America's Gun Violence
Comments
-
Yup, which is already a thing.HesCalledDyer said:
Nope, suing the bar.mcgruff10 said:
Not a fan of this at all. What is next, suing Ford after a drunk driving accident?Bentleyspop said:But I thought Sandy Hook didn't happen that it was a false flag event created by President Obama.....
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
Since it wasn't a rhetorical question, you always answer your own question as to the "responsible" part. If you're reading about it in a story then most likely not responsible.Halifax2TheMax said:
Sorry, I’m not your google machine. And I read the full article when I posted it. Maybe one of the “responsible” gun owners on here can speak to whether a firearm locked ina car is an approved, legal or acceptable method of safe firearm storage?mcgruff10 said:
Let us know the answers after you find them out.Halifax2TheMax said:
Does he have a screw loose or was he just another pissed off pre-teen with access to a gun? Is locked in a car an acceptable means of firearm storage? Department policy when not with the firearm?tempo_n_groove said:
The gun was locked in his car. How the kid knew that is beyond me. The kid has a screw loose. Can't you see that?Halifax2TheMax said:
0 -
What makes you claim that the kid, "had a screw loose?" The article stated "behavior issues in school." Does that now equate to "having a screw loose?"tempo_n_groove said:
Since it wasn't a rhetorical question, you always answer your own question as to the "responsible" part. If you're reading about it in a story then most likely not responsible.Halifax2TheMax said:
Sorry, I’m not your google machine. And I read the full article when I posted it. Maybe one of the “responsible” gun owners on here can speak to whether a firearm locked ina car is an approved, legal or acceptable method of safe firearm storage?mcgruff10 said:
Let us know the answers after you find them out.Halifax2TheMax said:
Does he have a screw loose or was he just another pissed off pre-teen with access to a gun? Is locked in a car an acceptable means of firearm storage? Department policy when not with the firearm?tempo_n_groove said:
The gun was locked in his car. How the kid knew that is beyond me. The kid has a screw loose. Can't you see that?Halifax2TheMax said:
As for responsibility, its spouted ceaselessly by the pro-gun crowd that the majority of gun owners are "responsible." I counter that they are until they're not by posting newsworthy articles of "responsibility" and its consequences. The pro-gun crowd rails that because the majority of gun owners are "responsible," additional or expanded gun laws are unnecessary and would be a violation of their rights under the 2A. Further, when those "responsible" gun owners do do stupid shit with their guns, like in the articles I link to, the "responsible" gun owner is very rarely held to account, so I beg to differ. While the state police patrolman in the Shangra La of Indianer most likely won't suffer any legal consequences of failing to secure his firearm in a safe and "responsible" manner, because Indianer doesn't have a safe firearm storage law, he seemingly failed to follow the guidelines his employer reminds all gun owners to follow when possessing a firearm, particularly when children are present or in the household. As such, I'd argue that not only was the trooper a "responsible" gun owner, he's also a "responsible" parent.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Shooting someone over video games? It's premeditated as he had to go out to the car to retrieve the firearm. That's having a screw loose.Halifax2TheMax said:
What makes you claim that the kid, "had a screw loose?" The article stated "behavior issues in school." Does that now equate to "having a screw loose?"tempo_n_groove said:
Since it wasn't a rhetorical question, you always answer your own question as to the "responsible" part. If you're reading about it in a story then most likely not responsible.Halifax2TheMax said:
Sorry, I’m not your google machine. And I read the full article when I posted it. Maybe one of the “responsible” gun owners on here can speak to whether a firearm locked ina car is an approved, legal or acceptable method of safe firearm storage?mcgruff10 said:
Let us know the answers after you find them out.Halifax2TheMax said:
Does he have a screw loose or was he just another pissed off pre-teen with access to a gun? Is locked in a car an acceptable means of firearm storage? Department policy when not with the firearm?tempo_n_groove said:
The gun was locked in his car. How the kid knew that is beyond me. The kid has a screw loose. Can't you see that?Halifax2TheMax said:
As for responsibility, its spouted ceaselessly by the pro-gun crowd that the majority of gun owners are "responsible." I counter that they are until they're not by posting newsworthy articles of "responsibility" and its consequences. The pro-gun crowd rails that because the majority of gun owners are "responsible," additional or expanded gun laws are unnecessary and would be a violation of their rights under the 2A. Further, when those "responsible" gun owners do do stupid shit with their guns, like in the articles I link to, the "responsible" gun owner is very rarely held to account, so I beg to differ. While the state police patrolman in the Shangra La of Indianer most likely won't suffer any legal consequences of failing to secure his firearm in a safe and "responsible" manner, because Indianer doesn't have a safe firearm storage law, he seemingly failed to follow the guidelines his employer reminds all gun owners to follow when possessing a firearm, particularly when children are present or in the household. As such, I'd argue that not only was the trooper a "responsible" gun owner, he's also a "responsible" parent.
