Vault #11 wishes? one month to go!

1262729313256

Comments

  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,143
    Zod said:
    missoula '98 :)
    I wish vault 8 was missoula 98 and not 05.
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • tbergs
    tbergs Posts: 10,458
    mcgruff10 said:
    Zod said:
    missoula '98 :)
    I wish vault 8 was missoula 98 and not 05.
    I really love the '98 tour, but with 2 vaults already under our belt from that year and LO2L I'd prefer we avoid that year or just release every show from '98 in bootleg format that is quality enough to do so with. Great tour.
    It's a hopeless situation...
  • demetrios
    demetrios Posts: 97,794
    I want a Pearl Jam Vault vinyl Canadian show release. Maybe Halifax 2005 please?  =)
  • WindowPaine
    WindowPaine Chicopee, MA Posts: 539
    for the love of all things pj, 1991-1992
    First Show: Springfield, MA 4/6/94
  • PB11041
    PB11041 Earth Posts: 2,845
    for the love of all things pj, 1991-1992
    Unfortunately there is very little material from that era that would warrant going to the effort of putting on vinyl, which seems to be the driving force behind the vault releases.  Brett Eliason was not multi-tracking until 1993, though a couple of shows like Drop in the Park were multi-tracked (that likely because they were home and had access to more equipment) 
    His eminence has yet to show. 
    http://www.hi5sports.org/ (Sports Program for Kids with Disabilities)
    http://www.livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=3652

  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,561
    edited October 2018
    PB11041 said:
    for the love of all things pj, 1991-1992
    Unfortunately there is very little material from that era that would warrant going to the effort of putting on vinyl, which seems to be the driving force behind the vault releases.  Brett Eliason was not multi-tracking until 1993, though a couple of shows like Drop in the Park were multi-tracked (that likely because they were home and had access to more equipment) 
    Yeah, even that MTV New Years Eve show included with S/T wasn't multi track right? You would figure that show would have been recorded properly? 
    Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • PB11041
    PB11041 Earth Posts: 2,845
    PB11041 said:
    for the love of all things pj, 1991-1992
    Unfortunately there is very little material from that era that would warrant going to the effort of putting on vinyl, which seems to be the driving force behind the vault releases.  Brett Eliason was not multi-tracking until 1993, though a couple of shows like Drop in the Park were multi-tracked (that likely because they were home and had access to more equipment) 
    Yeah, even that MTV New Years Eve show included with S/T sounded pretty bad. You would figure that show would have been recorded properly? 
    I think the uniqueness of that show is why they decided to release it, but yeah given all the interviews with Brett Eliason over the years, the things in the PJ 20 book and the fairly good detailed piece on the Live Recordings from Deep 13, that New Years show was purely a front of house mix that was tapped into and it was "hot", not balanced at all.  

    There are still many many very good to excellent soundboard line recordings from particularly 1992 - 2.11.92, 2.12.92, 3.2.92, 3.4.92, 6.6.92, 6.8.92 and 6.18.92 
    His eminence has yet to show. 
    http://www.hi5sports.org/ (Sports Program for Kids with Disabilities)
    http://www.livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=3652

  • mace1229
    mace1229 Posts: 9,892
    PB11041 said:
    for the love of all things pj, 1991-1992
    Unfortunately there is very little material from that era that would warrant going to the effort of putting on vinyl, which seems to be the driving force behind the vault releases.  Brett Eliason was not multi-tracking until 1993, though a couple of shows like Drop in the Park were multi-tracked (that likely because they were home and had access to more equipment) 
    What was their purpose of recording everything? I dont think it was until 98 that they planned on releasing everything, and even that fell through.
    So why did they bother to record every single show, especially if not all were up to quality standards?
  • PB11041
    PB11041 Earth Posts: 2,845
    mace1229 said:
    PB11041 said:
    for the love of all things pj, 1991-1992
    Unfortunately there is very little material from that era that would warrant going to the effort of putting on vinyl, which seems to be the driving force behind the vault releases.  Brett Eliason was not multi-tracking until 1993, though a couple of shows like Drop in the Park were multi-tracked (that likely because they were home and had access to more equipment) 
    What was their purpose of recording everything? I dont think it was until 98 that they planned on releasing everything, and even that fell through.
    So why did they bother to record every single show, especially if not all were up to quality standards?
    Kelly Curtis wanted to release live official bootlegs as far back as 1992, but was mostly rebuffed on it being impractical to record the shows in a manner suitable for release.   They recorded the shows because they wanted to.  For the band to be able to play them back and hear how things sound and if they wanted to make adjustments.  They began multi-tracking because, basically Brett Eliason was into doing it, but in any event, read the stuff in Deep 13, it explains most of what is going on with the live recording process. 
    His eminence has yet to show. 
    http://www.hi5sports.org/ (Sports Program for Kids with Disabilities)
    http://www.livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=3652

