Justice Department Plans to Stop Using Private Prisons
Free
Posts: 3,562
The announcement comes after a Mother Jones investigation found serious deficiencies at a private prison in Louisiana.
http://m.motherjones.com/politics/2016/08/department-justice-plans-end-private-prison
http://m.motherjones.com/politics/2016/08/department-justice-plans-end-private-prison
0
Comments
How many people have been locked up for the benefit of profit? I'm cautiously optimistic.
You're the one that consistently states government interference in our lives is unnecessary- that we can competently and ethically provide all services privately.
I'm not putting faith into government. I'm putting faith in that people finally see how the scam works.
-Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
"Life Is What Happens To You When Your Busy Making Other Plans" John Lennon
-Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
-Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
And then there's this guy:
It's dangerous out here!
-Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
-Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
Only a few thousand minors in this one case, nothing to see here.
Because everyone knows that only the big bad Federal boogeyman is capable of corruption, state and local governments are immune to all that.
Oh, wait...
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2011/08/11/139536686/pa-judge-sentenced-to-28-years-in-massive-juvenile-justice-bribery-scandal
You seem not to care what states do, as long as the Federal boogeyman stays out of it.
Tell me, do you think southern states should still have the authority to administer slavery? Or did the Federal boogeyman have the authority to override that nasty little habit?
Constitutionally it should be handled by the States.
Slavery? You mean the practice that was allowed by the federal government? Thank God government saved us from government.
Nice deflection (again) on the states rights vs. human rights problem.
Here, let me devote more time to fill your special needs.
I'm against locking up people for profit. I'm against most laws because they end up locking up people for profit. I'm against corruption at any level. Your accusation about not caring about corruption is directed at the wrong person, instead it should be directed at every person that will cast a vote for that POS Clinton.
So please, let's talk about deflection.
But yeah I would take Trump a million times over the criminal Clinton, but I'm not voting for him either because he doesn't push for more liberty.
I'm not voting, I've said it before, none are worthy of my selection, I don't need a ruler, and none promote liberty. Accept it.
https://thinkprogress.org/the-federal-government-is-not-actually-ending-private-prisons-40e8c8dbf976#.uznezet73
You perform the same function here that every libertarian I know performs on the internet.
You claim to have an airtight ideology and you drop catch phrases about ending the Fed and crooked politicians, mention Article 3 section 2, or whatever it is, and then refuse to actually debate your ideology, as though it is beneath you, or perhaps the ideology. You say "muh roads", but you won't (or more likely can't) provide evidence to refute the criticisms laid at your feet. You shout about states' rights, and, again, you won't (or can't) answer simple questions about the consequences of those states' rights.
I know, I know, you don't self-identify as a libertarian anymore, but that's the ideology you espouse, whether you prefer to label it as such or not.
I live in the context of the historical record and reality, where the government you want failed the people who lived under it.
I have to say, I think it's pick your poison; however, let's be honest... Trump? Like seriously... Trump? Yikes.