America's Gun Violence
Options
Comments
-
In what way is that a reason not to make them illegal?mattsl1983 said:
It always interests me when a guyGern Blansten said:It's always interesting when the guy shows up with one of these arguments:
1. The AR-15 isn't an assault rifle
2. The (insert whatever weapon the latest mass shooter used) isn't any different than your Grandpa's 22
1) doesn’t understand guns
2) thinks he knows something about guns
3) offers nothing to the conversation except the I think I know about guns but I really don’t.
now to entertain you, let’s say ar’s are illegal. If someone’s going to commit these acts, do you really think it would be hard for them to get a hold of one?"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
If that’s your response, that’s exactly why the should be legal. What difference right?Spiritual_Chaos said:
In what way is that a reason not to make them illegal?mattsl1983 said:
It always interests me when a guyGern Blansten said:It's always interesting when the guy shows up with one of these arguments:
1. The AR-15 isn't an assault rifle
2. The (insert whatever weapon the latest mass shooter used) isn't any different than your Grandpa's 22
1) doesn’t understand guns
2) thinks he knows something about guns
3) offers nothing to the conversation except the I think I know about guns but I really don’t.
now to entertain you, let’s say ar’s are illegal. If someone’s going to commit these acts, do you really think it would be hard for them to get a hold of one?0 -
So if you are saying people will get them anyhow...even if illegal. Are you for not having anything be illegal? Cause you could make the same argument for almost anything couldn't you?mattsl1983 said:
If that’s your response, that’s exactly why the should be legal. What difference right?Spiritual_Chaos said:
In what way is that a reason not to make them illegal?mattsl1983 said:
It always interests me when a guyGern Blansten said:It's always interesting when the guy shows up with one of these arguments:
1. The AR-15 isn't an assault rifle
2. The (insert whatever weapon the latest mass shooter used) isn't any different than your Grandpa's 22
1) doesn’t understand guns
2) thinks he knows something about guns
3) offers nothing to the conversation except the I think I know about guns but I really don’t.
now to entertain you, let’s say ar’s are illegal. If someone’s going to commit these acts, do you really think it would be hard for them to get a hold of one?hippiemom = goodness0 -
I already did. Make AR's as bolt or lever action, then you'll be right. But until then, you're wrong.mattsl1983 said:
How so? Please point out the difference. You call it a pile of turds, explain why it’s a pile of turds. I really want to know. I might be wrong. Show me I’m wrong. I’ll agree with you.rgambs said:
There's that pile of turds I predicted!mattsl1983 said:
Not really. A rifle is a rifle. No matter how much it looks military, it’s not. Have you ever heard the saying you can paint a trash can but in the end it’s still a trash can? That’s all ar’s are. Cool looking rifles, but no difference from the same one o deer hunt with.mrussel1 said:
Prevention of the tragedies would be great, but reduction of the carnage is a good start. Banning sales of military style weapons would achieve that end. The weapon used in El Paso was purchased legally and recently. Had the assault ban still been in place, chances are he could not have acquired the weapon. That's a really, really easy one.mattsl1983 said:
Hmm, nope. Not me. Have been off the forum for about a year, probably more. But great job of assuming and not researching.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Aren't you the guy being up in arms about AOC and Omar not stopping and responding to an alt-right, anti-muslim youtube channel?Ledbetterman10 said:Jeez when I saw 60 new posts in this thread since I last visited about 8 hours ago, I figured there was a mass shooting overnight or something. Thankfully that's not the case and it's just the usual crap: gifs of Jeff Goldblum, references to Kiss live albums, and of course, suggestions that someone's post is parroted from cable news.
