US income inequality at record high

brianluxbrianlux Posts: 42,052
edited September 2013 in A Moving Train
Where does it all end? What can be done to level things out more?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-24039202

The income gap between the richest 1% of Americans and the other 99% widened to a record margin in 2012, according to an analysis of tax filings.

The top 1% of US earners collected 19.3% of household income, breaking a record previously set in 1927.

Income inequality in the US has been growing for almost three decades.

Overall, the pre-tax incomes of the top 1% of households rose 19.6% compared to a 1% increase for the rest of Americans.

And the top 10% of richest households represented just under half of all income in the year, according to the analysis.

Emmanuel Saez at the University of California, Berkeley, one of the economists who analysed the tax data, said the rise may have been in part because of sales of stock to avoid higher capital gains taxes in January.

Mr Saez wrote in an analysis that despite recent policy changes aiming at lessening income inequality, the measures were relatively small in comparison to "policy changes that took place coming out of the Great Depression".

"Therefore, it seems unlikely that US income concentration will fall much in the coming years."
“The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.













Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • ajedigeckoajedigecko Posts: 2,430
    I stopped my American Nightmare.
    I live below my means.
    live and let live...unless it violates the pearligious doctrine.
  • aerialaerial Posts: 2,319
    Berkeley, Harvard, Brown not trusting much of anything that comes from these places....
    “We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.” Abraham Lincoln
  • brianluxbrianlux Posts: 42,052
    ajedigecko wrote:
    I stopped my American Nightmare.
    I live below my means.

    :lol: Yeah, I get that.

    Change will not come fast or easy. It's not a bad idea to learn how to make do. I suppose it's possible to be poor and happy I have to say I was less happy when I lived in my vehicle and though I'm still not rich, I've learned to do well with what I have. It takes a lot of work to get there though- shopping carefully, buying only what you need or what is important, buying durable rather than shoddy even if it costs more in the short run (but most often saves $ in the long run), budgeting carefully, etc. But these kinds of things are not often taught in school or most homes. My niece posted a picture of a t-shirt recently that says on it:

    "THINGS I NEVER LEARNED IN HIGH SCHOOL:

    -How to do taxes
    -What taxes are
    -How to vote
    -Anything to do with banking
    -How to buy a car or house

    BUT I'M SO GLAD I KNOW THE FUCKING PYTHAGOREAN THEOREM"
    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
    Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.













  • yosiyosi Posts: 3,038
    I don't think income inequality is the problem. The problem is lack of upward mobility/economic opportunity. I was speaking recently with a political science professor at Columbia who put it to me like this: if you're a poor person would you rather live in New York or Detroit? Pretty clearly the answer is New York even though there's way less income inequality in Detroit. The fact that a minority is vastly more wealthy than everyone else is only a problem if those in the less well-off majority are unable to improve their economic position.
    you couldn't swing if you were hangin' from a palm tree in a hurricane

  • MoonpigMoonpig Posts: 659
    aerial wrote:
    Berkeley, Harvard, Brown not trusting much of anything that comes from these places....

    Lol, there's a shock.
  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    yosi wrote:
    I don't think income inequality is the problem. The problem is lack of upward mobility/economic opportunity. I was speaking recently with a political science professor at Columbia who put it to me like this: if you're a poor person would you rather live in New York or Detroit? Pretty clearly the answer is New York even though there's way less income inequality in Detroit. The fact that a minority is vastly more wealthy than everyone else is only a problem if those in the less well-off majority are unable to improve their economic position.

    income inequality is the symptom not the problem ... the problem is a system that facilitates this ... assuming one thinks it is a problem of which i do ...
Sign In or Register to comment.