companies are able to find such huge markets for inferior products, while there is a far superior product everyone could be using. Sometimes there isn't even a price difference. And sometimes this is so much the case, that the far superior product goes off the market. Is it because people simply aren't very discerning or what??
    That makes sense but, again, my idealist brain goes to, "Why aren't all products well made?  What pride is there in making a piece of crap?  (Neil Young anyone, LOL).
    Well yeah, for sure, it's stupid. But since that isn't reality, I take the next best option. And Why? Because a whole lot of consumers are STUPID. Remember, it's the general population controlling this at the end of the day. If they didn't buy all those inferior products, the producers wouldn't be cranking them out.
    You are absolutely correct, Alison.  The thing is, I'm promoting ideas that in the big picture are unlikely to come about.  But if I can convince even just one person of the logic of reduced consumption and consumption of durable goods, that will have made some of my time on this (for now) rotting planet worthwhile.  No thanks needs either, just results!
    Hey Brian, just FYI, my name is spelled with 2 L's! ;)
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • brianluxbrianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,309
    PJ_Soul said:
    brianlux said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    brianlux said:
    brianlux said:
    Also, as a 53 year old male who hates shopping, congestion and not a big fan people I prefer the faceless, nameless world of online shopping.  Sorry Brian.  My favourite online retailers Amazon, Eddie Bauer (retail stores as well, just not where I am located), Duluth Trading, Apple, Mountain Warehouse (retail store opening in a local mall tomorrow).
    I'm actually in favor of both.  In my perfect, idealistic world, anything that can be produced locally or reused/re-purposed would be sold in shops in walkable downtown areas of towns and cities.  Things that are not produced locally would be purchased on line to consolidate transporting them.  Both would help reduce ecological footprint (I don't care for those trendy terms but I don't know how else to word it). Doing things this way would reduce loss of land to shopping malls and parking lots, save energy, reduce pollution and increase a sense of community.  Have our cake and eat it too!
    I do have to visit the grocery store ... as of yet I don't buy groceries on-line ... so yes I use both, but why do these stores need to be so frickin big.  I just want my groceries, not a 20 mile hike to get them...one of my favourite stores to visit is Giant Tiger ... because is just the right size.
    Yeah, some of these stores are monstrous.   Take water, compass, extra sock for that long trek, lol.

    PJ_Soul said:
    brianlux said:
    vaggar99 said:
    jeffbr said:
    Trump called this decision a "great victory for consumers and retailers." How is it great for consumers? I'm sure it needed to be done, but having the cost of purchases increase can rarely be considered a victory for the consumer. Much like Trump's trade war, this will result in additional money out of the consumer's pocket. Some victory. BTW, trumpstore.com only collects sales tax in 4 states currently, so when Trump excoriated Amazon over this issue he was being incredibly hypocritical. Surprised?
    whenever competition is made more fair, the consumer should win.  there was a time when we went to a local store for almost all of our shopping needs.  Brick and mortar did a great job of brining deals to your local neighborhood store.  not so much anymore.  foot traffic is way down, so the focus has turned to selling higher dollar/higher margin items to make up for the traffic loss.  bottom line: if you want something now, you're gonna have less choice and pay more for it.  

    hopefully, things start moving back to the glory days of the mid 90's!!! 


    America stores with less choice?  That made me laugh.  
    It is true that many stores in America have an almost obscene number of choice for the same common products where are almost all the same.  On the other hand, more and more I am finding there are high quality products that I used to get that I cannot find in any brick and mortar store in our area.  That include the  Newman's own kibble for my cat that I now have to buy on-line.  It includes some hardware items that, if I want quality, I have to go on line for.  And it definitely includes 99.99% of the records I would like to buy (preferable used in good condition).

    Three things have killed local downtown brick and mortar stores:
    1.Walmart (more crap per square foot than any store in the world).
    2.On-line sales.
    3.Suburbia, shopping malls and the death of community focused city central almost everywhere.