I mean, I bet these 60 posts - including discussing KISS - have been of more substance than that. So maybe chill with calling other people's posts "crap" ?0 -
Then you need to do the same with all handguns and any shotgun that’s not a single load or pump. You are aware how guns work right?mrussel1 said:
I already did. Make AR's as bolt or lever action, then you'll be right. But until then, you're wrong.mattsl1983 said:
How so? Please point out the difference. You call it a pile of turds, explain why it’s a pile of turds. I really want to know. I might be wrong. Show me I’m wrong. I’ll agree with you.rgambs said:
There's that pile of turds I predicted!mattsl1983 said:
Not really. A rifle is a rifle. No matter how much it looks military, it’s not. Have you ever heard the saying you can paint a trash can but in the end it’s still a trash can? That’s all ar’s are. Cool looking rifles, but no difference from the same one o deer hunt with.mrussel1 said:
Prevention of the tragedies would be great, but reduction of the carnage is a good start. Banning sales of military style weapons would achieve that end. The weapon used in El Paso was purchased legally and recently. Had the assault ban still been in place, chances are he could not have acquired the weapon. That's a really, really easy one.mattsl1983 said:
Hmm, nope. Not me. Have been off the forum for about a year, probably more. But great job of assuming and not researching.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Aren't you the guy being up in arms about AOC and Omar not stopping and responding to an alt-right, anti-muslim youtube channel?Ledbetterman10 said:Jeez when I saw 60 new posts in this thread since I last visited about 8 hours ago, I figured there was a mass shooting overnight or something. Thankfully that's not the case and it's just the usual crap: gifs of Jeff Goldblum, references to Kiss live albums, and of course, suggestions that someone's post is parroted from cable news.
I mean, I bet these 60 posts - including discussing KISS - have been of more substance than that. So maybe chill with calling other people's posts "crap" ?0 -
Isn’t that kind of how the war on drugs has gone, the war on immigration has gone? Let’s not pretend that because something becomes illegal it ceases to exist.cincybearcat said:
So if you are saying people will get them anyhow...even if illegal. Are you for not having anything be illegal? Cause you could make the same argument for almost anything couldn't you?mattsl1983 said:
If that’s your response, that’s exactly why the should be legal. What difference right?Spiritual_Chaos said:
In what way is that a reason not to make them illegal?mattsl1983 said:
It always interests me when a guyGern Blansten said:It's always interesting when the guy shows up with one of these arguments:
1. The AR-15 isn't an assault rifle
2. The (insert whatever weapon the latest mass shooter used) isn't any different than your Grandpa's 22
1) doesn’t understand guns
2) thinks he knows something about guns
3) offers nothing to the conversation except the I think I know about guns but I really don’t.
now to entertain you, let’s say ar’s are illegal. If someone’s going to commit these acts, do you really think it would be hard for them to get a hold of one?0 -
now to entertain you, let’s say rape is illegal. If someone’s going to commit these acts, do you really think it would be hard for them to rape?mattsl1983 said:
If that’s your response, that’s exactly why the should be legal. What difference right?Spiritual_Chaos said:
In what way is that a reason not to make them illegal?mattsl1983 said:
It always interests me when a guyGern Blansten said:It's always interesting when the guy shows up with one of these arguments:
1. The AR-15 isn't an assault rifle
2. The (insert whatever weapon the latest mass shooter used) isn't any different than your Grandpa's 22
1) doesn’t understand guns
2) thinks he knows something about guns
3) offers nothing to the conversation except the I think I know about guns but I really don’t.
now to entertain you, let’s say ar’s are illegal. If someone’s going to commit these acts, do you really think it would be hard for them to get a hold of one?
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
I do believe rape is illegal, and it still happens. I’m lost on your point.Spiritual_Chaos said:
now to entertain you, let’s say rape is illegal. If someone’s going to commit these acts, do you really think it would be hard for them to rape?mattsl1983 said:
If that’s your response, that’s exactly why the should be legal. What difference right?Spiritual_Chaos said:
In what way is that a reason not to make them illegal?mattsl1983 said:
It always interests me when a guyGern Blansten said:It's always interesting when the guy shows up with one of these arguments:
1. The AR-15 isn't an assault rifle
2. The (insert whatever weapon the latest mass shooter used) isn't any different than your Grandpa's 22
1) doesn’t understand guns
2) thinks he knows something about guns
3) offers nothing to the conversation except the I think I know about guns but I really don’t.
