***DONALD J TRUMP HAS OFFICIALLY BEEN IMPEACHED***
Comments
-
2018why is it ok to make fun of someone for their appearance just because they don't jive with your politics?By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0
-
"THE FIELD"
BeCaUsE wE hAtE pOliTicAl cOrrEctnEss!HughFreakingDillon said:why is it ok to make fun of someone for their appearance just because they don't jive with your politics?
I kid. It's really not. And not only that, it 1) skips the substantive point and 2) makes you look like you have no substance and are resorting to that kind of attack. We're trying to stave off authoritarianism...who cares what Trey Gowdy looks like (and yes, I took a shot at his hair...but it's not really a good way to go).
1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine
2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley0 -
See the first Kennedy-Nixon debate for why appearances matter.HughFreakingDillon said:why is it ok to make fun of someone for their appearance just because they don't jive with your politics?I SAW PEARL JAM0 -
Five o clock shadow!dankind said:
See the first Kennedy-Nixon debate for why appearances matter.HughFreakingDillon said:why is it ok to make fun of someone for their appearance just because they don't jive with your politics?I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
2018Trey Gowdy is a PUTZ, with nothing but BAD IDEAS and weak assed attempts at intimidation.
I was glad to see him go after Benghazi.
His hair and face bother me, but I'mma let it go.Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180 -
2018The bald faced HYPOCRISY of putting him on the "team" is not lost on me.
another COMPLICIT MF.Post edited by ikiT onBristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180 -
2018
putting on your best face during a presidential debate and making fun of someone's hair because you don't like their politics is obviously WAY different.dankind said:
See the first Kennedy-Nixon debate for why appearances matter.HughFreakingDillon said:why is it ok to make fun of someone for their appearance just because they don't jive with your politics?By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
No shit.HughFreakingDillon said:
putting on your best face during a presidential debate and making fun of someone's hair because you don't like their politics is obviously WAY different.dankind said:
See the first Kennedy-Nixon debate for why appearances matter.HughFreakingDillon said:why is it ok to make fun of someone for their appearance just because they don't jive with your politics?
But television viewers were completely turned off by Nixon -- who was leading quite well in the polls and arguably won the actual debate, even Johnson (Kennedy's running mate), who listened to the debate on the radio, thought so -- because he looked like a goddamn hobo compared to a fresh-faced JFK.
People judge other people based on their appearance, and a lot of times appearances hold the advantage over actual substance.
I'm not saying that it's fair or that I agree with it; I'm just saying it's a natural thing with humanity, as evidenced here as well.I SAW PEARL JAM0 -
2018Lets face it. I'm a real douche.
Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180 -
2018Tom Hanks' hair was legendary in The Da Vinci Code
Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180 -
I SAW PEARL JAM0 -
2018
"no shit". so what are you even talking about?dankind said:
No shit.HughFreakingDillon said:
putting on your best face during a presidential debate and making fun of someone's hair because you don't like their politics is obviously WAY different.dankind said:
See the first Kennedy-Nixon debate for why appearances matter.HughFreakingDillon said:why is it ok to make fun of someone for their appearance just because they don't jive with your politics?
But television viewers were completely turned off by Nixon -- who was leading quite well in the polls and arguably won the actual debate, even Johnson (Kennedy's running mate), who listened to the debate on the radio, thought so -- because he looked like a goddamn hobo compared to a fresh-faced JFK.
People judge other people based on their appearance, and a lot of times appearances hold the advantage over actual substance.
I'm not saying that it's fair or that I agree with it; I'm just saying it's a natural thing with humanity, as evidenced here as well.
of course it's a natural thing to judge based on appearance. I never said it wasn't. look, we're talking about completely different things here. obviously appearance matters. that's how 99% of social attraction works.
I'm saying it's low and stupid to attack someone for it simply because you don't like them. I don't see anyone making fun of any democrats' appearance in these threads.By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
2018
Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180 -
And I agree. In the hobo Nixon case, he was brushed off by people who up until then actually liked and supported him. That seems beyond low and stupid to me. Willfully ignorant comes to mind.HughFreakingDillon said:
"no shit". so what are you even talking about?dankind said:
No shit.HughFreakingDillon said:
putting on your best face during a presidential debate and making fun of someone's hair because you don't like their politics is obviously WAY different.dankind said:
See the first Kennedy-Nixon debate for why appearances matter.HughFreakingDillon said:why is it ok to make fun of someone for their appearance just because they don't jive with your politics?
