Bomb goes off in NYC subway!

Comments

  • AnnafalkAnnafalk Posts: 4,004
    If I understand this correctly, the only one injured was the person carrying this “device”  Very lucky no one else was hurt.
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    If this counts as terrorism, then the US soil terrorism wins, I was thinking the chef would be outed first. 
    Fortunately, nobody was injured.
  • Akayed Ullah is reported to be the guy.

    The dipshit is so useless he can't even succeed at blowing himself up. He's in the hospital. Hopefully, he's getting the very best care and attention concerned people could ask for.
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    Akayed Ullah is reported to be the guy.

    The dipshit is so useless he can't even succeed at blowing himself up. He's in the hospital. Hopefully, he's getting the very best care and attention concerned people could ask for.
    Bangladesh...any statement from Nike yet?
  • PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Posts: 49,950
    edited December 2017
    Annafalk said:
    If I understand this correctly, the only one injured was the person carrying this “device”  Very lucky no one else was hurt.
    I heard on the news that a few others were injured, but none seriously, so luck was still with them. Good thing the terrorist is too incompetent to build a bomb that works. I'm going to hope he will not be getting another shot at it, correct? Does such an attack like this likely get someone life in prison in the USA, even without causing any deaths? I'm not very informed about punishment for terrorists in the USA actually, namely because you often don't seem to hear much about what happens to these people after the attacks (which is actually pretty sinister if you think about it, but anyway, that isn't the point I'm making here).
    Post edited by PJ_Soul on
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • unsungunsung Posts: 9,487
    We should ban bombs.
  • Cliffy6745Cliffy6745 Posts: 33,840
    edited December 2017
    unsung said:
    We should ban bombs.
    1. Bombs are banned. Nothing like making something that inflicts mass pain difficult to get.
    2. Imagine if this guy had a gun and was able to easily take out dozens of people on a subway platform.
    3. Take a seat on the bench and give yourself a breather to think through your posts 
    Post edited by Cliffy6745 on
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    unsung said:
    We should ban bombs.
    1. Bombs are banned.
    2. Imagine if this guy had a gun and was able to easily take out dozens of people on a subway platform.
    3. Take a seat on the bench and give yourself a breather to think through your posts 
    lol...in jest
    imagine if he had a gatling gun!

    https://youtu.be/TxQG8qEKT0c


  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    JC29856 said:
    If this counts as terrorism, then the US soil terrorism wins, I was thinking the chef would be outed first. 
    Fortunately, nobody was injured.
    the chef is outed!
    Super Mario
  • CM189191CM189191 Posts: 6,927
    unsung said:
    We should ban bombs.
    what part of 'shall not be infringed' do you not understand?
  • cp3iversoncp3iverson Posts: 8,692
    JC29856 said:
    unsung said:
    We should ban bombs.
    1. Bombs are banned.
    2. Imagine if this guy had a gun and was able to easily take out dozens of people on a subway platform.
    3. Take a seat on the bench and give yourself a breather to think through your posts 
    lol...in jest
    imagine if he had a gatling gun!

    https://youtu.be/TxQG8qEKT0c


    An all time classic

    “I’m in the upstate region”.  Oh my word
  • mcgruff10mcgruff10 Posts: 28,496
    PJ_Soul said:
    Annafalk said:
    If I understand this correctly, the only one injured was the person carrying this “device”  Very lucky no one else was hurt.
    I heard on the news that a few others were injured, but none seriously, so luck was still with them. Good thing the terrorist is too incompetent to build a bomb that works. I'm going to hope he will not be getting another shot at it, correct? Does such an attack like this likely get someone life in prison in the USA, even without causing any deaths? I'm not very informed about punishment for terrorists in the USA actually, namely because you often don't seem to hear much about what happens to these people after the attacks (which is actually pretty sinister if you think about it, but anyway, that isn't the point I'm making here).
    very similar to another recent case:
    http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-new-york-bomb-conviction-20171016-story.html
    The verdict in Manhattan came after a two-week trial of 29-year-old Ahmad Khan Rahimi, an Afghanistan-born man living in Elizabeth. The charges, including using a weapon of mass destruction and bombing a public place, carry a maximum punishment of life in prison.
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Posts: 49,950
    mcgruff10 said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    Annafalk said:
    If I understand this correctly, the only one injured was the person carrying this “device”  Very lucky no one else was hurt.
    I heard on the news that a few others were injured, but none seriously, so luck was still with them. Good thing the terrorist is too incompetent to build a bomb that works. I'm going to hope he will not be getting another shot at it, correct? Does such an attack like this likely get someone life in prison in the USA, even without causing any deaths? I'm not very informed about punishment for terrorists in the USA actually, namely because you often don't seem to hear much about what happens to these people after the attacks (which is actually pretty sinister if you think about it, but anyway, that isn't the point I'm making here).
    very similar to another recent case:
    http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-new-york-bomb-conviction-20171016-story.html
    The verdict in Manhattan came after a two-week trial of 29-year-old Ahmad Khan Rahimi, an Afghanistan-born man living in Elizabeth. The charges, including using a weapon of mass destruction and bombing a public place, carry a maximum punishment of life in prison.
    That is good.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    https://www.salon.com/2010/06/22/terrorism_22/