now to entertain you, let’s say ar’s are illegal. If someone’s going to commit these acts, do you really think it would be hard for them to get a hold of one?0 -
stop with that stupid fucking question. You already showed that you don't know how lever action rifles work, so you're moving onto a secondary argument, with handguns. The point I'm making is that we can reduce the carnage by eliminating a weapon capable of grave, pervasive damage WITHOUT ever having to modify the weapon.mattsl1983 said:
Then you need to do the same with all handguns and any shotgun that’s not a single load or pump. You are aware how guns work right?mrussel1 said:
I already did. Make AR's as bolt or lever action, then you'll be right. But until then, you're wrong.mattsl1983 said:
How so? Please point out the difference. You call it a pile of turds, explain why it’s a pile of turds. I really want to know. I might be wrong. Show me I’m wrong. I’ll agree with you.rgambs said:
There's that pile of turds I predicted!mattsl1983 said:
Not really. A rifle is a rifle. No matter how much it looks military, it’s not. Have you ever heard the saying you can paint a trash can but in the end it’s still a trash can? That’s all ar’s are. Cool looking rifles, but no difference from the same one o deer hunt with.mrussel1 said:
Prevention of the tragedies would be great, but reduction of the carnage is a good start. Banning sales of military style weapons would achieve that end. The weapon used in El Paso was purchased legally and recently. Had the assault ban still been in place, chances are he could not have acquired the weapon. That's a really, really easy one.mattsl1983 said:
Hmm, nope. Not me. Have been off the forum for about a year, probably more. But great job of assuming and not researching.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Aren't you the guy being up in arms about AOC and Omar not stopping and responding to an alt-right, anti-muslim youtube channel?Ledbetterman10 said:Jeez when I saw 60 new posts in this thread since I last visited about 8 hours ago, I figured there was a mass shooting overnight or something. Thankfully that's not the case and it's just the usual crap: gifs of Jeff Goldblum, references to Kiss live albums, and of course, suggestions that someone's post is parroted from cable news.
I mean, I bet these 60 posts - including discussing KISS - have been of more substance than that. So maybe chill with calling other people's posts "crap" ?0 -
Ok. Now I know where you stand.mattsl1983 said:
I do believe rape is illegal, and it still happens. I’m lost on your point.Spiritual_Chaos said:
now to entertain you, let’s say rape is illegal. If someone’s going to commit these acts, do you really think it would be hard for them to rape?mattsl1983 said:
If that’s your response, that’s exactly why the should be legal. What difference right?Spiritual_Chaos said:
In what way is that a reason not to make them illegal?mattsl1983 said:
It always interests me when a guyGern Blansten said:It's always interesting when the guy shows up with one of these arguments:
1. The AR-15 isn't an assault rifle
2. The (insert whatever weapon the latest mass shooter used) isn't any different than your Grandpa's 22
1) doesn’t understand guns
2) thinks he knows something about guns
3) offers nothing to the conversation except the I think I know about guns but I really don’t.
now to entertain you, let’s say ar’s are illegal. If someone’s going to commit these acts, do you really think it would be hard for them to get a hold of one?"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
You have obviously never met “The Duke”mrussel1 said:
stop with that stupid fucking question. You already showed that you don't know how lever action rifles work, so you're moving onto a secondary argument, with handguns. The point I'm making is that we can reduce the carnage by eliminating a weapon capable of grave, pervasive damage WITHOUT ever having to modify the weapon.mattsl1983 said:
Then you need to do the same with all handguns and any shotgun that’s not a single load or pump. You are aware how guns work right?mrussel1 said:
I already did. Make AR's as bolt or lever action, then you'll be right. But until then, you're wrong.mattsl1983 said:
How so? Please point out the difference. You call it a pile of turds, explain why it’s a pile of turds. I really want to know. I might be wrong. Show me I’m wrong. I’ll agree with you.rgambs said:
There's that pile of turds I predicted!mattsl1983 said:
Not really. A rifle is a rifle. No matter how much it looks military, it’s not. Have you ever heard the saying you can paint a trash can but in the end it’s still a trash can? That’s all ar’s are. Cool looking rifles, but no difference from the same one o deer hunt with.mrussel1 said:
Prevention of the tragedies would be great, but reduction of the carnage is a good start. Banning sales of military style weapons would achieve that end. The weapon used in El Paso was purchased legally and recently. Had the assault ban still been in place, chances are he could not have acquired the weapon. That's a really, really easy one.mattsl1983 said:
Hmm, nope. Not me. Have been off the forum for about a year, probably more. But great job of assuming and not researching.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Aren't you the guy being up in arms about AOC and Omar not stopping and responding to an alt-right, anti-muslim youtube channel?Ledbetterman10 said:Jeez when I saw 60 new posts in this thread since I last visited about 8 hours ago, I figured there was a mass shooting overnight or something. Thankfully that's not the case and it's just the usual crap: gifs of Jeff Goldblum, references to Kiss live albums, and of course, suggestions that someone's post is parroted from cable news.