  • 2-feign-reluctance
    2-feign-reluctance TigerTown, USA Posts: 23,462
    1996 needs some love.
    www.cluthelee.com
  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,561
    edited October 2018
    mcgruff10 said:
    Ok changed the title....what are we feeling for vault 9?
    Copenhagen 2007
    Stockholm 1992
    Or anything 1996 for all of you who seem to be craving it.
    Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • lolobugg
    lolobugg BLUE RDGE MTNS Posts: 8,195
    1996 needs some love.

    Tell em', playa!!!

    livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=446

    1995- New Orleans, LA  : New Orleans, LA

    1996- Charleston, SC

    1998- Atlanta, GA: Birmingham, AL: Greenville, SC: Knoxville, TN

    2000- Atlanta, GA: New Orleans, LA: Memphis, TN: Nashville, TN

    2003- Raleigh, NC: Charlotte, NC: Atlanta, GA

    2004- Asheville, NC (hometown show)

    2006- Cincinnati, OH

    2008- Columbia, SC

    2009- Chicago, IL x 2 / Ed Vedder- Atlanta, GA x 2

    2010- Bristow, VA

    2011- Alpine Valley, WI (PJ20) x 2 / Ed Vedder- Chicago, IL

    2012- Atlanta, GA

    2013- Charlotte, NC

    2014- Cincinnati, OH

    2015- New York, NY

    2016- Greenville, SC: Hampton, VA:: Columbia, SC: Raleigh, NC : Lexington, KY: Philly, PA 2: (Wrigley) Chicago, IL x 2 (holy shit): Temple of the Dog- Philly, PA

    2017- ED VED- Louisville, KY

    2018- Chicago, IL x2, Boston, MA x2

    2020- Nashville, TN 

    2022- Smashville 

    2023- Austin, TX x2

    2024- Baltimore

  • Indifference71
    Indifference71 Chicago Posts: 14,914
    PJ20.
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,759
    edited October 2018
    I'll keep saying Santa Barbara 2003 until it happens. Other than that... I really just want Vault 2 on vinyl before anything else.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • Wobbie
    Wobbie Posts: 31,396
    vegas ‘00
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
    Missoula 24
  • PB11041
    PB11041 Earth Posts: 2,845
    Hijacking this thread a touch, but how about there are two Vault directions.

    One set of shows that is earmarked for Annual as a vinyl set, those can be like Vault+

    Another set that is disc/download only, that comes out quarterly, obviously in this format, the once annual uber Vault is one of the quarterly, so really we simply get 3 extra a year.

    This way, I might be able to hear some of the shows from say fall 1993, spring 1994, the 1995 and 1996 shows before my Last Exit.

    I mean, listen we are being offered Halloween shirts and stickers and wristbands and backpacks and whatever else in merch...just give me a smidge more access to the early years.  This is not hard.  This is not too much too ask.  Just a smidge more...

    Related image

     
    His eminence has yet to show. 
    http://www.hi5sports.org/ (Sports Program for Kids with Disabilities)
    http://www.livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=3652

  • PB11041
    PB11041 Earth Posts: 2,845
    Bump... it is time to spend the next 8 months talking about vault 9
    His eminence has yet to show. 
    http://www.hi5sports.org/ (Sports Program for Kids with Disabilities)
    http://www.livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=3652

  • cp3iverson
    cp3iverson Posts: 8,702
    PJ_Soul said:
    I'll keep saying Santa Barbara 2003 until it happens. Other than that... I really just want Vault 2 on vinyl before anything else.
    Awesome show but man Chris Cornell sounded pretty rough there on Hunger Strike.  
  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,143
    96 is the answer. 
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • rummy
    rummy British Columbia, Canada Posts: 4,466
    mcgruff10 said:
    96 is the answer. 
    Always (or at least until the release one from 1996 and then it becomes 1995 again!)