They are of less compression (lossless) and therefore higher quality than mp3. Thought everyone knew that. All bands who sell downloads price them about the same
~~~~~~~Vinyl For Sale (shipping costs in North America included)~~~~~~~ The Who - Phases Box Set. Ltd. Ed. All 9 studio albums w/ Moon (11 discs) $200 ^discogs entry link^ Peter Gabriel - Up 200 gram 'Classic Records' audiophile version. Sealed. $225 ^discogs entry link^ Van Halen - I 180 gram Remastered 'DCC Compact Classic' version. Ltd. Ed. (#53!). Sealed. $175 ^discogs entry link^ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
They are of less compression (lossless) and therefore higher quality than mp3. Thought everyone knew that. All bands who sell downloads price them about the same
Edit: The only "Shame" involved is when people buy the lame mps's and then trade them as lossless (which they are NOT) to other people
~~~~~~~Vinyl For Sale (shipping costs in North America included)~~~~~~~ The Who - Phases Box Set. Ltd. Ed. All 9 studio albums w/ Moon (11 discs) $200 ^discogs entry link^ Peter Gabriel - Up 200 gram 'Classic Records' audiophile version. Sealed. $225 ^discogs entry link^ Van Halen - I 180 gram Remastered 'DCC Compact Classic' version. Ltd. Ed. (#53!). Sealed. $175 ^discogs entry link^ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes bands do charge more for FLAC but I don't think it costs any more money for the band to rip their music to flac instead of mp3. It might cost a few extra cents for 1gb of bandwidth opposed to 100mb, but that's it. They both encoded from the same master and encoding is running the program with different settings...
I can live with them charging the extra 5 bux, but I wish the free 10c Analog code would work for FLAC. Were Analog members, we like better audio quality. Why would give an mp3 only code to people who pay extra just for the annual single on vinyl.
Yes bands do charge more for FLAC but I don't think it costs any more money for the band to rip their music to flac instead of mp3. It might cost a few extra cents for 1gb of bandwidth opposed to 100mb, but that's it. They both encoded from the same master and encoding is running the program with different settings...
I can live with them charging the extra 5 bux, but I wish the free 10c Analog code would work for FLAC. Were Analog members, we like better audio quality. Why would give an mp3 only code to people who pay extra just for the annual single on vinyl.
They are of less compression (lossless) and therefore higher quality than mp3. Thought everyone knew that. All bands who sell downloads price them about the same
I know what FLAC files are, I just think they are milking fans by charging more for them. The PJ marketing machine is a capitalists wet dream.
In theory, our country, the U.S., is a capitalist's wet dream. Pearl Jam isn't doing anything I haven't seen down by countless other bands i.e. Phish, Umphrey's McGee, Peter Gabriel, Black Crowes, etc...
They charge more for flac, IMO, because they are more valuable than the mp3 files. At least they are to me (I want my DOG to hear every frequency, even if I can't perceive them all!) Just like blu-ray discs cost more than regular dvds. Zod is probably correct about production costs being pretty much equal. I'm sorry you feel you are getting milked by paying more for the flacs. I'd be pissed too if I felt the same. You might even be right. I just assume everyone charged more for flacs because that is what I've experienced but I have never really asked myself "Why?" I do know that I have stored flacs on cd-rs from years ago which allows me the ability to burn a fresh new copy for listening at any time
~~~~~~~Vinyl For Sale (shipping costs in North America included)~~~~~~~ The Who - Phases Box Set. Ltd. Ed. All 9 studio albums w/ Moon (11 discs) $200 ^discogs entry link^ Peter Gabriel - Up 200 gram 'Classic Records' audiophile version. Sealed. $225 ^discogs entry link^ Van Halen - I 180 gram Remastered 'DCC Compact Classic' version. Ltd. Ed. (#53!). Sealed. $175 ^discogs entry link^ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I generally don't buy digital music files, but the only other one I have bought FLAC was the same price. Also what happened to the raw 64k bootlegs being available the day after the show? The show I saw in 2003 the files were available the next day and had more content than the final bootleg. The hard drive they were on failed so they are gone now, I would love to have those back. That's when I learned the hard way to back up my data, been backing up ever since.
