Canada's mosque

MeanMr.Mustard

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/01/30/canadian-pm-trudeau-calls-quebec-city-mosque-shooting-terrorist-attack-on-muslims.html

looks like the Prime Minister's good intentions aren't liked by everyone in Canada.

benjs

MeanMr.Mustard said:

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/01/30/canadian-pm-trudeau-calls-quebec-city-mosque-shooting-terrorist-attack-on-muslims.html

looks like the Prime Minister's good intentions aren't liked by everyone in Canada.

You're right, godfather. Maybe the solution is extreme vetting on white male Canadians and an immigration ban on Caucasians from countries known to have links to terrorists - starting with America.

benjs

By the way, Canada has countless mosques alongside the countless of other places of worship.

vaggar99

benjs said:

MeanMr.Mustard said:

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/01/30/canadian-pm-trudeau-calls-quebec-city-mosque-shooting-terrorist-attack-on-muslims.html

looks like the Prime Minister's good intentions aren't liked by everyone in Canada.

You're right, godfather. Maybe the solution is extreme vetting on white male Canadians and an immigration ban on Caucasians from countries known to have links to terrorists - starting with America.

the NRA are the terrorists.

benjs

vaggar99 said:

benjs said:

MeanMr.Mustard said:

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/01/30/canadian-pm-trudeau-calls-quebec-city-mosque-shooting-terrorist-attack-on-muslims.html

looks like the Prime Minister's good intentions aren't liked by everyone in Canada.

You're right, godfather. Maybe the solution is extreme vetting on white male Canadians and an immigration ban on Caucasians from countries known to have links to terrorists - starting with America.

the NRA are the terrorists.

I was referring to some suspected terrorists from Saudi Arabia, I'm not at all speaking about the NRA. Facilitators of weaponry at worst are of questionable moral fiber, but not terrorists.

vaggar99

benjs said:

vaggar99 said:

benjs said:

MeanMr.Mustard said:

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/01/30/canadian-pm-trudeau-calls-quebec-city-mosque-shooting-terrorist-attack-on-muslims.html

looks like the Prime Minister's good intentions aren't liked by everyone in Canada.

You're right, godfather. Maybe the solution is extreme vetting on white male Canadians and an immigration ban on Caucasians from countries known to have links to terrorists - starting with America.

the NRA are the terrorists.

I was referring to some suspected terrorists from Saudi Arabia, I'm not at all speaking about the NRA. Facilitators of weaponry at worst are of questionable moral fiber, but not terrorists.

we have the highest rate of gun deaths of any civilized country in the world. its not even a contest. at the heart of it, you have the NRA. wearing a suit and glasses, does not exclude you from being called a terrorist.

benjs

vaggar99 said:

benjs said:

vaggar99 said:

benjs said:

MeanMr.Mustard said:

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/01/30/canadian-pm-trudeau-calls-quebec-city-mosque-shooting-terrorist-attack-on-muslims.html

looks like the Prime Minister's good intentions aren't liked by everyone in Canada.

You're right, godfather. Maybe the solution is extreme vetting on white male Canadians and an immigration ban on Caucasians from countries known to have links to terrorists - starting with America.

the NRA are the terrorists.

I was referring to some suspected terrorists from Saudi Arabia, I'm not at all speaking about the NRA. Facilitators of weaponry at worst are of questionable moral fiber, but not terrorists.

we have the highest rate of gun deaths of any civilized country in the world. its not even a contest. at the heart of it, you have the NRA. wearing a suit and glasses, does not exclude you from being called a terrorist.

Yes, it does. Given that our founding fathers designed the constitution in ways that arguably provided the population with the right to carry arms, it would be less of a stretch to coin the drafters of the second amendment as terrorists than the NRA.

To call someone a terrorist, you'd have to prove that without reasonable a doubt he or she intended (or conspired) to act maliciously. Is the NRA in bed with each proponent of gun violence in the States? That's what the NRA as terrorists would look like.

benjs

vaggar99 said:

benjs said:

vaggar99 said:

benjs said:

MeanMr.Mustard said:

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/01/30/canadian-pm-trudeau-calls-quebec-city-mosque-shooting-terrorist-attack-on-muslims.html

looks like the Prime Minister's good intentions aren't liked by everyone in Canada.

You're right, godfather. Maybe the solution is extreme vetting on white male Canadians and an immigration ban on Caucasians from countries known to have links to terrorists - starting with America.

the NRA are the terrorists.

I was referring to some suspected terrorists from Saudi Arabia, I'm not at all speaking about the NRA. Facilitators of weaponry at worst are of questionable moral fiber, but not terrorists.

we have the highest rate of gun deaths of any civilized country in the world. its not even a contest. at the heart of it, you have the NRA. wearing a suit and glasses, does not exclude you from being called a terrorist.

If you had the highest rate of knife deaths would you call cutlery manufacturers terrorists too?

PJPOWER

Wait, aren't these types of guns "banned" in Canada?

vaggar99

benjs said:

vaggar99 said:

benjs said:

vaggar99 said:

benjs said:

MeanMr.Mustard said:

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/01/30/canadian-pm-trudeau-calls-quebec-city-mosque-shooting-terrorist-attack-on-muslims.html

looks like the Prime Minister's good intentions aren't liked by everyone in Canada.

You're right, godfather. Maybe the solution is extreme vetting on white male Canadians and an immigration ban on Caucasians from countries known to have links to terrorists - starting with America.

the NRA are the terrorists.

