Paternity Leave
unsung
Posts: 9,487
http://www.firstcoastnews.com/story/sports/mlb/2014/04/03/boomer-esiason-rips-mets-infielder-paternity-leave/7248353/
My company allows a father to take two weeks upon the birth of a child. Boomer Esiason opened his mouth, and IMO made inself look like an idiot. Fathers should have equal, or at least some time off for this event.
My company allows a father to take two weeks upon the birth of a child. Boomer Esiason opened his mouth, and IMO made inself look like an idiot. Fathers should have equal, or at least some time off for this event.
0
Comments
fathers should be allowed to take time off to be with their wife/g/f and newborn baby without being bashed by anybody.
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
Anyway, I agree with gimme's last sentence - the father/child bond is just as necessary as that of the mother.
As to being paid or not while on leave...got mixed feelings about that.
i would think that it would be encouraged that a father be with his newborn to forge that bond as soon as possible.even for just those first couple of days. just my thoughts on the matter i guess.
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
Typo Man: "Thanks kidz, but remembir, stay in skool!"
I took a month off for both of my daughters and I regret none of it.
Typo Man: "Thanks kidz, but remembir, stay in skool!"
Laughing aside, if you feel that fathers should have some time off for this event, then perhaps look at things not from a political point of view, as you usually do, and look at things from a human point of view. The thing about you, unsung, is that you are such a strict right sided party player, that it is difficult to read anything you write any other way. This is a start. Good for you.
The poison from the poison stream caught up to you ELEVEN years ago and you floated out of here. Sept. 14, 08
I took off two weeks for the birth of each kid...and because I was the higher income earner, I went back to work after that (I think employment insurance is generally around %60 of your wage). I didn't claim the EI because I had a flexible employer who allowed me to take more holidays those years, and I wanted the kids' mom to be able to take the full year off (this is why I'm not positive I have the rules right - we only used the benefit for one of us).
So look at that....a socialist safety net program that works, and an 'entitled' person who didn't squeeze every possible penny out of it....Funny how that works.
Either way, it is covered by FMLA federal labor laws, which guarantees up to 12 weeks if I am not mistaken. I can take as much time as my PTO can cover.(insert Christian Bale's "Oh GOOD for you" here) I do not expect a company to pay for it however. It is up to me to plan and provide, but there would be not one person coming between me and being with my children.
and my preachy nature can resist...whether the dad is there for the first 12 weeks means nothing if they aren't there for the next 12 to 18 to 30 years but that is a whole other discussion...
It is terrifying when you are too stupid to know who is dumb
- Joe Rogan
I agree with your last paragraph…
You are absolutely not released in terms of going to back to work in 2-3 days, you can choose to I suppose. Six weeks is the normal amount of short term disability coverage after a birth if your company offers it. FMLA covers 12 weeks unpaid. I am not sure what you are arguing there. There are certainly exceptions to this but losing your job because you had a birth are few and far between situations as far as I know (which isn't much admittedly)
http://www.babycenter.com/404_when-can-i-go-back-to-work-after-delivery_1156149.bc
the link sort of discusses it, but I am just going off of my experience with FMLA as a supervisor and my experience through our children's births
It is terrifying when you are too stupid to know who is dumb
- Joe Rogan
We live in the worst country in the world for federally mandated (paid) maternity leave.
I have a daughter.
See I don't want some general (federal) government lackey telling me what I can or cannot do when I am doing no harm. It is none of their business. Unfortunately most of them, from BOTH sides, think that they have that right. I have little use for them beyond what is expressly authorized by Art 1 Section VIII of the Constitution, those are their enumerated powers what they are allowed to do, anything else was supposed to be left up to the States.
So while I am not for the demise of the general government, I am for a drastic downsizing in line of what the Constitution authorizes them to do.
I am a Constitutionalist/Libertarian primarily, certainly anti-Authoritarian. I'm actually left on most social issues, mostly because it keeps govt out of them. I'll never beg for my rights, and no government can grant them.
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
"Life Is What Happens To You When Your Busy Making Other Plans" John Lennon