Act II - Trazis "Compare your opponent to Adolf Hitler. This is your heavy artillery, for when your opponent is obviously right, and you are spectacularly wrong."
Act II - Trazis "Compare your opponent to Adolf Hitler. This is your heavy artillery, for when your opponent is obviously right, and you are spectacularly wrong."
Democrats aren't the reason yesterday was one of the worst days of the Trump Presidency. Maybe the worst day so far. So, you know, good time to worry about John Podesta's emails. Not a distraction. No really. Not at all.
Michael Scherer (TIME) is working on a story delving into the claim
> that Hillary Clinton was under no obligation to turn over 55,000 pages of emails.
see the names of "journalists" in this email? Google some and read their headlines!
Because Twitter is such an explosive verifiable source of information, more so than the National Enquirer. Every allegation in that article never reached me despite my multiple news sources. Trump replaced by Orin Hatch is laughable as are your attempts at legitimizing fake news. Gee, I wonder how many people have gotten rich on Clinton/Obama conspiracy theories? Nice try though JC, slow news day? And no worries, Mueller will release the "lurid" details. Order up! 755+1+7Xs
Because Twitter is such an explosive verifiable source of information, more so than the National Enquirer. Every allegation in that article never reached me despite my multiple news sources. Trump replaced by Orin Hatch is laughable as are your attempts at legitimizing fake news. Gee, I wonder how many people have gotten rich on Clinton/Obama conspiracy theories? Nice try though JC, slow news day? And no worries, Mueller will release the "lurid" details. Order up! 755+1+7Xs
never underestimate the power of social media. Russians behind fake news on Twitter and Facebook influenced our elections! let's not make the same mistake twice
Because Twitter is such an explosive verifiable source of information, more so than the National Enquirer. Every allegation in that article never reached me despite my multiple news sources. Trump replaced by Orin Hatch is laughable as are your attempts at legitimizing fake news. Gee, I wonder how many people have gotten rich on Clinton/Obama conspiracy theories? Nice try though JC, slow news day? And no worries, Mueller will release the "lurid" details. Order up! 755+1+7Xs
never underestimate the power of social media. Russians behind fake news on Twitter and Facebook influenced our elections! let's not make the same mistake twice
Trump's twitter feed was the fakest of them all. You seem to be coming around to the Trump/Russia collusion.
Because Twitter is such an explosive verifiable source of information, more so than the National Enquirer. Every allegation in that article never reached me despite my multiple news sources. Trump replaced by Orin Hatch is laughable as are your attempts at legitimizing fake news. Gee, I wonder how many people have gotten rich on Clinton/Obama conspiracy theories? Nice try though JC, slow news day? And no worries, Mueller will release the "lurid" details. Order up! 755+1+7Xs
never underestimate the power of social media. Russians behind fake news on Twitter and Facebook influenced our elections! let's not make the same mistake twice
Trump's twitter feed was the fakest of them all. You seem to be coming around to the Trump/Russia collusion.
maybe, help me...define collusion and specifically how does Trump/Putin to Trump/Russia fit the definition. thanks
Because Twitter is such an explosive verifiable source of information, more so than the National Enquirer. Every allegation in that article never reached me despite my multiple news sources. Trump replaced by Orin Hatch is laughable as are your attempts at legitimizing fake news. Gee, I wonder how many people have gotten rich on Clinton/Obama conspiracy theories? Nice try though JC, slow news day? And no worries, Mueller will release the "lurid" details. Order up! 755+1+7Xs
never underestimate the power of social media. Russians behind fake news on Twitter and Facebook influenced our elections! let's not make the same mistake twice
Trump's twitter feed was the fakest of them all. You seem to be coming around to the Trump/Russia collusion.
maybe, help me...define collusion and specifically how does Trump/Putin to Trump/Russia fit the definition. thanks
This and questions like this will be answered when the president you voted for is impeached. Patience is key.
Because Twitter is such an explosive verifiable source of information, more so than the National Enquirer. Every allegation in that article never reached me despite my multiple news sources. Trump replaced by Orin Hatch is laughable as are your attempts at legitimizing fake news. Gee, I wonder how many people have gotten rich on Clinton/Obama conspiracy theories? Nice try though JC, slow news day? And no worries, Mueller will release the "lurid" details. Order up! 755+1+7Xs
never underestimate the power of social media. Russians behind fake news on Twitter and Facebook influenced our elections! let's not make the same mistake twice
Trump's twitter feed was the fakest of them all. You seem to be coming around to the Trump/Russia collusion.
maybe, help me...define collusion and specifically how does Trump/Putin to Trump/Russia fit the definition. thanks
You have access to a dictionary and google, I presume?
