"I have not made a decision"

unsung
unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
edited August 2013 in A Moving Train
Well, that's good. It isn't your decision to make, it's a decision that Congress must make. You aren't King.


http://politi.co/1498aGg
Post edited by Unknown User on
«13

Comments

  • Losiento
    Losiento Posts: 282
    This is a tough call. We are talking thousands of innocent people in mass graves. Unfortunate, though they didn't act upon it and join the Middle East were trying lay down sanctions which were continually being defile by Assad. The climate is very hostile, besides I have already told you what UN inspectors will find there, that is even if they let them in.

    It is called Genocide.
  • ajedigecko
    ajedigecko \m/deplorable af \m/ Posts: 2,431
    President Bush had the support of congress to remove sadamn.

    This one...he will not get support.

    ...he will spit on the Constitution again.
    live and let live...unless it violates the pearligious doctrine.
  • callen
    callen Posts: 6,388
    Losiento wrote:
    This is a tough call. We are talking thousands of innocent people in mass graves. Unfortunate, though they didn't act upon it and join the Middle East were trying lay down sanctions which were continually being defile by Assad. The climate is very hostile, besides I have already told you what UN inspectors will find there, that is even if they let them in.

    It is called Genocide.
    Even if congress approves, we don't know who used chemicals and likely never will.
    10-18-2000 Houston, 04-06-2003 Houston, 6-25-2003 Toronto, 10-8-2004 Kissimmee, 9-4-2005 Calgary, 12-3-05 Sao Paulo, 7-2-2006 Denver, 7-22-06 Gorge, 7-23-2006 Gorge, 9-13-2006 Bern, 6-22-2008 DC, 6-24-2008 MSG, 6-25-2008 MSG
  • ledvedderman
    ledvedderman Posts: 7,762
    unsung wrote:
    Well, that's good. It isn't your decision to make, it's a decision that Congress must make. You aren't King.


    http://politi.co/1498aGg

    Yes. If he doesn't go to Congress he must think he's king. Something that hasn't been done since Pearl Harbor. Having said that, I do want him to go to Congress because the GOP is blood thirsty for impeachment.
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,435
    funny thing is under a white president the gop would be all in favor of attacking.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • ledvedderman
    ledvedderman Posts: 7,762
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    funny thing is under a white president the gop would be all in favor of attacking.

    I'm not seeing race being a factor in this one. It could be any Democrat in office and they'd still be doing the same thing. Who can forget the millions of dollars wasted on the Clinton impeachment? They are sharks in the water and just looking for the slightest drop of blood to attack.
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • pjl44
    pjl44 Posts: 10,594
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    funny thing is under a white president the gop would be all in favor of attacking.
    https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/strawman
  • unsung
    unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    funny thing is under a white president the gop would be all in favor of attacking.



    Yeah that why those white GOP senators McCain and graham are only pretending to want to get involved.
  • ajedigecko
    ajedigecko \m/deplorable af \m/ Posts: 2,431
    ...ovama would not have wom the election without whiteys vote
    live and let live...unless it violates the pearligious doctrine.
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,435
    unsung wrote:
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    funny thing is under a white president the gop would be all in favor of attacking.



    Yeah that why those white GOP senators McCain and graham are only pretending to want to get involved.
    if romney were president we would have gone in immediately.

    bank on it.

    these guys are gonna oppose it if obama wants to go in, and they will call him a coward and terrible leader if he doesn't. the man can not win with these dickheads in congress.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,435
    ledvedderman wrote:
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    funny thing is under a white president the gop would be all in favor of attacking.

    I'm not seeing race being a factor in this one. It could be any Democrat in office and they'd still be doing the same thing. Who can forget the millions of dollars wasted on the Clinton impeachment? They are sharks in the water and just looking for the slightest drop of blood to attack.
    race has been a factor in everything the gop has done in the last 2 terms.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • ledvedderman
    ledvedderman Posts: 7,762
    What about this guy?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NbdXSrM0m9w

    :D
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • unsung
    unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    I don't care who is President, and I don't care what party has the office. NO President is authorized to conduct military attacks without Congressional approval. We are not under any threat that time would be an issue. Just like Libya, any attack without approval is ILLEGAL.

    Stop pointing fingers at the GOP especially when you are doing the EXACT same thing.

    Whatever happened to the anti-war left? Oh it's ok cause it is your guy. You are no different than those you criticize. Don't worry, the Libertarians and Constitutionalists are coming.
  • Jason P
    Jason P Posts: 19,327
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    race has been a factor in everything the gop has done in the last 2 terms.
    The election race, that is.
    Be Excellent To Each Other
    Party On, Dudes!
  • Gern Blansten
    Gern Blansten Mar-A-Lago Posts: 22,486
    ajedigecko wrote:
    President Bush had the support of congress to remove sadamn.

    This one...he will not get support.

    ...he will spit on the Constitution again.

    LOL....how did he get support? Do you remember?
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
    The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
  • satansbed
    satansbed Posts: 2,139
    ajedigecko wrote:
    President Bush had the support of congress to remove sadamn.

    This one...he will not get support.

    ...he will spit on the Constitution again.


    The last war Congress declared was World War II. Everything since—Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, Panama, Iraq, Bosnia, Afghanistan, Iraq (again!) and Libya—has been fought with something less than a full-throated declaration of war by the U.S. Congress

    [ :nono: name-calling removed by Admin. See Posting Guidelines.]
  • ledvedderman
    ledvedderman Posts: 7,762
    unsung wrote:
    I don't care who is President, and I don't care what party has the office. NO President is authorized to conduct military attacks without Congressional approval. We are not under any threat that time would be an issue. Just like Libya, any attack without approval is ILLEGAL.

    Stop pointing fingers at the GOP especially when you are doing the EXACT same thing.

    Whatever happened to the anti-war left? Oh it's ok cause it is your guy. You are no different than those you criticize. Don't worry, the Libertarians and Constitutionalists are coming.

    Who is pointing fingers? I'm sorry, but it looks like you at the left. I'm a lifelong Democrat and I'm against intervention.
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,435
    unsung wrote:
    I don't care who is President, and I don't care what party has the office. NO President is authorized to conduct military attacks without Congressional approval. We are not under any threat that time would be an issue. Just like Libya, any attack without approval is ILLEGAL.

    Stop pointing fingers at the GOP especially when you are doing the EXACT same thing.

    Whatever happened to the anti-war left? Oh it's ok cause it is your guy. You are no different than those you criticize. Don't worry, the Libertarians and Constitutionalists are coming.
    i am sick of fighting fucking wars. i am sick of protesting. it gets us nowhere. the warmongering in both parties has broken me.

    i am anti war. i am against any intervention at any time.

    you can not be anti war and support military action. no matter who the president is.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,435
    why can't we take care of our own people for once?

    we can't get a universal health insurance system, but we can sure as fuck pay for a stealth bomber or 15, and then rebuild what we blow up.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,435
    to me obama is worse than bush regarding war.

    bush laid out his case, even though it was all a lie.

    obama has done no such thing.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."

Categories