Ralph Nader points to 22 ways the Canadian health-care system is better than Obamacare

Ralph Nader points to 22 ways the Canadian health-care system is better than Obamacare in the U.S.

http://www.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2014/01/12/canadian_health_care_better_than_obamacare.html#

Political activist Ralph Nader recently outlined the advantages of Canada’s medicare system over so-called Obamacare in the United States to an audience at Western University in London, Ont.:
Dear America:
Costly complexity is baked into Obamacare. No health insurance system is without problems but Canadian-style single-payer full medicare for all is simple, affordable, comprehensive and universal.
In the early 1960s, President Lyndon Johnson enrolled 20 million elderly Americans into medicare in six months. There were no websites. They did it with index cards.
Here are 22 ways the Canadian health-care system is better than Obamacare.
Love, Canada
Photos View photos
Narendra Parmar, left, is helped by enrollment specialist Laquanda Jordan as he signs up for health insurance through the Affordable Care Act in Miami on Dec. 23, 2013.zoom
No. 22: In Canada, everyone is covered automatically at birth — everybody in, nobody out.
In the United States, under Obamacare, 31 million Americans will still be uninsured by 2023 and millions more will remain underinsured.
No. 21: In Canada, the health system is designed to put people, not profits, first.
In the United States, Obamacare will do little to curb insurance industry profits and will actually enhance insurance industry profits.
No. 20: In Canada, coverage is not tied to a job or dependent on your income — rich and poor are in the same system, the best guarantee of quality.
In the United States, under Obamacare, much still depends on your job or income. Lose your job or lose your income and you might lose your existing health insurance or have to settle for lesser coverage.
No. 19: In Canada, health-care coverage stays with you for your entire life.
In the United States, under Obamacare, for tens of millions of Americans, health-care coverage stays with you for as long as you can afford your share.
No. 18: In Canada, you can freely choose your doctors and hospitals and keep them. There are no lists of “in-network” vendors and no extra hidden charges for going “out of network.”
In the United States, under Obamacare, the in-network list of places where you can get treated is shrinking — thus restricting freedom of choice — and if you want to go out of network, you pay for it.
No. 17: In Canada, the health-care system is funded by income, sales and corporate taxes that, combined, are much lower than what Americans pay in premiums.
In the United States, under Obamacare, for thousands of Americans, it’s pay or die — if you can’t pay, you die. That’s why many thousands will still die every year under Obamacare from lack of health insurance to get diagnosed and treated in time.
No. 16: In Canada, there are no complex hospital or doctor bills. In fact, usually you don’t even see a bill.
In the United States, under Obamacare, hospital and doctor bills will still be terribly complex, making it impossible to discover the many costly overcharges.
No. 15: In Canada, costs are controlled. Canada pays 10 per cent of its GDP for its health-care system, covering everyone.
In the United States, under Obamacare, costs continue to skyrocket. The U.S. pays 18 per cent of its GDP and still doesn’t cover tens of millions of people.
No. 14: In Canada, it is unheard of for anyone to go bankrupt due to health-care costs.
In the United States, under Obamacare, health-care-driven bankruptcy will continue to plague Americans.
No. 13: In Canada, if you lose your job, you don’t lose your health insurance.
In the United States, you will often hear people say, “I hate my job, but I can’t leave it because I’ll lose my health insurance.” Or people will be forced to get a job they hate just for the health insurance.
No. 12: In Canada, simplicity leads to major savings in administrative costs and overhead.
In the United States, under Obamacare, complexity will lead to ratcheting up administrative costs and overhead.
No. 11: In Canada, when you go to a doctor or hospital the first thing they ask you is: “What’s wrong?”
In the United States, the first thing they ask you is: “What kind of insurance do you have?”
No. 10: In Canada, the government negotiates drug prices so they are more affordable.
In the United States, under Obamacare, Congress made it specifically illegal for the government to negotiate drug prices for volume purchases, so they remain unaffordable.
No. 9: In Canada, government health-care funds are not profitably diverted to the top 1 per cent.
In the United States, under Obamacare, health-care funds will continue to flow to the top. In 2012, CEOs at six of the largest insurance companies in the U.S. received a total of $83.3 million in pay, plus benefits.
No. 8: In Canada, there are no necessary co-pays or deductibles.
In the United States, under Obamacare, the deductibles and co-pays will continue to be unaffordable for many millions of Americans.
No. 7: In Canada, the health-care system contributes to social solidarity and national pride.
In the United States, Obamacare is divisive, with rich and poor in different systems and tens of millions left out or with sorely limited benefits.
No. 6: In Canada, delays in health care are not due to the cost of insurance.
In the United States, under Obamacare, patients without health insurance or who are underinsured will continue to delay or forgo care and put their lives at risk.
No. 5: In Canada, nobody dies due to lack of health insurance.
In the United States, under Obamacare, many thousands will continue to die every year due to lack of health insurance.
No. 4: In Canada, an increasing majority supports their health-care system, which costs half as much per person as in the United States.
In the United States, a majority — many for different reasons — oppose Obamacare.
No. 3: In Canada, the tax payments to fund the health-care system are progressive — the lowest 20 per cent pays 6 per cent of income into the system while the highest 20 per cent pays 8 per cent.
In the United States, under Obamacare, the poor pay a larger share of their income for health care than the affluent.
No. 2: In Canada, the administration of the system is simple. You get a health card when you are born. And you swipe it when you go to a doctor or hospital. End of story.
In the United States, Obamacare’s 2,500 pages plus regulations (the Canadian medicare bill was 13 pages) is so complex that then-speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said before passage: “We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it.”
No. 1: In Canada, the majority of citizens love their health-care system.
In the United States, the majority of citizens, physicians and nurses prefer the Canadian-type system — single-payer, free choice of doctor and hospital, everybody in, nobody out.


