Petition to file treason charges against the 47 gop senators who signed letter to iran

BS44325

badbrains said:

BS44325 said:

Here are a couple of links showing how "unprecedented" this letter is:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/10/7-times-democrats-advised-americas-enemies-to-oppose-the-president/

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/03/11/while-dems-are-complaining-about-gop-senators-letter-to-iran-guess-what-ted-kennedy-did-in-1983/

Thanks for posting. (Seriously ). If the story is true, which looks like it is, that shits fucked up as well. 100% bullshit when anyone does anything like this. But I will say it was only 1 person compared to 47. Still just as wrong.

None of it is really "wrong". The US has co-equal branches of government. Checks and balances. Let's not forget that the Senate rejected the Treaty of Versailles.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/blogs/learning/2012/03/19/march-19-1920-senate-rejects-treaty-of-versailles-for-second-and-final-time/

A letter such as Cotton's wouldn't be necessary if congress was kept in the loop on negotiations. After all they must sign off on any deal reached.

badbrains

BS44325 said:

badbrains said:

BS44325 said:

Here are a couple of links showing how "unprecedented" this letter is:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/10/7-times-democrats-advised-americas-enemies-to-oppose-the-president/

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/03/11/while-dems-are-complaining-about-gop-senators-letter-to-iran-guess-what-ted-kennedy-did-in-1983/

Thanks for posting. (Seriously ). If the story is true, which looks like it is, that shits fucked up as well. 100% bullshit when anyone does anything like this. But I will say it was only 1 person compared to 47. Still just as wrong.

None of it is really "wrong". The US has co-equal branches of government. Checks and balances. Let's not forget that the Senate rejected the Treaty of Versailles.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/blogs/learning/2012/03/19/march-19-1920-senate-rejects-treaty-of-versailles-for-second-and-final-time/

A letter such as Cotton's wouldn't be necessary if congress was kept in the loop on negotiations. After all they must sign off on any deal reached.

But who's to say they weren't and if I was president, I wouldn't be going around telling congress my negotiations. That's like playing cards and telling everyone u have an A.

gimmesometruth27

BS44325 said:

badbrains said:

BS44325 said:

Here are a couple of links showing how "unprecedented" this letter is:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/10/7-times-democrats-advised-americas-enemies-to-oppose-the-president/

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/03/11/while-dems-are-complaining-about-gop-senators-letter-to-iran-guess-what-ted-kennedy-did-in-1983/

Thanks for posting. (Seriously ). If the story is true, which looks like it is, that shits fucked up as well. 100% bullshit when anyone does anything like this. But I will say it was only 1 person compared to 47. Still just as wrong.

None of it is really "wrong". The US has co-equal branches of government. Checks and balances. Let's not forget that the Senate rejected the Treaty of Versailles.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/blogs/learning/2012/03/19/march-19-1920-senate-rejects-treaty-of-versailles-for-second-and-final-time/

A letter such as Cotton's wouldn't be necessary if congress was kept in the loop on negotiations. After all they must sign off on any deal reached.

no they must not. that is their complaint. president can act unilaterally in this case.

obama can reach an agreement, and if the congress had to approve it, they would torpedo it just to be dicks and just to show up obama.

BS44325

gimmesometruth27 said:

BS44325 said:

badbrains said:

BS44325 said:

Here are a couple of links showing how "unprecedented" this letter is:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/10/7-times-democrats-advised-americas-enemies-to-oppose-the-president/

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/03/11/while-dems-are-complaining-about-gop-senators-letter-to-iran-guess-what-ted-kennedy-did-in-1983/

Thanks for posting. (Seriously ). If the story is true, which looks like it is, that shits fucked up as well. 100% bullshit when anyone does anything like this. But I will say it was only 1 person compared to 47. Still just as wrong.

None of it is really "wrong". The US has co-equal branches of government. Checks and balances. Let's not forget that the Senate rejected the Treaty of Versailles.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/blogs/learning/2012/03/19/march-19-1920-senate-rejects-treaty-of-versailles-for-second-and-final-time/

A letter such as Cotton's wouldn't be necessary if congress was kept in the loop on negotiations. After all they must sign off on any deal reached.

no they must not. that is their complaint. president can act unilaterally in this case.

obama can reach an agreement, and if the congress had to approve it, they would torpedo it just to be dicks and just to show up obama.

Which is their perogative. Checks and balances. That's how it works. You need a civics lesson.

badbrains

BS44325 said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

BS44325 said:

badbrains said:

BS44325 said:

Here are a couple of links showing how "unprecedented" this letter is:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/10/7-times-democrats-advised-americas-enemies-to-oppose-the-president/

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/03/11/while-dems-are-complaining-about-gop-senators-letter-to-iran-guess-what-ted-kennedy-did-in-1983/

Thanks for posting. (Seriously ). If the story is true, which looks like it is, that shits fucked up as well. 100% bullshit when anyone does anything like this. But I will say it was only 1 person compared to 47. Still just as wrong.