I mean, I bet these 60 posts - including discussing KISS - have been of more substance than that. So maybe chill with calling other people's posts "crap" ?
0 -
It’s not a stupid fucking question. A damn 9mm hand gun operates the same as a damn ar. If you knew anything about guns you would know that. Take your high and mighty bullshit somewhere else. You think by getting pissy it proves any point you are trying to make aside from just making you sound completely flustered and out of ideas? Because that’s exactly what it does. Blame an ar or bushmaster. Now go back and look at mass shootings and how many of them were used. Then further educate yourself on what a semiautomatic does and how it operates. But yes, let’s ban Ar’s. How much has changed?mrussel1 said:
stop with that stupid fucking question. You already showed that you don't know how lever action rifles work, so you're moving onto a secondary argument, with handguns. The point I'm making is that we can reduce the carnage by eliminating a weapon capable of grave, pervasive damage WITHOUT ever having to modify the weapon.mattsl1983 said:
Then you need to do the same with all handguns and any shotgun that’s not a single load or pump. You are aware how guns work right?mrussel1 said:
I already did. Make AR's as bolt or lever action, then you'll be right. But until then, you're wrong.mattsl1983 said:
How so? Please point out the difference. You call it a pile of turds, explain why it’s a pile of turds. I really want to know. I might be wrong. Show me I’m wrong. I’ll agree with you.rgambs said:
There's that pile of turds I predicted!mattsl1983 said:
Not really. A rifle is a rifle. No matter how much it looks military, it’s not. Have you ever heard the saying you can paint a trash can but in the end it’s still a trash can? That’s all ar’s are. Cool looking rifles, but no difference from the same one o deer hunt with.mrussel1 said:
Prevention of the tragedies would be great, but reduction of the carnage is a good start. Banning sales of military style weapons would achieve that end. The weapon used in El Paso was purchased legally and recently. Had the assault ban still been in place, chances are he could not have acquired the weapon. That's a really, really easy one.mattsl1983 said:
Hmm, nope. Not me. Have been off the forum for about a year, probably more. But great job of assuming and not researching.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Aren't you the guy being up in arms about AOC and Omar not stopping and responding to an alt-right, anti-muslim youtube channel?Ledbetterman10 said:Jeez when I saw 60 new posts in this thread since I last visited about 8 hours ago, I figured there was a mass shooting overnight or something. Thankfully that's not the case and it's just the usual crap: gifs of Jeff Goldblum, references to Kiss live albums, and of course, suggestions that someone's post is parroted from cable news.
I mean, I bet these 60 posts - including discussing KISS - have been of more substance than that. So maybe chill with calling other people's posts "crap" ?0 -
Round and round and round the discussion goes.
Looks like we’re now back to blaming single parent homes for these shootings. Anything to avoid the obvious reason for gun deaths.
Does the US really have that much higher a rate of single parent families than every other country?
I also wonder how many fatherless families there were back in these golden times some
people speak of, back when the country was founded. What with war, farming and logging accidents, and other dangers of the natural world, I think quite a few.my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
www.myspace.com0 -
I say go for it. How much does that change? According to govt statistics, you don’t even put a dent in gun HomicidesSpiritual_Chaos said:
In what way is that a reason not to make them illegal?mattsl1983 said:
It always interests me when a guyGern Blansten said:It's always interesting when the guy shows up with one of these arguments:
1. The AR-15 isn't an assault rifle
2. The (insert whatever weapon the latest mass shooter used) isn't any different than your Grandpa's 22
1) doesn’t understand guns
2) thinks he knows something about guns
3) offers nothing to the conversation except the I think I know about guns but I really don’t.