Their false stories about Trump have included a claim that he was already being replaced as president by Senator Orrin Hatch in a process kept secret from the American public.
For months, you've heard the Clinton campaign endlessly repeat in
interviews and on social media that they have raised millions and
millions of dollars for state parties through something called the
"Hillary Victory Fund." They've even used it as an attack line to
insinuate Bernie wasn't willing to help down-ballot Democrats.
Well, yesterday morning, thanks to a Politico investigation, we found
out that less than 1 percent of the $61 million raised by
the Victory Fund has stayed in state party coffers. And indeed, the
majority of the money spent by the Victory Fund has gone to benefit
Hillary Clinton's primary campaign against us. The piece said some state
party fundraisers believe they are basically acting
as "money laundering conduits."
There's more, but first let me get to the part where you can take
action. In recent weeks, the Clinton campaign has expressed a lot
of interest in what is important to Bernie's supporters. Here's your
chance to send a message about our distaste for big-money in politics:
Sign
our petition calling on the Clinton campaign to stop bending campaign
finance rules to their breaking point, and immediately transfer all the
money allowable to the state parties participating in the "Hillary
Victory Fund."
Here's how the scheme works for the Clinton campaign:
Rich people like Alice Walton of Walmart who have already contributed
the maximum amount allowable to the Clinton campaign can contribute
an additional $350,000-plus to the Victory Fund.
The first $33,400 of her contribution is supposed to go the DNC, and the
rest divided up between participating state parties. But that's
not what's been happening. The Victory Fund has mostly been doing one
of two things with Ms. Walton's money:
1. Taking that money and spending it on advertisements and small-dollar
fundraising solicitations. Then they take all the small-dollar
contributions and data reaped from Alice Walton's contribution and
transfer it directly to the Clinton campaign. This tactic is basically a
way for them to benefit from a contribution much larger than the legal
limit from Alice Walton.
2. They take Alice Walton's money and transfer it to state parties, who
then immediately transfer it to the DNC. Often times they do
it without the state party even knowing because the Clinton campaign
controls many of the bank accounts involved. So at the end of the day,
most of the state parties have received exactly $0 from their Victory
Fund arrangement.
So, now that we know the Clinton campaign is taking advantage of state
parties to skirt fundraising limits on her presidential campaign,
it's time for her to do the right thing and let the state parties keep
their fair share of the cash:
Sign
our petition calling on the Clinton campaign to stop bending campaign
finance rules to their breaking point, and immediately transfer all the
money allowable to the state parties participating in the "Hillary
Victory Fund."
It's unfortunate that Hillary Clinton has benefited from tens of
millions of dollars in cash transfers and advertising to campaign
against us in the primary. But it's not too late for her campaign to do
the right thing by the state parties we're going to need to win
elections up and down the ticket this November.
I'm sure if you sign our petition, that is something they will notice.
In solidarity,
Jeff Weaver
Campaign Manager
Bernie 2016
Contribute
Hi Mark,
I'm emailing you because Luis isn't responding to my query.
I'm a correspondent for PolitiFact and we're taking another look at
our George Clooney
ruling<http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2016/apr/17/george-clooney/george-clooney-decries-big-money-politics-says-mos/>
in the wake of today's Politico
story<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/clinton-fundraising-leaves-little-for-state-parties-222670>
reporting that the money from the Hillary Victory Fund that was
supposed to go state Democratic committee is, instead, being sent
directly to the DNC.
We we wrote the Clooney piece, I didn't take the complaints about
that seriously because it seemed ridiculous that states would get money
to help their local candidates and then turn around and give ALL of it
to the DNC. So now there's evidence that they are.
Can you or someone in the DNC explain what is going on here? Why
would a state committee even do that. Please don't tell me this is
Clinton money and you have nothing to do with it. You're accepting the
funds. You could easily refuse to accept it or turn it back to the
states for their House / Senate races?
At the very least, this gives the appearance that the DNC is
benefiting from money raised under false pretenses. Is the party
comfortable with that?
I'm at 401-529-5313 if you would prefer to chat in person.
Thanks,
-- Gene Emery
Comments
Act I - Trutin
Best approach is to slaughter Donald for his bromance with Putin
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25651
Act II - Trazis
"Compare your opponent to Adolf Hitler. This is your heavy artillery, for when your opponent is obviously right, and you are spectacularly wrong."
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/40193
Onward Together!