There isn't a single statistic, article, meme. gif or conversation that I could have with you that would ever sway your view on firearms.
0 -
So the state trooper bears no “responsibility?” Guess he should have just left the gun on the kitchen table, loaded with a round in the chamber?tempo_n_groove said:
Shooting someone over video games? It's premeditated as he had to go out to the car to retrieve the firearm. That's having a screw loose.Halifax2TheMax said:
What makes you claim that the kid, "had a screw loose?" The article stated "behavior issues in school." Does that now equate to "having a screw loose?"tempo_n_groove said:
Since it wasn't a rhetorical question, you always answer your own question as to the "responsible" part. If you're reading about it in a story then most likely not responsible.Halifax2TheMax said:
Sorry, I’m not your google machine. And I read the full article when I posted it. Maybe one of the “responsible” gun owners on here can speak to whether a firearm locked ina car is an approved, legal or acceptable method of safe firearm storage?mcgruff10 said:
Let us know the answers after you find them out.Halifax2TheMax said:
Does he have a screw loose or was he just another pissed off pre-teen with access to a gun? Is locked in a car an acceptable means of firearm storage? Department policy when not with the firearm?tempo_n_groove said:
The gun was locked in his car. How the kid knew that is beyond me. The kid has a screw loose. Can't you see that?Halifax2TheMax said:
As for responsibility, its spouted ceaselessly by the pro-gun crowd that the majority of gun owners are "responsible." I counter that they are until they're not by posting newsworthy articles of "responsibility" and its consequences. The pro-gun crowd rails that because the majority of gun owners are "responsible," additional or expanded gun laws are unnecessary and would be a violation of their rights under the 2A. Further, when those "responsible" gun owners do do stupid shit with their guns, like in the articles I link to, the "responsible" gun owner is very rarely held to account, so I beg to differ. While the state police patrolman in the Shangra La of Indianer most likely won't suffer any legal consequences of failing to secure his firearm in a safe and "responsible" manner, because Indianer doesn't have a safe firearm storage law, he seemingly failed to follow the guidelines his employer reminds all gun owners to follow when possessing a firearm, particularly when children are present or in the household. As such, I'd argue that not only was the trooper a "responsible" gun owner, he's also a "responsible" parent.
There isn't a single statistic, article, meme. gif or conversation that I could have with you that would ever sway your view on firearms.
And no amount of posting articles about “responsible” gun owners will convince the pro-gun crowd to stop paying their NRA dues or vote for candidates who support sensible gun control legislation. And I hope your reference to having “a screw loose” isn’t a reference to mental illness as if it is, you’re denigrating the majority of those with mental illness. Can you clarify?
And to your last statement, correct. Although I’d be willing to bet that if we discussed the topic in full, there’d be common ground.
