Home› A Moving Train

This case will have some of you not knowing which side to take.

unsungunsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
in A Moving Train
Lesbian arrested over a bullet.

Comments

  • pjalive21pjalive21 St. Louis, MO Posts: 2,818
    edited November 2016
    If you believe everything in the article the officer was wrong and out of line and whoever involved should lose their jobs and the city should pay up

    Edit: Definitely a one sided take that seems to be missing a lot of the story
    Post edited by pjalive21 on
  • pjhawkspjhawks Posts: 12,572
    so many unanswered questions in that story. seemed a pretty one-sided take on it.
  • PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 49,991
    If you take this article at face value, why would anyone not know which side to take? Her rights are very clearly being violated (even if maybe the cops had more reason to arrest her, her rights would be getting violated. Not providing tampons?? Wtf?
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • pjalive21pjalive21 St. Louis, MO Posts: 2,818
    edited November 2016
    PJ_Soul said:

    If you take this article at face value, why would anyone not know which side to take? Her rights are very clearly being violated (even if maybe the cops had more reason to arrest her, her rights would be getting violated. Not providing tampons?? Wtf?

    i originally reacted like you did and said the same thing, but then sat back and thought about it and how we only got one side of the story, BUT if an investigation proves this to be true then ill stand by what i originally said and they should be fired and the city should pay up

    i also looked at the website it came from and its a 2nd Amendment website, so there is an agenda there
    Post edited by pjalive21 on
  • PJ_SoulPJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 49,991
    pjalive21 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    If you take this article at face value, why would anyone not know which side to take? Her rights are very clearly being violated (even if maybe the cops had more reason to arrest her, her rights would be getting violated. Not providing tampons?? Wtf?

    i originally reacted like you did and said the same thing, but then sat back and thought about it and how we only got one side of the story, BUT if an investigation proves this to be true then ill stand by what i originally said and they should be fired and the city should pay up

    i also looked at the website it came from and its a 2nd Amendment website, so there is an agenda there
    I assumed the story was at least half bullshit, lol, as it is obviously biased. But even if just the tampon thing is true, that's wrong. I know there was recently another instance of this in a jail, and that judge got coverage because she was pissed about it. If the whole thing is anything close to accurate, yeah, people should be fired of course.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • rgambsrgambs Posts: 13,576
    PJ_Soul said:

    If you take this article at face value, why would anyone not know which side to take? Her rights are very clearly being violated (even if maybe the cops had more reason to arrest her, her rights would be getting violated. Not providing tampons?? Wtf?

    Because, in unsung's mind, liberals love lesbians and hate guns, but distrust cops or, conservatives love cops and love guns so they are at odds?
    My best guess.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • HughFreakingDillonHughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 37,367
    not under arrest but taken to the station and not allowed legal counsel? sounds like that cop should not be a cop. i hate guns but it sounds like she did nothing wrong AND had them stored properly.
    "Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk"
    -EV  8/14/93




Sign In or Register to comment.