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
Michael Scherer (TIME) is working on a story delving into the claim > that Hillary Clinton was under no obligation to turn over 55,000 pages of emails.
see the names of "journalists" in this email? Google some and read their headlines!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/pr/wp/2017/08/28/michael-scherer-joins-the-washington-post-as-national-political-reporter/
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Lurid Trump allegations made by Louise Mensch and co-writer came from hoaxer
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/aug/28/trump-tweets-hoax-louise-mensch-claude-taylor
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Russians behind fake news on Twitter and Facebook influenced our elections! let's not make the same mistake twice
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Ethics 101
https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2017/08/29/so-mad-donna-brazile-gets-defensive-when-confronted-with-pushing-menschs-fake-trump-stories/amp/
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://amp.pastemagazine.com/articles/2017/08/claude-taylor-and-louise-mensch-as-cautionary-tale.html
Their false stories about Trump have included a claim that he was already being replaced as president by Senator Orrin Hatch in a process kept secret from the American public.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
I can't imagine the amount of viruses his computer has with all these shady websites he visits regularly.
does it matter how they were ascertained?
http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://www.lgraham.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/4766f54d-d433-4055-9f3d-c94f97eeb1c0/testimony-of-sean-edgett-acting-general-counsel-twitter.pdf
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/9495
For months, you've heard the Clinton campaign endlessly repeat in interviews and on social media that they have raised millions and millions of dollars for state parties through something called the "Hillary Victory Fund." They've even used it as an attack line to insinuate Bernie wasn't willing to help down-ballot Democrats. Well, yesterday morning, thanks to a Politico investigation, we found out that less than 1 percent of the $61 million raised by the Victory Fund has stayed in state party coffers. And indeed, the majority of the money spent by the Victory Fund has gone to benefit Hillary Clinton's primary campaign against us. The piece said some state party fundraisers believe they are basically acting as "money laundering conduits." There's more, but first let me get to the part where you can take action. In recent weeks, the Clinton campaign has expressed a lot of interest in what is important to Bernie's supporters. Here's your chance to send a message about our distaste for big-money in politics: Sign our petition calling on the Clinton campaign to stop bending campaign finance rules to their breaking point, and immediately transfer all the money allowable to the state parties participating in the "Hillary Victory Fund." Here's how the scheme works for the Clinton campaign: Rich people like Alice Walton of Walmart who have already contributed the maximum amount allowable to the Clinton campaign can contribute an additional $350,000-plus to the Victory Fund. The first $33,400 of her contribution is supposed to go the DNC, and the rest divided up between participating state parties. But that's not what's been happening. The Victory Fund has mostly been doing one of two things with Ms. Walton's money: 1. Taking that money and spending it on advertisements and small-dollar fundraising solicitations. Then they take all the small-dollar contributions and data reaped from Alice Walton's contribution and transfer it directly to the Clinton campaign. This tactic is basically a way for them to benefit from a contribution much larger than the legal limit from Alice Walton. 2. They take Alice Walton's money and transfer it to state parties, who then immediately transfer it to the DNC. Often times they do it without the state party even knowing because the Clinton campaign controls many of the bank accounts involved. So at the end of the day, most of the state parties have received exactly $0 from their Victory Fund arrangement. So, now that we know the Clinton campaign is taking advantage of state parties to skirt fundraising limits on her presidential campaign, it's time for her to do the right thing and let the state parties keep their fair share of the cash: Sign our petition calling on the Clinton campaign to stop bending campaign finance rules to their breaking point, and immediately transfer all the money allowable to the state parties participating in the "Hillary Victory Fund." It's unfortunate that Hillary Clinton has benefited from tens of millions of dollars in cash transfers and advertising to campaign against us in the primary. But it's not too late for her campaign to do the right thing by the state parties we're going to need to win elections up and down the ticket this November. I'm sure if you sign our petition, that is something they will notice. In solidarity, Jeff Weaver Campaign Manager Bernie 2016 Contribute
Hi Mark, I'm emailing you because Luis isn't responding to my query. I'm a correspondent for PolitiFact and we're taking another look at our George Clooney ruling<http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2016/apr/17/george-clooney/george-clooney-decries-big-money-politics-says-mos/> in the wake of today's Politico story<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/clinton-fundraising-leaves-little-for-state-parties-222670> reporting that the money from the Hillary Victory Fund that was supposed to go state Democratic committee is, instead, being sent directly to the DNC. We we wrote the Clooney piece, I didn't take the complaints about that seriously because it seemed ridiculous that states would get money to help their local candidates and then turn around and give ALL of it to the DNC. So now there's evidence that they are. Can you or someone in the DNC explain what is going on here? Why would a state committee even do that. Please don't tell me this is Clinton money and you have nothing to do with it. You're accepting the funds. You could easily refuse to accept it or turn it back to the states for their House / Senate races? At the very least, this gives the appearance that the DNC is benefiting from money raised under false pretenses. Is the party comfortable with that? I'm at 401-529-5313 if you would prefer to chat in person. Thanks, -- Gene Emery
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©