Agree/Disagree ... he makes some good points.
I have certain rules I live by ... My First Rule ... I don't believe anything the government tells me ... George Carlin

"Life Is What Happens To You When Your Busy Making Other Plans" John Lennon

Comments

  • IdrisIdris Posts: 2,317
    edited January 2014
    Overall I agree...(though) I have a few issues with our health care system.
    -

    Nader 2016!
    Post edited by Idris on
  • Well, of course it's better. (I didn't really read the OP)

    The basis of Obamacare is still in working with insurance companies.
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    edited January 2014
    A couple things about Canada... first off... your people are more important than your money? That's insane. Any american will tell you that money is the most important thing in life. Money... then political party.
    Secondly... Canada needs to be punished somehow for Justin Beiber. Giving us Hockey is great... like, really GREAT. But, it still doesn't offset Beiber.
    ...
    That's all.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • lukin2006lukin2006 Posts: 9,087
    We also gave you Neil Young and Rush, so combined with hockey that should offset a Beiber :)).
    I have certain rules I live by ... My First Rule ... I don't believe anything the government tells me ... George Carlin

    "Life Is What Happens To You When Your Busy Making Other Plans" John Lennon
  • a5pja5pj Posts: 3,896
    Said it before and I'll say it again many times I'm sure, I'd move to Canada if it wasn't so cold!

    Agree with the post, insurance is the biggest racket we have in the US, it's terrible.
    Wouldn't it be funny if the world ended in 2010, with lots of fire?



  • hedonisthedonist Posts: 24,524
    lukin2006 said:

    We also gave you Neil Young and Rush, so combined with hockey that should offset a Beiber :)).

    AND Phil Hartman!

    (thank god for Rush, too)

    As to Beiber, I wish we could deport/export that idiotic self-absorbed little punkass.

    As to the healthcare deal...well, my husband's still in their website/"customer service" limbo. It's a circle-jerk.

  • brianluxbrianlux Posts: 42,051
    If everything Nader said is true, then yes, our health care is far inferior. In the US, a person must be very proactive in finding good medical care. Personally, I've had mixed luck. It's taken a while, but I've found a good chiropractor a fairly good general practitioner and a good allergist. Not so thrilled with physical therapy I've received. Same with finding someone who can diagnose my vertigo though that one, to be fair, is really difficult to pinpoint. I have the world's best dentist but no dental coverage (although he does give a cash discount which helps).

    We set up an HSA (health savings account) which has helped but you really have to shop around to get one that works well- we had to switch banks a few times. So, yeah, getting adequate health care in the US is possible but it's a LOT of leg work and a certain degree of luck.
    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
    Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.













  • hedonisthedonist Posts: 24,524
    Does an HSA have different parameters than a regular savings account? Because that's basically what we've been doing for awhile now - putting extra funds into savings not only for health issues but for anything else that might unexpectedly arise.

    Fuck knows what the actual insurance coverage rates are going to be.
  • JimmyVJimmyV Posts: 19,172
    This
    Canadian-type system — single-payer, free choice of doctor and hospital, everybody in, nobody out.
    has always been a preferable system to me. However, I am told that democracy as we know it will cease to exist and we will be subject to a Bolshevik revolution if such a system is enacted here in the US. That this has not happened in Canada is of no matter. Truly universal healthcare will be the downfall of American Democracy.

    Or something like that.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • brianluxbrianlux Posts: 42,051
    hedonist said:

    Does an HSA have different parameters than a regular savings account? Because that's basically what we've been doing for awhile now - putting extra funds into savings not only for health issues but for anything else that might unexpectedly arise.

    Fuck knows what the actual insurance coverage rates are going to be.

    My wife handles that aspect of our budgeting so I'm not totally sure how it works but it has something to do with the money put into it being tax deductible and the earnings (some ridiculously small percentage) are tax deductible. Every little bit helps!

    And I'm not sure how Obamacare will affect that. Not sure I want to know... but I do. Maybe no one knows at this point!
    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
    Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.













  • lukin2006lukin2006 Posts: 9,087
    Several things about our

    1) elective surgery wait time can be extensive.

    2) if you have no family doc wait times at clinics and emergeny rooms can be lengthy (clinics not so bad, emergency rooms you can wait 4-8 hours easily). Many areas are underserviced ... so doc shortages exist.