now to entertain you, let’s say ar’s are illegal. If someone’s going to commit these acts, do you really think it would be hard for them to get a hold of one?0 -
Okay dude. You challenged that a 3030 marlin hunting rifle could be modified to be as pervasive of a killer as an AR. That's total bullshit because you either 1. Don't know that the rifle is lever action or 2. Believe there is some fairy dust that turns a Marlin into a high capacity 30 shots per minute killing machine. And I'm the one that doesn't know anything about guns. I'm a gun owner, but not an enthusiast. I own rifles and several handguns, including a .357 that I can also magically turn from a revolver into a 30 shot capacity. It's really a fascinating mod that I've developed to make that happen. But oh yeah, there's no way you can both own a gun and not have it spit out 30 rounds per minute right?mattsl1983 said:
It’s not a stupid fucking question. A damn 9mm hand gun operates the same as a damn ar. If you knew anything about guns you would know that. Take your high and mighty bullshit somewhere else. You think by getting pissy it proves any point you are trying to make aside from just making you sound completely flustered and out of ideas? Because that’s exactly what it does. Blame an ar or bushmaster. Now go back and look at mass shootings and how many of them were used. Then further educate yourself on what a semiautomatic does and how it operates. But yes, let’s ban Ar’s. How much has changed?mrussel1 said:
stop with that stupid fucking question. You already showed that you don't know how lever action rifles work, so you're moving onto a secondary argument, with handguns. The point I'm making is that we can reduce the carnage by eliminating a weapon capable of grave, pervasive damage WITHOUT ever having to modify the weapon.mattsl1983 said:
Then you need to do the same with all handguns and any shotgun that’s not a single load or pump. You are aware how guns work right?mrussel1 said:
I already did. Make AR's as bolt or lever action, then you'll be right. But until then, you're wrong.mattsl1983 said:
How so? Please point out the difference. You call it a pile of turds, explain why it’s a pile of turds. I really want to know. I might be wrong. Show me I’m wrong. I’ll agree with you.rgambs said:
There's that pile of turds I predicted!mattsl1983 said:
Not really. A rifle is a rifle. No matter how much it looks military, it’s not. Have you ever heard the saying you can paint a trash can but in the end it’s still a trash can? That’s all ar’s are. Cool looking rifles, but no difference from the same one o deer hunt with.mrussel1 said:
Prevention of the tragedies would be great, but reduction of the carnage is a good start. Banning sales of military style weapons would achieve that end. The weapon used in El Paso was purchased legally and recently. Had the assault ban still been in place, chances are he could not have acquired the weapon. That's a really, really easy one.mattsl1983 said:
Hmm, nope. Not me. Have been off the forum for about a year, probably more. But great job of assuming and not researching.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Aren't you the guy being up in arms about AOC and Omar not stopping and responding to an alt-right, anti-muslim youtube channel?Ledbetterman10 said:Jeez when I saw 60 new posts in this thread since I last visited about 8 hours ago, I figured there was a mass shooting overnight or something. Thankfully that's not the case and it's just the usual crap: gifs of Jeff Goldblum, references to Kiss live albums, and of course, suggestions that someone's post is parroted from cable news.
I mean, I bet these 60 posts - including discussing KISS - have been of more substance than that. So maybe chill with calling other people's posts "crap" ?
There are solutions, but your own ignorance of weapons prevents you from understanding that not all guns can be turned into semi automatic high capacity killing tools.0 -
So, do you see any changes to the gun laws of the test being a good idea?mattsl1983 said:
I say go for it. How much does that change? According to govt statistics, you don’t even put a dent in gun HomicidesSpiritual_Chaos said:
In what way is that a reason not to make them illegal?mattsl1983 said:
It always interests me when a guyGern Blansten said:It's always interesting when the guy shows up with one of these arguments:
1. The AR-15 isn't an assault rifle
2. The (insert whatever weapon the latest mass shooter used) isn't any different than your Grandpa's 22
1) doesn’t understand guns
2) thinks he knows something about guns
3) offers nothing to the conversation except the I think I know about guns but I really don’t.
now to entertain you, let’s say ar’s are illegal. If someone’s going to commit these acts, do you really think it would be hard for them to get a hold of one?
