Computer Scientists urge Clinton to challenge results based on results of electronic voting machines

JC29856

Gern Blansten said:

Pennsylvania:

2012 Results: Obama 2,990,274 / Romney 2,680,434 = Total 5,670,708

2016 Results: Clinton 2,844,705 / Trump 2,912,941 = Total 5,757,646

I was reading an a write up in Forbes about Hilliary huge margins in major cities but it was the suburbs where trump won, especially in pa wis and mich.

mickeyrat

read something the other day that Wi, Mi, and Pa all went for Trump by roughly 1%. 3 MUST win states for him to win. odds of this possibility were said to be huge. Or Yuge if you like. He did say it was rigged, didnt he?.

Gern Blansten

mickeyrat said:

read something the other day that Wi, Mi, and Pa all went for Trump by roughly 1%. 3 MUST win states for him to win. odds of this possibility were said to be huge. Or Yuge if you like. He did say it was rigged, didnt he?.

Yeah that's the odd part. Everything kind of fell into place except for those three states.

polaris_x

Gern Blansten said:

mickeyrat said:

read something the other day that Wi, Mi, and Pa all went for Trump by roughly 1%. 3 MUST win states for him to win. odds of this possibility were said to be huge. Or Yuge if you like. He did say it was rigged, didnt he?.

Yeah that's the odd part. Everything kind of fell into place except for those three states.

and florida

HughFreakingDillon

wouldn't a precise audit take months to conduct? I think HRC's only hope is the electoral collage magically not standing behind trump. which isn't going to happen.

JimmyV

FiveThirtyEight: Demographics, Not Hacking, Explain The Election Results

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/demographics-not-hacking-explain-the-election-results/

PJfanwillneverleave1

http://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/three-swing-states-were-possibly-hacked-during-election-activists-urge-hillary-clinton-to-challenge-results/ar-AAkFW2R?li=AAadgLE&ocid=spartanntp
Ms Clinton has made no indication she would challenge the results and the White House is intent on a smooth transition.

Free

Poor Clinton news network. They just will never get over this loss.

PJ_Soul

Hey, I am a fan of truth. If there was some kind of election fraud or foul play, then it should be thoroughly investigated. I think that well-founded suspicions, even if they may be proven false, are worth an audit. If everything is on the up and up, then there isn't anything to worry about, right? That's why I don't see why anyone would mock calls for an audit (talking to you Free). I would be saying the same if Hillary had won with the same results (combined with the warnings that we heard for weeks from many different players that there could be election interference). I'm saying this without having looked into the reasons why some think there might have been tampering. I do recall reading from various sources that the election was at risk from hackers and various other political activists, etc. I have no clue whether or not they actually did something. I would certainly be interested to see the results of an in depth audit, if only because there apparently hasn't been one for a long time.

PJfanwillneverleave1

^^^
It's sad.

PJ_Soul

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

^^^
It's sad.

What is?

PJfanwillneverleave1

^^^
That there are still people who think that Hillary will be President.

PJ_Soul

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

^^^
That there are still people who think that Hillary will be President.

Well yeah, unless something that none of us know about yet comes up, that ain't going to happen.

HughFreakingDillon

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

^^^
That there are still people who think that Hillary will be President.

dude, this would be happening no matter who it was. if it were reversed, you damn well bet that Trump would be at the forefront of a recount. And you'd be trumpeting from the rooftops the conspiracy against him.

JimmyV

Republicans were ready to scream bloody murder about this in 2012. Luckily President Obama won the popular vote by almost 5 million and spared us all.

#ThanksObama