Post edited by Halifax2TheMax on09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
I've come to realize that there is no common ground or compromise with you, so no.Halifax2TheMax said:
So the state trooper bears no “responsibility?” Guess he should have just left the gun on the kitchen table, loaded with a round in the chamber?tempo_n_groove said:
Shooting someone over video games? It's premeditated as he had to go out to the car to retrieve the firearm. That's having a screw loose.Halifax2TheMax said:
What makes you claim that the kid, "had a screw loose?" The article stated "behavior issues in school." Does that now equate to "having a screw loose?"tempo_n_groove said:
Since it wasn't a rhetorical question, you always answer your own question as to the "responsible" part. If you're reading about it in a story then most likely not responsible.Halifax2TheMax said:
Sorry, I’m not your google machine. And I read the full article when I posted it. Maybe one of the “responsible” gun owners on here can speak to whether a firearm locked ina car is an approved, legal or acceptable method of safe firearm storage?mcgruff10 said:
Let us know the answers after you find them out.Halifax2TheMax said:
Does he have a screw loose or was he just another pissed off pre-teen with access to a gun? Is locked in a car an acceptable means of firearm storage? Department policy when not with the firearm?tempo_n_groove said:
The gun was locked in his car. How the kid knew that is beyond me. The kid has a screw loose. Can't you see that?Halifax2TheMax said:
As for responsibility, its spouted ceaselessly by the pro-gun crowd that the majority of gun owners are "responsible." I counter that they are until they're not by posting newsworthy articles of "responsibility" and its consequences. The pro-gun crowd rails that because the majority of gun owners are "responsible," additional or expanded gun laws are unnecessary and would be a violation of their rights under the 2A. Further, when those "responsible" gun owners do do stupid shit with their guns, like in the articles I link to, the "responsible" gun owner is very rarely held to account, so I beg to differ. While the state police patrolman in the Shangra La of Indianer most likely won't suffer any legal consequences of failing to secure his firearm in a safe and "responsible" manner, because Indianer doesn't have a safe firearm storage law, he seemingly failed to follow the guidelines his employer reminds all gun owners to follow when possessing a firearm, particularly when children are present or in the household. As such, I'd argue that not only was the trooper a "responsible" gun owner, he's also a "responsible" parent.
There isn't a single statistic, article, meme. gif or conversation that I could have with you that would ever sway your view on firearms.
And no amount of posting articles about “responsible” gun owners will convince the pro-gun crowd to stop paying their NRA dues or vote for candidates who support sensible gun control legislation. And I hope your reference to having “a screw loose” isn’t a reference to mental illness as if it is, you’re denigrating the majority of those with mental illness. Can you clarify?
And to your last statement, correct. Although I’d be willing to bet that if we discussed the topic in full, there’d be common ground.
You can google the term screw loose.
I'm sure your mention of "Indianer" wasn't meant to be poking fun at the people in Indiana as hicks or backwoods people or anything, would it?0 -
Well, that’s too bad. But it is funny to me how you direct me to google rather than explain it yourself and as for Indianer? I don’t know, I’ve never been there but I do know that they have lax gun laws, hence the issues in Chicago and a poster on here thought it was an idelic place to live in peace. Maybe Mike Pence can explain? But I do know the Colts suck in the NFL, hiring a tea bagger to be their QB and hanging banners after one something or other. Guess I might just assume “screw loose” has a broad definition, then?tempo_n_groove said:
I've come to realize that there is no common ground or compromise with you, so no.Halifax2TheMax said:
So the state trooper bears no “responsibility?” Guess he should have just left the gun on the kitchen table, loaded with a round in the chamber?tempo_n_groove said:
Shooting someone over video games? It's premeditated as he had to go out to the car to retrieve the firearm. That's having a screw loose.Halifax2TheMax said:
What makes you claim that the kid, "had a screw loose?" The article stated "behavior issues in school." Does that now equate to "having a screw loose?"tempo_n_groove said:
Since it wasn't a rhetorical question, you always answer your own question as to the "responsible" part. If you're reading about it in a story then most likely not responsible.Halifax2TheMax said:
Sorry, I’m not your google machine. And I read the full article when I posted it. Maybe one of the “responsible” gun owners on here can speak to whether a firearm locked ina car is an approved, legal or acceptable method of safe firearm storage?mcgruff10 said:
Let us know the answers after you find them out.Halifax2TheMax said:
Does he have a screw loose or was he just another pissed off pre-teen with access to a gun? Is locked in a car an acceptable means of firearm storage? Department policy when not with the firearm?tempo_n_groove said:
The gun was locked in his car. How the kid knew that is beyond me. The kid has a screw loose. Can't you see that?Halifax2TheMax said:
As for responsibility, its spouted ceaselessly by the pro-gun crowd that the majority of gun owners are "responsible." I counter that they are until they're not by posting newsworthy articles of "responsibility" and its consequences. The pro-gun crowd rails that because the majority of gun owners are "responsible," additional or expanded gun laws are unnecessary and would be a violation of their rights under the 2A. Further, when those "responsible" gun owners do do stupid shit with their guns, like in the articles I link to, the "responsible" gun owner is very rarely held to account, so I beg to differ. While the state police patrolman in the Shangra La of Indianer most likely won't suffer any legal consequences of failing to secure his firearm in a safe and "responsible" manner, because Indianer doesn't have a safe firearm storage law, he seemingly failed to follow the guidelines his employer reminds all gun owners to follow when possessing a firearm, particularly when children are present or in the household. As such, I'd argue that not only was the trooper a "responsible" gun owner, he's also a "responsible" parent.