I was referring to some suspected terrorists from Saudi Arabia, I'm not at all speaking about the NRA. Facilitators of weaponry at worst are of questionable moral fiber, but not terrorists.

we have the highest rate of gun deaths of any civilized country in the world. its not even a contest. at the heart of it, you have the NRA. wearing a suit and glasses, does not exclude you from being called a terrorist.

Yes, it does. Given that our founding fathers designed the constitution in ways that arguably provided the population with the right to carry arms, it would be less of a stretch to coin the drafters of the second amendment as terrorists than the NRA.

To call someone a terrorist, you'd have to prove that without reasonable a doubt he or she intended (or conspired) to act maliciously. Is the NRA in bed with each proponent of gun violence in the States? That's what the NRA as terrorists would look like.

they use the Constitution as a basis for excessive armament in the same way Islamic terrorists use the Koran. There are also Christian undertones coupled with paranoid propaganda. So, yes I consider the NRA a terrorist organization.

Cutlery is an extremely inefficient way to kill. But yeah, if it were the year 1200, i might be going after whatever group says that its okay for every American to have an arsenal of combat swords in their home.

catefrances

vaggar99 said:

benjs said:

vaggar99 said:

benjs said:

MeanMr.Mustard said:

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/01/30/canadian-pm-trudeau-calls-quebec-city-mosque-shooting-terrorist-attack-on-muslims.html

looks like the Prime Minister's good intentions aren't liked by everyone in Canada.

You're right, godfather. Maybe the solution is extreme vetting on white male Canadians and an immigration ban on Caucasians from countries known to have links to terrorists - starting with America.

the NRA are the terrorists.

I was referring to some suspected terrorists from Saudi Arabia, I'm not at all speaking about the NRA. Facilitators of weaponry at worst are of questionable moral fiber, but not terrorists.

we have the highest rate of gun deaths of any civilized country in the world. its not even a contest. at the heart of it, you have the NRA. wearing a suit and glasses, does not exclude you from being called a terrorist.

doesnt sound very civilised does it?

vaggar99

the Constitution also calls for equality. Did we have that from the get go? And do we have it now? I think not. If you are a WMA, you get a pass on a lot of bad behavior.

benjs

vaggar99 said:

benjs said:

vaggar99 said:

benjs said:

vaggar99 said:

benjs said:

MeanMr.Mustard said:

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/01/30/canadian-pm-trudeau-calls-quebec-city-mosque-shooting-terrorist-attack-on-muslims.html

looks like the Prime Minister's good intentions aren't liked by everyone in Canada.

You're right, godfather. Maybe the solution is extreme vetting on white male Canadians and an immigration ban on Caucasians from countries known to have links to terrorists - starting with America.

the NRA are the terrorists.

I was referring to some suspected terrorists from Saudi Arabia, I'm not at all speaking about the NRA. Facilitators of weaponry at worst are of questionable moral fiber, but not terrorists.

we have the highest rate of gun deaths of any civilized country in the world. its not even a contest. at the heart of it, you have the NRA. wearing a suit and glasses, does not exclude you from being called a terrorist.

Yes, it does. Given that our founding fathers designed the constitution in ways that arguably provided the population with the right to carry arms, it would be less of a stretch to coin the drafters of the second amendment as terrorists than the NRA.

To call someone a terrorist, you'd have to prove that without reasonable a doubt he or she intended (or conspired) to act maliciously. Is the NRA in bed with each proponent of gun violence in the States? That's what the NRA as terrorists would look like.

they use the Constitution as a basis for excessive armament in the same way Islamic terrorists use the Koran. There are also Christian undertones coupled with paranoid propaganda. So, yes I consider the NRA a terrorist organization.

Cutlery is an extremely inefficient way to kill. But yeah, if it were the year 1200, i might be going after whatever group says that its okay for every American to have an arsenal of combat swords in their home.

Except that, again, armament isn't a crime, whereas the terrorists exploiting the meaning of the Qur'an that you're referring to who are attempting to murder - clearly are committing crimes. Also, religious propaganda and undertones are tools used by terrorists, but they're also tools used by peace-loving priests and imams and to be frank, even many parents.

If your battle is against tools that can be used for good or evil and plan on unequivocally condemning them and their users, you will run out of tools to live day to day with, and run out of decent people to communicate with.

Wma31394

Any update on who did this?

MeanMr.Mustard

Wma31394 said:

Any update on who did this?

well....according to some of the folks here the NRA did it. LOL !!!!!!! so going along with that belief is it fare to say that all muslims are the enemy because of the so called radical muslims ?

vaggar99

i'm hearing that it was Syrian refugees.

MeanMr.Mustard

vaggar99 said:

i'm hearing that it was Syrian refugees.

that wouldn't surprise anybody...but they sure made it sound like a couple Canadians ?

Jason P

The shooters are students, one of Moroccan origin.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4170500/Five-dead-GUNMEN-open-fire-Mosque-Quebec-City.html

tbergs

Until it is actually known what their ties are, it's pointless to speculate. Wait for the information to come out instead of hearing the best guesses of all of the news organizations hoping to get the scoop.

MeanMr.Mustard

yea...still waiting for the NRA to accept responsibility . LOL !!!!

PJPOWER

tbergs said:

Until it is actually known what their ties are, it's pointless to speculate. Wait for the information to come out instead of hearing the best guesses of all of the news organizations hoping to get the scoop.

Agreed...all of those organizations initially shouting "white supremacists" should be immediately regarded as fake news organizations.