None of it is really "wrong". The US has co-equal branches of government. Checks and balances. Let's not forget that the Senate rejected the Treaty of Versailles.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/blogs/learning/2012/03/19/march-19-1920-senate-rejects-treaty-of-versailles-for-second-and-final-time/

A letter such as Cotton's wouldn't be necessary if congress was kept in the loop on negotiations. After all they must sign off on any deal reached.

no they must not. that is their complaint. president can act unilaterally in this case.

obama can reach an agreement, and if the congress had to approve it, they would torpedo it just to be dicks and just to show up obama.

Which is their perogative. Checks and balances. That's how it works. You need a civics lesson.

Civics lesson? Gimmie? Why you insulting him? Me I can understand, but Gimmie?

benjs

BS44325 said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

BS44325 said:

badbrains said:

BS44325 said:

Here are a couple of links showing how "unprecedented" this letter is:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/10/7-times-democrats-advised-americas-enemies-to-oppose-the-president/

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/03/11/while-dems-are-complaining-about-gop-senators-letter-to-iran-guess-what-ted-kennedy-did-in-1983/

Thanks for posting. (Seriously ). If the story is true, which looks like it is, that shits fucked up as well. 100% bullshit when anyone does anything like this. But I will say it was only 1 person compared to 47. Still just as wrong.

None of it is really "wrong". The US has co-equal branches of government. Checks and balances. Let's not forget that the Senate rejected the Treaty of Versailles.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/blogs/learning/2012/03/19/march-19-1920-senate-rejects-treaty-of-versailles-for-second-and-final-time/

A letter such as Cotton's wouldn't be necessary if congress was kept in the loop on negotiations. After all they must sign off on any deal reached.

no they must not. that is their complaint. president can act unilaterally in this case.

obama can reach an agreement, and if the congress had to approve it, they would torpedo it just to be dicks and just to show up obama.

Which is their perogative. Checks and balances. That's how it works. You need a civics lesson.

When your civics lesson reveals that politicians speak for themselves instead of their country - your civics plan needs a revamp. Those aren't checks and balances: they're dirty and self-serving politics that prevent any meaningful progress in the world.

BS44325

benjs said:

BS44325 said:

gimmesometruth27 said:

BS44325 said:

badbrains said:

BS44325 said:

Here are a couple of links showing how "unprecedented" this letter is:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/10/7-times-democrats-advised-americas-enemies-to-oppose-the-president/

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/03/11/while-dems-are-complaining-about-gop-senators-letter-to-iran-guess-what-ted-kennedy-did-in-1983/

Thanks for posting. (Seriously ). If the story is true, which looks like it is, that shits fucked up as well. 100% bullshit when anyone does anything like this. But I will say it was only 1 person compared to 47. Still just as wrong.

None of it is really "wrong". The US has co-equal branches of government. Checks and balances. Let's not forget that the Senate rejected the Treaty of Versailles.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/blogs/learning/2012/03/19/march-19-1920-senate-rejects-treaty-of-versailles-for-second-and-final-time/

A letter such as Cotton's wouldn't be necessary if congress was kept in the loop on negotiations. After all they must sign off on any deal reached.

no they must not. that is their complaint. president can act unilaterally in this case.

obama can reach an agreement, and if the congress had to approve it, they would torpedo it just to be dicks and just to show up obama.

Which is their perogative. Checks and balances. That's how it works. You need a civics lesson.

When your civics lesson reveals that politicians speak for themselves instead of their country - your civics plan needs a revamp. Those aren't checks and balances: they're dirty and self-serving politics that prevent any meaningful progress in the world.

Here's your meaningful progress:

(Warning - link from zionist paper)

http://www.timesofisrael.com/khamenei-calls-death-to-america-as-kerry-hails-progress-on-nuke-deal/

It appears the French are in sync with the GOP senators.

rgambs

From the article:
"The politics of America is to create insecurity."
He nailed that part, even if the rest was coocoo for cocopuffs!

BS44325

http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/23/politics/house-letter-obama-iran/

I guess the treason numbers are now up to 414 out of a total 535

josevolution

Yeah fuck diplomatic resolutions lets just dropp some boms on those dirty harabs after all they surely can't just want nuclear power for energy it has to be for a bomb for Jerusalem .....

Last-12-Exit

What was treason again?

badbrains

josevolution said:

Yeah fuck diplomatic resolutions lets just dropp some boms on those dirty harabs after all they surely can't just want nuclear power for energy it has to be for a bomb for Jerusalem .....

Amen Jose

badbrains

BS44325 said:

http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/23/politics/house-letter-obama-iran/

I guess the treason numbers are now up to 414 out of a total 535

For a Canadian, u sure do have a crazy hard on for us to drop some bombs on Iran. Amazing, let's kill more people.