There isn't a single statistic, article, meme. gif or conversation that I could have with you that would ever sway your view on firearms.
And no amount of posting articles about “responsible” gun owners will convince the pro-gun crowd to stop paying their NRA dues or vote for candidates who support sensible gun control legislation. And I hope your reference to having “a screw loose” isn’t a reference to mental illness as if it is, you’re denigrating the majority of those with mental illness. Can you clarify?
And to your last statement, correct. Although I’d be willing to bet that if we discussed the topic in full, there’d be common ground.
You can google the term screw loose.
I'm sure your mention of "Indianer" wasn't meant to be poking fun at the people in Indiana as hicks or backwoods people or anything, would it?
09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Completely agree, makes no sense to me at all.mcgruff10 said:
Not a fan of this at all. What is next, suing Ford after a drunk driving accident?Bentleyspop said:But I thought Sandy Hook didn't happen that it was a false flag event created by President Obama.....
In order for a lawsuit to be successful, wouldn't the defendant have to have done something wrong? I have never heard anything suggesting that Remington did anything illegal or against protocol. No matter how much someone hates guns, there's no evidence Remington has did anything to cause this.0 -
Yeah, it’s a bit ridiculous. In regards to the similarity of a bar being sued for serving someone they should not have, the more appropriate comparison would be suing the maker of the alcohol for a person driving drunk and killing...does that make any sense at all?mace1229 said:
Completely agree, makes no sense to me at all.mcgruff10 said:
Not a fan of this at all. What is next, suing Ford after a drunk driving accident?Bentleyspop said:But I thought Sandy Hook didn't happen that it was a false flag event created by President Obama.....
In order for a lawsuit to be successful, wouldn't the defendant have to have done something wrong? I have never heard anything suggesting that Remington did anything illegal or against protocol. No matter how much someone hates guns, there's no evidence Remington has did anything to cause this.0 -
A more apt comparison is suing tobacco companies for the health impacts of smoking.... And most seem to think that was justified.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
I don’t think that is justified either. The marketing to kids maybe, but to sue the company for something you chose to partake in...knowing the risks...PJ_Soul said:A more apt comparison is suing tobacco companies for the health impacts of smoking.... And most seem to think that was justified.0 -
K. But most people seem fine with it, that's all I'm saying. I actually don't agree with it either... I also don't give a shit, really. I feel the same about the gun thing. Fuck the gun manufacturers - I am against guns enough to not give a flying if the manufacturers get sued.PJPOWER said:
I don’t think that is justified either. The marketing to kids maybe, but to sue the company for something you chose to partake in...knowing the risks...PJ_Soul said:A more apt comparison is suing tobacco companies for the health impacts of smoking.... And most seem to think that was justified.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
You are right, but people are usually fine with this stuff until the precedent is used in a manner that they do not agree with. From what I can tell with this lawsuit, it is about the way they marketed (haven’t read the details), so it may be “more” in line with some of the cigarette company lawsuits. I do think some gun companies’ marketing is borderline ridiculous, but I’m not sure how that specifically lead to the shooting...which is what I believe they are going to have to prove, but I could be wrong.PJ_Soul said:
K. But most people seem fine with it, that's all I'm saying. I actually don't agree with it either... I also don't give a shit, really. I feel the same about the gun thing. Fuck the gun manufacturers - I am against guns enough to not give a flying if the manufacturers get sued.PJPOWER said:
I don’t think that is justified either. The marketing to kids maybe, but to sue the company for something you chose to partake in...knowing the risks...PJ_Soul said:A more apt comparison is suing tobacco companies for the health impacts of smoking.... And most seem to think that was justified.0 -
The Tobacco thing to me is way different. They spent billions of dollars concocting additives to make it addicting, kind of like the pharmaceuticals now.