It's the CDR option that's the true ripoff. They charge 17 bucks for something that costs less than 5 bucks to produce. It's easy to tell because they only charge an extra dollar for a third disc.
Anyone have any show thats a downloadable ALAC? I'd love to get it from you, hook a brother up. I need to make sure it's worthwhile before I buy the shows I was at in ALAC, but I have no experience.... Please!
Anyone have any show thats a downloadable ALAC? I'd love to get it from you, hook a brother up. I need to make sure it's worthwhile before I buy the shows I was at in ALAC, but I have no experience.... Please!
You can easily convert FLAC to ALAC without any degradation in sound. As for downloading shows in FLAC/ALAC for free, Google is your friend.
I agree FLAC should cost more as the files are larger and they cost more to create and maintain. It is a higher value to people who care. If you don't care about the better sound, MP3 will be good enough for you and you won't have to pay as much. I'm glad 9.99 of the cost is covered by the analog membership code.
Up here so high I start to shake, Up here so high the sky I scrape, I've no fear but for falling down, So look out below I am falling now, Falling down,...not staying down, Could’ve held me up, rather tear me down, Drown in the river
They are of less compression (lossless) and therefore higher quality than mp3. Thought everyone knew that. All bands who sell downloads price them about the same
I know what FLAC files are, I just think they are milking fans by charging more for them. The PJ marketing machine is a capitalists wet dream.
Newsflash. The band is a business. I know it is shocking...
Comments
The Who - Phases Box Set. Ltd. Ed. All 9 studio albums w/ Moon (11 discs) $200
^discogs entry link^
Peter Gabriel - Up 200 gram 'Classic Records' audiophile version. Sealed. $225
^discogs entry link^
Van Halen - I 180 gram Remastered 'DCC Compact Classic' version. Ltd. Ed. (#53!). Sealed. $175
^discogs entry link^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Edit: The only "Shame" involved is when people buy the lame mps's and then trade them as lossless (which they are NOT) to other people
The Who - Phases Box Set. Ltd. Ed. All 9 studio albums w/ Moon (11 discs) $200
^discogs entry link^
Peter Gabriel - Up 200 gram 'Classic Records' audiophile version. Sealed. $225
^discogs entry link^
Van Halen - I 180 gram Remastered 'DCC Compact Classic' version. Ltd. Ed. (#53!). Sealed. $175
^discogs entry link^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I can live with them charging the extra 5 bux, but I wish the free 10c Analog code would work for FLAC. Were Analog members, we like better audio quality. Why would give an mp3 only code to people who pay extra just for the annual single on vinyl.
They charge more for flac, IMO, because they are more valuable than the mp3 files. At least they are to me (I want my DOG to hear every frequency, even if I can't perceive them all!) Just like blu-ray discs cost more than regular dvds. Zod is probably correct about production costs being pretty much equal. I'm sorry you feel you are getting milked by paying more for the flacs. I'd be pissed too if I felt the same. You might even be right. I just assume everyone charged more for flacs because that is what I've experienced but I have never really asked myself "Why?" I do know that I have stored flacs on cd-rs from years ago which allows me the ability to burn a fresh new copy for listening at any time
The Who - Phases Box Set. Ltd. Ed. All 9 studio albums w/ Moon (11 discs) $200
^discogs entry link^
Peter Gabriel - Up 200 gram 'Classic Records' audiophile version. Sealed. $225
^discogs entry link^
Van Halen - I 180 gram Remastered 'DCC Compact Classic' version. Ltd. Ed. (#53!). Sealed. $175
^discogs entry link^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
:-bd
Not saying he is right or wrong. Just stating the case.
As for downloading shows in FLAC/ALAC for free, Google is your friend.
I agree FLAC should cost more as the files are larger and they cost more to create and maintain. It is a higher value to people who care. If you don't care about the better sound, MP3 will be good enough for you and you won't have to pay as much. I'm glad 9.99 of the cost is covered by the analog membership code.