And no need to start acting out. Just saying, beforehand."Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0 -
I am impressed with your resolve to argue the obvious with someone who clearly doesn't get it or care.mrussel1 said:
Okay dude. You challenged that a 3030 marlin hunting rifle could be modified to be as pervasive of a killer as an AR. That's total bullshit because you either 1. Don't know that the rifle is lever action or 2. Believe there is some fairy dust that turns a Marlin into a high capacity 30 shots per minute killing machine. And I'm the one that doesn't know anything about guns. I'm a gun owner, but not an enthusiast. I own rifles and several handguns, including a .357 that I can also magically turn from a revolver into a 30 shot capacity. It's really a fascinating mod that I've developed to make that happen. But oh yeah, there's no way you can both own a gun and not have it spit out 30 rounds per minute right?mattsl1983 said:
It’s not a stupid fucking question. A damn 9mm hand gun operates the same as a damn ar. If you knew anything about guns you would know that. Take your high and mighty bullshit somewhere else. You think by getting pissy it proves any point you are trying to make aside from just making you sound completely flustered and out of ideas? Because that’s exactly what it does. Blame an ar or bushmaster. Now go back and look at mass shootings and how many of them were used. Then further educate yourself on what a semiautomatic does and how it operates. But yes, let’s ban Ar’s. How much has changed?mrussel1 said:
stop with that stupid fucking question. You already showed that you don't know how lever action rifles work, so you're moving onto a secondary argument, with handguns. The point I'm making is that we can reduce the carnage by eliminating a weapon capable of grave, pervasive damage WITHOUT ever having to modify the weapon.mattsl1983 said:
Then you need to do the same with all handguns and any shotgun that’s not a single load or pump. You are aware how guns work right?mrussel1 said:
I already did. Make AR's as bolt or lever action, then you'll be right. But until then, you're wrong.mattsl1983 said:
How so? Please point out the difference. You call it a pile of turds, explain why it’s a pile of turds. I really want to know. I might be wrong. Show me I’m wrong. I’ll agree with you.rgambs said:
There's that pile of turds I predicted!mattsl1983 said:
Not really. A rifle is a rifle. No matter how much it looks military, it’s not. Have you ever heard the saying you can paint a trash can but in the end it’s still a trash can? That’s all ar’s are. Cool looking rifles, but no difference from the same one o deer hunt with.mrussel1 said:
Prevention of the tragedies would be great, but reduction of the carnage is a good start. Banning sales of military style weapons would achieve that end. The weapon used in El Paso was purchased legally and recently. Had the assault ban still been in place, chances are he could not have acquired the weapon. That's a really, really easy one.mattsl1983 said:
Hmm, nope. Not me. Have been off the forum for about a year, probably more. But great job of assuming and not researching.Spiritual_Chaos said:
Aren't you the guy being up in arms about AOC and Omar not stopping and responding to an alt-right, anti-muslim youtube channel?Ledbetterman10 said:Jeez when I saw 60 new posts in this thread since I last visited about 8 hours ago, I figured there was a mass shooting overnight or something. Thankfully that's not the case and it's just the usual crap: gifs of Jeff Goldblum, references to Kiss live albums, and of course, suggestions that someone's post is parroted from cable news.
I mean, I bet these 60 posts - including discussing KISS - have been of more substance than that. So maybe chill with calling other people's posts "crap" ?
There are solutions, but your own ignorance of weapons prevents you from understanding that not all guns can be turned into semi automatic high capacity killing tools.It's a hopeless situation...0 -
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0
-
Here is a decently put together graphic from NY Times that portrays some of the difficulties in banning “parts”. The problem is that AR-15s are extremely adaptable and configurable. I don’t have the answer, but I just wanted to point out the flaws with some of this “copy and paste” gun laws from other countries rhetoric. Before the last assault weapons ban, these were not nearly as configurable and it was a bit easier to broadly ban them. Now, it would take much more legislation to effectively ban these rifles. In a time with such political animosity, I would not hang my hat on that coming any time soon, even if we get a Democrat president the next go around. Better background checks on all purchases and training (as mentioned by Mcgruff) is a lot more attainment at this point and is where I believe the focus should be if anything at all is to be done. Anyways, here is the mentioned article from way up there:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/07/31/us/assault-weapons-ban.html
0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help