As intelligent beings, do we have a certain responsibility in the universe?
brianlux
Posts: 42,042
I just wrote this in the Train's Lounge Car and got to thinking maybe it would be a good topic for discussion:
"...last night before going to sleep I was reading in this book called The New Universe and the Human Future by Abrams and Primack about how most of the universe is comprised of dark matter and dark energy and how, besides hydrogen and helium, all visible atoms in the universe only make up about .01 percent of the whole. Then I read that chemistry is "incomparable more complex than physics" and that biology is more complex than chemistry and that civilized, intelligent beings (us and possibly others like us) are the most complex things we know of in the universe. And then I got to thinking, if all that is true and, say, we turn out to be the only self-aware, intelligent life in the universe and we and our atoms are such an infinitesimally small part of that incredible vast whole... well, the more I thought about these things the more TOTALLY FREAKED OUT I felt about all that..."
The reason this freaks me out is that it seems, even if we are not the only intelligent beings in the universe, that being so infinitesimally small either implies we are either totally irrelevant due to our negligible size or perhaps the opposite- that we have, by what ever means be it luck or some cosmic plan, a tremendous responsibility to make the most of the incredible beings that we are. I strongly tend to think the latter. But I also find this frustrating because I look at the world around us and see what a mess we have made of it and I GET TOTALLY FREAKED OUT about that!
Curious as to what you all think.
"...last night before going to sleep I was reading in this book called The New Universe and the Human Future by Abrams and Primack about how most of the universe is comprised of dark matter and dark energy and how, besides hydrogen and helium, all visible atoms in the universe only make up about .01 percent of the whole. Then I read that chemistry is "incomparable more complex than physics" and that biology is more complex than chemistry and that civilized, intelligent beings (us and possibly others like us) are the most complex things we know of in the universe. And then I got to thinking, if all that is true and, say, we turn out to be the only self-aware, intelligent life in the universe and we and our atoms are such an infinitesimally small part of that incredible vast whole... well, the more I thought about these things the more TOTALLY FREAKED OUT I felt about all that..."
The reason this freaks me out is that it seems, even if we are not the only intelligent beings in the universe, that being so infinitesimally small either implies we are either totally irrelevant due to our negligible size or perhaps the opposite- that we have, by what ever means be it luck or some cosmic plan, a tremendous responsibility to make the most of the incredible beings that we are. I strongly tend to think the latter. But I also find this frustrating because I look at the world around us and see what a mess we have made of it and I GET TOTALLY FREAKED OUT about that!
Curious as to what you all think.
“The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.
0
Comments
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
"Intelligence" is a tricky word because it is defined so variously. We have a form of intelligence that includes self-awareness and consciousness which may be unique but as a whole, we don't practice wisdom. Instead, with all that brain power we possess, we work to destroy that which sustains us and all other life instead of preserve and protect it. That is confounding to me.
I was just reading how the human waste (both exrement and garbage) on Everest is at an all-time high and climbers are now required to bring down about 20 lbs of that waste off the mountain. We even litter and ruin the most pristine of all places, it proves we're not as intelligent as we think.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
I think you're right, Gambs, in seeing humans as having emotional issues- it's almost as though we aren't wired quite right to steer the wild beast of our emotions. It's too bad Carl Rogers' ideas aren't taught more widely. Those emotions can lead to great things. As for our base instincts, I'm not sure we need to overcome them so much as reign them in and make them useful. Wanton destruction is rather pointless. Jimi burning his guitar at Monterey was a creative act that has thrilled generations (although I would say to mimic that act has would be both redundant pointless).
But what I was hoping to go for here was looking at the bigger picture besides just brute survival (all animals have an intrinsic survival instinct) - to look at things like our responsibility to use our big brains wisely. To strive to understand our destiny. To use our good fortune to be cognizant, potentially cognitive, and definitely to be creative. It confounds me that we humans so often don't seek the higher ground, but even worse, that we seem hell bent on destroying ourselves and, along the way, so much of the rest of our planet.