Seattle Crowd Was Fantastic!

2»

Comments

  • thefixer9
    thefixer9 Posts: 9,376
    Sure, not the best crowd ever, but I thought still a great crowd! And I still don't remember the "Come on" part.
    Tres Mts- 3/16/2011
    Eddie Vedder- 7/16/11
    Brad- 4/21/12 (RSD Performance), 4/27/12, 8/10/12
    Flight To Mars- 5/23/12
    RNDM- 11/27/12

    PEARL JAM- 12/6/13 I have finally seen Pearl Jam live!
  • SZ303389
    SZ303389 Posts: 453
    thefixer9 wrote:
    Sure, not the best crowd ever, but I thought still a great crowd! And I still don't remember the "Come on" part.

    it was there, you'll hear it on the bootleg. it was during a time when he wanted us to repeat what he was singing (hey oh hey hey oh oh....) something like that :)
    ShawnZ
  • thefixer9
    thefixer9 Posts: 9,376
    SZ303389 wrote:
    thefixer9 wrote:
    Sure, not the best crowd ever, but I thought still a great crowd! And I still don't remember the "Come on" part.

    it was there, you'll hear it on the bootleg. it was during a time when he wanted us to repeat what he was singing (hey oh hey hey oh oh....) something like that :)

    The reason we weren't singing back was because we yelled out our voices from all the other songs! I could barely song Betterman because I was singing so loud before, my voice was almost gone!
    Tres Mts- 3/16/2011
    Eddie Vedder- 7/16/11
    Brad- 4/21/12 (RSD Performance), 4/27/12, 8/10/12
    Flight To Mars- 5/23/12
    RNDM- 11/27/12

    PEARL JAM- 12/6/13 I have finally seen Pearl Jam live!
  • 3days
    3days Posts: 1,200
    Not sure if this has already been posted, but it pretty much sums up my take on the show and the audience:

    http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/ ... r-20131207
  • SZ303389
    SZ303389 Posts: 453
    3days wrote:
    Not sure if this has already been posted, but it pretty much sums up my take on the show and the audience:

    http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/ ... r-20131207

    hahaha, that guy obviously wasn't there. yes PJ was great, but the crowd was hardly "earthshaking," really...earthshaking? and ed wasn't pissed macklemore "sold out three consecutive nights." it was a "fuck you" in jest after mccready held up three fingers after ed referred to the two shows macklemore was playing and raising money for the orion charity. jeez, maybe you weren't there either, or in the 300 section :lol:
    ShawnZ
  • 3days
    3days Posts: 1,200
    SZ303389 wrote:

    http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/ ... r-20131207

    hahaha, that guy obviously wasn't there. yes PJ was great, but the crowd was hardly "earthshaking," really...earthshaking?

    Obviously... because as we all know, Rolling Stone writers are complete and total strangers to PJ gigs. I mean, they've only had in-magazine reviews for the last 5 PJ shows I've attended.

    Rolling Stone's lack of experience with music, rock'n'roll shows, and crowds in general, also makes it easy to surmise that "the guy obviously wasn't there".
    SZ303389 wrote:
    and ed wasn't pissed macklemore "sold out three consecutive nights." it was a "fuck you" in jest after mccready held up three fingers after ed referred to the two shows macklemore was playing and raising money for the orion charity.

    Which is why the writer utilized the phrase "take a playful jab" and the word "jokingly". And why the writer never specified who the f-u was actually shouted at. Along with the f-u, Ed did say a few f-him's... which also appeared to be a "playful jab", "jokingly" directed at Macklemore.
  • SomethingCreative
    SomethingCreative Kazoo, MI Posts: 3,413
    edited December 2013
    SZ303389 wrote:
    3days wrote:
    Not sure if this has already been posted, but it pretty much sums up my take on the show and the audience:

    http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/ ... r-20131207

    hahaha, that guy obviously wasn't there. yes PJ was great, but the crowd was hardly "earthshaking," really...earthshaking? and ed wasn't pissed macklemore "sold out three consecutive nights." it was a "fuck you" in jest after mccready held up three fingers after ed referred to the two shows macklemore was playing and raising money for the orion charity. jeez, maybe you weren't there either, or in the 300 section :lol:

    do you really need to shit all over this show and city in this thread too?

    I was there... 107 row 2 right next to the lighting booth. From there I could see the entire floor, the seats on the sides, the nosebleeds behind the stage. At no point during the show was I disappointed with this crowd (I admit 09 was pretty dead, especially night 1). Ive said it in another thread, the crowd was drowning out the entire band at times, not just Ed. The sing along thing? People really need to stop overreacting about that shit...

    Side note: I was completely sober for this show, I remember it well.
    Post edited by SomethingCreative on
    "Well, I think this band is incapable of sucking."
    -my dad after hearing Not for You for the first time on SNL .
  • Leezestarr313
    Leezestarr313 Temple of the cat Posts: 14,451
    SZ303389 wrote:
    3days wrote:
    Not sure if this has already been posted, but it pretty much sums up my take on the show and the audience:

    http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/ ... r-20131207

    hahaha, that guy obviously wasn't there. yes PJ was great, but the crowd was hardly "earthshaking," really...earthshaking? and ed wasn't pissed macklemore "sold out three consecutive nights." it was a "fuck you" in jest after mccready held up three fingers after ed referred to the two shows macklemore was playing and raising money for the orion charity. jeez, maybe you weren't there either, or in the 300 section :lol:


    Was there even a 300's section? We were in section 219, and we were second to last row behind the stage :think:


    I didn't think the audience sucked, our section was pretty awesome! I agree with what others said, the reception of a show can be different depending on where you are. In Philly in GA, I sang and screamed so loud I think I hurt my diaphragm :oops: :lol: I would still say, from the shows I attended, Philly 1 was the best, crowd and show and all. But Seattle was special and by no means lame.
    Please, Pearl Jam, consider a Benaroya Hall vinyl reissue! http://community.pearljam.com/discussion/148993/please-pearl-jam-consider-a-vinyl-benaroya-hall-re-issue


  • SomethingCreative
    SomethingCreative Kazoo, MI Posts: 3,413
    Leezestarr313 wrote:

    Was there even a 300's section? We were in section 219, and we were second to last row behind the stage :think:


    no... there is no 300 level... starting to wonder if this dude was even actually there or if he's just being a mega troll :roll:
    "Well, I think this band is incapable of sucking."
    -my dad after hearing Not for You for the first time on SNL .
  • uninnocent-
    uninnocent- Posts: 5,959
    Leezestarr313 wrote:

    Was there even a 300's section? We were in section 219, and we were second to last row behind the stage :think:

    To be fair I kept referring to my seat in 228 as being in the back of the 300's. I guess I'm just used to other venues.
  • South of Seattle
    South of Seattle West Seattle Posts: 10,724
    The Sirens sing along was weird I think because no one knew what to do. The song is still too new :lol:
    NERDS!
  • SZ303389
    SZ303389 Posts: 453
    South of Seattle wrote:
    The Sirens sing along was weird I think because no one knew what to do. The song is still too new :lol:

    it was perfect in vancouver
    ShawnZ
  • South of Seattle
    South of Seattle West Seattle Posts: 10,724
    SZ303389 wrote:
    South of Seattle wrote:
    The Sirens sing along was weird I think because no one knew what to do. The song is still too new :lol:

    it was perfect in vancouver
    I was at Spokane and Sirens didn't have the weird sing along. I will admit that Non-US crowd are way better singers though. :lol:
    NERDS!

Categories