    My 72 year old mother is constantly complaining about the obscene amount of choice we have in stores. She thinks it's completely outrageous and really annoying. I personally like it, just because there aren't that many choices when it comes to GOOD products, but the wider the selection, the more likely it is that there will be at least one really good choice to make. But ideally, the market just wouldn't be flooded with all those crappy options. It's always amazed me how companies are able to find such huge markets for inferior products, while there is a far superior product everyone could be using. Sometimes there isn't even a price difference. And sometimes this is so much the case, that the far superior product goes off the market. Is it because people simply aren't very discerning or what??
    That makes sense but, again, my idealist brain goes to, "Why aren't all products well made?  What pride is there in making a piece of crap?  (Neil Young anyone, LOL).
    Well yeah, for sure, it's stupid. But since that isn't reality, I take the next best option. And Why? Because a whole lot of consumers are STUPID. Remember, it's the general population controlling this at the end of the day. If they didn't buy all those inferior products, the producers wouldn't be cranking them out.
    You are absolutely correct, Alison.  The thing is, I'm promoting ideas that in the big picture are unlikely to come about.  But if I can convince even just one person of the logic of reduced consumption and consumption of durable goods, that will have made some of my time on this (for now) rotting planet worthwhile.  No thanks needs either, just results!
    Hey Brian, just FYI, my name is spelled with 2 L's! ;)
    Ah oh... that's twice I did that.  Three strikes and I'm in deep shit!  :lol:
    "Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!"
    -Eddie Vedder, "Smile"

    "Try to not spook the horse."
    -Neil Young













  • PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 49,989
    brianlux said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    brianlux said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    brianlux said:
    brianlux said:
    Also, as a 53 year old male who hates shopping, congestion and not a big fan people I prefer the faceless, nameless world of online shopping.  Sorry Brian.  My favourite online retailers Amazon, Eddie Bauer (retail stores as well, just not where I am located), Duluth Trading, Apple, Mountain Warehouse (retail store opening in a local mall tomorrow).
    I'm actually in favor of both.  In my perfect, idealistic world, anything that can be produced locally or reused/re-purposed would be sold in shops in walkable downtown areas of towns and cities.  Things that are not produced locally would be purchased on line to consolidate transporting them.  Both would help reduce ecological footprint (I don't care for those trendy terms but I don't know how else to word it). Doing things this way would reduce loss of land to shopping malls and parking lots, save energy, reduce pollution and increase a sense of community.  Have our cake and eat it too!
    I do have to visit the grocery store ... as of yet I don't buy groceries on-line ... so yes I use both, but why do these stores need to be so frickin big.  I just want my groceries, not a 20 mile hike to get them...one of my favourite stores to visit is Giant Tiger ... because is just the right size.
    Yeah, some of these stores are monstrous.   Take water, compass, extra sock for that long trek, lol.

    PJ_Soul said:
    brianlux said:
    vaggar99 said:
    jeffbr said:
    Trump called this decision a "great victory for consumers and retailers." How is it great for consumers? I'm sure it needed to be done, but having the cost of purchases increase can rarely be considered a victory for the consumer. Much like Trump's trade war, this will result in additional money out of the consumer's pocket. Some victory. BTW, trumpstore.com only collects sales tax in 4 states currently, so when Trump excoriated Amazon over this issue he was being incredibly hypocritical. Surprised?
    whenever competition is made more fair, the consumer should win.  there was a time when we went to a local store for almost all of our shopping needs.  Brick and mortar did a great job of brining deals to your local neighborhood store.  not so much anymore.  foot traffic is way down, so the focus has turned to selling higher dollar/higher margin items to make up for the traffic loss.  bottom line: if you want something now, you're gonna have less choice and pay more for it.  

    hopefully, things start moving back to the glory days of the mid 90's!!! 


    America stores with less choice?  That made me laugh.  
    It is true that many stores in America have an almost obscene number of choice for the same common products where are almost all the same.  On the other hand, more and more I am finding there are high quality products that I used to get that I cannot find in any brick and mortar store in our area.  That include the  Newman's own kibble for my cat that I now have to buy on-line.  It includes some hardware items that, if I want quality, I have to go on line for.  And it definitely includes 99.99% of the records I would like to buy (preferable used in good condition).

    Three things have killed local downtown brick and mortar stores:
    1.Walmart (more crap per square foot than any store in the world).
    2.On-line sales.
    3.Suburbia, shopping malls and the death of community focused city central almost everywhere.