No advertising or concoction is making people want to buy guns and go shoot up people/places, and please don't say the NRA is.0 -
https://boston.cbslocal.com/2019/03/15/alton-new-hampshire-shooting-investigation-police/
11 years old. Sad and crazy.
SHOW COUNT: (170) 1990's=3, 2000's=53, 2010/20's=114, US=124, CAN=15, Europe=20 ,New Zealand=4, Australia=5
Mexico=1, Colombia=10 -
Unreal.Indifference said:https://boston.cbslocal.com/2019/03/15/alton-new-hampshire-shooting-investigation-police/
11 years old. Sad and crazy.
0 -
you're not his google machine? didn't you ask the original question? That's pretty rich. LOLHalifax2TheMax said:
Sorry, I’m not your google machine. And I read the full article when I posted it. Maybe one of the “responsible” gun owners on here can speak to whether a firearm locked ina car is an approved, legal or acceptable method of safe firearm storage?mcgruff10 said:
Let us know the answers after you find them out.Halifax2TheMax said:
Does he have a screw loose or was he just another pissed off pre-teen with access to a gun? Is locked in a car an acceptable means of firearm storage? Department policy when not with the firearm?tempo_n_groove said:
The gun was locked in his car. How the kid knew that is beyond me. The kid has a screw loose. Can't you see that?Halifax2TheMax said:
Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
That he did lolHughFreakingDillon said:
you're not his google machine? didn't you ask the original question? That's pretty rich. LOLHalifax2TheMax said:
Sorry, I’m not your google machine. And I read the full article when I posted it. Maybe one of the “responsible” gun owners on here can speak to whether a firearm locked ina car is an approved, legal or acceptable method of safe firearm storage?mcgruff10 said:
Let us know the answers after you find them out.Halifax2TheMax said:
Does he have a screw loose or was he just another pissed off pre-teen with access to a gun? Is locked in a car an acceptable means of firearm storage? Department policy when not with the firearm?tempo_n_groove said:
The gun was locked in his car. How the kid knew that is beyond me. The kid has a screw loose. Can't you see that?Halifax2TheMax said:
I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
You’re a gun owner, right? Is storing them in a locked vehicle an acceptable and “responsible” firearm storage method? There, I asked you a direct question. LOL.mcgruff10 said:
That he did lolHughFreakingDillon said:
you're not his google machine? didn't you ask the original question? That's pretty rich. LOLHalifax2TheMax said:
Sorry, I’m not your google machine. And I read the full article when I posted it. Maybe one of the “responsible” gun owners on here can speak to whether a firearm locked ina car is an approved, legal or acceptable method of safe firearm storage?mcgruff10 said:
Let us know the answers after you find them out.Halifax2TheMax said:
Does he have a screw loose or was he just another pissed off pre-teen with access to a gun? Is locked in a car an acceptable means of firearm storage? Department policy when not with the firearm?tempo_n_groove said:
The gun was locked in his car. How the kid knew that is beyond me. The kid has a screw loose. Can't you see that?Halifax2TheMax said:
09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
If you don’t have some sort of trigger lock on it especially with kids then it is a no go for me. But how messed up is your kid that they broke into your police vehicle because you took away their play station?! Can a policeman lock up their work firearm? (I have no clue, honest question)Halifax2TheMax said:
You’re a gun owner, right? Is storing them in a locked vehicle an acceptable and “responsible” firearm storage method? There, I asked you a direct question. LOL.mcgruff10 said:
That he did lolHughFreakingDillon said:
you're not his google machine? didn't you ask the original question? That's pretty rich. LOLHalifax2TheMax said:
Sorry, I’m not your google machine. And I read the full article when I posted it. Maybe one of the “responsible” gun owners on here can speak to whether a firearm locked ina car is an approved, legal or acceptable method of safe firearm storage?mcgruff10 said:
Let us know the answers after you find them out.Halifax2TheMax said:
Does he have a screw loose or was he just another pissed off pre-teen with access to a gun? Is locked in a car an acceptable means of firearm storage? Department policy when not with the firearm?tempo_n_groove said:
The gun was locked in his car. How the kid knew that is beyond me. The kid has a screw loose. Can't you see that?Halifax2TheMax said:
I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.2K The Porch
- 279 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.3K Flea Market
- 39.3K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help