2013 Boots

Brane_of_JFKBrane_of_JFK Maryland Posts: 1,901
Just got the Baltimore bootleg in. Is it just me or are these extremely cheaply made? The artwork on the actual CDs looks like something I could do by just printing out labels and attaching to blank CDs. Looks cheap and cheesy IMO. Anyone else??

Comments

  • LiftedLifted Posts: 1,836
    That's why I don't buy the cds. Pretty sure all the boots released on CD after 2003....which is really 2008-present have all just been cd-r's with a printed label thrown in a cardboard sleeve. Is what is it is.
  • At 10 dollars a cd you cant really bitch. Im very happy and grateful I am getting a chance to relive my shows the entire tour if I wish. Most bands dont go out of their way to mass produce their entire tour for their fans. Yeah its just a cd R but that doesnt mean the quality sucks. It looks like a bootleg while sounding better than one. I just care about the quality of sound and paying only 10 bucks for 30 songs and a live show I attended not the label on a cd. Sounds like more than a good deal to me.
  • I'm just happy they even do this. Really looking forward to the c'ville boot to release. Was one of the best concerts (not just Pearl Jam) I have been to period!

    At 10 dollars a cd you cant really bitch. Im very happy and grateful I am getting a chance to relive my shows the entire tour if I wish. Most bands dont go out of their way to mass produce their entire tour for their fans. Yeah its just a cd R but that doesnt mean the quality sucks. It looks like a bootleg while sounding better than one. I just care about the quality of sound and paying only 10 bucks for 30 songs and a live show I attended not the label on a cd. Sounds like more than a good deal to me.

  • AmherstJammerAmherstJammer Amherst, Massachusetts Posts: 1,510
    I have been playing the 2008 cd's for 5 years and they all look and play like brand new.
Sign In or Register to comment.