Congressional hearing on persecution of Christians
Last-12-Exit
Posts: 8,661
Source is fox news:
Congressman Chris Smith and other lawmakers are saying that the united states should be leveraging trade and foreign aid to force other countries to stop persecuting Christians after Congressman Smith witnessed Christians in China being arrested for following their christain faith. Also, president Obama is taking some nore criticism for leaving a post unfilled. That post: The ambassador at large for international religious freedom.
Ive never heard of that administrative post before so I'm not sure at all what he/she does. My question is: should the US leverage foreign aid to countries that don't have the same "religious freedoms" that we have here? I'm also wondering if there would be a congressional hearing on the persecution Muslims had the congressman saw Muslims arrested simply for being Muslim.
Or am I just over thinking this and it's no big deal?
Congressman Chris Smith and other lawmakers are saying that the united states should be leveraging trade and foreign aid to force other countries to stop persecuting Christians after Congressman Smith witnessed Christians in China being arrested for following their christain faith. Also, president Obama is taking some nore criticism for leaving a post unfilled. That post: The ambassador at large for international religious freedom.
Ive never heard of that administrative post before so I'm not sure at all what he/she does. My question is: should the US leverage foreign aid to countries that don't have the same "religious freedoms" that we have here? I'm also wondering if there would be a congressional hearing on the persecution Muslims had the congressman saw Muslims arrested simply for being Muslim.
Or am I just over thinking this and it's no big deal?
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Ship the Westboro Baptist Church to China.
That way, we no longer have to deal with them, Congress will quit trying to police religion in foriegn countries and we don't have to add an Ambassador at Large for International Religious Freedom to the government payroll.
...
Fixed. You're welcome.
Hail, Hail!!!
My question is should we be doing that? (if my interpretation is correct.) Or, am I over thinking this?
http://video.foxnews.com/v/3186883117001/congressional-hearing-under-way-on-persecution-of-christians/#sp=show-clips
I don't think we should cut aid to a country simply because they persecute Christians, but I do think we should cut aid to countries where the poor aren't being helped by it.
...are those who've helped us.
Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
This is so true! Great point!! how many of our dollars have gone to dictators and terrorists in the guise of aid?
and if aid is given to those who need it, cutting the aid only hurts the people who already hurt.
our sanctions against Iraq led to the death of hundreds of thousands of poor citizens, mostly children, without weakening his regime. m albright said "It was worth it, we had to pay that price." we didn't pay a cent and neither did Saddam.
And please state your thoughts more accurately. "Threatening our aid"? Is that like, "Ok bag of wheat, up against the wall!"
I'm not sure what wasn't clear about what I said. And I'm also not clear why you thought I said fox news more about the term leveraging.
So what exactly is it you are asking or trying to say here?
ANYBODY THINK THERE WILL BE A CONGRESSIONAL HEARING ON THIS? of course not they are brown folk and they don't worship whitejesus
To be honest, in a contemporary setting the first thing that crosses my mind when I hear the words "persecution" and "Christians" together isn't the persecution of Christians. If were talking about Rome during the time of Nero or during the time of the Roman Persian wars or during the Reformation, yes, Christians were persecuted. But I think the tables have turned. Besides, isn't foreign aid a diplomatic issue, not a religious issue and don't we have separation of church and state?... hahaha!