    3) those who a doc usually keep usually keep him/her because many doc have closed practices and finding a new doc is not easily done. So shopping around for a doc you are comfortable with is usually not an option.

    4) your never to poor to be sick

    5) just showing a health card to doc/clinic/er or a lab for medical test is very nice.

    I myself appreciate what we have ... I also believe we can greatly improve our system by looking at some european models. I also appreciate what I have because I live in an area where I was able to get a good family doc, have good after hour emergency clinics. My parents live 40 minutes away and their community has no open practices, 1 walk - in clinic and the local emergency room (for them being almost 80 it's not a problem not having a family doc, but they are fortunate to be in good health, many seniors are not near as fortunate). Thats the part of the systems thats the problem, not enough family docs, to many people relying on clinics/er's and you have to wonder how many people are walking around with high blood pressure/high sugar/ cholesterol etc thats going unchecked that will eventually lead to other sickness's in the future.


    I have certain rules I live by ... My First Rule ... I don't believe anything the government tells me ... George Carlin

    "Life Is What Happens To You When Your Busy Making Other Plans" John Lennon
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    lukin2006 said:

    We also gave you Neil Young and Rush, so combined with hockey that should offset a Beiber :)).

    ...
    I don't know... The level of Beiber's douchebaggery is in the high yield megaton range. It's up there in the Kardashians/Paris Hilton. So, you see... we have 500 megatons of doucheiness to deal with already... please, make Beiber go home.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • lukin2006lukin2006 Posts: 9,087
    We also gave you Nickelback and Avril Lavigne ;). I say we're even. No need to thank us,.
    I have certain rules I live by ... My First Rule ... I don't believe anything the government tells me ... George Carlin

    "Life Is What Happens To You When Your Busy Making Other Plans" John Lennon
  • mikepegg44mikepegg44 Posts: 3,353
    edited March 2014
    He is right there are a staggering amount of problems this bill doesn't solve. However there are some positives as well that I think opponents never concede. The problem is that the only way to fix the cost of insurance problem was to get rid of the industry. It would be good to, because a shit load of people would immediately lose their jobs and need gov't health coverage

    Oddly enough and contrary to everything I believe, I actually think the only way healthcare costs come down is a single payor system. I find it strange that a bunch of people who never have to worry about their healthcare again as long as they live get to design and make a law dictating how the rest of us should do it. The disconnect between real life and career politicians is staggering. They are in a bubble and town hall meetings in your district dont' cut it.



    Fuckers...

    And Canada gave us SCTV. For those too young to know, find it and watch it.
    that’s right! Can’t we all just get together and focus on our real enemies: monogamous gays and stem cells… - Ned Flanders
    It is terrifying when you are too stupid to know who is dumb
    - Joe Rogan
  • Bennyorr4Bennyorr4 Posts: 307
    Cosmo said:

    A couple things about Canada... first off... your people are more important than your money? That's insane. Any american will tell you that money is the most important thing in life. Money... then political party.
    Secondly... Canada needs to be punished somehow for Justin Beiber. Giving us Hockey is great... like, really GREAT. But, it still doesn't offset Beiber.
    ...
    That's all.


    I agree with you comment however; we gave you a sweet kid that sang songs. You guys wrecked him. So now he's yours to keep. That is YOUR punishment. HAHAHAH!
  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    Bennyorr4 said:

    Cosmo said:

    A couple things about Canada... first off... your people are more important than your money? That's insane. Any american will tell you that money is the most important thing in life. Money... then political party.
    Secondly... Canada needs to be punished somehow for Justin Beiber. Giving us Hockey is great... like, really GREAT. But, it still doesn't offset Beiber.
    ...
    That's all.


    I agree with you comment however; we gave you a sweet kid that sang songs. You guys wrecked him. So now he's yours to keep. That is YOUR punishment. HAHAHAH!
    hahaha ... i don't know about that but i'm going with it ... haha
  • lukin2006lukin2006 Posts: 9,087
    For those people in the states who have good insurance and can afford good insurance there is no doubt the US healthcare is is better. If your wealthy then your healthcare is better no matter where in this world you live. If he wants a single payer model then he needs to examine other single payer models in the world, because our system is no where near the best example.
    I have certain rules I live by ... My First Rule ... I don't believe anything the government tells me ... George Carlin

    "Life Is What Happens To You When Your Busy Making Other Plans" John Lennon
  • PingfahPingfah Posts: 350

    He is right there are a staggering amount of problems this bill doesn't solve. However there are some positives as well that I think opponents never concede. The problem is that the only way to fix the cost of insurance problem was to get rid of the industry. It would be good to, because a shit load of people would immediately lose their jobs and need gov't health coverage

    Problem is, the most vocal opponents of Obamacare are generally not proponents of a more sensible system like single payer, they are mostly rightwing naysayers, the sort who blather on about death panels and are responsible for the USA not being able to pass a sensible healthcare bill in the first place.

    I'd say for the most part, those who favour a single payer system probably recognise Obamacare for what it is, the best they could get out of an impossible situation.

Sign In or Register to comment.