But television viewers were completely turned off by Nixon -- who was leading quite well in the polls and arguably won the actual debate, even Johnson (Kennedy's running mate), who listened to the debate on the radio, thought so -- because he looked like a goddamn hobo compared to a fresh-faced JFK.
People judge other people based on their appearance, and a lot of times appearances hold the advantage over actual substance.
I'm not saying that it's fair or that I agree with it; I'm just saying it's a natural thing with humanity, as evidenced here as well.
of course it's a natural thing to judge based on appearance. I never said it wasn't. look, we're talking about completely different things here. obviously appearance matters. that's how 99% of social attraction works.
I'm saying it's low and stupid to attack someone for it simply because you don't like them. I don't see anyone making fun of any democrats' appearance in these threads.
Hell, most of the human race is low and stupid -- even more so when politics are involved.
I SAW PEARL JAM0 -
2019
Well I can only speak for myself. I've thought he would be impeached by the end of this year since the day he was elected. Always knew the odds of being convicted were low but it would depend on the mood of the country at the time pretty much. So no carts in front of horses here and my opinion/prediction has not changed has not changed one bit. Regarding the public sentiment: t's nice to see the public get behind this as quickly as they have. Time will tell.HughFreakingDillon said:
I'm sure he will. But all I'm saying is everyone is STILL, after all this time, putting the cart before the horse. people are already acting like he already has been. people are already moving onto removal, when they haven't even voted to impeach or not yet. they are still in the inquiry phase, and I haven't seen a lick of progress on that end either. what exactly is this anyway? are they waiting until they know they have enough support in the house to get it done? was an impeachment inquiry done with Bill?The Juggler said:
He’s going to be impeached. And I think the odds of conviction are higher than you think, as are the odds of his kids being charged and convicted of something at some point.HughFreakingDillon said:
and he still hasn't been impeached. it was the same with mueller. he was going to bring everyone down. he didn't. now this. maybe he'll be impeached. maybe he won't. but he won't be convicted. nor will any of his kids.The Juggler said:
Again, these things probably will not happen, but the odds are probably higher than you think.HughFreakingDillon said:
it's just more "we need to bring down the entire trump admin" and it will literally never happen. ivanka won't be indicted, jared won't be indicted, nor will eric or don jr, or kellyanne or sarah sanders, kavanaugh won't be impeached, etc. it's all just hopes and dreams.cincybearcat said:
I've seen this mentioned in a lot of places. Don't think it's been mainstream media yet. But that is the type of talk that bugs me. Focus on the investigation. We have proof and will have more re:Donald Trump. If Pence come into it it only muddies the waters.HughFreakingDillon said:
only in a movie would that happen.ikiT said:they're gonna take Pence too.
President Pelosi.A month ago most people thought he wouldn’t be impeached. Life comes at you fast.
Not sure if they did an inquiry or went right with the vote with Clinton or not. I think they should go to a vote asap to take that argument away from Trump but it is entirely up to Pelosi.Post edited by The Juggler onwww.myspace.com0 -
2018
too bad it seems pelosi is the only one who is waffling on this. i mean, what does she have to lose? it's not like she's planning on running for prez and needs to choose her time carefully.The Juggler said:
Well I can only speak for myself. I've thought he would be impeached by the end of this year since the day he was elected. Always knew the odds of being convicted were low but it would depend on the mood of the country at the time pretty much. So no carts in front of horses here and my opinion/prediction has not changed has not changed one bit. Regarding the public sentiment: t's nice to see the public get behind this as quickly as they have. Time will tell.HughFreakingDillon said:
I'm sure he will. But all I'm saying is everyone is STILL, after all this time, putting the cart before the horse. people are already acting like he already has been. people are already moving onto removal, when they haven't even voted to impeach or not yet. they are still in the inquiry phase, and I haven't seen a lick of progress on that end either. what exactly is this anyway? are they waiting until they know they have enough support in the house to get it done? was an impeachment inquiry done with Bill?The Juggler said:
He’s going to be impeached. And I think the odds of conviction are higher than you think, as are the odds of his kids being charged and convicted of something at some point.HughFreakingDillon said:
and he still hasn't been impeached. it was the same with mueller. he was going to bring everyone down. he didn't. now this. maybe he'll be impeached. maybe he won't. but he won't be convicted. nor will any of his kids.The Juggler said:
Again, these things probably will not happen, but the odds are probably higher than you think.HughFreakingDillon said:
it's just more "we need to bring down the entire trump admin" and it will literally never happen. ivanka won't be indicted, jared won't be indicted, nor will eric or don jr, or kellyanne or sarah sanders, kavanaugh won't be impeached, etc. it's all just hopes and dreams.cincybearcat said:
I've seen this mentioned in a lot of places. Don't think it's been mainstream media yet. But that is the type of talk that bugs me. Focus on the investigation. We have proof and will have more re:Donald Trump. If Pence come into it it only muddies the waters.HughFreakingDillon said:
only in a movie would that happen.ikiT said:they're gonna take Pence too.