    Iraq, Afghanistan and other countries controlled by Muslims, he said, "we will be attacking U.S.," adding that Americans "only care about their people, but they don't care about the people elsewhere in the world when they die" . 

    Well, the drone hits in Afghanistan and Iraq, they don't see children, they don't see anybody. They kill women, children, they kill everybody. It's a war, and in war, they kill people. They're killing all Muslims. . . .

    I am part of the answer to the U.S. terrorizing the Muslim nations and the Muslim people.  And, on behalf of that, I'm avenging the attack.  Living in the United States, Americans only care about their own people, but they don't care about the people elsewhere in the world when they die. 

  • Go BeaversGo Beavers Posts: 9,085
    The war on terror won’t end until we look at and deal with what motivates a terrorist. 
  • josevolutionjosevolution Posts: 29,532
    The war on terror won’t end until we look at and deal with what motivates a terrorist. 
    I'd say the 1st thing they wan't is for America to not intervene in their homelands and as long as America supports Israel they will never stop ...that's just my opinion 
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • unsungunsung Posts: 9,487
    Blowback.  Ron Paul tried to explain it and got booed.
  • unsungunsung Posts: 9,487
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:
    We should ban bombs.
    what part of 'shall not be infringed' do you not understand?
    Damn Christian white men clinging to their bombs.

    Oh, wait, whoops.
  • Go BeaversGo Beavers Posts: 9,085
    unsung said:
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:
    We should ban bombs.
    what part of 'shall not be infringed' do you not understand?
    Damn Christian white men clinging to their bombs.

    Oh, wait, whoops.
    Whoops is right. Those guys are “crazy”, not terrorists. 


  • unsung said:
    We should ban bombs.
    Do they sell them at Walmart?
    Adelaide 17/11/2009, Melbourne 20/11/2009, Sydney 22/11/2009, Melbourne (Big Day Out Festival) 24/01/2014
  • CM189191CM189191 Posts: 6,927
    unsung said:
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:
    We should ban bombs.
    what part of 'shall not be infringed' do you not understand?
    Damn Christian white men clinging to their bombs.

    Oh, wait, whoops.

  • CM189191 said:
    unsung said:
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:
    We should ban bombs.
    what part of 'shall not be infringed' do you not understand?
    Damn Christian white men clinging to their bombs.

    Oh, wait, whoops.


    Idiot
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • josevolutionjosevolution Posts: 29,532
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:
    We should ban bombs.
    what part of 'shall not be infringed' do you not understand?
    Damn Christian white men clinging to their bombs.

    Oh, wait, whoops.


    Idiot
    And he has a boss go figure..
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • josevolutionjosevolution Posts: 29,532
    There’s more of these incidents still to happen there’s sympathizers out here on the loose this has to be a huge red flag for authorities and yet the president will spew that we need to keep all Muslims from entering this country ..
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • CM189191CM189191 Posts: 6,927
    unsung said:
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:
    We should ban bombs.
    what part of 'shall not be infringed' do you not understand?
    Damn Christian white men clinging to their bombs.

    Oh, wait, whoops.
    Oh wait whoops

  • CM189191 said:
    unsung said:
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:
    We should ban bombs.
    what part of 'shall not be infringed' do you not understand?
    Damn Christian white men clinging to their bombs.

    Oh, wait, whoops.


    Idiot
    What a pappnase.
    Adelaide 17/11/2009, Melbourne 20/11/2009, Sydney 22/11/2009, Melbourne (Big Day Out Festival) 24/01/2014
  • brianluxbrianlux Posts: 42,027
    edited December 2017
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:
    CM189191 said:
    unsung said:
    We should ban bombs.
    what part of 'shall not be infringed' do you not understand?
    Damn Christian white men clinging to their bombs.

    Oh, wait, whoops.


    Idiot
    What a pappnase.
    I had to look that one up.   And the Wiki photo says...

    :lol:
    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
    Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.













  • ^ ^ thank that classic thread for that 
    Adelaide 17/11/2009, Melbourne 20/11/2009, Sydney 22/11/2009, Melbourne (Big Day Out Festival) 24/01/2014
Sign In or Register to comment.