    My 72 year old mother is constantly complaining about the obscene amount of choice we have in stores. She thinks it's completely outrageous and really annoying. I personally like it, just because there aren't that many choices when it comes to GOOD products, but the wider the selection, the more likely it is that there will be at least one really good choice to make. But ideally, the market just wouldn't be flooded with all those crappy options. It's always amazed me how companies are able to find such huge markets for inferior products, while there is a far superior product everyone could be using. Sometimes there isn't even a price difference. And sometimes this is so much the case, that the far superior product goes off the market. Is it because people simply aren't very discerning or what??
    That makes sense but, again, my idealist brain goes to, "Why aren't all products well made?  What pride is there in making a piece of crap?  (Neil Young anyone, LOL).
    Well yeah, for sure, it's stupid. But since that isn't reality, I take the next best option. And Why? Because a whole lot of consumers are STUPID. Remember, it's the general population controlling this at the end of the day. If they didn't buy all those inferior products, the producers wouldn't be cranking them out.
    You are absolutely correct, Alison.  The thing is, I'm promoting ideas that in the big picture are unlikely to come about.  But if I can convince even just one person of the logic of reduced consumption and consumption of durable goods, that will have made some of my time on this (for now) rotting planet worthwhile.  No thanks needs either, just results!
    Hey Brian, just FYI, my name is spelled with 2 L's! ;)
    Ah oh... that's twice I did that.  Three strikes and I'm in deep shit!  :lol:
    Oh, I've been ignoring it for a while - you always do it. :lol::lol:
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • brianluxbrianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,309
    PJ_Soul said:
    brianlux said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    brianlux said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    brianlux said:
    brianlux said:
    Also, as a 53 year old male who hates shopping, congestion and not a big fan people I prefer the faceless, nameless world of online shopping.  Sorry Brian.  My favourite online retailers Amazon, Eddie Bauer (retail stores as well, just not where I am located), Duluth Trading, Apple, Mountain Warehouse (retail store opening in a local mall tomorrow).
    I'm actually in favor of both.  In my perfect, idealistic world, anything that can be produced locally or reused/re-purposed would be sold in shops in walkable downtown areas of towns and cities.  Things that are not produced locally would be purchased on line to consolidate transporting them.  Both would help reduce ecological footprint (I don't care for those trendy terms but I don't know how else to word it). Doing things this way would reduce loss of land to shopping malls and parking lots, save energy, reduce pollution and increase a sense of community.  Have our cake and eat it too!
    I do have to visit the grocery store ... as of yet I don't buy groceries on-line ... so yes I use both, but why do these stores need to be so frickin big.  I just want my groceries, not a 20 mile hike to get them...one of my favourite stores to visit is Giant Tiger ... because is just the right size.
    Yeah, some of these stores are monstrous.   Take water, compass, extra sock for that long trek, lol.

    PJ_Soul said:
    brianlux said:
    vaggar99 said:
    jeffbr said:
    Trump called this decision a "great victory for consumers and retailers." How is it great for consumers? I'm sure it needed to be done, but having the cost of purchases increase can rarely be considered a victory for the consumer. Much like Trump's trade war, this will result in additional money out of the consumer's pocket. Some victory. BTW, trumpstore.com only collects sales tax in 4 states currently, so when Trump excoriated Amazon over this issue he was being incredibly hypocritical. Surprised?
    whenever competition is made more fair, the consumer should win.  there was a time when we went to a local store for almost all of our shopping needs.  Brick and mortar did a great job of brining deals to your local neighborhood store.  not so much anymore.  foot traffic is way down, so the focus has turned to selling higher dollar/higher margin items to make up for the traffic loss.  bottom line: if you want something now, you're gonna have less choice and pay more for it.  

    hopefully, things start moving back to the glory days of the mid 90's!!! 


    America stores with less choice?  That made me laugh.  
    It is true that many stores in America have an almost obscene number of choice for the same common products where are almost all the same.  On the other hand, more and more I am finding there are high quality products that I used to get that I cannot find in any brick and mortar store in our area.  That include the  Newman's own kibble for my cat that I now have to buy on-line.  It includes some hardware items that, if I want quality, I have to go on line for.  And it definitely includes 99.99% of the records I would like to buy (preferable used in good condition).

    Three things have killed local downtown brick and mortar stores:
    1.Walmart (more crap per square foot than any store in the world).
    2.On-line sales.
    3.Suburbia, shopping malls and the death of community focused city central almost everywhere.

    My 72 year old mother is constantly complaining about the obscene amount of choice we have in stores. She thinks it's completely outrageous and really annoying. I personally like it, just because there aren't that many choices when it comes to GOOD products, but the wider the selection, the more likely it is that there will be at least one really good choice to make. But ideally, the market just wouldn't be flooded with all those crappy options. It's always amazed me how companies are able to find such huge markets for inferior products, while there is a far superior product everyone could be using. Sometimes there isn't even a price difference. And sometimes this is so much the case, that the far superior product goes off the market. Is it because people simply aren't very discerning or what??
    That makes sense but, again, my idealist brain goes to, "Why aren't all products well made?  What pride is there in making a piece of crap?  (Neil Young anyone, LOL).
    Well yeah, for sure, it's stupid. But since that isn't reality, I take the next best option. And Why? Because a whole lot of consumers are STUPID. Remember, it's the general population controlling this at the end of the day. If they didn't buy all those inferior products, the producers wouldn't be cranking them out.
    You are absolutely correct, Alison.  The thing is, I'm promoting ideas that in the big picture are unlikely to come about.  But if I can convince even just one person of the logic of reduced consumption and consumption of durable goods, that will have made some of my time on this (for now) rotting planet worthwhile.  No thanks needs either, just results!
    Hey Brian, just FYI, my name is spelled with 2 L's! ;)
    Ah oh... that's twice I did that.  Three strikes and I'm in deep shit!  :lol:
    Oh, I've been ignoring it for a while - you always do it. :lol::lol:
    :lol:
    "Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!"
    -Eddie Vedder, "Smile"