President Pelosi.A month ago most people thought he wouldn’t be impeached. Life comes at you fast.
Not sure if they did an inquiry or went right with the vote with Clinton or not. I think they should go to a vote asap to take that argument away from Trump but it is entirely up to Pelosi.By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
2019
She's just trying to protect the moderate congressmen and women. She's played this perfectly thus far. I think she knows what she is doing.HughFreakingDillon said:
too bad it seems pelosi is the only one who is waffling on this. i mean, what does she have to lose? it's not like she's planning on running for prez and needs to choose her time carefully.The Juggler said:
Well I can only speak for myself. I've thought he would be impeached by the end of this year since the day he was elected. Always knew the odds of being convicted were low but it would depend on the mood of the country at the time pretty much. So no carts in front of horses here and my opinion/prediction has not changed has not changed one bit. Regarding the public sentiment: t's nice to see the public get behind this as quickly as they have. Time will tell.HughFreakingDillon said:
I'm sure he will. But all I'm saying is everyone is STILL, after all this time, putting the cart before the horse. people are already acting like he already has been. people are already moving onto removal, when they haven't even voted to impeach or not yet. they are still in the inquiry phase, and I haven't seen a lick of progress on that end either. what exactly is this anyway? are they waiting until they know they have enough support in the house to get it done? was an impeachment inquiry done with Bill?The Juggler said:
He’s going to be impeached. And I think the odds of conviction are higher than you think, as are the odds of his kids being charged and convicted of something at some point.HughFreakingDillon said:
and he still hasn't been impeached. it was the same with mueller. he was going to bring everyone down. he didn't. now this. maybe he'll be impeached. maybe he won't. but he won't be convicted. nor will any of his kids.The Juggler said:
Again, these things probably will not happen, but the odds are probably higher than you think.HughFreakingDillon said:
it's just more "we need to bring down the entire trump admin" and it will literally never happen. ivanka won't be indicted, jared won't be indicted, nor will eric or don jr, or kellyanne or sarah sanders, kavanaugh won't be impeached, etc. it's all just hopes and dreams.cincybearcat said:
I've seen this mentioned in a lot of places. Don't think it's been mainstream media yet. But that is the type of talk that bugs me. Focus on the investigation. We have proof and will have more re:Donald Trump. If Pence come into it it only muddies the waters.HughFreakingDillon said:
only in a movie would that happen.ikiT said:they're gonna take Pence too.
President Pelosi.A month ago most people thought he wouldn’t be impeached. Life comes at you fast.
