UN report on North Korea's concentration camps

freshymad

The UN released a detailed report about North Korea's concentration camps and the systematic abuse and torture of three generations of political prisoners. It's absolutely horrifying. How can we work to free these people? It seems nearly impossible.

http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/02/17/north-korean-leader-kim-jong-un-warned-by-un-he-may-be-held-accountable-for-crimes-against-humanity/

Shin Dong-Hyuk was born and raised in one of the camps and escaped in 2005. This is a 60 Minutes story about him. Despite the inept interviewer (A psychological experiment? Perhaps being a newscaster is a truer psychological experiment.) it's the best introduction to his experience. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/anderson-cooper-on-north-korean-born-in-prison-camp/

Please visit and like Shin's Facebook page* https://www.facebook.com/NKSDH and support his new organization http://insidenk.org/?page_id=640. His organization is making films that raise awareness of the atrocities occurring right now in North Korea. There is also another organization called The Committee for Human Rights in North Korea http://www.hrnk.org.

* I never thought I could find any use for Facebook, but thank you Facebook for giving a voice to this honest plea for humanity. This is as real as it gets..

brianlux

I'm waiting for the "Let's blow North Korea off the face of the earth" post. 8-|

A terrible and sad situation, to be sure.

freshymad

Please share how you best determine where to apply your time and resources. I have recently worked with a poorly run charity and see that good intentions aren't enough. But inasmuch suffering as this world offers up, is there a more desperate need for action than in North Korea?

freshymad

Getting outside information to the people of North Korea is our best hope right now.

One Free Korea http://freekorea.us/ publishes a very informative newsletter. Here's one of the latest emails:

AP outraged about free speech in Cuba
Posted: 03 Apr 2014 05:34 AM PDT
Is the AP a cabal of closet Marxist-Leninists or just the supine courtesan of every tyrant who lets it open a bureau in his kingdom? Either way, I really don’t understand what drives its corporate conscience. On one hand, it recently criticized the Obama Administration for “propaganda” photos. On the other hand, it did this not long after putting on an exhibition of actual propaganda photos of Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong Il.

Now, the AP has released a breathless expose of a U.S.A.I.D.-backed program, launched by the Obama Administration, to bring just a sliver of free speech to Cuba, in the form of a Twitter clone called “ZunZuneo.” AP even gave the 60 Minutes treatment to the civil servant who ran the program, following him home and sticking a camera in his face:

Let’s sum this up. The program was completely non-violent and appears to have broken no laws except Cuban censorship laws. It never even got far enough to plant any subversive information (unfortunately!). It was also popular and potentially effective. Before the AP exposed it, it was providing a service that Cubans liked and used. What if they liked and used it even more after it became a safe place to complain about food shortages, nosy block committees, corruption, the persecution of dissidents, and censorship? Is it morally wrong for people living under oppressive governments to be able to complain about those things or organize online?
ZunZuneo’s organizers wanted the social network to grow slowly to avoid detection by the Cuban government. Eventually, documents and interviews reveal, they hoped the network would reach critical mass so that dissidents could organize “smart mobs” — mass gatherings called at a moment’s notice — that could trigger political demonstrations, or “renegotiate the balance of power between the state and society.” [AP]

I want our government to help people do that! There’s no evidence that anyone was hurt by this program, and had it succeeded, no one would have been hurt except the Castro brothers and their censors. At worst, the program might have been housed more appropriately in the CIA or the Broadcasting Board of Governors, although U.S.A.I.D. didn’t deny its involvement after the program’s exposure. The Cubans who used ZunZuneo were unaware of its U.S. government connections and weren’t endangered (one good reason why U.S.A.I.D. initially concealed its links to ZunZuneo). Why is this a scandal — other than the fact of its public exposure? Is it the AP’s position that the Cuban people should spend their whole lives living under poverty and oppression? How else will those conditions ever change?

Also, note how the AP “interviews” Cuban citizens, almost certainly in the presence of government minders, without telling us whether any minders were present. That fact, however relevant to the viewer, would have illustrated the absurdity of the AP’s argument nicely.

Say, do you suppose the AP has a bureau in Havana? Do you suppose it ever covers stories about dissent in Cuba, or is it pretty much like AP’s bureau in Pyongyang — a lucrative partnership with censors and propagandists? This story is a good example of why, as much as I distrust all news media, I distrust the AP more than the rest of them.

Based on everything in the AP’s report, I conclude that this was actually a great idea that served both the interests of the United States and those of the Cuban people. I wonder how hard it would be for the CIA to hack into Koryolink and bring Twitter to North Korea. I wonder how long it would take for the AP to blow the lid on that.