    "Try to not spook the horse."
    -Neil Young













  • Meltdown99Meltdown99 None Of Your Business... Posts: 10,739
    vaggar99 said:
    vaggar99 said:
    vaggar99 said:
    jeffbr said:
    Trump called this decision a "great victory for consumers and retailers." How is it great for consumers? I'm sure it needed to be done, but having the cost of purchases increase can rarely be considered a victory for the consumer. Much like Trump's trade war, this will result in additional money out of the consumer's pocket. Some victory. BTW, trumpstore.com only collects sales tax in 4 states currently, so when Trump excoriated Amazon over this issue he was being incredibly hypocritical. Surprised?
    whenever competition is made more fair, the consumer should win.  there was a time when we went to a local store for almost all of our shopping needs.  Brick and mortar did a great job of brining deals to your local neighborhood store.  not so much anymore.  foot traffic is way down, so the focus has turned to selling higher dollar/higher margin items to make up for the traffic loss.  bottom line: if you want something now, you're gonna have less choice and pay more for it.  

    hopefully, things start moving back to the glory days of the mid 90's!!! 


    America stores with less choice?  That made me laugh.  
    well, i happen to help run a small retail chain and that's not only what I see but help execute everyday.   the change is subtle, but it's there.
    So is theft a big problem in your chain?  Somehow I think retailers like the cost savings from online sales (no theft).  When I worked at K Mart they tried to keep theft at 3% or less ... I will be honest I was young and they never explained 3% or less.  I was assuming 3% of store sales, these issues were discussed at monthly staff meetings ... one year theft was over 5%, and the manager was "pissed".
    yes, theft is a big problem.  we probably sit around 3% loss from theft.  it might be true that there is less theft in online sales, but you still have employee theft to deal with.  Online stores have additional cost of shipping and labor associated with picking product that the consumer would have normally done.  The long standing sales tax holiday was sort of a way to help online stores offset some of these costs.  
    All very good points.  So the manager I had at Kmart was fairly accurate in the theft losses.
    Give Peas A Chance…
  • vaggar99vaggar99 San Diego USA Posts: 3,427
    vaggar99 said:
    vaggar99 said:
    vaggar99 said:
    jeffbr said:
    Trump called this decision a "great victory for consumers and retailers." How is it great for consumers? I'm sure it needed to be done, but having the cost of purchases increase can rarely be considered a victory for the consumer. Much like Trump's trade war, this will result in additional money out of the consumer's pocket. Some victory. BTW, trumpstore.com only collects sales tax in 4 states currently, so when Trump excoriated Amazon over this issue he was being incredibly hypocritical. Surprised?
    whenever competition is made more fair, the consumer should win.  there was a time when we went to a local store for almost all of our shopping needs.  Brick and mortar did a great job of brining deals to your local neighborhood store.  not so much anymore.  foot traffic is way down, so the focus has turned to selling higher dollar/higher margin items to make up for the traffic loss.  bottom line: if you want something now, you're gonna have less choice and pay more for it.  

    hopefully, things start moving back to the glory days of the mid 90's!!! 


    America stores with less choice?  That made me laugh.  
    well, i happen to help run a small retail chain and that's not only what I see but help execute everyday.   the change is subtle, but it's there.
    So is theft a big problem in your chain?  Somehow I think retailers like the cost savings from online sales (no theft).  When I worked at K Mart they tried to keep theft at 3% or less ... I will be honest I was young and they never explained 3% or less.  I was assuming 3% of store sales, these issues were discussed at monthly staff meetings ... one year theft was over 5%, and the manager was "pissed".
    yes, theft is a big problem.  we probably sit around 3% loss from theft.  it might be true that there is less theft in online sales, but you still have employee theft to deal with.  Online stores have additional cost of shipping and labor associated with picking product that the consumer would have normally done.  The long standing sales tax holiday was sort of a way to help online stores offset some of these costs.  
    All very good points.  So the manager I had at Kmart was fairly accurate in the theft losses.
    3% is a national average (from my understanding).  I've got us sitting at about 2.5% year to date.  
Sign In or Register to comment.