Not sure if they did an inquiry or went right with the vote with Clinton or not. I think they should go to a vote asap to take that argument away from Trump but it is entirely up to Pelosi.www.myspace.com0 -
2018
protect them how?The Juggler said:
She's just trying to protect the moderate congressmen and women. She's played this perfectly thus far. I think she knows what she is doing.HughFreakingDillon said:
too bad it seems pelosi is the only one who is waffling on this. i mean, what does she have to lose? it's not like she's planning on running for prez and needs to choose her time carefully.The Juggler said:
Well I can only speak for myself. I've thought he would be impeached by the end of this year since the day he was elected. Always knew the odds of being convicted were low but it would depend on the mood of the country at the time pretty much. So no carts in front of horses here and my opinion/prediction has not changed has not changed one bit. Regarding the public sentiment: t's nice to see the public get behind this as quickly as they have. Time will tell.HughFreakingDillon said:
I'm sure he will. But all I'm saying is everyone is STILL, after all this time, putting the cart before the horse. people are already acting like he already has been. people are already moving onto removal, when they haven't even voted to impeach or not yet. they are still in the inquiry phase, and I haven't seen a lick of progress on that end either. what exactly is this anyway? are they waiting until they know they have enough support in the house to get it done? was an impeachment inquiry done with Bill?The Juggler said:
He’s going to be impeached. And I think the odds of conviction are higher than you think, as are the odds of his kids being charged and convicted of something at some point.HughFreakingDillon said:
and he still hasn't been impeached. it was the same with mueller. he was going to bring everyone down. he didn't. now this. maybe he'll be impeached. maybe he won't. but he won't be convicted. nor will any of his kids.The Juggler said:
Again, these things probably will not happen, but the odds are probably higher than you think.HughFreakingDillon said:
it's just more "we need to bring down the entire trump admin" and it will literally never happen. ivanka won't be indicted, jared won't be indicted, nor will eric or don jr, or kellyanne or sarah sanders, kavanaugh won't be impeached, etc. it's all just hopes and dreams.cincybearcat said:
I've seen this mentioned in a lot of places. Don't think it's been mainstream media yet. But that is the type of talk that bugs me. Focus on the investigation. We have proof and will have more re:Donald Trump. If Pence come into it it only muddies the waters.HughFreakingDillon said:
only in a movie would that happen.ikiT said:they're gonna take Pence too.
President Pelosi.A month ago most people thought he wouldn’t be impeached. Life comes at you fast.
Not sure if they did an inquiry or went right with the vote with Clinton or not. I think they should go to a vote asap to take that argument away from Trump but it is entirely up to Pelosi.By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
2019
Well they're in Trump districts so that is why she waited until there was a super obvious and super easy reason to just start an inquiry a couple weeks ago. Having them go on record early with a formal vote could jeopardize them next year. But now that the public is so much behind it, they can probably go with an official vote to start theHughFreakingDillon said:
protect them how?The Juggler said:
She's just trying to protect the moderate congressmen and women. She's played this perfectly thus far. I think she knows what she is doing.HughFreakingDillon said:
too bad it seems pelosi is the only one who is waffling on this. i mean, what does she have to lose? it's not like she's planning on running for prez and needs to choose her time carefully.The Juggler said:
Well I can only speak for myself. I've thought he would be impeached by the end of this year since the day he was elected. Always knew the odds of being convicted were low but it would depend on the mood of the country at the time pretty much. So no carts in front of horses here and my opinion/prediction has not changed has not changed one bit. Regarding the public sentiment: t's nice to see the public get behind this as quickly as they have. Time will tell.HughFreakingDillon said:
I'm sure he will. But all I'm saying is everyone is STILL, after all this time, putting the cart before the horse. people are already acting like he already has been. people are already moving onto removal, when they haven't even voted to impeach or not yet. they are still in the inquiry phase, and I haven't seen a lick of progress on that end either. what exactly is this anyway? are they waiting until they know they have enough support in the house to get it done? was an impeachment inquiry done with Bill?The Juggler said:
He’s going to be impeached. And I think the odds of conviction are higher than you think, as are the odds of his kids being charged and convicted of something at some point.HughFreakingDillon said:
and he still hasn't been impeached. it was the same with mueller. he was going to bring everyone down. he didn't. now this. maybe he'll be impeached. maybe he won't. but he won't be convicted. nor will any of his kids.The Juggler said:
Again, these things probably will not happen, but the odds are probably higher than you think.HughFreakingDillon said:
it's just more "we need to bring down the entire trump admin" and it will literally never happen. ivanka won't be indicted, jared won't be indicted, nor will eric or don jr, or kellyanne or sarah sanders, kavanaugh won't be impeached, etc. it's all just hopes and dreams.cincybearcat said:
I've seen this mentioned in a lot of places. Don't think it's been mainstream media yet. But that is the type of talk that bugs me. Focus on the investigation. We have proof and will have more re:Donald Trump. If Pence come into it it only muddies the waters.HughFreakingDillon said:
only in a movie would that happen.ikiT said:they're gonna take Pence too.
President Pelosi.A month ago most people thought he wouldn’t be impeached. Life comes at you fast.
Not sure if they did an inquiry or went right with the vote with Clinton or not. I think they should go to a vote asap to take that argument away from Trump but it is entirely up to Pelosi.www.myspace.com0 -
2019
www.myspace.com0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help